Hello, TheBlueMapper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 04:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Borsoka ( talk) 08:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
I've added sources for the regions, that explain what they have to do with Romania. What's wrong now? Why are you still removing the content? TheBlueMapper ( talk) 08:58, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timočka Krajina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Lacul Fără Fund (Ocna Sibiului), TheBlueMapper!
Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Consider providing additional reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Meatsgains ( talk) 12:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Regions that have to do with Romania, but were not part of it. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Borsoka ( talk) 17:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello TheBlueMapper. Your report at WP:AN3 contains serious personal attacks against User:Borsoka. "Borsoka actually clearly does it because of hate towards Romania, because he is Hungarian." It may be in your interest to withdraw the report, before an admin takes action. Otherwise, the most likely result will be a block of your own account. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 14:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I've edited it so it doesn't look like that anymore. TheBlueMapper ( talk) 16:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Reb1981. TheBlueMapper, thanks for creating Ovidiu Island!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. When you use the same source more than once, please use refname. So it doesn't duplicate in reflist.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Reb1981 ( talk) 02:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Hungarians, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
21:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Can you please tell me what was wrong with that edit? It was just to help people new to the subject distinguish the two peoples. On the Romanians page for example, we have the same thing, but with Romani people. Why not remove them too? TheBlueMapper ( talk) 21:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for an excellent job of improving my rather incomplete new article Lake Horea. I realize you could do that by consulting references in Romanian.
I would suggest further efforts:
Please reply to me right here, with a numbered list.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 01:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Please look at Ghelari mine and its Romanian reference. The Infobox mine box says it closed in 2005, but the text uses past tense but says there is a very large iron reserve. The text should explicitly say the mine is closed, and the reason if known.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 00:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TheBlueMapper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Mark Axworthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
appears to fail NACADEMIC and NCREATIVE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia
ᐐT₳LKᐬ
17:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) on ship article titles before moving any more ship articles. Llammakey ( talk) 17:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, TheBlueMapper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, TheBlueMapper, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 04:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Borsoka ( talk) 08:54, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
I've added sources for the regions, that explain what they have to do with Romania. What's wrong now? Why are you still removing the content? TheBlueMapper ( talk) 08:58, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timočka Krajina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Lacul Fără Fund (Ocna Sibiului), TheBlueMapper!
Wikipedia editor Meatsgains just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Consider providing additional reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Meatsgains ( talk) 12:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Regions that have to do with Romania, but were not part of it. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Borsoka ( talk) 17:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello TheBlueMapper. Your report at WP:AN3 contains serious personal attacks against User:Borsoka. "Borsoka actually clearly does it because of hate towards Romania, because he is Hungarian." It may be in your interest to withdraw the report, before an admin takes action. Otherwise, the most likely result will be a block of your own account. Thanks, EdJohnston ( talk) 14:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, I've edited it so it doesn't look like that anymore. TheBlueMapper ( talk) 16:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Reb1981. TheBlueMapper, thanks for creating Ovidiu Island!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. When you use the same source more than once, please use refname. So it doesn't duplicate in reflist.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Reb1981 ( talk) 02:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Hungarians, did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
21:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Can you please tell me what was wrong with that edit? It was just to help people new to the subject distinguish the two peoples. On the Romanians page for example, we have the same thing, but with Romani people. Why not remove them too? TheBlueMapper ( talk) 21:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for an excellent job of improving my rather incomplete new article Lake Horea. I realize you could do that by consulting references in Romanian.
I would suggest further efforts:
Please reply to me right here, with a numbered list.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 01:36, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Please look at Ghelari mine and its Romanian reference. The Infobox mine box says it closed in 2005, but the text uses past tense but says there is a very large iron reserve. The text should explicitly say the mine is closed, and the reason if known.-- Dthomsen8 ( talk) 00:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TheBlueMapper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Mark Axworthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
appears to fail NACADEMIC and NCREATIVE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia
ᐐT₳LKᐬ
17:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please read Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) on ship article titles before moving any more ship articles. Llammakey ( talk) 17:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, TheBlueMapper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)