Good morning/afternoon to the fellow editors.
This is my talk page, feel free to leave a message at my talk page.
Sometimes my archives mess up, so if it happens let me know please.
:It's important to read WP:TPNO before posting stuff on my talk page.
ARCHIVES LIST /info/en/?search=User_talk:TheAlienMan2002/Archive_N - November 2021 - August 2023
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to
User talk:Dialmayo can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as
harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. The next time you pull similar nonsense, it will be a quick trip to
WP:ANI.
JBL (
talk)
23:11, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
JBL (
talk)
23:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Star
Mississippi
02:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)TheAlienMan2002 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi, I would like to be unblocked from editing namespaces from Wikipedia and here is why: Say if I had a question right? I would have to go to either the Teahouse or the Help Desk to ask the question. But, I don't have permission to ask a question on the appropriate page because I am blocked from it. Another alternative for myself would be to pose as an IP, which there's a lot of them, especially for this platform, and ask the question. I would have to identify myself as TheAlienMan2002 and then I would ask the question. I hold the believe that my namespace was an unconstitutional block just because of my writing style. Well some people might say stuff like "Your writing style has totally changed". Well yes, it did change because I had to change the way I wrote stuff otherwise people would get confused and think I used an LLM all the time. I never used an LLM, I swear on my life. If I have to ask a question, as a newbie, I would have to ask as an IP, meaning I would have to log out of my account, search up WP:TEAHOUSE and go on there. I understand the blocks that you've presented to me, but, I would like to be unlocked for WP pages like the Teahouse or the Help Desk. I am still a learner on this platform, and I have learned about talk page etiquette and useful information about other stuff that has been discussed on my talk page archive. The conversation about the LLM's has crowded my talk page and made my talk page absurdly long. So I archived it. WP pages like the Teahouse or the Help Desk are important to newcomers like myself. (Although I joined Wikipedia around 3 years ago, took a long break, then came back around Aug-Sep 2022 around a year later.) I learned that I shouldn't be responding to other peoples messages if you don't have much experience on Wikipedia, articles like the Be Bold section or the Civil article. There's so much rules on Wikipedia that newcomers like us, can't keep up sometimes and we may forget. So, I am asking very nicely, to be unblocked from certain articles like Teahouse or Help Desk, and leave the remaining blocked until I have learned fully about the expectations of Wikipedia. Thank you, TheAlienMan2002 ( talk) 13:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm declining on two grounds. First, your threat to evade your block by WP:LOUTSOCK. We don't take kindly to threats to violate your block while you make an unblock request. Second, your absolutely ludicrous claim that your block was unconstitutional. Yamla ( talk) 13:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TAM2002, if I may offer some unsolicited advice, you may want to rethink your approach on a couple things.
First, when you say Another alternative for myself would be to pose as an IP
, what you’re describing is called
socking, and is one of the fastest ways to get community banned, not just blocked. I’d recommend striking that immediately. I've seen people lose talk page access for even implying that socking was on their menu of options.
Second, I'd advise you to stop denying you used an LLM, even if you didn't use one before. Here's why: The community has spoken pretty clearly that they think there's some problems with your communication. If you WERE using an LLM, the only thing that has to be done for you to improve is to stop using an LLM. However, if you WEREN'T using an LLM, then there isn't any quick fix to the issues, and so someone would have a pretty decent argument for a WP:CIR block. I'm not saying you have to admit to using an LLM, especially if you didn't, but I am saying that denying you used one is more likely to hurt than help you.
I hope that was useful, or at least not annoying. In any case, I wish you luck with your unblock request. EducatedRedneck ( talk) 13:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
TheAlienMan2002 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I feel like it's been a while since I've edited this project. I'd like to take full responsibility for using LLM's and even pushing it so far as to create accounts to just vandalize Wikipedia. This isn't me as a person. This is a whole different person when it comes to making disruptive editing on Wikipedia. I know as an editor since 2021 that editing Wikipedia has a tedious amount of rules that people need to follow, but sometimes people can just forget and need to be reminded of those rules so that they don't make the same mistakes. But unfortunately for myself, I (may) have gotten angry to just create accounts and use them to vandalize. I know now that it was wrong, and I have come back to this website to be forgiven and let the past step aside from eternity. So I'm asking someone, whoever is reviewing this, to consider my block appeal. Thank you. TheAlienMan2002 ( talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There's no hope of you being unblocked as long as you continue to evade the block. You'll need to go six months without evasion to show us that you can abide by guidelines and instructions before we can even consider removing the block. 331dot ( talk) 08:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TheAlienMan2002 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I've demonstrated that I can handle editing Wikipeida without any issues. I feel like I am a trusted Wikipedian here because I make helpful edits on this website. TheAlienMan2002 ( talk) 23:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per @ Yamla:'s findings, whose removal does not at all help you make your case. Star Mississippi 01:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Good morning/afternoon to the fellow editors.
This is my talk page, feel free to leave a message at my talk page.
Sometimes my archives mess up, so if it happens let me know please.
:It's important to read WP:TPNO before posting stuff on my talk page.
ARCHIVES LIST /info/en/?search=User_talk:TheAlienMan2002/Archive_N - November 2021 - August 2023
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to
User talk:Dialmayo can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as
harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. The next time you pull similar nonsense, it will be a quick trip to
WP:ANI.
JBL (
talk)
23:11, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
JBL (
talk)
23:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Star
Mississippi
02:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)TheAlienMan2002 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi, I would like to be unblocked from editing namespaces from Wikipedia and here is why: Say if I had a question right? I would have to go to either the Teahouse or the Help Desk to ask the question. But, I don't have permission to ask a question on the appropriate page because I am blocked from it. Another alternative for myself would be to pose as an IP, which there's a lot of them, especially for this platform, and ask the question. I would have to identify myself as TheAlienMan2002 and then I would ask the question. I hold the believe that my namespace was an unconstitutional block just because of my writing style. Well some people might say stuff like "Your writing style has totally changed". Well yes, it did change because I had to change the way I wrote stuff otherwise people would get confused and think I used an LLM all the time. I never used an LLM, I swear on my life. If I have to ask a question, as a newbie, I would have to ask as an IP, meaning I would have to log out of my account, search up WP:TEAHOUSE and go on there. I understand the blocks that you've presented to me, but, I would like to be unlocked for WP pages like the Teahouse or the Help Desk. I am still a learner on this platform, and I have learned about talk page etiquette and useful information about other stuff that has been discussed on my talk page archive. The conversation about the LLM's has crowded my talk page and made my talk page absurdly long. So I archived it. WP pages like the Teahouse or the Help Desk are important to newcomers like myself. (Although I joined Wikipedia around 3 years ago, took a long break, then came back around Aug-Sep 2022 around a year later.) I learned that I shouldn't be responding to other peoples messages if you don't have much experience on Wikipedia, articles like the Be Bold section or the Civil article. There's so much rules on Wikipedia that newcomers like us, can't keep up sometimes and we may forget. So, I am asking very nicely, to be unblocked from certain articles like Teahouse or Help Desk, and leave the remaining blocked until I have learned fully about the expectations of Wikipedia. Thank you, TheAlienMan2002 ( talk) 13:19, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm declining on two grounds. First, your threat to evade your block by WP:LOUTSOCK. We don't take kindly to threats to violate your block while you make an unblock request. Second, your absolutely ludicrous claim that your block was unconstitutional. Yamla ( talk) 13:47, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TAM2002, if I may offer some unsolicited advice, you may want to rethink your approach on a couple things.
First, when you say Another alternative for myself would be to pose as an IP
, what you’re describing is called
socking, and is one of the fastest ways to get community banned, not just blocked. I’d recommend striking that immediately. I've seen people lose talk page access for even implying that socking was on their menu of options.
Second, I'd advise you to stop denying you used an LLM, even if you didn't use one before. Here's why: The community has spoken pretty clearly that they think there's some problems with your communication. If you WERE using an LLM, the only thing that has to be done for you to improve is to stop using an LLM. However, if you WEREN'T using an LLM, then there isn't any quick fix to the issues, and so someone would have a pretty decent argument for a WP:CIR block. I'm not saying you have to admit to using an LLM, especially if you didn't, but I am saying that denying you used one is more likely to hurt than help you.
I hope that was useful, or at least not annoying. In any case, I wish you luck with your unblock request. EducatedRedneck ( talk) 13:32, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
TheAlienMan2002 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I feel like it's been a while since I've edited this project. I'd like to take full responsibility for using LLM's and even pushing it so far as to create accounts to just vandalize Wikipedia. This isn't me as a person. This is a whole different person when it comes to making disruptive editing on Wikipedia. I know as an editor since 2021 that editing Wikipedia has a tedious amount of rules that people need to follow, but sometimes people can just forget and need to be reminded of those rules so that they don't make the same mistakes. But unfortunately for myself, I (may) have gotten angry to just create accounts and use them to vandalize. I know now that it was wrong, and I have come back to this website to be forgiven and let the past step aside from eternity. So I'm asking someone, whoever is reviewing this, to consider my block appeal. Thank you. TheAlienMan2002 ( talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There's no hope of you being unblocked as long as you continue to evade the block. You'll need to go six months without evasion to show us that you can abide by guidelines and instructions before we can even consider removing the block. 331dot ( talk) 08:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TheAlienMan2002 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I've demonstrated that I can handle editing Wikipeida without any issues. I feel like I am a trusted Wikipedian here because I make helpful edits on this website. TheAlienMan2002 ( talk) 23:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per @ Yamla:'s findings, whose removal does not at all help you make your case. Star Mississippi 01:52, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.