Edit was a valid edit, but on what ended up being an old version of the page. As posted on Titoxd's talk page: It looks like I got fooled by the link I took here, which went to
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hurricane_Katrina&oldid=22074472#Terrorist_Attack_Hypotheses. My edits were to that page, which had already been updated, so when my edits were submitted, it put stuff back in since I only deleted the second two with a note the first should probably go, and changed the link for Islamist and terrorist.
Tewdrig 15:19, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
All right, no problem. I've been checking the diffs, and you're right, you tried to take it out, only that there were so many edits between the vandal edit and your revert that it didn't appear to be a revert. But no harm taken. I put the {{test3}} template because we were under a heavy vandalism attack at the time you edited, and my fuse was already very short. I apologize. I hope this doesn't spoil your view of Wikipedia, and welcome. --
Titoxd00:26, 1 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Edit was a valid edit, but on what ended up being an old version of the page. As posted on Titoxd's talk page: It looks like I got fooled by the link I took here, which went to
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Hurricane_Katrina&oldid=22074472#Terrorist_Attack_Hypotheses. My edits were to that page, which had already been updated, so when my edits were submitted, it put stuff back in since I only deleted the second two with a note the first should probably go, and changed the link for Islamist and terrorist.
Tewdrig 15:19, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
All right, no problem. I've been checking the diffs, and you're right, you tried to take it out, only that there were so many edits between the vandal edit and your revert that it didn't appear to be a revert. But no harm taken. I put the {{test3}} template because we were under a heavy vandalism attack at the time you edited, and my fuse was already very short. I apologize. I hope this doesn't spoil your view of Wikipedia, and welcome. --
Titoxd00:26, 1 September 2005 (UTC)reply