![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Regarding your edit warring to keep WP:RS material out of this article. This is a warning. Please desist from this, and cease harassing me on my talk page. Mish ( talk) 06:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I don't understand this reason for this deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Peter_James_Bethune&diff=365556163&oldid=365554949 Does this mean that any information added to an article must directly mention the subject of the article? For example, if an article is about a particular model of a car, and it has a certain type of suspension, I can't add a line that this type of suspension is considered potentially dangerous unless the source mentions that particular model of car????? Ghostofnemo ( talk) 02:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Another deletion that seems unsupported: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Peter_James_Bethune&diff=365974855&oldid=365974691 Please revert your deletion. Ghostofnemo ( talk) 13:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Thay are also riligous schalers in pakistan and i'm a writer i want write the article about The sons of Syed Safdar Hussain Najafi and i'm not his son. pleas undelete the my 5 articles. Syedalinaqinaqvi ( talk) 14:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove source information from images, even public domain images. All image description pages must have a source. Thanks! Powers T 18:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Administrators have a duty help edit and improve material, not delete it in its entirety. Your behavior has crossed the line. You have failed in your duties to remain neutral and helpful to the community. If my articles were believed to be in violation, you should have helped edit the text to match a neutral point of view, not delete the entire article and write malicious and antagonistic comments like "should probably just delete the whole thing."
I will try my best to have your administrative privileges revoked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjschmidt715 ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
-- Nascar 1996 14:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you added a Proposed Deletion tag to the article Inspirada. The page creator and only other editor removed that tag approximately 15 minutes later; they have since modified the article, but it still appears to be delete-worthy. There is nothing on the talk page, or any particular justification that the editor will be able to add RS to establish notability. However, the style of the writing is very personal (see, in particular, the note about the Casino). This appears to be a new-ish editor (about 1 month). I don't know what the appropriate step to take is; I just happened upon the article while looking at Recent Changes. Qwyrxian ( talk) 04:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry! but I haven't added content, as you did to the article Time Warner, I've just changed the content from Vivendi to Disney, so The Walt Disney Company is the largest media and entertainment conglomerate in the world. You changed the content and not cited a reliable source for the content of your edit. Take a look at Media conglomerate Thank you. User:Febo Apolo( talk) 13:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Regarding your edit warring to keep WP:RS material out of this article. This is a warning. Please desist from this, and cease harassing me on my talk page. Mish ( talk) 06:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} I don't understand this reason for this deletion: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Peter_James_Bethune&diff=365556163&oldid=365554949 Does this mean that any information added to an article must directly mention the subject of the article? For example, if an article is about a particular model of a car, and it has a certain type of suspension, I can't add a line that this type of suspension is considered potentially dangerous unless the source mentions that particular model of car????? Ghostofnemo ( talk) 02:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Another deletion that seems unsupported: http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Peter_James_Bethune&diff=365974855&oldid=365974691 Please revert your deletion. Ghostofnemo ( talk) 13:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
{{ User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}} Thay are also riligous schalers in pakistan and i'm a writer i want write the article about The sons of Syed Safdar Hussain Najafi and i'm not his son. pleas undelete the my 5 articles. Syedalinaqinaqvi ( talk) 14:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
Please do not remove source information from images, even public domain images. All image description pages must have a source. Thanks! Powers T 18:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Administrators have a duty help edit and improve material, not delete it in its entirety. Your behavior has crossed the line. You have failed in your duties to remain neutral and helpful to the community. If my articles were believed to be in violation, you should have helped edit the text to match a neutral point of view, not delete the entire article and write malicious and antagonistic comments like "should probably just delete the whole thing."
I will try my best to have your administrative privileges revoked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjschmidt715 ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
-- Nascar 1996 14:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
I noticed that you added a Proposed Deletion tag to the article Inspirada. The page creator and only other editor removed that tag approximately 15 minutes later; they have since modified the article, but it still appears to be delete-worthy. There is nothing on the talk page, or any particular justification that the editor will be able to add RS to establish notability. However, the style of the writing is very personal (see, in particular, the note about the Casino). This appears to be a new-ish editor (about 1 month). I don't know what the appropriate step to take is; I just happened upon the article while looking at Recent Changes. Qwyrxian ( talk) 04:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry! but I haven't added content, as you did to the article Time Warner, I've just changed the content from Vivendi to Disney, so The Walt Disney Company is the largest media and entertainment conglomerate in the world. You changed the content and not cited a reliable source for the content of your edit. Take a look at Media conglomerate Thank you. User:Febo Apolo( talk) 13:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)