Hello, Telegraph Totter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
Please sign your messages on talk pages typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! DLB111U ( talk) 16:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You probably aren't aware of the section of Wikipedia's Manual of Style that deals with dashes, HERE. What it says is that the dash used in a scoreline or in a range of numbers or years, like a sports season, should be the endash, which can be generated by the html entity – or selected from the Insert character box (below the edit window): it's the first, shorter, dash of the two, and isn't the same as the hyphen. cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 17:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mick McManus (wrestler) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I've deleted the Mr Marcus material. My reasoning is in the edit summary and in a new section I've started on the article's talk page. Please do not re-insert the material. Instead, if you think I'm wrong (always a distinct possibility,) please discuss on the talk page thread. Please do not be hurt, insulted or turned off to wikipedia editing because of my reversion. With biographies of living people we are especially cautious and need iron-clad sources for any material that's as sensitive as this. If a consensus arises on the talk page in opposition to my deletion, the material can be re-inserted. But it definitely needs further disuccion and more consideration.
Thanks,
David in DC (
talk)
11:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miquel Brown may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 00:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Just to underline what you have already been told; WP:BLPSOURCES is policy here, and it says we cannot use tabloids on articles on living people. You must not add tabloid sources, and you are welcome to join those of us who enforce it on articles. -- John ( talk) 05:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Have discovered a birth certificate may not be regarded as a suitable reference as it's a primary rather than a secondary source. Coincidentally, I've had a similar issue today over whether or not a marriage certificate can be cited as a source, but there are arguments for and against it. Probably better would be if there's something else that quotes her birth date using the document. Paul MacDermott ( talk) 19:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 01:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:David Wallechinsky.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Please observe our various policies and guidelines when editting this article.
I have been editing this article to comply with our policies, and explained each edit in my edit summaries. Please stop undoing my work to improve this article's compliance with our policies.
Thank you. Yworo ( talk) 17:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Oh, and Examiner.com is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. In fact, it has been intentionally blacklisted so that it cannot be used. You must find different sources than Examiner.com. Yworo ( talk) 17:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. My reply is:
Yes, we have policies. Yes, I've been editing Wikipedia for 9 year and have made over 72,000 edits, and during that time I happened to bother to read said policies, which is more than can be said for you. Wikipedia is edited collaboratively. The policies are made the same way, and during my time here I've participated in making, modifying, and explaining policy. And it's up to every Wikipedia editor to make sure that our articles, especially those about living people and the recently deceased, adhere to those policies. It's not your site: when in Rome... Yworo ( talk) 14:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Katherine Kingsley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden ( talk) 08:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Please go over WP:BLPPRIMARY. Until you have a secondary reliable source that can be used to reference date of birth or any other type of personal information, it needs to stay off the article. If you have any questions, there's a discussion thread at WP:BLP/N. Thanks. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC) No there isn't. --The Totter 00:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sinitta's birth certificate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. -- Jreferee ( talk) 12:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC).
Despite many messages to you on your talk page, article talk pages, and in edit summaries, you continue to completely misinterpret what constitutes a reliable source. Have you read WP:RS? Or WP:BLPSOURCES? Please do so prior to adding any additional material to BLP articles. A continued and flagrant disregard of BLP policy despite the problems with your edits being explained to you will likely lead to a topic ban from BLP articles altogether. Bottom line: If material is removed from an article citing BLP concerns with the material or the sourcing, you must get consensus prior to restoring the material. You have repeatedly reverted removal of unsourced or poorly sourced contentious information and you need to stop. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 15:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)-- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 15:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Helen Flanagan. Thank you. Super Mario Man 14:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Melanie Sykes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove dates of birth from the opening sentence of articles, as you did at Melanie Sykes. Per WP:OPENPARA, that is where the date of birth should go. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 09:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 13:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Telegraph Totter. I noticed here that your signature does not contain a link back to you as required by WP:SIGLINK. Please change your signature to include at least one link to your user page, your talk page or your contributions. If you need assistance accomplishing that, please feel free to ask. Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 16:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Please update your signature as requested before making any further edits to talk pages. — DoRD ( talk) 16:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I see you have made a number of edits changing how "number" is represented. Please note that according to Wikipedia manual of style MOS:NUMBERSIGN using "No." is correct. Hzh ( talk) 00:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jimmy Savile shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 22:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Britain's Got Talent (series 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Davidson ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Content, particularly potentially controversial content about living people, requires the highest quality sources. The Daily Mail is so far from qualifying as a reliable source as to be laughable. Please stop attempting to use it. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Ghmyrtle has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Andy Dingley ( talk) 03:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Dave Thompson (author), without
verifying it by citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
You already have warnings concerning your editing of BLPs dating back to June last year. Further unsourced edits of this type will entail a discussion at
WP:ANI.
Super
Mario
Man
03:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Telegraph Totter. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chris Hutchins, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Chris Hutchins to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Wgolf ( talk) 19:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Hutchins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mr. Sheen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of book Mr Confidential.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Please fix your signature per
WP:SIGLINK. This has been requested before in this
thread above. People need that link to your talkpage to communicate with you and if you don't do it you may be blocked until you do. Thank you,
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
11:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Hello, Telegraph Totter, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
Please sign your messages on talk pages typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here! DLB111U ( talk) 16:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello. You probably aren't aware of the section of Wikipedia's Manual of Style that deals with dashes, HERE. What it says is that the dash used in a scoreline or in a range of numbers or years, like a sports season, should be the endash, which can be generated by the html entity – or selected from the Insert character box (below the edit window): it's the first, shorter, dash of the two, and isn't the same as the hyphen. cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 17:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mick McManus (wrestler) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I've deleted the Mr Marcus material. My reasoning is in the edit summary and in a new section I've started on the article's talk page. Please do not re-insert the material. Instead, if you think I'm wrong (always a distinct possibility,) please discuss on the talk page thread. Please do not be hurt, insulted or turned off to wikipedia editing because of my reversion. With biographies of living people we are especially cautious and need iron-clad sources for any material that's as sensitive as this. If a consensus arises on the talk page in opposition to my deletion, the material can be re-inserted. But it definitely needs further disuccion and more consideration.
Thanks,
David in DC (
talk)
11:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miquel Brown may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 00:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Just to underline what you have already been told; WP:BLPSOURCES is policy here, and it says we cannot use tabloids on articles on living people. You must not add tabloid sources, and you are welcome to join those of us who enforce it on articles. -- John ( talk) 05:27, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Have discovered a birth certificate may not be regarded as a suitable reference as it's a primary rather than a secondary source. Coincidentally, I've had a similar issue today over whether or not a marriage certificate can be cited as a source, but there are arguments for and against it. Probably better would be if there's something else that quotes her birth date using the document. Paul MacDermott ( talk) 19:27, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 01:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:David Wallechinsky.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Please observe our various policies and guidelines when editting this article.
I have been editing this article to comply with our policies, and explained each edit in my edit summaries. Please stop undoing my work to improve this article's compliance with our policies.
Thank you. Yworo ( talk) 17:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Oh, and Examiner.com is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. In fact, it has been intentionally blacklisted so that it cannot be used. You must find different sources than Examiner.com. Yworo ( talk) 17:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. My reply is:
Yes, we have policies. Yes, I've been editing Wikipedia for 9 year and have made over 72,000 edits, and during that time I happened to bother to read said policies, which is more than can be said for you. Wikipedia is edited collaboratively. The policies are made the same way, and during my time here I've participated in making, modifying, and explaining policy. And it's up to every Wikipedia editor to make sure that our articles, especially those about living people and the recently deceased, adhere to those policies. It's not your site: when in Rome... Yworo ( talk) 14:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Katherine Kingsley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Gbawden ( talk) 08:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Please go over WP:BLPPRIMARY. Until you have a secondary reliable source that can be used to reference date of birth or any other type of personal information, it needs to stay off the article. If you have any questions, there's a discussion thread at WP:BLP/N. Thanks. § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC) No there isn't. --The Totter 00:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sinitta's birth certificate.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. -- Jreferee ( talk) 12:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC).
Despite many messages to you on your talk page, article talk pages, and in edit summaries, you continue to completely misinterpret what constitutes a reliable source. Have you read WP:RS? Or WP:BLPSOURCES? Please do so prior to adding any additional material to BLP articles. A continued and flagrant disregard of BLP policy despite the problems with your edits being explained to you will likely lead to a topic ban from BLP articles altogether. Bottom line: If material is removed from an article citing BLP concerns with the material or the sourcing, you must get consensus prior to restoring the material. You have repeatedly reverted removal of unsourced or poorly sourced contentious information and you need to stop. -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 15:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)-- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 15:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Helen Flanagan. Thank you. Super Mario Man 14:50, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Melanie Sykes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 04:38, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove dates of birth from the opening sentence of articles, as you did at Melanie Sykes. Per WP:OPENPARA, that is where the date of birth should go. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 09:15, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 13:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Telegraph Totter. I noticed here that your signature does not contain a link back to you as required by WP:SIGLINK. Please change your signature to include at least one link to your user page, your talk page or your contributions. If you need assistance accomplishing that, please feel free to ask. Thanks — DoRD ( talk) 16:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Please update your signature as requested before making any further edits to talk pages. — DoRD ( talk) 16:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I see you have made a number of edits changing how "number" is represented. Please note that according to Wikipedia manual of style MOS:NUMBERSIGN using "No." is correct. Hzh ( talk) 00:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Jimmy Savile shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Ghmyrtle ( talk) 22:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Britain's Got Talent (series 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Davidson ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Content, particularly potentially controversial content about living people, requires the highest quality sources. The Daily Mail is so far from qualifying as a reliable source as to be laughable. Please stop attempting to use it. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Ghmyrtle has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Andy Dingley ( talk) 03:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
Dave Thompson (author), without
verifying it by citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
You already have warnings concerning your editing of BLPs dating back to June last year. Further unsourced edits of this type will entail a discussion at
WP:ANI.
Super
Mario
Man
03:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Telegraph Totter. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chris Hutchins, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Chris Hutchins to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Wgolf ( talk) 19:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chris Hutchins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Jones ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mr. Sheen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:27, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of book Mr Confidential.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Please fix your signature per
WP:SIGLINK. This has been requested before in this
thread above. People need that link to your talkpage to communicate with you and if you don't do it you may be blocked until you do. Thank you,
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
22:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
—
Berean Hunter
(talk)
11:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.