![]() |
Hi Tekosh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Tekosh
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nickwan Qaderi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Amkgp ( talk) 19:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nickwan Qaderi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickwan Qaderi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 17:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Death of Mahsa Amini, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
07:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Death of Mahsa Amini, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
15:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:Tekosh. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
15:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)As you may have expected, since you have continued to use your talk page for another personal attack while you are blocked, your talk page access has been removed for the duration of the block. I shall also increase the block length to a week. If you continue to edit to promote a nationalist point of view, or to make personal attacks on editors with whom you disagree, or both, you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. That is not how Wikipedia works. JBW ( talk) 16:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
We do not include ethnicity per MOS:CONTEXTBIO> also she is not fully Kurdish as mentioned on body. Shadow4dark ( talk) 12:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Abu Hanifa Dinawari. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran ( talk) 02:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Tekosh, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
12:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
22:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 22:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Jasmin Moghbeli, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This message is to you dear admins: @ Lectonar, @ Lourdes, @ Edward-Woodrow,
I would have liked to delete my account after you read it but that's not possible, so I'll just abandon the account (if there's a better way to vanish, please let me know). I hope I can deliver my message across correctly.
In the past few weeks, I have been trying to contribute to Wikipedia but a certain user which happens to be a very experienced admin, that has clear problem with my race and ethnicity, has been suppressing me, my edits, my comments, the pages I have shown interest in, and etc. I understand that the three of you have no idea about the Kurdish/Persian conflict in Iran. Hence a random Persian guy can make it look normal and rational to you that he can easily just suppress my edits on wikipedia the way his country Persia/Iran has been oppressing the Kurds for the past 100 years. I promise if this wasn't Wikipedia and if this user had political power in real world he would put me in jail for my different ideology. I don't blame him, that's how he's raised. He is used to the 100 years old fascism in Iran where Persians are the rulers and every other ethnicity is suppressed.
I have come to the conclusion that Wikipedia is not the right place for me as a Kurdish person who is interested in Kurdish-Mesopotamian history, since I don't have much editing power given how that user suppresses my contributions. If it keeps continuing like this, I will never even become an admin to counterargue at his same equal level.
But this specific user has motivated me hugely to actually get active outside Wikipedia and publish peer-reviewed papers where other Kurds can use on Wikipedia.
Thanks for all your comments, I honestly learnt a lot from them. I just wish you had a bit more context to understand the Persian/Kurdish conflict and were more sensitive about it as we don't want Wikipedia to become the place where minorities get suppressed even more. Please remember just because someone is more experienced on Wikipedia doesn't make them right. Over the course of the last decade, there have been several instances on this particular user's page where non-Kurdish users have expressed the belief that he holds "ethnocentric Persian viewpoints".
Good luck to you all. Tekosh ( talk) 04:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Black Kite (talk)
19:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Tekosh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hello, Tekosh
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Nickwan Qaderi, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Amkgp ( talk) 19:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nickwan Qaderi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickwan Qaderi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. // Timothy :: talk 17:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Death of Mahsa Amini, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
07:41, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Death of Mahsa Amini, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
15:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:Tekosh. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
15:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
16:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)As you may have expected, since you have continued to use your talk page for another personal attack while you are blocked, your talk page access has been removed for the duration of the block. I shall also increase the block length to a week. If you continue to edit to promote a nationalist point of view, or to make personal attacks on editors with whom you disagree, or both, you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. That is not how Wikipedia works. JBW ( talk) 16:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
We do not include ethnicity per MOS:CONTEXTBIO> also she is not fully Kurdish as mentioned on body. Shadow4dark ( talk) 12:59, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Abu Hanifa Dinawari. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran ( talk) 02:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User talk:Tekosh, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Edward-Woodrow :) [
talk
12:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
HistoryofIran (
talk)
22:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk 22:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Jasmin Moghbeli, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 16:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
This message is to you dear admins: @ Lectonar, @ Lourdes, @ Edward-Woodrow,
I would have liked to delete my account after you read it but that's not possible, so I'll just abandon the account (if there's a better way to vanish, please let me know). I hope I can deliver my message across correctly.
In the past few weeks, I have been trying to contribute to Wikipedia but a certain user which happens to be a very experienced admin, that has clear problem with my race and ethnicity, has been suppressing me, my edits, my comments, the pages I have shown interest in, and etc. I understand that the three of you have no idea about the Kurdish/Persian conflict in Iran. Hence a random Persian guy can make it look normal and rational to you that he can easily just suppress my edits on wikipedia the way his country Persia/Iran has been oppressing the Kurds for the past 100 years. I promise if this wasn't Wikipedia and if this user had political power in real world he would put me in jail for my different ideology. I don't blame him, that's how he's raised. He is used to the 100 years old fascism in Iran where Persians are the rulers and every other ethnicity is suppressed.
I have come to the conclusion that Wikipedia is not the right place for me as a Kurdish person who is interested in Kurdish-Mesopotamian history, since I don't have much editing power given how that user suppresses my contributions. If it keeps continuing like this, I will never even become an admin to counterargue at his same equal level.
But this specific user has motivated me hugely to actually get active outside Wikipedia and publish peer-reviewed papers where other Kurds can use on Wikipedia.
Thanks for all your comments, I honestly learnt a lot from them. I just wish you had a bit more context to understand the Persian/Kurdish conflict and were more sensitive about it as we don't want Wikipedia to become the place where minorities get suppressed even more. Please remember just because someone is more experienced on Wikipedia doesn't make them right. Over the course of the last decade, there have been several instances on this particular user's page where non-Kurdish users have expressed the belief that he holds "ethnocentric Persian viewpoints".
Good luck to you all. Tekosh ( talk) 04:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Black Kite (talk)
19:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)