![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re. your block on User 86.47.53.31 , I was about to approach him/her again in the interest of trying to de-escalate the personal invective, but on reflection your response will probably be more effective. Anyway, rather than waste a good pint...
RashersTierney (
talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the
WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
RashersTierney ( talk) 15:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Tan, you should have used {{subst:uw-block1|time=1 week|reason=[[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]}} here and here. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 16:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Patar knight's thanks(pam) |
|
My recent RfA passed at 52 supports, 7 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Thank you for your support !vote, and I hope that I will be able to justify your trust in me as an administrator. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 19:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
The remaining columns of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi. |
Thank you for protecting Talk:Matt Sanchez. Out of curiousity, did you find it through the AN/I discussion or the RFPP page? Horologium (talk) 01:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, this AfD was opened by User:Ricky28618, who you just indef blocked. You might consider closing this as nobody who has yet commented sees any justification in this nomination. Tim Vickers ( talk) 02:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Medusa: Dare to Be Truthful has been protected because of a request made by User:XLR8TION who claims that User:74.197.86.10 is involved in edit-warring, destroying it with unconstructive entries that contain pointless information and bad grammar. All parties interested in the subject are encouraged to discuss the issue here. Tony the Marine ( talk) 02:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to help out with the Matt Sanchez article, but I see that the page was blocked. I'm on Matt's e-mail list and just got two of his articles.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/07/02/class/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529966,00.html
There's a lot of bias on the Matt Sanchez page and I'm hoping we'll see something more balanced soon. 119.59.82.18 ( talk) 17:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tan. I've unblocked Dapi89 following some talk-page chit-chat; obviously in the light of your above note about leaving for a holiday I couldn't discuss this with you first, for which I apologise. All the best, EyeSerene talk 18:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
74.65.153.232 identified himself as Hellboy10 - one of the many you've blocked as a Bambifan sock. Thought you might want to know, so you can pull out the Ban-stick... :) TheRealFennShysa ( talk) 15:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I have started an ANI discussion on Some guy: WP:ANI#Some guy You may want to comment there. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 05:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Didn't realise I has screwed up the template with my edit. Apologies!!! leaky_caldron ( talk) 22:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Why did you block me? I was editing this article, and I couldn't edit any article, except my talk page. I was editing Wikipedia. Why did you block me? I was NOT disrupting wikipedia, as I was editing the article, giving the article a plot section. It WAS NOT pointless info. And my spelling was correct. I need an explanation. -- 74.197.86.10 ( talk) 03:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Tanthalas. I thought of nominating the article for speedy deletion--I don't think it was created in good faith to begin with-- but figured someone would make a case for it as a noteworthy sandwich. As always, much appreciated, JNW ( talk) 19:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
If two users are on the same IP address, and one is blocked, does that also automatically block the other one? Or is some additional action required? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 05:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
AC removed sections declining his request and other comments and made a new one, http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AArab_Cowboy&diff=301828348&oldid=301828144 -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 09:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
(This was moved from the AN. I'll assume good faith and ask about what exactly happened here-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 11:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC))
I find the way User:Tanthalas39 has handled the problems between User:Supreme Deliciousness and User:Arab Cowboy on the noticeboard here constitutes for an abuse of power. He warned the User:Arab Cowboy of Disruptive Editing and as soon as User:Arab Cowboy replied he blocked him for 72 hours. He didn't take into account that this is a new user and that he is still learning what Disruptive editing even is. I don't see how Arab Cowboy has done Disruptive Editing and wish for clarification of why he was blocked. User:Arab Cowboy was asked on Asmahan to stop editing until matters are cleared, which he did. I find his dedication at least to Asmahan proves him as a valuable addition to our community. I think saying "AC, knock off the disruption here. This constitutes an only warning." is a clear abuse of power. What disruption? He was the one who started the thread. Maybe I'm missing something so please User:Tanthalas39 please explain your behavior.-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 10:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
After carefully reading the Noticeboard I think I have rushed into this accusation and formally apologize as such. Arab Cowboy seems to have done Disruptive edits: "Roux, obviously, it's a good thing that you are not [an admin]." " The "logic" of some of the users here is pathetic." "but from the way the answers have been coming here, it's more like a madhouse than a place to have an intelligent discourse." So it seems that he has engaged in such edits and your blocking threat was valid.-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 15:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
I have absolutely no idea - I've got AIV on my watchlist, but I haven't visited in a while, so I have no idea what happened there. Must have clicked a rollback on my watchlist somewhere without noticing, although I'd have expected a screen to come up and tell me I'd done it. Really sorry, anyway - seriously got no clue what went on Fritzpoll ( talk) 14:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. He kept going after users who posted warnings regarding his edits. He even attempted to delete the report I left off of WP:AIV, which really does cross into the realm of bad karma around here. -- McDoobAU93 ( talk) 17:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
The
June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
00:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
As you know, you just blocked Nukes4Tots again. The editor who filed the block, Theserialcomma ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) was blocked for one month by Georgewilliamherbert ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) for baiting: User talk:Theserialcomma#Blocked for a month for baiting. This was a first-time block. Do you think this is appropriate? I honestly don't know - I can see how his comments appear to be baiting. Some guy ( talk) 22:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
This is back. I figure somebody should have let you know. Law type! snype? 09:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
As you noticed, CieloEstrellado is back after being blocked, making accusations against me. I've written my counterargument, and now I'd like to ask you to resolve the issue to -hopefully- end the dispute.
Thank you.
Mfarah ( talk) 02:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm looking through the AfDs and I'm seeing a lot of articles that are not going to have any more discussion and as I know you are an admin online I was wondering if you could point me in the direction of a better place (than WP:AN) to report AfDs discussions that have fizzled. In all my time here, I've never actually found a place. Rgood erm ote 06:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Admin,
Thank you for freezing the Sturm College of Law Page. I am hoping you can help me further, or point me to someone who can. I am a relatively new editor (March of 2009) and I am having problems with another Editor who I believe is a bully. He is not an admin, yet he goes onto the Sturm College of Law site and deletes content / pictures for no valid reason. This all started when he deleted a picture of the law school with the reason "not relevant." It has been ongoing and I believe he is not helping the site, only harming it.
I looked through his other work when responding to his posts and have found that he has done this to many other users as well. Could he please be banned from editing the Sturm College of Law site?
His username is: Keystoneridin!
Thank you for your help. Wikics14 Wikics14 ( talk) 20:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
REPLY: I have done this to no other pages. I accidentally deleted the picture the first time. Since then, I have moved the picture to the paragraph below. keystoneridin! ( talk) 21:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
You keep doing everything I suggest before I suggest it! Wisdom89 ( T / C) 03:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Please see here for a response to your post. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
You just blocked User:58.169.38.195 for vandalizing MacKillop Catholic College, Canberra however he has apparently create an account User:Gahla and has vandalized the page again. -- Sophitessa ( talk) 04:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Since the ANI post is closed (thankfully, I was getting a little snarky myself), what do we do with the AfD? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 05:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I wish something would be done about this. I didn't have a clue that basically all FM licenced radio stations are allegedly notable, and raised an AfD on one that didn't meet any of our notability guidelines, only to be told that there are essays and something out-dated about which AfDs are successful and which fail that I should have followed. But since none of this is in the guidelines, and it's all basically "we did this 3 years ago so we should be doing it now" so far as I can see, it needs to be either put in the guidelines or made clear that it is not part of the guidelines and the guidelines are what count. I'm not sure what to do about this though. Any thoughts? Dougweller ( talk) 08:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your discussion on WP:AN/I concerning User:Aliveatoms. It is currently marked resolving with a note that the user has been warned. I am having trouble seeing how this resolves the issues outlined here. This user has been very disruptive and is targeting me specifically with a bad faith AFD nomination, vandalized my user page and most recently listed me on a list on his/her user page of editors he disliked. This user removes any and all warnings placed on their talk page. I would appreciate it if you reconsidered this decision.-- RadioFan ( talk) 12:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Genre warrior. Despite repeated warnings over the last month, user refuses to even POST on his talk page, and continues to add and change genres, usually out of the blue, with no source. I wouldn't usually be here, but Virtual Steve is asleep XD -- King ♣ Talk 13:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Bah! You beat me to it by 30 seconds ... you suck! :-P — Kralizec! ( talk) 14:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Tan - No violation of the verifiability policy was in question, as no attempt was made to add any unsourced or original content. What did occur was notification of KMF's on-going edit-warring efforts. Thanks!
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tan | 39 14:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.6.97.3 ( talk)
Hello, I'm not sure why you are holding the banhammer over my head when you don't seem to have any record of editing the Morganton page and are not a party in the ongoing dispute. The Cheese man and I are adults capable of settling this ourselves. Thank you for your help, and please stop threatening me. Gene Ray Wisest Human ( talk) 15:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I have a problem with the user Darth21. On the two pages was a conflict between me and him. He says the player that came free and, I say that was transferred for 5 euro. I showed the official documents issued by the Romanian Football Federation and the Romanian Professional Football League. Ilie Iordache was sold for Pandurii to AEK Athens for only 5 euros! [1] He says the documents are false. Please warn, and if does not stop, block him editing for a period. Sorry that I wrote and incorrectly, English is not my native language. 86.121.118.188 ( talk) 19:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Recently, you indefinitely banned AlexHG ( talk · contribs).
Based off his editing tendencies (particularly his fixation on Simple Plan-related articles), I highly suspect he has manifested under the new I.P. 216.106.100.224 ( talk · contribs). Could you investigate? -- Poe Joe ( talk) 05:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I notice you're the last admin to delete the above article. It's been recreated at Justan Bieber, and I'm confident it passes the relevant notability guidelines. Is there any chance you could unprotect/move the new page to the correct title? Cheers. Fribbulus Xax ( talk) 20:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
124.158.33.22 and other similar IP's in the range are suspected sockpuppets to an indefblocked user User:Aweare. It is currently blocked for one week. Would a longer block be possible since he will be back to user talk pages and personally attack other users? Please see Special:Contributions/124.158.33.22. Also talk page editing should be disabled as well. Momo san Gespräch 14:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You blocked
124.158.32.204 yesterday for block evasion but is now abusing the talk page. Can you block talk page editing for the duration of the block? See
Talk page history.
Momo san
Gespräch
03:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to try and take your advice, but she has been seriously fucking rude to me from the start even when I tried to be conciliatory, see her talk page. She clearly doesn't like having her admin decisions disagreed with. I think I'd better go to bed. Everything looks rosier in the morning. Theresa Knott | token threats 21:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your speaking to Gavin.Collins about his unwarranted call for a block of AlbertHerring. Unfortunately, I do not think it will change Gavin’s views at all. Gavin is very firm in his opinions and interpretations of policies, and does not change them no matter how many people show him he is wrong. Gavin is still firmly convinced his actions were right and the correct interpretation of policy. [1]
This is nothing new as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins 2, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Kender and the associated links clearly show. Edward321 ( talk) 22:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your comment at ANI, I have trouble being heard at the Willis Tower move discussion because of move supporters who cite WP:COMMONNAMES as trumping the WP:Reliable sources you mentioned. The move supporters appear to be making assumptions about what term the general public uses. A line from the WP:COMMONNAMES lead was pulled as a primary justification for the proposed move. This has been, in my view, successfully refuted as a case of oversimplification of the intent of the sentence and guideline. Any input you have regarding the use of this guideline, which can be digested by both camps at the discussion, would be appreciated. Sswonk ( talk) 17:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Haven't been back on the wiki in a while now, but I think I'll start up editing again. Had to take a prolonged break after my RfA. (Family issues and Navy issues and school issues, woot to it being over) Anywho, just thought I'd say hello again. Undead Warrior ( talk) 08:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Heya, just checking what your thoughts are on this user's current unblock request. It has been a while since the original block, so I'm taking them at their word for now. Mainly, I don't see what we have to lose giving them a chance. Either way, your comments would be appreciated. – Luna Santin ( talk) 01:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I recall you blocked this guy before for genre warring. He's back off the block now, and guess what he's up to? -- King ♣ Talk 19:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to thank you for your quick response and contribution to yesterday's request for semi-protection of Physical Education. Thanks again, Peace and Passion ( talk) 20:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
As you participated in the first RFC, I am informing you there is a second RFC on Aitias currently open. Majorly talk 16:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Re. your block on User 86.47.53.31 , I was about to approach him/her again in the interest of trying to de-escalate the personal invective, but on reflection your response will probably be more effective. Anyway, rather than waste a good pint...
RashersTierney (
talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the
WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
RashersTierney ( talk) 15:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Tan, you should have used {{subst:uw-block1|time=1 week|reason=[[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive editing]]}} here and here. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 16:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
Patar knight's thanks(pam) |
|
My recent RfA passed at 52 supports, 7 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Thank you for your support !vote, and I hope that I will be able to justify your trust in me as an administrator. -- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 19:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
The remaining columns of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi. |
Thank you for protecting Talk:Matt Sanchez. Out of curiousity, did you find it through the AN/I discussion or the RFPP page? Horologium (talk) 01:48, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, this AfD was opened by User:Ricky28618, who you just indef blocked. You might consider closing this as nobody who has yet commented sees any justification in this nomination. Tim Vickers ( talk) 02:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Medusa: Dare to Be Truthful has been protected because of a request made by User:XLR8TION who claims that User:74.197.86.10 is involved in edit-warring, destroying it with unconstructive entries that contain pointless information and bad grammar. All parties interested in the subject are encouraged to discuss the issue here. Tony the Marine ( talk) 02:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to help out with the Matt Sanchez article, but I see that the page was blocked. I'm on Matt's e-mail list and just got two of his articles.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2009/07/02/class/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,529966,00.html
There's a lot of bias on the Matt Sanchez page and I'm hoping we'll see something more balanced soon. 119.59.82.18 ( talk) 17:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tan. I've unblocked Dapi89 following some talk-page chit-chat; obviously in the light of your above note about leaving for a holiday I couldn't discuss this with you first, for which I apologise. All the best, EyeSerene talk 18:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
74.65.153.232 identified himself as Hellboy10 - one of the many you've blocked as a Bambifan sock. Thought you might want to know, so you can pull out the Ban-stick... :) TheRealFennShysa ( talk) 15:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
I have started an ANI discussion on Some guy: WP:ANI#Some guy You may want to comment there. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 05:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Didn't realise I has screwed up the template with my edit. Apologies!!! leaky_caldron ( talk) 22:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Why did you block me? I was editing this article, and I couldn't edit any article, except my talk page. I was editing Wikipedia. Why did you block me? I was NOT disrupting wikipedia, as I was editing the article, giving the article a plot section. It WAS NOT pointless info. And my spelling was correct. I need an explanation. -- 74.197.86.10 ( talk) 03:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Tanthalas. I thought of nominating the article for speedy deletion--I don't think it was created in good faith to begin with-- but figured someone would make a case for it as a noteworthy sandwich. As always, much appreciated, JNW ( talk) 19:48, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
If two users are on the same IP address, and one is blocked, does that also automatically block the other one? Or is some additional action required? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 05:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
AC removed sections declining his request and other comments and made a new one, http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AArab_Cowboy&diff=301828348&oldid=301828144 -- Supreme Deliciousness ( talk) 09:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
(This was moved from the AN. I'll assume good faith and ask about what exactly happened here-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 11:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC))
I find the way User:Tanthalas39 has handled the problems between User:Supreme Deliciousness and User:Arab Cowboy on the noticeboard here constitutes for an abuse of power. He warned the User:Arab Cowboy of Disruptive Editing and as soon as User:Arab Cowboy replied he blocked him for 72 hours. He didn't take into account that this is a new user and that he is still learning what Disruptive editing even is. I don't see how Arab Cowboy has done Disruptive Editing and wish for clarification of why he was blocked. User:Arab Cowboy was asked on Asmahan to stop editing until matters are cleared, which he did. I find his dedication at least to Asmahan proves him as a valuable addition to our community. I think saying "AC, knock off the disruption here. This constitutes an only warning." is a clear abuse of power. What disruption? He was the one who started the thread. Maybe I'm missing something so please User:Tanthalas39 please explain your behavior.-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 10:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
After carefully reading the Noticeboard I think I have rushed into this accusation and formally apologize as such. Arab Cowboy seems to have done Disruptive edits: "Roux, obviously, it's a good thing that you are not [an admin]." " The "logic" of some of the users here is pathetic." "but from the way the answers have been coming here, it's more like a madhouse than a place to have an intelligent discourse." So it seems that he has engaged in such edits and your blocking threat was valid.-- Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk) 15:51, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
I have absolutely no idea - I've got AIV on my watchlist, but I haven't visited in a while, so I have no idea what happened there. Must have clicked a rollback on my watchlist somewhere without noticing, although I'd have expected a screen to come up and tell me I'd done it. Really sorry, anyway - seriously got no clue what went on Fritzpoll ( talk) 14:46, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. He kept going after users who posted warnings regarding his edits. He even attempted to delete the report I left off of WP:AIV, which really does cross into the realm of bad karma around here. -- McDoobAU93 ( talk) 17:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
The
June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk)
00:11, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
As you know, you just blocked Nukes4Tots again. The editor who filed the block, Theserialcomma ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) was blocked for one month by Georgewilliamherbert ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) for baiting: User talk:Theserialcomma#Blocked for a month for baiting. This was a first-time block. Do you think this is appropriate? I honestly don't know - I can see how his comments appear to be baiting. Some guy ( talk) 22:59, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
This is back. I figure somebody should have let you know. Law type! snype? 09:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
As you noticed, CieloEstrellado is back after being blocked, making accusations against me. I've written my counterargument, and now I'd like to ask you to resolve the issue to -hopefully- end the dispute.
Thank you.
Mfarah ( talk) 02:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm looking through the AfDs and I'm seeing a lot of articles that are not going to have any more discussion and as I know you are an admin online I was wondering if you could point me in the direction of a better place (than WP:AN) to report AfDs discussions that have fizzled. In all my time here, I've never actually found a place. Rgood erm ote 06:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello Admin,
Thank you for freezing the Sturm College of Law Page. I am hoping you can help me further, or point me to someone who can. I am a relatively new editor (March of 2009) and I am having problems with another Editor who I believe is a bully. He is not an admin, yet he goes onto the Sturm College of Law site and deletes content / pictures for no valid reason. This all started when he deleted a picture of the law school with the reason "not relevant." It has been ongoing and I believe he is not helping the site, only harming it.
I looked through his other work when responding to his posts and have found that he has done this to many other users as well. Could he please be banned from editing the Sturm College of Law site?
His username is: Keystoneridin!
Thank you for your help. Wikics14 Wikics14 ( talk) 20:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
REPLY: I have done this to no other pages. I accidentally deleted the picture the first time. Since then, I have moved the picture to the paragraph below. keystoneridin! ( talk) 21:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
You keep doing everything I suggest before I suggest it! Wisdom89 ( T / C) 03:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Please see here for a response to your post. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 04:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
You just blocked User:58.169.38.195 for vandalizing MacKillop Catholic College, Canberra however he has apparently create an account User:Gahla and has vandalized the page again. -- Sophitessa ( talk) 04:48, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Since the ANI post is closed (thankfully, I was getting a little snarky myself), what do we do with the AfD? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 05:24, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I wish something would be done about this. I didn't have a clue that basically all FM licenced radio stations are allegedly notable, and raised an AfD on one that didn't meet any of our notability guidelines, only to be told that there are essays and something out-dated about which AfDs are successful and which fail that I should have followed. But since none of this is in the guidelines, and it's all basically "we did this 3 years ago so we should be doing it now" so far as I can see, it needs to be either put in the guidelines or made clear that it is not part of the guidelines and the guidelines are what count. I'm not sure what to do about this though. Any thoughts? Dougweller ( talk) 08:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your discussion on WP:AN/I concerning User:Aliveatoms. It is currently marked resolving with a note that the user has been warned. I am having trouble seeing how this resolves the issues outlined here. This user has been very disruptive and is targeting me specifically with a bad faith AFD nomination, vandalized my user page and most recently listed me on a list on his/her user page of editors he disliked. This user removes any and all warnings placed on their talk page. I would appreciate it if you reconsidered this decision.-- RadioFan ( talk) 12:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Genre warrior. Despite repeated warnings over the last month, user refuses to even POST on his talk page, and continues to add and change genres, usually out of the blue, with no source. I wouldn't usually be here, but Virtual Steve is asleep XD -- King ♣ Talk 13:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Bah! You beat me to it by 30 seconds ... you suck! :-P — Kralizec! ( talk) 14:30, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Tan - No violation of the verifiability policy was in question, as no attempt was made to add any unsourced or original content. What did occur was notification of KMF's on-going edit-warring efforts. Thanks!
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tan | 39 14:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.6.97.3 ( talk)
Hello, I'm not sure why you are holding the banhammer over my head when you don't seem to have any record of editing the Morganton page and are not a party in the ongoing dispute. The Cheese man and I are adults capable of settling this ourselves. Thank you for your help, and please stop threatening me. Gene Ray Wisest Human ( talk) 15:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I have a problem with the user Darth21. On the two pages was a conflict between me and him. He says the player that came free and, I say that was transferred for 5 euro. I showed the official documents issued by the Romanian Football Federation and the Romanian Professional Football League. Ilie Iordache was sold for Pandurii to AEK Athens for only 5 euros! [1] He says the documents are false. Please warn, and if does not stop, block him editing for a period. Sorry that I wrote and incorrectly, English is not my native language. 86.121.118.188 ( talk) 19:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Recently, you indefinitely banned AlexHG ( talk · contribs).
Based off his editing tendencies (particularly his fixation on Simple Plan-related articles), I highly suspect he has manifested under the new I.P. 216.106.100.224 ( talk · contribs). Could you investigate? -- Poe Joe ( talk) 05:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I notice you're the last admin to delete the above article. It's been recreated at Justan Bieber, and I'm confident it passes the relevant notability guidelines. Is there any chance you could unprotect/move the new page to the correct title? Cheers. Fribbulus Xax ( talk) 20:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
124.158.33.22 and other similar IP's in the range are suspected sockpuppets to an indefblocked user User:Aweare. It is currently blocked for one week. Would a longer block be possible since he will be back to user talk pages and personally attack other users? Please see Special:Contributions/124.158.33.22. Also talk page editing should be disabled as well. Momo san Gespräch 14:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You blocked
124.158.32.204 yesterday for block evasion but is now abusing the talk page. Can you block talk page editing for the duration of the block? See
Talk page history.
Momo san
Gespräch
03:59, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to try and take your advice, but she has been seriously fucking rude to me from the start even when I tried to be conciliatory, see her talk page. She clearly doesn't like having her admin decisions disagreed with. I think I'd better go to bed. Everything looks rosier in the morning. Theresa Knott | token threats 21:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your speaking to Gavin.Collins about his unwarranted call for a block of AlbertHerring. Unfortunately, I do not think it will change Gavin’s views at all. Gavin is very firm in his opinions and interpretations of policies, and does not change them no matter how many people show him he is wrong. Gavin is still firmly convinced his actions were right and the correct interpretation of policy. [1]
This is nothing new as Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins 2, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Kender and the associated links clearly show. Edward321 ( talk) 22:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your comment at ANI, I have trouble being heard at the Willis Tower move discussion because of move supporters who cite WP:COMMONNAMES as trumping the WP:Reliable sources you mentioned. The move supporters appear to be making assumptions about what term the general public uses. A line from the WP:COMMONNAMES lead was pulled as a primary justification for the proposed move. This has been, in my view, successfully refuted as a case of oversimplification of the intent of the sentence and guideline. Any input you have regarding the use of this guideline, which can be digested by both camps at the discussion, would be appreciated. Sswonk ( talk) 17:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Haven't been back on the wiki in a while now, but I think I'll start up editing again. Had to take a prolonged break after my RfA. (Family issues and Navy issues and school issues, woot to it being over) Anywho, just thought I'd say hello again. Undead Warrior ( talk) 08:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Heya, just checking what your thoughts are on this user's current unblock request. It has been a while since the original block, so I'm taking them at their word for now. Mainly, I don't see what we have to lose giving them a chance. Either way, your comments would be appreciated. – Luna Santin ( talk) 01:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I recall you blocked this guy before for genre warring. He's back off the block now, and guess what he's up to? -- King ♣ Talk 19:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I'd like to thank you for your quick response and contribution to yesterday's request for semi-protection of Physical Education. Thanks again, Peace and Passion ( talk) 20:00, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
As you participated in the first RFC, I am informing you there is a second RFC on Aitias currently open. Majorly talk 16:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)