This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
... curl it to bring the edge to the midline; since there is only one edge, it will meet itself there, passing through the midline.
Now that is an elegant and pithy description! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloudswrest ( talk • contribs) 20:46, 6 January 2015
I explained some of my reasons for my response to this topic on Meni's talk page, if you're interested. RomanSpa ( talk) 21:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anton, could you help with a picture? Could you make a picture of a tiling of divergent apeirogons, like {∞,3}, except larger edge lengths that don't converge at infinity?
I'd like the example for this article Apeirogon#Apeirogons_in_hyperbolic_plane. I could actually use this image File:H2 tiling 2iu-7.png, but it could use more resolution to see more detail near the limit, and might be adjusted a big smaller aperigons so details don't get small quite as fast. Well, I'll use your existing image of tr{∞,iπ/λ} for now, so if you make a new one, you can replace it sometime. Tom Ruen ( talk) 18:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
tr{∞, 3} | tr{12i,3} | tr{9i,3} | tr{6i,3} |
---|---|---|---|
tr{4i,3} | tr{3i,3} | tr{2i,3} | tr{i,3} |
Strange things seem to be happening below j5. Tom Ruen ( talk) 04:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
j1 | j2 | j3 | j4 | j5 | j6 | j7 | j8 | j9 | j10 | j11 | j12 | j∞ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||||
Checkers |
Animation of sequence from 12 downto 1, 1/2 second per frame
Omnitruncation |
Mirrors (back-and-forth) |
I've redone j1 through j4 and will upload sometime soon. — Tamfang ( talk) 23:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Oh, a tiny complaint: Edge widths better here File:H2 tiling 23i-1.png than here File:H2 tiling 23j12-1.png etc, although they both flicker out in the limits. Certainly this template images are too small, but often good, like triangular duals. Tom Ruen ( talk) 09:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
*n32 symmetry mutation of regular tilings: {n,3} | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spherical | Euclidean | Compact hyperb. | Paraco. | Noncompact hyperbolic | |||||||
{2,3} | {3,3} | {4,3} | {5,3} | {6,3} | {7,3} | {8,3} | {∞,3} | {12i,3} | {9i,3} | {6i,3} | {3i,3} |
*n32 symmetry mutation of regular tilings: {3,n} | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spherical | Euclid. | Compact hyper. | Paraco. | Noncompact hyperbolic | |||||||
3.3 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 3∞ | 312i | 39i | 36i | 33i |
Now it is asking if one were to do it via a multipxer for Jd and Kd thru Ja and Ka and each gerated by using a multiplexer that is a 8 to 1 line multiplexer for each J and K controll. it says to write down the 8 input lines of each multiplxer, including alternatives. It says the least significant address lines is the ones and is connected to Qa and the most significant the fours, adress line is for each multiplexer is Qc. It states that Qb is connected to the twos adress lines in each case. please help Doorknob747 ( talk) 16:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
hello Tamfang this is Dfrr. there is a user named User:Trimethylxanthine who has not been getting any messages from any users but me. in fact only one other user has sent him a message which was when he first came to wikipedia. User:Conifer User:MrWooHoo User:Davejohnsan User:StuRat and many other users have gotten a message kind like this (not exactly like this) to there talk page. so lets send him wikiloves barnstars messages and anything to make him feel that people know about him thank you and have a happy April Dfrr ( talk) 09:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rice burner because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 15:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that you reverted my edition, making again Talk:Twin cities a redirect to Talk:Minneapolis–Saint Paul; but, if Twin cities and Minneapolis–Saint Paul are distinct articles, I think that they should have distinct talk pages (instead of the talk page of one redirecting to the talk page of the other)-- MiguelMadeira ( talk) 10:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your efforts to remove "a term used to describe" generally.
Overdrive is tricky though and the article has a long history of a difficult effort to give it a clear lead. The trouble is that "overdrive" has four meanings, all mixed up, and two (maybe three) of these are concepts rather than mechanisms.
It's hard to understand what an overdrive (mechanism) is without first understanding the concept #1 of it, and avoiding the trap of just stating "An overdrive (mechanism #3) is a gadget for making it do overdrive (concept #2)". That's a common definition that's widely given, but it's either inexplicable or actually misleading. We still need to start with concept #1.
If you can assist with any better clarification in the lead, I'm only too aware that it could use it. However I think we are legitimately stuck with "overdrive is a term" for this one, as that's the highest common factor between them. Andy Dingley ( talk) 09:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billericay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilbrook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tamfang, at a 2nd attempt, I've just been successfully fitted with a biventricular ICD at Guy's, linked to an emergency 24/7 home/hosp monitor. I am now returning to Wikipedia to create a number of List-articles &c, similar to the ( List of German monarchs in 1918).
Am I correct in stating the day Wilhelm II abdicated his own titles, he also abdicated the titles of his wife, and his children as heirs and successors. He also abdicated all other titles belonging to the remainder of his relatives of the House of Hohenzollern. Could you estimate how many Hohenzollerns lost their titles as a direct result of Wilhelm's abdication?
Could you advise me if it is feasible or achievable, to list all of the names, titles &c of those from the (Family tree) of the House of Hohenzollern, who lost their titles on Nov 9, 1918? and if so, could you suggest a viable box style format to list the contents? Regards Steve. Stephen2nd ( talk) 15:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Statement of Abdication (1918). As translated and appearing in the 1923 Source Records of the Great War, Vol. VI, edited by Charles F. Horne.
I herewith renounce for all time claims to the throne of Prussia and to the German Imperial throne connected therewith. At the same time I release all officials of the German Empire and of Prussia, as well as all officers, non-commissioned officers and men of the navy and of the Prussian army, as well as the troops of the federated states of Germany, from the oath of fidelity which they tendered to me as their Emperor, King and Commander-in-Chief. I expect of them that until the re-establishment of order in the German Empire they shall render assistance to those in actual power in Germany, in protecting the German people from the threatening dangers of anarchy, famine, and foreign rule. Proclaimed under our own hand and with the imperial seal attached. Amerongen, 28 November, 1918. Signed WILLIAM.
The crown prince, The Bavarian monarch was one of only five of the 22 German potentates not to relinquish his rights to the throne, the others being the King of Saxony, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, the Prince of Waldeck-Pyrmont and the Grand Duke of Hesse.
Regards for now, and good luck to us all. Stephen. Stephen2nd ( talk) 22:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Seems clear enough to me. Try asking at Wikipedia:Help Desk why that site is forbidden. — Tamfang ( talk) 02:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
... curl it to bring the edge to the midline; since there is only one edge, it will meet itself there, passing through the midline.
Now that is an elegant and pithy description! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloudswrest ( talk • contribs) 20:46, 6 January 2015
I explained some of my reasons for my response to this topic on Meni's talk page, if you're interested. RomanSpa ( talk) 21:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi Anton, could you help with a picture? Could you make a picture of a tiling of divergent apeirogons, like {∞,3}, except larger edge lengths that don't converge at infinity?
I'd like the example for this article Apeirogon#Apeirogons_in_hyperbolic_plane. I could actually use this image File:H2 tiling 2iu-7.png, but it could use more resolution to see more detail near the limit, and might be adjusted a big smaller aperigons so details don't get small quite as fast. Well, I'll use your existing image of tr{∞,iπ/λ} for now, so if you make a new one, you can replace it sometime. Tom Ruen ( talk) 18:48, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
tr{∞, 3} | tr{12i,3} | tr{9i,3} | tr{6i,3} |
---|---|---|---|
tr{4i,3} | tr{3i,3} | tr{2i,3} | tr{i,3} |
Strange things seem to be happening below j5. Tom Ruen ( talk) 04:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
j1 | j2 | j3 | j4 | j5 | j6 | j7 | j8 | j9 | j10 | j11 | j12 | j∞ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||||
Checkers |
Animation of sequence from 12 downto 1, 1/2 second per frame
Omnitruncation |
Mirrors (back-and-forth) |
I've redone j1 through j4 and will upload sometime soon. — Tamfang ( talk) 23:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Oh, a tiny complaint: Edge widths better here File:H2 tiling 23i-1.png than here File:H2 tiling 23j12-1.png etc, although they both flicker out in the limits. Certainly this template images are too small, but often good, like triangular duals. Tom Ruen ( talk) 09:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
*n32 symmetry mutation of regular tilings: {n,3} | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spherical | Euclidean | Compact hyperb. | Paraco. | Noncompact hyperbolic | |||||||
{2,3} | {3,3} | {4,3} | {5,3} | {6,3} | {7,3} | {8,3} | {∞,3} | {12i,3} | {9i,3} | {6i,3} | {3i,3} |
*n32 symmetry mutation of regular tilings: {3,n} | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spherical | Euclid. | Compact hyper. | Paraco. | Noncompact hyperbolic | |||||||
3.3 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 3∞ | 312i | 39i | 36i | 33i |
Now it is asking if one were to do it via a multipxer for Jd and Kd thru Ja and Ka and each gerated by using a multiplexer that is a 8 to 1 line multiplexer for each J and K controll. it says to write down the 8 input lines of each multiplxer, including alternatives. It says the least significant address lines is the ones and is connected to Qa and the most significant the fours, adress line is for each multiplexer is Qc. It states that Qb is connected to the twos adress lines in each case. please help Doorknob747 ( talk) 16:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
hello Tamfang this is Dfrr. there is a user named User:Trimethylxanthine who has not been getting any messages from any users but me. in fact only one other user has sent him a message which was when he first came to wikipedia. User:Conifer User:MrWooHoo User:Davejohnsan User:StuRat and many other users have gotten a message kind like this (not exactly like this) to there talk page. so lets send him wikiloves barnstars messages and anything to make him feel that people know about him thank you and have a happy April Dfrr ( talk) 09:06, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rice burner because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dennis Bratland ( talk) 15:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
I noticed that you reverted my edition, making again Talk:Twin cities a redirect to Talk:Minneapolis–Saint Paul; but, if Twin cities and Minneapolis–Saint Paul are distinct articles, I think that they should have distinct talk pages (instead of the talk page of one redirecting to the talk page of the other)-- MiguelMadeira ( talk) 10:12, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your efforts to remove "a term used to describe" generally.
Overdrive is tricky though and the article has a long history of a difficult effort to give it a clear lead. The trouble is that "overdrive" has four meanings, all mixed up, and two (maybe three) of these are concepts rather than mechanisms.
It's hard to understand what an overdrive (mechanism) is without first understanding the concept #1 of it, and avoiding the trap of just stating "An overdrive (mechanism #3) is a gadget for making it do overdrive (concept #2)". That's a common definition that's widely given, but it's either inexplicable or actually misleading. We still need to start with concept #1.
If you can assist with any better clarification in the lead, I'm only too aware that it could use it. However I think we are legitimately stuck with "overdrive is a term" for this one, as that's the highest common factor between them. Andy Dingley ( talk) 09:24, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Billericay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bilbrook. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Tamfang, at a 2nd attempt, I've just been successfully fitted with a biventricular ICD at Guy's, linked to an emergency 24/7 home/hosp monitor. I am now returning to Wikipedia to create a number of List-articles &c, similar to the ( List of German monarchs in 1918).
Am I correct in stating the day Wilhelm II abdicated his own titles, he also abdicated the titles of his wife, and his children as heirs and successors. He also abdicated all other titles belonging to the remainder of his relatives of the House of Hohenzollern. Could you estimate how many Hohenzollerns lost their titles as a direct result of Wilhelm's abdication?
Could you advise me if it is feasible or achievable, to list all of the names, titles &c of those from the (Family tree) of the House of Hohenzollern, who lost their titles on Nov 9, 1918? and if so, could you suggest a viable box style format to list the contents? Regards Steve. Stephen2nd ( talk) 15:48, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Statement of Abdication (1918). As translated and appearing in the 1923 Source Records of the Great War, Vol. VI, edited by Charles F. Horne.
I herewith renounce for all time claims to the throne of Prussia and to the German Imperial throne connected therewith. At the same time I release all officials of the German Empire and of Prussia, as well as all officers, non-commissioned officers and men of the navy and of the Prussian army, as well as the troops of the federated states of Germany, from the oath of fidelity which they tendered to me as their Emperor, King and Commander-in-Chief. I expect of them that until the re-establishment of order in the German Empire they shall render assistance to those in actual power in Germany, in protecting the German people from the threatening dangers of anarchy, famine, and foreign rule. Proclaimed under our own hand and with the imperial seal attached. Amerongen, 28 November, 1918. Signed WILLIAM.
The crown prince, The Bavarian monarch was one of only five of the 22 German potentates not to relinquish his rights to the throne, the others being the King of Saxony, the Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, the Prince of Waldeck-Pyrmont and the Grand Duke of Hesse.
Regards for now, and good luck to us all. Stephen. Stephen2nd ( talk) 22:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Seems clear enough to me. Try asking at Wikipedia:Help Desk why that site is forbidden. — Tamfang ( talk) 02:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)