![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
TJRC ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 104.129.192.0/20. (This the Internet connectivity provided by Kaiser Permanente in its waiting room.) TJRC ( talk) 20:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This IP range is indeed a webhost, which is often the case for public WiFi. You will have to wait until you have left the waiting room to edit. 331dot ( talk) 20:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
not arguing your reversion, but the service is called “eternal september” because it provides free usenet access, in a play on the article topic. Peter Flass ( talk) 13:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I'll give you a chance to justify your edit (changing sourced dates to unsourced ones) but if you can't come up with sourcing for your preferred version I'll add the correct dates back. 80.195.228.113 ( talk) 14:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and explanation. At a reunion of sorts from at Davis, California several of us who attended UC Davis and couple who worked at a small clothing store business owned by Rod Toner, Carole Mindlin & Dan Mason called Nice & Tasty and were sad to see a few of the original band members not listed. We went to dozens of their rehearsals and performances at UC Davis, the Oasis Ballroom in Sacramento and other clubs as well as driving hours to see them compete in a few Battles of the Bands. Carole worked at the door of some of the clubs collecting money from patrons. Gordon went off to Harvard first. There was a bass player named Andy for a while too, but we didn't remember his last name. Also another singer named Kathy, but do not know her last name either. We thought it mattered to get the full history and to get UC Davis mentioned in there too. https://www.ucdavis.edu/
So the reliable source for the information is really former UC Davis fans and employees of Nice & Tasty. A group requested edit.
Rod Toner, the founder of the band, would be able to confirm this info as reliable. Is that possible, to ask him? He worked at the UC Davis newspaper too, which might be interesting to add. The Cal Aggie. https://theaggie.org/ 24.68.114.22 ( talk) 00:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the feedback but I think removing the The Three Body Problem trilogy is a mistake :) As citation I would use the wikipedia pages of the individual books themself: /info/en/?search=The_Three-Body_Problem_(novel). They are classified as _hard_ sci-fi there!
Insterstellar is maybe hard sci-fi (it's maybe on the edge, I'm not absolut about it :)). Would you count this as valid citation: https://theconversation.com/interstellar-gives-a-spectacular-view-of-hard-science-33991 ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnarök ( talk • contribs) 13:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
AGREE 100% that the story of the statutory rape should not be at the very top of the intro. thank you for removing it from the intro. Julieprus ( talk) 02:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
TJRC Thank you so much for the information! I just re-uploaded the awards content, which we agree is essential, with citations. Let me know if i made any mistakes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.4.68.21 ( talk) 01:11, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
I did nothing of the sort. I was simply writing a proven fact, and I even gave a reference proving that statement I made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HulkSpider ( talk • contribs) 14:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Do I really need to remind you that WP:AGF and WP:NPA are policy? You're crossing a line with your attacks and unsults. You've been here long enough to know better. Guettarda ( talk) 04:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my page, Jacob Cooper (composer). The page was originally made by my record label in 2013/4, and now I'm trying update it myself. To get around the conflict-of-interest issue, is it possible to submit my changes for review by an outside source? Another more specific question: most of my edits so far were to the "Compositions and Projects" section, and it seems like these shouldn't each have a reference, since they don't for other composer pages. If needed, though, they could all use the single reference of my website ( https://jacobcoopermusic.com/sounds/).
Thanks for helping me out with this--as you can probably tell, I'm new to wikipedia editing!
Jmcooper02 ( talk) 17:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't realize that it was a different version of English! Thanks for clarifying.
TetanicRain7592 ( talk) 23:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)TetanicRain7592
Hi There. Thank you for the message. I am Cheryl Dimont, Thomas Knoll's wife. 172.91.92.101 ( talk) 22:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Google listed their heights as 5'3" and 5'7" respectively. I made edits on their pages based on what Google said. 2601:883:4280:28B0:A45B:CC29:47BD:5DE8 ( talk) 16:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi TJRC, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 ( talk)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
...is one of the "good hand" edits of a long-term vandal, whose other edits are suppressed because they contain pretty vile examples of outing, harassment, and threats of violence, including rape threats. I don't disagree with your edit, but I thought maybe you should know. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 23:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Good afternoon, if you feel something needs to be sourced, there is no need for you to delete it, you just need to put the following tags: citation needed, citation needed. Tecmo ( talk) 21:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for spotting that. As you surmised, I cut-and-pasted the wrong link. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 20:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
New to Wikipedia. Thanks for the updates on National Association of Realtors and pushback on the anti-vandalism bot. I had the facts right, but didn't think to use references. Going forward, I will be mindful to use references when changing names. I will also be more conscientious about differentiating minor edits and regular edits. Fbpfdemo ( talk) 01:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you reverted some of the edits made by this editor, he has made hundreds of good faith but unnecessary and inaccurate edits recently by trying to add NIFTY 500 component on every one of the index's constituent companies. Now I don't know how well versed you are with indexes in general but this particular index is not used much in India, and I see no particular reason to specify it on 500 company pages. Not to mention the fact that he's listed them all as NIFTY 500 'component' instead of the universal 'constituent' on all these pages which irks me because I've spent hours trying to ensure consistency on this very topic. I honestly have no clue how to correct so many edits or if they should be corrected at all. I am definitely in favour of reverting these edits but once again, there are hundreds of his edits to revert. You seem to be a very experienced editor and I would like your help in this matter. Thanks Debitpixie 💬 12:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, how can we ensure that users of Wikipedia can easily find "PPL" (which is the name Commonly used name for Phonographic Performance Limited by the Company itself, it's 110,000 members and the 100,000's of License Fee payers)? See their logo. £271.8 million was collected by the in 2019 so they are a Notable Company and it should be easily accessible via the search term "PPL" currently it's not obvious. Do you have any suggestions?
My aim was to include "PPL" in the title as "Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL)" to clarify who they are but as they are commonly known as "PPL" maybe a better title would be "PPL (Phonographic Performance Limited)"?
Thanks for any input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ888kmg ( talk • contribs) 21:46, August 23, 2020 (UTC)
Requesting a clarification on the stated basis for reversion of edit on Invasion of the Bee Girls (1973) and List of films in the public domain in the United States, which was "registration (of initial 28-year term) was not required; may not have been renewed, and if that's the case it would indeed be PD; but for lack of renewal, not for lack of registration." While that is true under current law, as noted in the U.S.Copyright Office Circular 45 Copyright Registration of Motion Pictures on page 4 states that motion pictures published prior to 1978 had a manditory registration during the initial 28 year period. Also, while the IMDb, Internet Archive, and the wikipedia article state that the film is in the public domain, the AFI Catalog lists the reason, that the film was not registered. Lastly, there is at least one other entry in the List of films in the public domain in the United States with "not registered for copyright", the 1959 Last Clear Chance, that article discusses its public domain status due to failure to register. Lastly, perhaps the commons image needs a better / correct license rather than a violation of copyright claim. Thanks. Deanlaw ( talk) 18:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to remove an addition to the Tonya Harding page that was clearly an add. The addition of the Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan Museum doesn't seem relevant to Tonya Harding herself, the description includes two names of the people who started it, however the "museum" has now turned into a pop culture museum. It's uncomfortable seeing these people promote on Tonya Hardings page, as their names are not relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.232.212.158 ( talk) 01:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Rosemary Clooneys version of White Christmas complete with the verse was played on BBC1 and 2 with Testcard F and Ceefax Pages from 1976-1995 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.230.86 ( talk) 00:17, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
Hi TJRC Thanks for your responses to my edits of the page for David Warren inventor. The reference to the history by Philip Heath should be for page 284 only. I misinterpreted the field titled "pages" as referring to the number of pages in the volume. I'm not sure where to go to fix this - can i get back to the Reference form? ArchivesTGSNSW ( talk) 00:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
TJRC,
Hey, I’m new to wiki editing and appreciate constructive input. I am admittedly confused why you reverted my edits, you noted a lacked a proper citation, which may have been the case but my citation was a link to Cornell law school of the relevant SCOTUS ruling itself? Under Powell vs Alabama Stinney should have been afforded qualified counsel with adequate time to prepare-which he did not receive. No matter what I feel my edits did need some re-wording, but other than the SC case the rest of my edits were purely structural, I did not add new information. OgamD218 ( talk) 16:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Alex Shibutani has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Just notifying you about an RfC that I opened that relates to a discussion you participated in about the Shibutani ice dance partners. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Removed Anitra Ford edit. I added “The Odd Couple” because I actually saw the episode that she was in and looked up her information. That show wasn’t listed in things she had done, so I added it. I didn’t think I had to include a source, since I watched it, and it can also be easily checked simply by going to IMDB.com. But here is the link just in case. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0285503/bio Also from Bing, https://www.bing.com/k/celebrities/anitra-ford/timeline. 73.39.220.131 ( talk) 05:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC) SB
"Last time" litreally means most recent time, both are synomynous so in no way I changed the meaning of the article, Just search meaning of "Last time", I just prefer last time than most recent time and you just prefer the most recent time even though both are the same, anyway it depends on the opinions on people of how they wanna see something or write something. So that was indeed a minor edit, and you did a mistake calling me out, Anyway I forgive you, Nice talking to you thank you sir! Hope you treat your junior editors better from next time. :) Swtadi143 ( talk) 18:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
I clearly mentioned that was a obvious vandalism with no clear or reliable source. So ofcource I just undid and reverted the version because theres no reliable source so it does come on "minor edit". Swtadi143 ( talk) 18:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Not gonna argue with you about the wording on that part of the Strange Advance article. I mean, yeah, they did end up changing their band name due to the existence of a German band with the same name as their original band name, but it was most probably not due to legal action as was the case of the New Jersey New Wave band Smash Palace, which was actually forced to change their name from Quincy due to legal action from Quincy Jones. Cheers. 136.50.71.144 ( talk) 20:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi I'm confused by your many reverts of my edits to John J. Doll. In going through the list of those who served in the office, I had added little to Doll, for lack of worthy additions. His page had a Notability banner from 2015 attached by a user whose credentials looked impressive to me, and which, while searching for additions, appeared valid. I later attached the same tag to Teresa Stanek Rea, for whom search also yielded little else of note. Holding a public office, in itself, may not lend adequate notability beyond appearing on lists.
I get that you disagree with their notability, and that's fine, but I do not get at all why you chose to steamroller revert perfectly valid copyediting on Doll's page as well. I also disagree with a particular note you left on Doll's reverts: "later consultancy probably isn't even worth mentioning, but certainly not in the lede". Whatever the person currently does is worthy of a sentence, when their professional life is their notability, and current status generally precedes past in the lead... not the lede, which is a publishing term that describes nothing actually done on Wikipedia. (PS what lead? It's a stub.) 98.13.210.103 ( talk) 19:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
TJRC ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 104.129.192.0/20. (This the Internet connectivity provided by Kaiser Permanente in its waiting room.) TJRC ( talk) 20:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This IP range is indeed a webhost, which is often the case for public WiFi. You will have to wait until you have left the waiting room to edit. 331dot ( talk) 20:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
not arguing your reversion, but the service is called “eternal september” because it provides free usenet access, in a play on the article topic. Peter Flass ( talk) 13:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
I'll give you a chance to justify your edit (changing sourced dates to unsourced ones) but if you can't come up with sourcing for your preferred version I'll add the correct dates back. 80.195.228.113 ( talk) 14:29, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply and explanation. At a reunion of sorts from at Davis, California several of us who attended UC Davis and couple who worked at a small clothing store business owned by Rod Toner, Carole Mindlin & Dan Mason called Nice & Tasty and were sad to see a few of the original band members not listed. We went to dozens of their rehearsals and performances at UC Davis, the Oasis Ballroom in Sacramento and other clubs as well as driving hours to see them compete in a few Battles of the Bands. Carole worked at the door of some of the clubs collecting money from patrons. Gordon went off to Harvard first. There was a bass player named Andy for a while too, but we didn't remember his last name. Also another singer named Kathy, but do not know her last name either. We thought it mattered to get the full history and to get UC Davis mentioned in there too. https://www.ucdavis.edu/
So the reliable source for the information is really former UC Davis fans and employees of Nice & Tasty. A group requested edit.
Rod Toner, the founder of the band, would be able to confirm this info as reliable. Is that possible, to ask him? He worked at the UC Davis newspaper too, which might be interesting to add. The Cal Aggie. https://theaggie.org/ 24.68.114.22 ( talk) 00:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the feedback but I think removing the The Three Body Problem trilogy is a mistake :) As citation I would use the wikipedia pages of the individual books themself: /info/en/?search=The_Three-Body_Problem_(novel). They are classified as _hard_ sci-fi there!
Insterstellar is maybe hard sci-fi (it's maybe on the edge, I'm not absolut about it :)). Would you count this as valid citation: https://theconversation.com/interstellar-gives-a-spectacular-view-of-hard-science-33991 ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragnarök ( talk • contribs) 13:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
AGREE 100% that the story of the statutory rape should not be at the very top of the intro. thank you for removing it from the intro. Julieprus ( talk) 02:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
TJRC Thank you so much for the information! I just re-uploaded the awards content, which we agree is essential, with citations. Let me know if i made any mistakes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.4.68.21 ( talk) 01:11, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
I did nothing of the sort. I was simply writing a proven fact, and I even gave a reference proving that statement I made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HulkSpider ( talk • contribs) 14:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Do I really need to remind you that WP:AGF and WP:NPA are policy? You're crossing a line with your attacks and unsults. You've been here long enough to know better. Guettarda ( talk) 04:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing my page, Jacob Cooper (composer). The page was originally made by my record label in 2013/4, and now I'm trying update it myself. To get around the conflict-of-interest issue, is it possible to submit my changes for review by an outside source? Another more specific question: most of my edits so far were to the "Compositions and Projects" section, and it seems like these shouldn't each have a reference, since they don't for other composer pages. If needed, though, they could all use the single reference of my website ( https://jacobcoopermusic.com/sounds/).
Thanks for helping me out with this--as you can probably tell, I'm new to wikipedia editing!
Jmcooper02 ( talk) 17:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't realize that it was a different version of English! Thanks for clarifying.
TetanicRain7592 ( talk) 23:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)TetanicRain7592
Hi There. Thank you for the message. I am Cheryl Dimont, Thomas Knoll's wife. 172.91.92.101 ( talk) 22:20, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Google listed their heights as 5'3" and 5'7" respectively. I made edits on their pages based on what Google said. 2601:883:4280:28B0:A45B:CC29:47BD:5DE8 ( talk) 16:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi TJRC, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.
Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.
To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!
Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 ( talk)
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
...is one of the "good hand" edits of a long-term vandal, whose other edits are suppressed because they contain pretty vile examples of outing, harassment, and threats of violence, including rape threats. I don't disagree with your edit, but I thought maybe you should know. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 23:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Good afternoon, if you feel something needs to be sourced, there is no need for you to delete it, you just need to put the following tags: citation needed, citation needed. Tecmo ( talk) 21:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for spotting that. As you surmised, I cut-and-pasted the wrong link. Regards, Newyorkbrad ( talk) 20:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
New to Wikipedia. Thanks for the updates on National Association of Realtors and pushback on the anti-vandalism bot. I had the facts right, but didn't think to use references. Going forward, I will be mindful to use references when changing names. I will also be more conscientious about differentiating minor edits and regular edits. Fbpfdemo ( talk) 01:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you reverted some of the edits made by this editor, he has made hundreds of good faith but unnecessary and inaccurate edits recently by trying to add NIFTY 500 component on every one of the index's constituent companies. Now I don't know how well versed you are with indexes in general but this particular index is not used much in India, and I see no particular reason to specify it on 500 company pages. Not to mention the fact that he's listed them all as NIFTY 500 'component' instead of the universal 'constituent' on all these pages which irks me because I've spent hours trying to ensure consistency on this very topic. I honestly have no clue how to correct so many edits or if they should be corrected at all. I am definitely in favour of reverting these edits but once again, there are hundreds of his edits to revert. You seem to be a very experienced editor and I would like your help in this matter. Thanks Debitpixie 💬 12:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, how can we ensure that users of Wikipedia can easily find "PPL" (which is the name Commonly used name for Phonographic Performance Limited by the Company itself, it's 110,000 members and the 100,000's of License Fee payers)? See their logo. £271.8 million was collected by the in 2019 so they are a Notable Company and it should be easily accessible via the search term "PPL" currently it's not obvious. Do you have any suggestions?
My aim was to include "PPL" in the title as "Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL)" to clarify who they are but as they are commonly known as "PPL" maybe a better title would be "PPL (Phonographic Performance Limited)"?
Thanks for any input. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ888kmg ( talk • contribs) 21:46, August 23, 2020 (UTC)
Requesting a clarification on the stated basis for reversion of edit on Invasion of the Bee Girls (1973) and List of films in the public domain in the United States, which was "registration (of initial 28-year term) was not required; may not have been renewed, and if that's the case it would indeed be PD; but for lack of renewal, not for lack of registration." While that is true under current law, as noted in the U.S.Copyright Office Circular 45 Copyright Registration of Motion Pictures on page 4 states that motion pictures published prior to 1978 had a manditory registration during the initial 28 year period. Also, while the IMDb, Internet Archive, and the wikipedia article state that the film is in the public domain, the AFI Catalog lists the reason, that the film was not registered. Lastly, there is at least one other entry in the List of films in the public domain in the United States with "not registered for copyright", the 1959 Last Clear Chance, that article discusses its public domain status due to failure to register. Lastly, perhaps the commons image needs a better / correct license rather than a violation of copyright claim. Thanks. Deanlaw ( talk) 18:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to remove an addition to the Tonya Harding page that was clearly an add. The addition of the Tonya Harding and Nancy Kerrigan Museum doesn't seem relevant to Tonya Harding herself, the description includes two names of the people who started it, however the "museum" has now turned into a pop culture museum. It's uncomfortable seeing these people promote on Tonya Hardings page, as their names are not relevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.232.212.158 ( talk) 01:21, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Rosemary Clooneys version of White Christmas complete with the verse was played on BBC1 and 2 with Testcard F and Ceefax Pages from 1976-1995 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.230.86 ( talk) 00:17, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
Hi TJRC Thanks for your responses to my edits of the page for David Warren inventor. The reference to the history by Philip Heath should be for page 284 only. I misinterpreted the field titled "pages" as referring to the number of pages in the volume. I'm not sure where to go to fix this - can i get back to the Reference form? ArchivesTGSNSW ( talk) 00:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
TJRC,
Hey, I’m new to wiki editing and appreciate constructive input. I am admittedly confused why you reverted my edits, you noted a lacked a proper citation, which may have been the case but my citation was a link to Cornell law school of the relevant SCOTUS ruling itself? Under Powell vs Alabama Stinney should have been afforded qualified counsel with adequate time to prepare-which he did not receive. No matter what I feel my edits did need some re-wording, but other than the SC case the rest of my edits were purely structural, I did not add new information. OgamD218 ( talk) 16:37, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Alex Shibutani has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.
Just notifying you about an RfC that I opened that relates to a discussion you participated in about the Shibutani ice dance partners. Natg 19 ( talk) 00:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Removed Anitra Ford edit. I added “The Odd Couple” because I actually saw the episode that she was in and looked up her information. That show wasn’t listed in things she had done, so I added it. I didn’t think I had to include a source, since I watched it, and it can also be easily checked simply by going to IMDB.com. But here is the link just in case. https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0285503/bio Also from Bing, https://www.bing.com/k/celebrities/anitra-ford/timeline. 73.39.220.131 ( talk) 05:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC) SB
"Last time" litreally means most recent time, both are synomynous so in no way I changed the meaning of the article, Just search meaning of "Last time", I just prefer last time than most recent time and you just prefer the most recent time even though both are the same, anyway it depends on the opinions on people of how they wanna see something or write something. So that was indeed a minor edit, and you did a mistake calling me out, Anyway I forgive you, Nice talking to you thank you sir! Hope you treat your junior editors better from next time. :) Swtadi143 ( talk) 18:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
I clearly mentioned that was a obvious vandalism with no clear or reliable source. So ofcource I just undid and reverted the version because theres no reliable source so it does come on "minor edit". Swtadi143 ( talk) 18:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Not gonna argue with you about the wording on that part of the Strange Advance article. I mean, yeah, they did end up changing their band name due to the existence of a German band with the same name as their original band name, but it was most probably not due to legal action as was the case of the New Jersey New Wave band Smash Palace, which was actually forced to change their name from Quincy due to legal action from Quincy Jones. Cheers. 136.50.71.144 ( talk) 20:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi I'm confused by your many reverts of my edits to John J. Doll. In going through the list of those who served in the office, I had added little to Doll, for lack of worthy additions. His page had a Notability banner from 2015 attached by a user whose credentials looked impressive to me, and which, while searching for additions, appeared valid. I later attached the same tag to Teresa Stanek Rea, for whom search also yielded little else of note. Holding a public office, in itself, may not lend adequate notability beyond appearing on lists.
I get that you disagree with their notability, and that's fine, but I do not get at all why you chose to steamroller revert perfectly valid copyediting on Doll's page as well. I also disagree with a particular note you left on Doll's reverts: "later consultancy probably isn't even worth mentioning, but certainly not in the lede". Whatever the person currently does is worthy of a sentence, when their professional life is their notability, and current status generally precedes past in the lead... not the lede, which is a publishing term that describes nothing actually done on Wikipedia. (PS what lead? It's a stub.) 98.13.210.103 ( talk) 19:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)