A tag has been placed on Slut smut, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Iain99 18:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Slut smut, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
WebHamster
18:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
List of Tetris variants, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Marasmusine
21:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Since you're not going to enter a discussion about which Tetris variants you object to the removal of, are still going against concensus, continuing to place back external links (against our WP:External links / WP:Spam guides), unverified information and removing references, it's very difficult for me to understand why you keep reverting. I don't know how many times I've asked you to read the relevent Wikipedia policies. Again, here's another chance for you to tell me which entries you think belong in the list without reverting it.
PicTiles? No notability, no independent references, only an external link to their website. Spam, it get's removed. Same for Eqtris and Vertris and so on. We are (still) not a web directory. Care to elaborate? Why would you want to add these spam links again?
I'll also point out that I consider calling my edit 'trolling' a personal attack, please read WP:NPA. Marasmusine 06:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Dearest Sweet Winged One,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to
Hirohisat,
Wizardman, and
Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.
This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sweet Winged One for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Marasmusine ( talk) 08:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Slut smut, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Iain99 18:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Slut smut, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our
policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
WebHamster
18:55, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
List of Tetris variants, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Marasmusine
21:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Since you're not going to enter a discussion about which Tetris variants you object to the removal of, are still going against concensus, continuing to place back external links (against our WP:External links / WP:Spam guides), unverified information and removing references, it's very difficult for me to understand why you keep reverting. I don't know how many times I've asked you to read the relevent Wikipedia policies. Again, here's another chance for you to tell me which entries you think belong in the list without reverting it.
PicTiles? No notability, no independent references, only an external link to their website. Spam, it get's removed. Same for Eqtris and Vertris and so on. We are (still) not a web directory. Care to elaborate? Why would you want to add these spam links again?
I'll also point out that I consider calling my edit 'trolling' a personal attack, please read WP:NPA. Marasmusine 06:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Dearest Sweet Winged One,
Thank you for your participation in
my RFA, which closed successfully with 96 supports, 1 oppose, and 3 neutrals. No matter if you !voted support, oppose, neutral, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm a new admin remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them. I would like to give a special shout out to
Hirohisat,
Wizardman, and
Husond, for there original co-nominations. Thank you once again and good day.
This RFA thanks was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks. So unfortunatly this is not entirely my own design.
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sweet Winged One for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Marasmusine ( talk) 08:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)