![]() |
Hi SvetiNikolay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Kubrat, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk)
14:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, SvetiNikolay,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk)
14:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I have only 1 account which I recently registered. I attempted dispute only on ONE of the articles which you familiar with,but you did not respond to my dispute. About the Kubrat change, I did it with this account and only with it. I am not quiet sure what do you mean if I am cooperating with other people on requesting edit or editing. I have only 1 account,and the dispute on the Bulgars article you can see my IP on it,i did not register my account yet. So your statement is false. I do everything myself with 1 account only. Take that into consideration. Thanks
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your
recent edits appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk)
16:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kubrat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 15:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi SvetiNikolay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Kubrat, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk)
14:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, SvetiNikolay,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk)
14:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
I have only 1 account which I recently registered. I attempted dispute only on ONE of the articles which you familiar with,but you did not respond to my dispute. About the Kubrat change, I did it with this account and only with it. I am not quiet sure what do you mean if I am cooperating with other people on requesting edit or editing. I have only 1 account,and the dispute on the Bulgars article you can see my IP on it,i did not register my account yet. So your statement is false. I do everything myself with 1 account only. Take that into consideration. Thanks
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your
recent edits appear to be
intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally
unpopular way, are highly
disruptive and can lead to a
block or
ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through
dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you.
Jingiby (
talk)
16:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kubrat. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 15:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)