Dear Editors:

My name is Susan Peabody. I tried to promote my own work on Wikepedia and was blocked from using my sand by an editor. I went to the guidelines for being unblocked and it said to go to the bottom of the my talk page and make an appeal. Unfortunately the editor deleted my account and now I cannot log in to anything to make an appeal. Is it possible to get my sandbox back so I can appeal the block. I did not understand fully what Wikepedia wants and so I made a mistake. I believe in second chances I hope you do. Thank you.

Dear Editors:

I was told to go to the talk page of the editor who banned me and I was unable to get his name because he deleted my account. Can I get my account back so I can appeal. I think his name was Huron. He was very frustrated with me because I would not do what he said which to stop trying to help people by promoting myself and that I was not notable enough to get a bio. Right now all I want to do is provide some additional information to the cultural aspects of love addiction which cites my book. I have two more examples of love addiction in are culture. These are FACTS and not my opinion as Huron suggested. I am enoying all the people I am meeting at Wikepedia by hanging around and trying to please you. Susan Peabody

Another cultural example of love addiction is Tristan and Isolde is a tale made popular during the 12th century through Anglo-Norman literature, inspired by Celtic legend, particularly the stories of Deirdre and Naoise and Diarmuid Ua Duibhne and Gráinne. It has become an influential romance and tragedy, retold in numerous sources with many variations. The tragic story is of the adulterous love between the Cornish knight Tristan (Tristram) and the Irish princess Iseult (Isolde, Yseult, etc.). The narrative predates and most likely influenced the romance of Lancelot and Guinevere in the Matter of Britain and has had a substantial impact on Western art, the idea of romantic love, and Western literature since it first appeared in the 12th century. While the details of the story differ from one author to another, the overall plot structure remains much the same.

From Wikepedia

I think editing is more fun than writing for Wikepedia. You have a lot of typos I have noticed. If I promise to behave myself can I become an editor. Do you pay? Is it ok to be nice to people. LOL

P.S. The squeaky wheel does not always get the grease. Sometimes the wagon breaks down and gets discarded at the side of the road.

I am exhausted and going to bed. If you want to contact me my email susapeabody@gmail.com

If this gets deleted by Heron thank you all for the hard work you do on this board. God bless us all as Tiny Tim said in Charles's Dickens, "The Christmas Carol." Another fact . . . I will check in tomorrow. My husband is mad because I have been on the computer all day, but I fell in love with your Tea Room where all the other authors are complaining about being rejected.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Susan Anderson/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 02:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello! Susan Anderson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Susan Anderson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JustaZBguy ( talk) 23:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC) reply