![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for making a report at
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only
block users if they have received a recent final
warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you.
Jmlk
1
7
09:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't think that the Chris Lawrence page needed to be fixed because i personally have the same thoughts. I can only hope that I could do those things - don't you? I think it was good for someone who does the same thing as me to write that cause it makes me happy (Im a guy who loves that certain guy that the page is all about). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.213.110 ( talk) 09:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
huh? - superβεεcat 01:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I know better... But, it seems that some editors scurried in and made articles because of the existence of a photo before. I was hoping the same thing would happen with those particular cartridge pages. I may go back and write stub articles for those titles later today. Guess I can't be lazy, huh? TeamZissou 20:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Huh? :) Cheers. -- Rrburke( talk) 22:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I didn't notice the spam links at the bottom of the page my first time through: this should really be {{db-spam}}ed, IMO -- Rrburke( talk) 01:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Quasi-Realist, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi-Realist. Thank you. SCOCSOOCSOSC 22:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Quasi-Realist is an acual term...it is not too well known but it does exist and has been used by certain specialists (expert critics...noted reviews) on the net and in the media to describe certain slasher movies that are deemed believeable and not seen as surreal made up nonsense. Please don't let this be removed...it is freeing up the slasher film section and is category that overlaps into other genres of films -- SCOCSOOCSOSC 22:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
My sources on Quasi-Realist & Backwoods Slasher came from magzines such as Empire booklets on Horror a book by clive barker about the various sections on horror, a profile on fictional psychos and numerous other entertainment books featuring on the subject of these specfic motion pictures, a fair parcentage aimed at film students. Websites who delve into deep exminations on specfic horror films such as HysteriaLives, Terror Trap, badmovieplanet, diabolical dominon, slasherpool and numerous crtical anylasises at internet movie database to name but a few. All of which have shown that both articles need to be taken into account as they have enough resonable information as too make them feesable subjects that would have some certain uses for those who log on to this site. Besides have some bases on specfic factural matterial that i have gained from writeups featured throughout the web and book industry. There are also vast and crew on set interviews who have state what sort of particular motion pictures these are that they are working on and they have been deemed these titles to avoid confusion and seperate what their work from other formats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SCOCSOOCSOSC ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Yandamoori. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Mhking
01:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Are you interested in running at some point in the future? -- Dweller 09:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being
uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia.
QQ MORE NOOB
09:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Why have u tagged brynmawr comprehensive school What was wrong with it ???
What was wrongh with what I wrote ??
(note this user was vandalblocked)
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot
21:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Disambiguation pages do not get speedy deleted for lack of context, which these have. -- NE2 00:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I've tried to add History of Smoking per the instructions on WP:AFD, but the reason I provided for deletion is showing while the title of the section is not. I'm making your entry confusing. Help? Buzzmeow. TeamZissou 10:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Um, why is there a warning tag on my talk page? I didn't create the page...so...does it go over on User:Naacats page? Thanks for getting it to work, though. TeamZissou 10:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for being one of the best Wikipedians I've worked with...er...has fixed something I messed up. Cheers to you.
TeamZissou 11:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I am getting seriously fed up with deleting this, so have sent it to AfD to get a clear consensus to delete & salt it. The user who keeps reposting it has ignored so many whacks with the cluestick, I think that's the only way it'll sink in. — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Nominating mathematical quilts for speedy deletion was definitely not one of the better edits I've seen. If an article is clumsily written, that's a reason to improve it, not to delete it. It certainly wasn't lacking in sufficient context---everybody knows what a quilt is. Michael Hardy 22:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I've looked again. It was poorly written but it certainly did not lack context. Michael Hardy 21:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Please be aware that CSD criterion G4 only applies to articles that were deleted following an articles for deletion discussion. Previously speedily deleted or prodded articles cannot be speedily deleted under G4, although the original deletion reason usually applies. In the case of PumpTop TV, the recreated article was also a copyright violation and I have deleted it for that reason. Natalie 21:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for making a report at
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only
block users if they have received a recent final
warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you.
Jmlk
1
7
09:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't think that the Chris Lawrence page needed to be fixed because i personally have the same thoughts. I can only hope that I could do those things - don't you? I think it was good for someone who does the same thing as me to write that cause it makes me happy (Im a guy who loves that certain guy that the page is all about). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.213.110 ( talk) 09:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
huh? - superβεεcat 01:32, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I know better... But, it seems that some editors scurried in and made articles because of the existence of a photo before. I was hoping the same thing would happen with those particular cartridge pages. I may go back and write stub articles for those titles later today. Guess I can't be lazy, huh? TeamZissou 20:48, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Huh? :) Cheers. -- Rrburke( talk) 22:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
I didn't notice the spam links at the bottom of the page my first time through: this should really be {{db-spam}}ed, IMO -- Rrburke( talk) 01:31, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Quasi-Realist, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi-Realist. Thank you. SCOCSOOCSOSC 22:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Quasi-Realist is an acual term...it is not too well known but it does exist and has been used by certain specialists (expert critics...noted reviews) on the net and in the media to describe certain slasher movies that are deemed believeable and not seen as surreal made up nonsense. Please don't let this be removed...it is freeing up the slasher film section and is category that overlaps into other genres of films -- SCOCSOOCSOSC 22:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
My sources on Quasi-Realist & Backwoods Slasher came from magzines such as Empire booklets on Horror a book by clive barker about the various sections on horror, a profile on fictional psychos and numerous other entertainment books featuring on the subject of these specfic motion pictures, a fair parcentage aimed at film students. Websites who delve into deep exminations on specfic horror films such as HysteriaLives, Terror Trap, badmovieplanet, diabolical dominon, slasherpool and numerous crtical anylasises at internet movie database to name but a few. All of which have shown that both articles need to be taken into account as they have enough resonable information as too make them feesable subjects that would have some certain uses for those who log on to this site. Besides have some bases on specfic factural matterial that i have gained from writeups featured throughout the web and book industry. There are also vast and crew on set interviews who have state what sort of particular motion pictures these are that they are working on and they have been deemed these titles to avoid confusion and seperate what their work from other formats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SCOCSOOCSOSC ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
Yandamoori. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Mhking
01:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Are you interested in running at some point in the future? -- Dweller 09:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Please
assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Please stop being
uncivil to your fellow editors; instead, assume that they are here to improve Wikipedia.
QQ MORE NOOB
09:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Why have u tagged brynmawr comprehensive school What was wrong with it ???
What was wrongh with what I wrote ??
(note this user was vandalblocked)
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot
21:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. Disambiguation pages do not get speedy deleted for lack of context, which these have. -- NE2 00:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I've tried to add History of Smoking per the instructions on WP:AFD, but the reason I provided for deletion is showing while the title of the section is not. I'm making your entry confusing. Help? Buzzmeow. TeamZissou 10:18, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Um, why is there a warning tag on my talk page? I didn't create the page...so...does it go over on User:Naacats page? Thanks for getting it to work, though. TeamZissou 10:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for being one of the best Wikipedians I've worked with...er...has fixed something I messed up. Cheers to you.
TeamZissou 11:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I am getting seriously fed up with deleting this, so have sent it to AfD to get a clear consensus to delete & salt it. The user who keeps reposting it has ignored so many whacks with the cluestick, I think that's the only way it'll sink in. — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Nominating mathematical quilts for speedy deletion was definitely not one of the better edits I've seen. If an article is clumsily written, that's a reason to improve it, not to delete it. It certainly wasn't lacking in sufficient context---everybody knows what a quilt is. Michael Hardy 22:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I've looked again. It was poorly written but it certainly did not lack context. Michael Hardy 21:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Please be aware that CSD criterion G4 only applies to articles that were deleted following an articles for deletion discussion. Previously speedily deleted or prodded articles cannot be speedily deleted under G4, although the original deletion reason usually applies. In the case of PumpTop TV, the recreated article was also a copyright violation and I have deleted it for that reason. Natalie 21:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)