![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello, SuperWIKI, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of Kamen Rider Kuuga characters, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! S Philbrick (Talk) 13:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of Kamen Rider Kuuga characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://brainmusic-movie.blogspot.com/2010/02/kamen-rider-kuuga-2000-japan.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{
self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Army North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert C. Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to
List of active duty United States four-star officers, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history, as well as helping prevent
edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - wolf 19:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! -
wolf
19:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi SuperWIKI! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -
wolf
19:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
In light of your recent editing difficulties, I hope you find these notices and links they contain useful. In the future, if you have any questions, (ie: your recent struggles with with markup and tables) you can consult the Help Desk. - wolf 19:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, see WP:INDENT for how we reply to comments on talk pages, and the replies in this thread for an example; each beginning with an increasing number of colons.
Lastly, I noted the " ping" you attempted to add to Neovu79's talk page. Just a quick note about that; first, pings on the user's talk page are entirely unnecessary, since we already receive a notification for any changes made to all our of user pages. Even if you add a message, then immediately decide to delete, that will result in two notifications, one for the message, one for the removal. This applies to all user pages; user, user talk, sandbox, etc. You can ping someone else however, ie: ping user x on user y's talk page. You also added the ping incorrectly. You need to use the correct template (at the beginning of your post) and add your signature (at the end) at the same time, or else it won't work. I usually use the template {{Yo|username}}, which produces @username, but you will see a list of templates, along with instructions, on the Template:Reply to page. - wolf 16:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, I'm done with it. Now all I need is some consensus, but I cynically doubt it will receive attention on that talk page. SuperWIKI ( talk) 09:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I think the lead should be changed and expanded, wrt to numbers. If you take a look at General (United States)#Statutory limits, it discusses the numbers of flag/general officers for each branch, the % of 3&4 stars, and actual cap numbers of 4 star. There are also exemptions; JCS & staff, UCC, Dir. of CIA, CO of Forces Korea, etc. (and I think this plays a factor in your current lead numbers) A lot of this info is already included on the list of 4 stars, but after the table. Anyway, on your actual table, you have; Army 37, MC 15, USN 29, AF 30, SF 5, CG 4 & PH 1 but combinded DoD/Joint/UCC 45, for a total of 166. (perhaps postions that are exemptions should be marked with a symbol and/or colored background?) Anyway... some food for thought. - wolf 14:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Thewolfchild: Sorry to bother you, but that offer you made me to turn raw info into table markup? I'm ready to take you up on it. Right now, I have the table for the most recent pending appointments for two-star officers in the U.S. Armed Forces, and I think it would be helpful to turn the raw info extracted from the Department of Defense releases into the table code, if you're interested. May I request your help in this? P.S. There is hidden text code in the table that should help you organize a bit, plus Service logos (second-last column) should already be present in the test page. I can find citations by myself, but the last column would benefit from finding the Senate nomination url and citing them, with appropriate record and date. Hope you are doing well! Best wishes and greatest regards SuperWIKI ( talk) 17:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
{od}Here's some resources I found. Dunno if they'll come in handy or not, but thought I'd pass them along; [1], [2], [3], [4] & [5] Cheers - wolf 03:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
List of active duty United States rear admirals. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
13:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Thewolfchild: Would like to inform you that I just finished the baseline for this whopper right here: List of active duty United States Army major generals. You're welcome to read and comment here as always! SuperWIKI ( talk) 13:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This is in recognition of all the work you've put into creating lists of General and Flag Officers of the United States Armed Forces. Cheers -
wolf
11:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, SuperWIKI,
Thank you for creating List of active duty United States Army major generals.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
That was a very good article to read, lot of work must have went in there, thanks
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 17:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Joseywales1961: Going to bed so I'll handle it tomorrow. Can't see any tags but it's probably bc I'm on mobile, right? Don't worry, that's only the majority complete, the page is only missing the posts that take more effort to find. Thank you! SuperWIKI ( talk) 17:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
I just wanted to give you a heads up, I had to blank out your list of rear admirals for the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, as it was not accurate. Every one of those PHS officers/positions are one-star rear admirals and not two-star. The PHS uses the abbreviation RADM for both their one-star and two-star rear admirals and not RDML for their one-stars. The heads of service corps within the commissioned corps are either captains or one-star rear admirals. The PHS normally appoints officers with two-stars if they are appointed as heads of certain agencies within the HHS, i.e. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration, Indian Health Service, National Institutes of Health, etc. Neovu79 ( talk) 05:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey SW, when EPMen asked you about doing one-star lists, I found myself wondering if the number of one-star officers is equal to the number of one-star positions. Iow, must there be a specific billet for an O-6 to be promoted to? Or are there Brigadiers and Rear Admirals (lh) at large? (perhaps Neovu79 knows?) Anyway, keep up the good work. Cheers - wolf 06:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Just curious why you went with "major generals" instead of "two-star generals", as all the other list articles use "four-star" and "three-star". Was that a conscious choice? - wolf 04:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active duty United States Air Force major generals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Combined Forces Command.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas J. Robb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flight Surgeon Badge.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active duty United States Army major generals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Boyd.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Do you have a ref for this change. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 21:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Lundy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army War College.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Apparently, the USCG also has got the grade of Command Senior Chief Petty Officer (Silver Badge), see here: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCG/bulletins/2bf8f3d Thanks, 2001:7E8:C681:7A01:A8CA:A11C:A950:AF2D ( talk) 20:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Thewolfchild: I might need some help here, I have no idea how to handle this. An IP user has been making good faith edits that, while helpful in some areas, also has some problems with markup and clarity of language, including removing specific details on educational degrees and specific years of assignments. How do I handle this? SuperWIKI ( talk) 07:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
If they don't respond, but continue to edit the page, then you have two options; 1) if the edits clearly do not benefit the article (ie: vandalism), then warn them, using the vandalism or disruptive editing templates found on twinkle. If they continue despite 3 or 4 warnings, report them to AIV. 2) If their edits are basically just in opposition to yours, (making it a content dispute), then file a report at ANI, indicating they refuse to engage despite all your attempts. Lastly, this is just my opinion, others may differ. Since you specifically pinged me, I won't be able to be involved directly, as it would make this a canvassing violation, but feel free to ping again me if you have any more questions. Cheers - wolf 18:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Have you started work on it as a draft yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EPMen ( talk • contribs) 02:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Simerly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Lee.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
List of United States Air Force four-star generals into
Draft:List of United States Air Force three-star generals since 2010. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Also on List of United States Space Force three-star generals.— Diannaa ( talk) 13:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Military Barnstar | |
For your tireless contributions to military-related Wikipedia articles! –– FORMALDUDE( talk) 16:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC) |
I can't seem to find anything, perhaps you might with your activity in US military related articles: are Michael Minihan and Kenneth Minihan related? Connormah ( talk) 17:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
If you're willing to set this function up, I have some further documented details with refs on a very, unfortunately, obscure and non-important part of Zumwalt's tour as CNO. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 08:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John D. Alexander (admiral), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's College.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. What does "non-separated" mean? And slapping a template on an article is not very helpful. You might consider {{ sofixit}}. Thanks ♦ Lingzhi.Random ( talk) 15:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of Naval Operations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wainwright.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
I see that you beat me to this. I'm very surprised that she accepted a direct commission. She could have just served in office as a civilian. Neovu79 ( talk) 15:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
On the topic of Lance K. Landrum, a U.S. Air Force lieutenant general, you reverted my edits after you stated that Wiki policy says that ranks' images shouldn't be included in the infobox. From what I've found, many well-known articles include an image of the rank in the infobox, including George Patton, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Omar Bradley.
You stated that military rank should not be included as an honorific prefix, but I have seen it used in many other articles, such as for Dwight Eisenhower, Omar Bradley, Chester Nimitz, and Douglas MacArthur. All of the aforementioned articles are widely visited and edited, and many are featured articles, which are meant to be used as an example for how new articles should look.
Could you please explain these discrepancies? Many thanks. Gunwriter ( talk) 21:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
I had replied to your question (it's not there anymore, but I figured you've seen the ping), anyway... one other thought I had is you could try posting at WT:MILHIST. There's not nearly as much drama as there is at ANI, and the articles you're concerned about fall under that wikiproject, so the editors are more likely to respond and even help you directly. Good luck - wolf 19:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Have added to your sandbox3, if you don't mind. KingEdinburgh ( talk) 10:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Well Hello ! Lol. I come in peace ! A random thought of my elementary schools name popped into my head one day. And i said “hmm let me see if he was a good guy lol” not that it matters any more! I found out some cool stuff on his wiki page. Seen he had a couple buildings name after him. Not sure if its just me being proud lol. But i do want to mention he also does have a school named after him in the town he was Born in , Beacon NY ! 😁 68.198.121.242 ( talk) 14:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you may have added
public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Coast Guard Atlantic Area. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
19:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I have looked up and down Google for references of the three tombstone vice admirals and cannot verify that the were promoted upon retirement. Do you have sources for them? Neovu79 ( talk) 22:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of the United States Army Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Staff.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SuperWIKI
Thank you for creating List of United States Army three-star generals from 1990 to 1999.
User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Excellent list article. Loved the succinct, informative lead. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 16:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SuperWIKI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Charles W. Martoglio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Military Barnstar | |
For your continued dedication and contributions to military-related Wikipedia articles! –– Neovu79 ( talk) 07:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, SuperWIKI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of United States Army three-star generals since 2020, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Did you find the answer you needed to this question? I'm not sure what you're looking for but the timeline looks fine to me.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Just noticed that for the 4 star list, designated position is on the left and current position is on the right. For the 3 star and 2 star lists, the current position is on the left and the designated position is on the right, which I find less confusing. Is re-ordering the "list of pending appointments" section on the 4 star list to make it consistent with the others something you'd be willing to do? Or is there a reason it's the way it is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EPMen ( talk • contribs) 01:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active duty United States senior enlisted leaders and advisors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camp Johnson.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks like Nowell is retiring Friday with Cheeseman succeeding him per the latest Navy flag officer roster. RADM Bill Byrne also retired. Other changes too.
Just found a lot of changes in terms of which selects have been promoted. Didn't want to make the edits myself since I'm terrible at formatting.
https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/march/marine-corps-general-officers-and-senior-enlisted-leaders — Preceding unsigned comment added by EPMen ( talk • contribs) 14:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Re: List of United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps four-star admirals, your edit show here, which reverted my edit shown here may have been misinterpreted.
Your edit summary of "Per style in other lists, the numbering is intended to be a tally format, with names unmentioned." would indicate you though my edit which changed the phrasing from
One,
James O. Mason, was already an officer in the regular corps...
back to the original phrasing of
One was already an officer in the regular corps...
decreased the readability of the article such that way they reader has to hover/jump to the piped link to find out that officer's name. My edit was not intended to sequence the officers in any way, but was an attempt to improve the grammar, as I indicated in my edit summary. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Hello, SuperWIKI, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of Kamen Rider Kuuga characters, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! S Philbrick (Talk) 13:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of Kamen Rider Kuuga characters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://brainmusic-movie.blogspot.com/2010/02/kamen-rider-kuuga-2000-japan.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{
self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{
Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 ( T· C) 22:00, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:EMK-Ix WoAAeZSr.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:52, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States Army North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albert C. Smith. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:23, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to
List of active duty United States four-star officers, please use the
preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history, as well as helping prevent
edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - wolf 19:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! -
wolf
19:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi SuperWIKI! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -
wolf
19:23, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
In light of your recent editing difficulties, I hope you find these notices and links they contain useful. In the future, if you have any questions, (ie: your recent struggles with with markup and tables) you can consult the Help Desk. - wolf 19:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, see WP:INDENT for how we reply to comments on talk pages, and the replies in this thread for an example; each beginning with an increasing number of colons.
Lastly, I noted the " ping" you attempted to add to Neovu79's talk page. Just a quick note about that; first, pings on the user's talk page are entirely unnecessary, since we already receive a notification for any changes made to all our of user pages. Even if you add a message, then immediately decide to delete, that will result in two notifications, one for the message, one for the removal. This applies to all user pages; user, user talk, sandbox, etc. You can ping someone else however, ie: ping user x on user y's talk page. You also added the ping incorrectly. You need to use the correct template (at the beginning of your post) and add your signature (at the end) at the same time, or else it won't work. I usually use the template {{Yo|username}}, which produces @username, but you will see a list of templates, along with instructions, on the Template:Reply to page. - wolf 16:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Well, I'm done with it. Now all I need is some consensus, but I cynically doubt it will receive attention on that talk page. SuperWIKI ( talk) 09:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I think the lead should be changed and expanded, wrt to numbers. If you take a look at General (United States)#Statutory limits, it discusses the numbers of flag/general officers for each branch, the % of 3&4 stars, and actual cap numbers of 4 star. There are also exemptions; JCS & staff, UCC, Dir. of CIA, CO of Forces Korea, etc. (and I think this plays a factor in your current lead numbers) A lot of this info is already included on the list of 4 stars, but after the table. Anyway, on your actual table, you have; Army 37, MC 15, USN 29, AF 30, SF 5, CG 4 & PH 1 but combinded DoD/Joint/UCC 45, for a total of 166. (perhaps postions that are exemptions should be marked with a symbol and/or colored background?) Anyway... some food for thought. - wolf 14:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Thewolfchild: Sorry to bother you, but that offer you made me to turn raw info into table markup? I'm ready to take you up on it. Right now, I have the table for the most recent pending appointments for two-star officers in the U.S. Armed Forces, and I think it would be helpful to turn the raw info extracted from the Department of Defense releases into the table code, if you're interested. May I request your help in this? P.S. There is hidden text code in the table that should help you organize a bit, plus Service logos (second-last column) should already be present in the test page. I can find citations by myself, but the last column would benefit from finding the Senate nomination url and citing them, with appropriate record and date. Hope you are doing well! Best wishes and greatest regards SuperWIKI ( talk) 17:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
{od}Here's some resources I found. Dunno if they'll come in handy or not, but thought I'd pass them along; [1], [2], [3], [4] & [5] Cheers - wolf 03:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
List of active duty United States rear admirals. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
13:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Thewolfchild: Would like to inform you that I just finished the baseline for this whopper right here: List of active duty United States Army major generals. You're welcome to read and comment here as always! SuperWIKI ( talk) 13:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
This is in recognition of all the work you've put into creating lists of General and Flag Officers of the United States Armed Forces. Cheers -
wolf
11:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, SuperWIKI,
Thank you for creating List of active duty United States Army major generals.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
That was a very good article to read, lot of work must have went in there, thanks
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 17:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Joseywales1961: Going to bed so I'll handle it tomorrow. Can't see any tags but it's probably bc I'm on mobile, right? Don't worry, that's only the majority complete, the page is only missing the posts that take more effort to find. Thank you! SuperWIKI ( talk) 17:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
I just wanted to give you a heads up, I had to blank out your list of rear admirals for the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, as it was not accurate. Every one of those PHS officers/positions are one-star rear admirals and not two-star. The PHS uses the abbreviation RADM for both their one-star and two-star rear admirals and not RDML for their one-stars. The heads of service corps within the commissioned corps are either captains or one-star rear admirals. The PHS normally appoints officers with two-stars if they are appointed as heads of certain agencies within the HHS, i.e. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Food and Drug Administration, Indian Health Service, National Institutes of Health, etc. Neovu79 ( talk) 05:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hey SW, when EPMen asked you about doing one-star lists, I found myself wondering if the number of one-star officers is equal to the number of one-star positions. Iow, must there be a specific billet for an O-6 to be promoted to? Or are there Brigadiers and Rear Admirals (lh) at large? (perhaps Neovu79 knows?) Anyway, keep up the good work. Cheers - wolf 06:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Just curious why you went with "major generals" instead of "two-star generals", as all the other list articles use "four-star" and "three-star". Was that a conscious choice? - wolf 04:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active duty United States Air Force major generals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Combined Forces Command.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Douglas J. Robb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flight Surgeon Badge.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active duty United States Army major generals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Boyd.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Do you have a ref for this change. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 21:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Lundy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army War College.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi! Apparently, the USCG also has got the grade of Command Senior Chief Petty Officer (Silver Badge), see here: https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCG/bulletins/2bf8f3d Thanks, 2001:7E8:C681:7A01:A8CA:A11C:A950:AF2D ( talk) 20:48, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Thewolfchild: I might need some help here, I have no idea how to handle this. An IP user has been making good faith edits that, while helpful in some areas, also has some problems with markup and clarity of language, including removing specific details on educational degrees and specific years of assignments. How do I handle this? SuperWIKI ( talk) 07:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
If they don't respond, but continue to edit the page, then you have two options; 1) if the edits clearly do not benefit the article (ie: vandalism), then warn them, using the vandalism or disruptive editing templates found on twinkle. If they continue despite 3 or 4 warnings, report them to AIV. 2) If their edits are basically just in opposition to yours, (making it a content dispute), then file a report at ANI, indicating they refuse to engage despite all your attempts. Lastly, this is just my opinion, others may differ. Since you specifically pinged me, I won't be able to be involved directly, as it would make this a canvassing violation, but feel free to ping again me if you have any more questions. Cheers - wolf 18:37, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Have you started work on it as a draft yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EPMen ( talk • contribs) 02:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Simerly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort Lee.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
List of United States Air Force four-star generals into
Draft:List of United States Air Force three-star generals since 2010. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:06, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Also on List of United States Space Force three-star generals.— Diannaa ( talk) 13:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Military Barnstar | |
For your tireless contributions to military-related Wikipedia articles! –– FORMALDUDE( talk) 16:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC) |
I can't seem to find anything, perhaps you might with your activity in US military related articles: are Michael Minihan and Kenneth Minihan related? Connormah ( talk) 17:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
If you're willing to set this function up, I have some further documented details with refs on a very, unfortunately, obscure and non-important part of Zumwalt's tour as CNO. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 08:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John D. Alexander (admiral), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King's College.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Hi. What does "non-separated" mean? And slapping a template on an article is not very helpful. You might consider {{ sofixit}}. Thanks ♦ Lingzhi.Random ( talk) 15:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of Naval Operations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wainwright.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
I see that you beat me to this. I'm very surprised that she accepted a direct commission. She could have just served in office as a civilian. Neovu79 ( talk) 15:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
On the topic of Lance K. Landrum, a U.S. Air Force lieutenant general, you reverted my edits after you stated that Wiki policy says that ranks' images shouldn't be included in the infobox. From what I've found, many well-known articles include an image of the rank in the infobox, including George Patton, Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Omar Bradley.
You stated that military rank should not be included as an honorific prefix, but I have seen it used in many other articles, such as for Dwight Eisenhower, Omar Bradley, Chester Nimitz, and Douglas MacArthur. All of the aforementioned articles are widely visited and edited, and many are featured articles, which are meant to be used as an example for how new articles should look.
Could you please explain these discrepancies? Many thanks. Gunwriter ( talk) 21:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
I had replied to your question (it's not there anymore, but I figured you've seen the ping), anyway... one other thought I had is you could try posting at WT:MILHIST. There's not nearly as much drama as there is at ANI, and the articles you're concerned about fall under that wikiproject, so the editors are more likely to respond and even help you directly. Good luck - wolf 19:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Have added to your sandbox3, if you don't mind. KingEdinburgh ( talk) 10:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Well Hello ! Lol. I come in peace ! A random thought of my elementary schools name popped into my head one day. And i said “hmm let me see if he was a good guy lol” not that it matters any more! I found out some cool stuff on his wiki page. Seen he had a couple buildings name after him. Not sure if its just me being proud lol. But i do want to mention he also does have a school named after him in the town he was Born in , Beacon NY ! 😁 68.198.121.242 ( talk) 14:18, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. It seems that you may have added
public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as
Coast Guard Atlantic Area. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia
guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at
Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an
attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
19:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
I have looked up and down Google for references of the three tombstone vice admirals and cannot verify that the were promoted upon retirement. Do you have sources for them? Neovu79 ( talk) 22:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chief of the United States Army Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Staff.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SuperWIKI
Thank you for creating List of United States Army three-star generals from 1990 to 1999.
User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Excellent list article. Loved the succinct, informative lead. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Onel5969 TT me 16:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SuperWIKI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Charles W. Martoglio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 09:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Military Barnstar | |
For your continued dedication and contributions to military-related Wikipedia articles! –– Neovu79 ( talk) 07:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC) |
Hello, SuperWIKI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:List of United States Army three-star generals since 2020, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Did you find the answer you needed to this question? I'm not sure what you're looking for but the timeline looks fine to me.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Just noticed that for the 4 star list, designated position is on the left and current position is on the right. For the 3 star and 2 star lists, the current position is on the left and the designated position is on the right, which I find less confusing. Is re-ordering the "list of pending appointments" section on the 4 star list to make it consistent with the others something you'd be willing to do? Or is there a reason it's the way it is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EPMen ( talk • contribs) 01:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active duty United States senior enlisted leaders and advisors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camp Johnson.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks like Nowell is retiring Friday with Cheeseman succeeding him per the latest Navy flag officer roster. RADM Bill Byrne also retired. Other changes too.
Just found a lot of changes in terms of which selects have been promoted. Didn't want to make the edits myself since I'm terrible at formatting.
https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2022/march/marine-corps-general-officers-and-senior-enlisted-leaders — Preceding unsigned comment added by EPMen ( talk • contribs) 14:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Re: List of United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps four-star admirals, your edit show here, which reverted my edit shown here may have been misinterpreted.
Your edit summary of "Per style in other lists, the numbering is intended to be a tally format, with names unmentioned." would indicate you though my edit which changed the phrasing from
One,
James O. Mason, was already an officer in the regular corps...
back to the original phrasing of
One was already an officer in the regular corps...
decreased the readability of the article such that way they reader has to hover/jump to the piped link to find out that officer's name. My edit was not intended to sequence the officers in any way, but was an attempt to improve the grammar, as I indicated in my edit summary. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)