This user may have left Wikipedia. Lingzhi.Random has not edited Wikipedia since 7 October 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
An editor says that something is wrong with this page. That editor can't be troubled to fix it, but can sleep easy knowing that they stuck on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly why it's there. |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
The Content Creativity Barnstar | ||
In appreciation of your content work. Keep in touch! —— Serial 15:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC) |
Every once in a while, I have a TFA, happy that it was also a tribute to Brian, in great collaboration, fine Main page, and see also. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/James Longstreet/archive1 is in need of additional reviewers. It requires a source review and would benefit from at least one additional general review. If you are interested, please feel free to leave a review of the article. Thank you. Display name 99 ( talk) 00:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Worldbruce: Thanks for your help! It's awesome… Now it's time for me to sleep... ♦ Lingzhi.Random ( talk) 17:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Season's Greetings | ||
Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022 Fowler&fowler «Talk» 21:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC) |
Nollaig shona duit
|
||
To Lingzhi, wising you and yours the very best for the holiday season and new year. Ceoil ( talk) 20:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between October and December 2021.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 19:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Best wishes for the holidays | ||
Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season, and here's hoping 2023 won't bring as much global trauma as 2020, the worse 2021 [2] & fecking 2022! Ceoil ( talk) 04:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2022.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 06:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Hi. Could you take a look at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T348906? It appears there's some problematic interaction between reviewsourcecheck-sb.js and the Who Wrote That extension. RoySmith (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Battle of Red Cliffs for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. a455bcd9 (Antoine) ( talk) 15:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. Lingzhi.Random has not edited Wikipedia since 7 October 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
An editor says that something is wrong with this page. That editor can't be troubled to fix it, but can sleep easy knowing that they stuck on a tag. Please allow this tag to languish indefinitely at the top of the page, since nobody knows exactly why it's there. |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Barkeep49 ( talk) 15:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
The Content Creativity Barnstar | ||
In appreciation of your content work. Keep in touch! —— Serial 15:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC) |
Every once in a while, I have a TFA, happy that it was also a tribute to Brian, in great collaboration, fine Main page, and see also. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 14:05, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/James Longstreet/archive1 is in need of additional reviewers. It requires a source review and would benefit from at least one additional general review. If you are interested, please feel free to leave a review of the article. Thank you. Display name 99 ( talk) 00:13, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
@ Worldbruce: Thanks for your help! It's awesome… Now it's time for me to sleep... ♦ Lingzhi.Random ( talk) 17:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Season's Greetings | ||
Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022 Fowler&fowler «Talk» 21:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC) |
Nollaig shona duit
|
||
To Lingzhi, wising you and yours the very best for the holiday season and new year. Ceoil ( talk) 20:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC) |
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between October and December 2021.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 19:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:42, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Best wishes for the holidays | ||
Wishing you and yours the best over the holiday season, and here's hoping 2023 won't bring as much global trauma as 2020, the worse 2021 [2] & fecking 2022! Ceoil ( talk) 04:14, 23 December 2022 (UTC) |
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 1 review between January and March 2022.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 06:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Hi. Could you take a look at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T348906? It appears there's some problematic interaction between reviewsourcecheck-sb.js and the Who Wrote That extension. RoySmith (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
I have nominated Battle of Red Cliffs for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. a455bcd9 (Antoine) ( talk) 15:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)