Can you hold off on the filleting of this article please. The cn templates only went on yesterday, and information you are removing is presumably correct, even if unsourced. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 16:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having an inline citation to a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references. Consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step.When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source, and the material therefore may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it.
Are you aware that Gill, who's article you've been editing, had been trying to canvass again? He was on his Twitter page today asking for his followers to come and help him after you edited his page https://twitter.com/gill1109/status/1706191884853404049 MeltingDistrict ( talk) 18:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
In this edit [1] you reverted back in challenged material into a BLP article, despite the previous edit summary drawing your attention to WP:BLPRESTORE and despite a revert by you less than 24 hours earlier in which you cite WP:ONUS, [2] so you are clearly well aware of that policy. You did not take this to talk. You might like to consider self reverting and doing so now as an act of good faith. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 22:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a
neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
22:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
23:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
Can you hold off on the filleting of this article please. The cn templates only went on yesterday, and information you are removing is presumably correct, even if unsourced. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 16:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source. Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having an inline citation to a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references. Consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step.When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source, and the material therefore may not be verifiable. If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it.
Are you aware that Gill, who's article you've been editing, had been trying to canvass again? He was on his Twitter page today asking for his followers to come and help him after you edited his page https://twitter.com/gill1109/status/1706191884853404049 MeltingDistrict ( talk) 18:17, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
In this edit [1] you reverted back in challenged material into a BLP article, despite the previous edit summary drawing your attention to WP:BLPRESTORE and despite a revert by you less than 24 hours earlier in which you cite WP:ONUS, [2] so you are clearly well aware of that policy. You did not take this to talk. You might like to consider self reverting and doing so now as an act of good faith. Sirfurboy🏄 ( talk) 22:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
It appears that you have been
canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While
friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a
neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are
indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain
point of view or side of a debate, or which are
selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of
consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
22:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk)
23:25, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |