Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
22:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Thank you.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page
Apple pie appears to have added incorrect information and has been
reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be
verifiable in a
reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
talk page. Please use the
sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Darkwind (
talk)
23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Battle at Kruger, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
JimVC3 (
talk)
23:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Code of Hammurabi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Sumer with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (
talk)
16:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
User talk:Strander3, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (
talk)
20:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Minecraft, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -
Barek (
talk •
contribs) -
00:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC){
Strander3 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I haven't used Wikipedia for anything but its intended purpose for about a year now. Please unblock my account.
Accept reason:
What's going on below is that we sometimes see users who actually point to their own block evasion as "evidence" that they can work within the rules here, and the wording of your request could be interpreted as someone trying to do that. However, after consulting with the blocking administrator I have decided to go ahead and unblock you. This is being done with the understanding that as you have already been blocked for vandalism ifthere is ever even one single edit from this account that can be considered vandalism the block can and will be re-instated without further warning. Hopefully that won't ever be necessary. Welcome back. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
I have been using it for reading only because I was blocked from editing 21 months ago. I don't have anything in mind that I would like to edit. I just would like the freedom to edit if the desire comes up. I give my word that this account will not be used for vandalism ever again.
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Bongwarrior (
talk)
22:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Thank you.
Falcon8765
(TALK)
23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page
Apple pie appears to have added incorrect information and has been
reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be
verifiable in a
reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please
cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's
talk page. Please use the
sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --
Darkwind (
talk)
23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of
your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Battle at Kruger, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
JimVC3 (
talk)
23:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Code of Hammurabi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Sumer with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (
talk)
16:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
User talk:Strander3, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (
talk)
20:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Minecraft, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. -
Barek (
talk •
contribs) -
00:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC){
Strander3 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I haven't used Wikipedia for anything but its intended purpose for about a year now. Please unblock my account.
Accept reason:
What's going on below is that we sometimes see users who actually point to their own block evasion as "evidence" that they can work within the rules here, and the wording of your request could be interpreted as someone trying to do that. However, after consulting with the blocking administrator I have decided to go ahead and unblock you. This is being done with the understanding that as you have already been blocked for vandalism ifthere is ever even one single edit from this account that can be considered vandalism the block can and will be re-instated without further warning. Hopefully that won't ever be necessary. Welcome back. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
I have been using it for reading only because I was blocked from editing 21 months ago. I don't have anything in mind that I would like to edit. I just would like the freedom to edit if the desire comes up. I give my word that this account will not be used for vandalism ever again.