hey Rajput brother, just so u know, Parashurama did not kill all Khsatriyas 21 times or anything, He destroyed the Haihaya warriors 21 times (yet they still exist today) - Goldenhawk hey brother,,i am not making up facts..I am presenting you the truths,why are you constantly deleting my information.all other castes are giving their famous peopkle names,,why are you deleting,i swear,i am presenting the truths to best of my knowledge.
Hey u crowbeat ... Kshatriyas rule the world..not the fat brahmins... Even parshurama had to concede defeat to Lord Ram who was Kshatriya..
U asshole u dickhead..getthe staright..whatever comments i add are authentic.. Ms dhoni is rajput..but u keep on deleting that, whereas on sehwag page u allow to be written that he is jat... badgujjars are rajputs..not one u ask will tell they are gujjars.. u are trying to remove rajput glorius history..i will not tolerate..u mongrose..
Rajputs were the rulers of india and gujjars and jats are farmers and cattle herders...
u urself are giving wrong information to the wrol.d
wat sort of wikipedia is that.. u must have taken some bribe..u sukker head....
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shilp Guru Shri Kripal Singh Shekhawat, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://rajputindia.com/resources/DownloadWord.asp?JournalID=617&sTitle=Shilp+Guru+Shri+Kripal+Singh+Shekhawat. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 07:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lt Commander Rashmi Singh, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rajputindia.com/resources/DownloadWord.asp?JournalID=601. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 08:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ashok Kumar Singh, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sportal.nic.in/legenddetails.asp?sno=701&moduleid=&maincatid=41&subid=0&comid=55. As a copyright violation, Ashok Kumar Singh appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ashok Kumar Singh has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. WWGB 10:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Pankaj Singh, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Pankaj Singh seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Pankaj Singh, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot
18:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Mahendra Singh Dhoni has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma msg! 05:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mahendra Singh Dhoni. Enigma msg! 05:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/.
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Mahendra Singh Dhoni, you will be
blocked from editing. You have already been blocked for adding the same content. If you continue to do so you will be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
Spaceman
Spiff
05:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Your addition to
Tomar Rajputs has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
14:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ss59861! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 08:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Gujar. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Sikh-History
07:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Bargujar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Chhora (
talk)
14:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Note that
Wikipedia administrators can block editors who engage in vandalism and other disruptive behavior. Thank you. thanks
Chhora (
talk)
12:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Bargujar, you will be
blocked from editing. Stop removing sourced content and adding your point of view to articles. —
Spaceman
Spiff
09:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
Mahendra Singh Dhoni. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing. —
Spaceman
Spiff
09:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. You mother fucker you bastard u biased ronchos...the bastard gujjar suppporter.. I am a badgujjar and i am a rajput..why are u vandalising our histroy by removing my content..u suckdickeer.. Y u add contents about other castes.. Badgujjars are raghav and are rajputs... u bastard.,..
Proof taht badgujjars are rajputs.. chk.. http://ebadgujar.com/history.html
this and the message above are not fun. Thus.
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist ( talk) 09:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey u crowbeat ... Kshatriyas rule the world..not the fat brahmins... Even parshurama had to concede defeat to Lord Ram who was Kshatriya..
U asshole u dickhead..getthe staright..whatever comments i add are authentic.. Ms dhoni is rajput..but u keep on deleting that, whereas on sehwag page u allow to be written that he is jat... badgujjars are rajputs..not one u ask will tell they are gujjars.. u are trying to remove rajput glorius history..i will not tolerate..u mongrose..
Rajputs were the rulers of india and gujjars and jats are farmers and cattle herders...
u urself are giving wrong information to the wrol.d
Rajputs are the rulers u bastard u mongrose..u dikkhead....u champelin poison envy drinking garbage slutter..
Ss59861 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Taelus ( talk) 10:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ss59861 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Does not address the issues ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
hey Rajput brother, just so u know, Parashurama did not kill all Khsatriyas 21 times or anything, He destroyed the Haihaya warriors 21 times (yet they still exist today) - Goldenhawk hey brother,,i am not making up facts..I am presenting you the truths,why are you constantly deleting my information.all other castes are giving their famous peopkle names,,why are you deleting,i swear,i am presenting the truths to best of my knowledge.
Hey u crowbeat ... Kshatriyas rule the world..not the fat brahmins... Even parshurama had to concede defeat to Lord Ram who was Kshatriya..
U asshole u dickhead..getthe staright..whatever comments i add are authentic.. Ms dhoni is rajput..but u keep on deleting that, whereas on sehwag page u allow to be written that he is jat... badgujjars are rajputs..not one u ask will tell they are gujjars.. u are trying to remove rajput glorius history..i will not tolerate..u mongrose..
Rajputs were the rulers of india and gujjars and jats are farmers and cattle herders...
u urself are giving wrong information to the wrol.d
wat sort of wikipedia is that.. u must have taken some bribe..u sukker head....
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shilp Guru Shri Kripal Singh Shekhawat, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://rajputindia.com/resources/DownloadWord.asp?JournalID=617&sTitle=Shilp+Guru+Shri+Kripal+Singh+Shekhawat. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 07:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lt Commander Rashmi Singh, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rajputindia.com/resources/DownloadWord.asp?JournalID=601. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 08:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ashok Kumar Singh, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sportal.nic.in/legenddetails.asp?sno=701&moduleid=&maincatid=41&subid=0&comid=55. As a copyright violation, Ashok Kumar Singh appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ashok Kumar Singh has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. WWGB 10:25, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Pankaj Singh, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Pankaj Singh seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Pankaj Singh, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot
18:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Mahendra Singh Dhoni has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma msg! 05:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mahendra Singh Dhoni. Enigma msg! 05:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/.
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Mahendra Singh Dhoni, you will be
blocked from editing. You have already been blocked for adding the same content. If you continue to do so you will be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. -
Spaceman
Spiff
05:51, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Your addition to
Tomar Rajputs has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
Apparition11
Complaints/
Mistakes
14:43, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ss59861! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 08:16, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Gujar. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Sikh-History
07:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Bargujar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Chhora (
talk)
14:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Note that
Wikipedia administrators can block editors who engage in vandalism and other disruptive behavior. Thank you. thanks
Chhora (
talk)
12:23, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Bargujar, you will be
blocked from editing. Stop removing sourced content and adding your point of view to articles. —
Spaceman
Spiff
09:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to
Mahendra Singh Dhoni. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be
blocked from editing. —
Spaceman
Spiff
09:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I give u proof that dhoni is a rajput chk it http://my.opera.com/AaryanRajput/blog/. You mother fucker you bastard u biased ronchos...the bastard gujjar suppporter.. I am a badgujjar and i am a rajput..why are u vandalising our histroy by removing my content..u suckdickeer.. Y u add contents about other castes.. Badgujjars are raghav and are rajputs... u bastard.,..
Proof taht badgujjars are rajputs.. chk.. http://ebadgujar.com/history.html
this and the message above are not fun. Thus.
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist ( talk) 09:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Hey u crowbeat ... Kshatriyas rule the world..not the fat brahmins... Even parshurama had to concede defeat to Lord Ram who was Kshatriya..
U asshole u dickhead..getthe staright..whatever comments i add are authentic.. Ms dhoni is rajput..but u keep on deleting that, whereas on sehwag page u allow to be written that he is jat... badgujjars are rajputs..not one u ask will tell they are gujjars.. u are trying to remove rajput glorius history..i will not tolerate..u mongrose..
Rajputs were the rulers of india and gujjars and jats are farmers and cattle herders...
u urself are giving wrong information to the wrol.d
Rajputs are the rulers u bastard u mongrose..u dikkhead....u champelin poison envy drinking garbage slutter..
Ss59861 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Taelus ( talk) 10:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ss59861 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Does not address the issues ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.