Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
10:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Sreein Sreedhar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
--Let There Be Sunshine
07:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sreein Sreedhar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of tallest building in Pune".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055 talk - contribs 18:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that in
this edit to
Left Democratic Front (Kerala), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
08:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Left Democratic Front (Kerala) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Firefly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Nava Kerala Mission have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia.
firefly (
t ·
c )
12:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party of India (Marxist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Democratic Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sreein Sreedhar! Your additions to
Pimpri-Chinchwad have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek ( talk) 11:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pimpri-Chinchwad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to
Pimpri-Chinchwad has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
19:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sreein Sreedhar,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pimpri Chinchwad Science Park for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Yeeno ( talk) 🍁 07:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E. K. Nayanar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manorama.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fazil.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
Chennai Super Kings–Mumbai Indians rivalry. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
13:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India–Pakistan sports rivalries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabaddi World Cup.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
List of highest-grossing Malayalam films. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Tusk001 ( talk) 04:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pepper and Daimler.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Pune Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chakan and Purandar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
I do not know how it happened, but you recently marked
this edit to the article on
Pimpri-Chinchwad as minor. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Your edit added two sentences:
It was clearly not a minor edit. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Sreein Sreedhar! Please stop marking edits as minor when they are not. You did that with seven consecutive edits at
Pune, so I have reverted them (there were other problems with at least one of the edits). As was explained to you several weeks ago, "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.--
Toddy1
(talk)
08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied the language pie chart with its sources from the article on
Mumbai into the page on
Pune and changed the numbers. It gives us very little confidence that you really looked at the sources you cited when you behave like that. If you had looked at the sources, you would have spotted that one of the sources was a newspaper article about the population of Mumbai.
Please note that whilst you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --
Toddy1
(talk)
08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to
Pune did not have an
edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! --
Toddy1
(talk)
08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop marking edits as minor when they are not. And stop making edits without doing an edit summary. You have been told about this before.
This edit to the article on
Pune had both these problems.
Also you need to take more care to see whether what you are doing is what you intended. To show you what you did, I have made an abbreviated version of the previous version and your version of the infobox for Pune. When you made your edit, you put in a new alt text for the changed image, but you forgot to update the caption.
Old version | Your version | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nagol0929. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Pinarayi Vijayan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Nagol0929 (
talk)
11:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Chennai Super Kings–Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
14:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chakan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
India–Pakistan cricket rivalry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 06:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India–Pakistan cricket rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arshdeep Singh.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wankhede Stadium, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mark Wood and Joel Wilson.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. There's a discussion that's taken place about this section. It's on the article talk page. If you disagree with the apparent consensus then please make your argument there rather than simply reverting. Thanks. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
NM
20:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sreein Sreedhar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Chennai Super Kings–Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 14:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am totally OK with changing pictures in the infobox but please discuss this with other editors before making the changes. We went through a discussion three years ago to choose the images. Thanks for your contribution to this page. Jonathansammy ( talk) 16:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhel.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to
Lakshmi Sahgal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's
copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Your in the Kollam infobox is reverted as most of the pictures added were fit into Kollam district, not in Kollam City. Varkala beach is in Thiruvananthapuram District, not Kollam. Akhilan ( talk) 08:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elections in Kerala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary Socialist Party.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
Elections in Kerala. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
23:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Materialscientist (
talk)
10:52, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Sreein Sreedhar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
--Let There Be Sunshine
07:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Sreein Sreedhar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of tallest building in Pune".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055 talk - contribs 18:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that in
this edit to
Left Democratic Front (Kerala), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
08:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Left Democratic Front (Kerala) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 08:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Firefly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Nava Kerala Mission have been undone because they appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a
neutral perspective. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia.
firefly (
t ·
c )
12:49, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party of India (Marxist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left Democratic Front. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sreein Sreedhar! Your additions to
Pimpri-Chinchwad have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid
copyright and
plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek ( talk) 11:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pimpri-Chinchwad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kawasaki.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to
Pimpri-Chinchwad has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
19:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sreein Sreedhar,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pimpri Chinchwad Science Park for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Yeeno ( talk) 🍁 07:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E. K. Nayanar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manorama.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:08, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Malayalam films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fazil.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
Chennai Super Kings–Mumbai Indians rivalry. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk)
13:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India–Pakistan sports rivalries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabaddi World Cup.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
List of highest-grossing Malayalam films. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Tusk001 ( talk) 04:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South India, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pepper and Daimler.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Pune Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chakan and Purandar.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
I do not know how it happened, but you recently marked
this edit to the article on
Pimpri-Chinchwad as minor. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Your edit added two sentences:
It was clearly not a minor edit. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi Sreein Sreedhar! Please stop marking edits as minor when they are not. You did that with seven consecutive edits at
Pune, so I have reverted them (there were other problems with at least one of the edits). As was explained to you several weeks ago, "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.--
Toddy1
(talk)
08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied the language pie chart with its sources from the article on
Mumbai into the page on
Pune and changed the numbers. It gives us very little confidence that you really looked at the sources you cited when you behave like that. If you had looked at the sources, you would have spotted that one of the sources was a newspaper article about the population of Mumbai.
Please note that whilst you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --
Toddy1
(talk)
08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to
Pune did not have an
edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! --
Toddy1
(talk)
08:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop marking edits as minor when they are not. And stop making edits without doing an edit summary. You have been told about this before.
This edit to the article on
Pune had both these problems.
Also you need to take more care to see whether what you are doing is what you intended. To show you what you did, I have made an abbreviated version of the previous version and your version of the infobox for Pune. When you made your edit, you put in a new alt text for the changed image, but you forgot to update the caption.
Old version | Your version | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nagol0929. I noticed that you recently
removed content from
Pinarayi Vijayan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Nagol0929 (
talk)
11:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Chennai Super Kings–Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
14:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chakan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
India–Pakistan cricket rivalry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 06:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India–Pakistan cricket rivalry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arshdeep Singh.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wankhede Stadium, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mark Wood and Joel Wilson.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:12, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. There's a discussion that's taken place about this section. It's on the article talk page. If you disagree with the apparent consensus then please make your argument there rather than simply reverting. Thanks. Blue Square Thing ( talk) 19:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
NM
20:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Sreein Sreedhar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Chennai Super Kings–Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 14:13, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I am totally OK with changing pictures in the infobox but please discuss this with other editors before making the changes. We went through a discussion three years ago to choose the images. Thanks for your contribution to this page. Jonathansammy ( talk) 16:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhel.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Your edit to
Lakshmi Sahgal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's
copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. —
Diannaa (
talk)
13:52, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Your in the Kollam infobox is reverted as most of the pictures added were fit into Kollam district, not in Kollam City. Varkala beach is in Thiruvananthapuram District, not Kollam. Akhilan ( talk) 08:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elections in Kerala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary Socialist Party.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into
Elections in Kerala. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk)
23:31, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Warner.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)