![]() |
Hi Srednaus Lenoroc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi is there any reason you've created a new account rather than continue using user:Srednuas Lenoroc? Nthep ( talk) 20:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, were you trying to achieve something specific here with the three blank edit requests you submitted? I'm happy to help if there's something you need help with. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
McGeddon (
talk)
14:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Based on your recent editing history, I suspect that you are using some type of automated tool to either perform or assist your editing. Please read WP:Bot policy and understand that operating a non-approved bot is not allowed. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 17:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I am using nothing special except the search process.
Srednaus Lenoroc (
talk)
17:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Just wanted to reiterate that whatever it is that you have accused me of usuing I am afraid I really am incapable of knowing. I refer to my "computer" as a machine because that is what it is to me. If it does not function under what little I do know about it then I am useless as to developing a more advance use of technology. So this "bot" I cannot help you solve your concern. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 20:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Meters and Meters too -- You want something to occur that is fundamentally impossible to do--erase from the record. Even when you delete it on the talk page the text that was deleted remains so whatever reason that compels you to do what you do is unfortunately useless. I have absolutely no control over that simple state of life. You may be annoyed by something but that is your person that has to somehow come to terms with say someone who is annoyed when on the street he hears someone whistle to themselves. It really is not a constitutional offense and the way that it was approached makes friendly chit chat about resolving it some other way all the less possible when you inconvenience others. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 20:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Oh, exclusided. What a prize!
Srednaus Lenoroc (
talk)
22:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It must be a conspiracy? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 22:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
00:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
That is a perfect example of the problem with WP. Now I imagine I am being disruptive and should be sanctioned for the faults of WP? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 10:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, "closing up a window" is very different from "closing a window". Windows being "closed up to avoid paying tax" is a reference to the window tax, where houseowners would brick up windows to lower the amount of tax due on their property; it does not refer to simply closing an open window. -- McGeddon ( talk) 12:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
They are when they are military. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 13:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
If you don't like "closed up" we can discuss it but forward isn't a verb; what if an illiterate English Lit grad or an American sees it? Keith-264 ( talk) 13:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Have you ever spoken with military people? They would seem the source. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I have blocked you from editing Wikipedia for disruptive editing. If you would like to appeal against the block, you can place {{unblock|your reason}} on this page, and your unblock request will be reviewed. Your unblock request should address the reasons why you were blocked, and in particular answer the question - which you have persistently evaded - as to whether you have edited Wikipedia using the name Srednuas Lenoroc ( talk · contribs) in addition to this account. WJBscribe (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I was asked a question then never given any time to reply. Did the person who blocked bother to read the time stamps? That sound like another case of foolishness and shark tank mentslity. Again I do not expect for this situation to end happily because WP has a problem with self-critique being perceived as an affront to its authority. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
In the mean time I explained what was the situation and discounted. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
And then before I could answer the last question I was blocked. That is Fair? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
So now WP has a situation where someone jumped the gun and has embarrassed WP Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, is WP going to admit their mistake? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop with your replies iuntil I answrr. I am putting in answers and losing them because new print comes up. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Regardless what you think WP has made a mistake. You don't ask a question then cut them before they have had time to answer. Not only that you do not discount a person's explanation without due diligence then create additional problems for those involved. We would bot be at this situation if whoever decided my answer was not truthful if they had done their work. Please WP would you do you work before you accuse people.
I had a computer that was programmed to go directly to my account without having to type everything. That computer broke. It had been some time since I had manually log in so was unble to recover. I put in a name that took. End of story. It does ot take an Einstein to understand that. And again, I do not expect for WP to revert this because you people in authority feel threatened. And to revert would clearly show that there was a mistake done. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Well? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to pull out of the thin plain air a name such as that without some reference to the old? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Good, you corrected the misspelling. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Larry, you are not requesting it, that is what you want. You are pissed off and not in the British sense. Yes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk • contribs) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Is that a question or a statement? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
700 words later and I confess I am none the wiser. Is there actually an answer to the question buried somewhere amongst all that self-justification and obfuscation? And if so, is there any explanation as to why the answer wasn't given 6 days ago instead of wasting everybody's time? WJBscribe (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi:, the answer is not consistent with this. There are still inconsistencies. Again, I think that he is just trolling and wasting our times. 16:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Now after getting your answer I have to crawl and beg? Again, I do not expect there to be a happy ending to this situation because that would mean all this deliberation has made people look very foolish. And may I suggest that in future use your words judiciously. I never abandoned any account. As I said, I just could not log in or recover. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
No long answer is necessary: block or unblock. This space is the process. What has been done should suffic otherwise you make it appear that the questions have not been answered and I cannot take WP's word for what they say. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Fortuna--Am I wrong in thinking that explanations are stories because that would be the understanding of your disparaging commnent? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I believe that you have now confirmed: (a) that you used to edit as Srednuas Lenoroc ( talk · contribs); and (b) lost the password so created this account. On that basis, I will now amend the block from indefinite to 48 hours. Your attitude to the questions regarding your former account was not acceptable. Instead of providing a answer and explanation, you have wriggled, dodged the question, and made numerous accusations against those trying to resolve the problem for the last week. That was disruptive and I believe a block remains appropriate. In addition, please note that there remain outstanding issues with your editing, which Nthep ( talk · contribs) has explained above. You should consider them carefully when you resume editing after the block expires. Failure to adjust your behaviour may result in further blocks. WJBscribe (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
@ WJBscribe:, i am not sure that it is a right decision. Take a look at here. He said that all those resemblance of his own account and other two accounts are just a "coincidence" and asserted that he is a seperate editor. It is inconsistent. @ RickinBaltimore:, could you please comment on? 46.221.178.57 ( talk) 16:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
So what is WP going to do about future cases of mistaken presumptions because if there is not one then there certainly is reason enough for it to exist. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
And just as I said. This situation has not ended in a happy situation because you still have me on block although the problem was never mine. Would you WP people so bent on this type of quest do due diligence. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
When one is accused it is not unlikely they will be defensive and oif course that is thought of as being uncoorperative at WP. A very esay accusation to levee. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Larry, Don't try and hide behind the face and put your post before comments that preceeded yours. It makes you look insincere. By the way, how does one canceaal their account? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
How does one canceal their account? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a suggestion (and I already known my status within WP): When posts arrive in this talk page there is no indication to what authority someone questions someone else. If this is a collective of individuals and no one seems to have authority, or at least recognized by their communication, then there is no saying how someone will react to a question when if they have no authority then why in hell would anyone answer it. I do not have to answer all the mail in my in box for my office to function. Everyone does not have to answer all their email in order for the world to function. Why should I answer someone that has as far as I can tell have no authority to do so. Private information should remain private and I do what I can about mine.
How does one deavtivate their account? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please forgive my hasty and officious colleagues and come back to continue your contributions. E Eng 23:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Srednaus Lenoroc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Srednaus Lenoroc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi is there any reason you've created a new account rather than continue using user:Srednuas Lenoroc? Nthep ( talk) 20:04, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, were you trying to achieve something specific here with the three blank edit requests you submitted? I'm happy to help if there's something you need help with. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 05:03, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
McGeddon (
talk)
14:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Based on your recent editing history, I suspect that you are using some type of automated tool to either perform or assist your editing. Please read WP:Bot policy and understand that operating a non-approved bot is not allowed. WikiDan61 ChatMe! ReadMe!! 17:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
I am using nothing special except the search process.
Srednaus Lenoroc (
talk)
17:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Just wanted to reiterate that whatever it is that you have accused me of usuing I am afraid I really am incapable of knowing. I refer to my "computer" as a machine because that is what it is to me. If it does not function under what little I do know about it then I am useless as to developing a more advance use of technology. So this "bot" I cannot help you solve your concern. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 20:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Meters and Meters too -- You want something to occur that is fundamentally impossible to do--erase from the record. Even when you delete it on the talk page the text that was deleted remains so whatever reason that compels you to do what you do is unfortunately useless. I have absolutely no control over that simple state of life. You may be annoyed by something but that is your person that has to somehow come to terms with say someone who is annoyed when on the street he hears someone whistle to themselves. It really is not a constitutional offense and the way that it was approached makes friendly chit chat about resolving it some other way all the less possible when you inconvenience others. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 20:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Oh, exclusided. What a prize!
Srednaus Lenoroc (
talk)
22:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
It must be a conspiracy? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 22:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Cordless Larry (
talk)
00:11, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
That is a perfect example of the problem with WP. Now I imagine I am being disruptive and should be sanctioned for the faults of WP? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 10:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, "closing up a window" is very different from "closing a window". Windows being "closed up to avoid paying tax" is a reference to the window tax, where houseowners would brick up windows to lower the amount of tax due on their property; it does not refer to simply closing an open window. -- McGeddon ( talk) 12:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
They are when they are military. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 13:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
If you don't like "closed up" we can discuss it but forward isn't a verb; what if an illiterate English Lit grad or an American sees it? Keith-264 ( talk) 13:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Have you ever spoken with military people? They would seem the source. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I have blocked you from editing Wikipedia for disruptive editing. If you would like to appeal against the block, you can place {{unblock|your reason}} on this page, and your unblock request will be reviewed. Your unblock request should address the reasons why you were blocked, and in particular answer the question - which you have persistently evaded - as to whether you have edited Wikipedia using the name Srednuas Lenoroc ( talk · contribs) in addition to this account. WJBscribe (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I was asked a question then never given any time to reply. Did the person who blocked bother to read the time stamps? That sound like another case of foolishness and shark tank mentslity. Again I do not expect for this situation to end happily because WP has a problem with self-critique being perceived as an affront to its authority. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:46, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
In the mean time I explained what was the situation and discounted. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
And then before I could answer the last question I was blocked. That is Fair? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
So now WP has a situation where someone jumped the gun and has embarrassed WP Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Well, is WP going to admit their mistake? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 14:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop with your replies iuntil I answrr. I am putting in answers and losing them because new print comes up. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Regardless what you think WP has made a mistake. You don't ask a question then cut them before they have had time to answer. Not only that you do not discount a person's explanation without due diligence then create additional problems for those involved. We would bot be at this situation if whoever decided my answer was not truthful if they had done their work. Please WP would you do you work before you accuse people.
I had a computer that was programmed to go directly to my account without having to type everything. That computer broke. It had been some time since I had manually log in so was unble to recover. I put in a name that took. End of story. It does ot take an Einstein to understand that. And again, I do not expect for WP to revert this because you people in authority feel threatened. And to revert would clearly show that there was a mistake done. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Well? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to pull out of the thin plain air a name such as that without some reference to the old? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Good, you corrected the misspelling. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Larry, you are not requesting it, that is what you want. You are pissed off and not in the British sense. Yes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk • contribs) 15:31, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Is that a question or a statement? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:36, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
700 words later and I confess I am none the wiser. Is there actually an answer to the question buried somewhere amongst all that self-justification and obfuscation? And if so, is there any explanation as to why the answer wasn't given 6 days ago instead of wasting everybody's time? WJBscribe (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
@ Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi:, the answer is not consistent with this. There are still inconsistencies. Again, I think that he is just trolling and wasting our times. 16:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Now after getting your answer I have to crawl and beg? Again, I do not expect there to be a happy ending to this situation because that would mean all this deliberation has made people look very foolish. And may I suggest that in future use your words judiciously. I never abandoned any account. As I said, I just could not log in or recover. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
No long answer is necessary: block or unblock. This space is the process. What has been done should suffic otherwise you make it appear that the questions have not been answered and I cannot take WP's word for what they say. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 15:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Fortuna--Am I wrong in thinking that explanations are stories because that would be the understanding of your disparaging commnent? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
I believe that you have now confirmed: (a) that you used to edit as Srednuas Lenoroc ( talk · contribs); and (b) lost the password so created this account. On that basis, I will now amend the block from indefinite to 48 hours. Your attitude to the questions regarding your former account was not acceptable. Instead of providing a answer and explanation, you have wriggled, dodged the question, and made numerous accusations against those trying to resolve the problem for the last week. That was disruptive and I believe a block remains appropriate. In addition, please note that there remain outstanding issues with your editing, which Nthep ( talk · contribs) has explained above. You should consider them carefully when you resume editing after the block expires. Failure to adjust your behaviour may result in further blocks. WJBscribe (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
@ WJBscribe:, i am not sure that it is a right decision. Take a look at here. He said that all those resemblance of his own account and other two accounts are just a "coincidence" and asserted that he is a seperate editor. It is inconsistent. @ RickinBaltimore:, could you please comment on? 46.221.178.57 ( talk) 16:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
So what is WP going to do about future cases of mistaken presumptions because if there is not one then there certainly is reason enough for it to exist. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:10, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
And just as I said. This situation has not ended in a happy situation because you still have me on block although the problem was never mine. Would you WP people so bent on this type of quest do due diligence. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:12, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
When one is accused it is not unlikely they will be defensive and oif course that is thought of as being uncoorperative at WP. A very esay accusation to levee. Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Larry, Don't try and hide behind the face and put your post before comments that preceeded yours. It makes you look insincere. By the way, how does one canceaal their account? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
How does one canceal their account? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a suggestion (and I already known my status within WP): When posts arrive in this talk page there is no indication to what authority someone questions someone else. If this is a collective of individuals and no one seems to have authority, or at least recognized by their communication, then there is no saying how someone will react to a question when if they have no authority then why in hell would anyone answer it. I do not have to answer all the mail in my in box for my office to function. Everyone does not have to answer all their email in order for the world to function. Why should I answer someone that has as far as I can tell have no authority to do so. Private information should remain private and I do what I can about mine.
How does one deavtivate their account? Srednaus Lenoroc ( talk) 16:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Please forgive my hasty and officious colleagues and come back to continue your contributions. E Eng 23:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Srednaus Lenoroc. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)