Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin contributing on Wikipedia: | ||
|
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
| |
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Fæ ( talk) 00:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC) |
Spuum, beware of the three revert rule: you can't make more than 3 reverts in the same article within a 24-hour period. You've made three in the last 24 hours. You may be blocked from editing for violating that rule.
Please try to fix your edit instead of restoring it. Address the concerns expressed by users Morenooso and Jmundo, and me. SamEV ( talk) 18:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
moreno oso (
talk)
23:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Hispanic and Latino Americans, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You have no
WP:CONSENSUS for this edit. Please cease. --
moreno oso (
talk)
05:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
(Uninvolved editor viewpoint) Hi, I would like to say that the high number of reversions on the article could be a problem under the Edit warring guidelines. However taking into consideration your attempts to discuss on the talk page I think there is sufficient good faith involved. I suggest you consider the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle good practice guidelines and you may want to put a pause on matters and raise for an independent Third opinion rather than running into any further user warnings based on the number of reverts of the same material or accusations of disruptive editing. Should you carry on with your current confrontational repeated edits and ignore warnings from the above experienced contributors, then your account is quite likely to be blocked on the next occasion. Thanks, Fæ ( talk) 11:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
A discussion concerning your recent reverts to Hispanic and Latino Americans has been post to this LINK. You may wish to visit the board and discuss your edits there. ---- moreno oso ( talk) 12:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Spuum reported by User:Morenooso (Result: 24h). EdJohnston ( talk) 18:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Metric Martyrs appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Fæ (
talk)
11:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did in
Salvatore Giunta (Medal of Honor). Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Sephiroth storm (
talk)
09:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Fvasconcellos (
t·
c)
06:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Some of your additions ( diff) to the Allah article were not appropriate. While the concept of "personifications" is relevant, you did little but add photos and label them in an improper way. - Stevertigo ( t | log | c) 03:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Jmundo (
talk)
03:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule on
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. —
Jeff
G. ツ
04:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 22:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Raghead Injun. Since you had some involvement with the Raghead Injun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kilopi ( talk) 06:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin contributing on Wikipedia: | ||
|
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
| |
The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Fæ ( talk) 00:53, 22 July 2010 (UTC) |
Spuum, beware of the three revert rule: you can't make more than 3 reverts in the same article within a 24-hour period. You've made three in the last 24 hours. You may be blocked from editing for violating that rule.
Please try to fix your edit instead of restoring it. Address the concerns expressed by users Morenooso and Jmundo, and me. SamEV ( talk) 18:36, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
moreno oso (
talk)
23:23, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Hispanic and Latino Americans, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. You have no
WP:CONSENSUS for this edit. Please cease. --
moreno oso (
talk)
05:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
(Uninvolved editor viewpoint) Hi, I would like to say that the high number of reversions on the article could be a problem under the Edit warring guidelines. However taking into consideration your attempts to discuss on the talk page I think there is sufficient good faith involved. I suggest you consider the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle good practice guidelines and you may want to put a pause on matters and raise for an independent Third opinion rather than running into any further user warnings based on the number of reverts of the same material or accusations of disruptive editing. Should you carry on with your current confrontational repeated edits and ignore warnings from the above experienced contributors, then your account is quite likely to be blocked on the next occasion. Thanks, Fæ ( talk) 11:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
A discussion concerning your recent reverts to Hispanic and Latino Americans has been post to this LINK. You may wish to visit the board and discuss your edits there. ---- moreno oso ( talk) 12:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:Spuum reported by User:Morenooso (Result: 24h). EdJohnston ( talk) 18:08, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for
your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
Metric Martyrs appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important
core policy. Thank you.
Fæ (
talk)
11:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did in
Salvatore Giunta (Medal of Honor). Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Sephiroth storm (
talk)
09:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own
personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
Fvasconcellos (
t·
c)
06:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Some of your additions ( diff) to the Allah article were not appropriate. While the concept of "personifications" is relevant, you did little but add photos and label them in an improper way. - Stevertigo ( t | log | c) 03:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Jmundo (
talk)
03:49, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule on
Hispanic and Latino Americans. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. —
Jeff
G. ツ
04:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. Fvasconcellos ( t· c) 22:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Raghead Injun. Since you had some involvement with the Raghead Injun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Kilopi ( talk) 06:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)