Hello, Spt172012, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to
leave me a message or place "
" on this page and someone will drop by to help.
FoCuSandLeArN (
talk)
22:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
The article Son of God vs. Son of Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AdventurousSquirrel (
talk)
23:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Son of God vs. Son of Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son of God vs. Son of Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jschnur ( talk) 03:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Spt172012, I noticed that after you created the article, multiple accounts have been created to work on it, and this Spt172012 account has not worked on it since. Looking at the edit history, it appears as though you may be creating multiple accounts to work on the article, so I just wanted to ask if this was true. It shouldn't be a big problem right now if it's true but you should only be using one account to edit. See WP:SOCK for more info. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 22:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spt172012. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC) |
Hello, Spt172012, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to
leave me a message or place "
" on this page and someone will drop by to help.
FoCuSandLeArN (
talk)
22:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
{{helpme}}
The article Son of God vs. Son of Man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
AdventurousSquirrel (
talk)
23:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Son of God vs. Son of Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son of God vs. Son of Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jschnur ( talk) 03:56, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Spt172012, I noticed that after you created the article, multiple accounts have been created to work on it, and this Spt172012 account has not worked on it since. Looking at the edit history, it appears as though you may be creating multiple accounts to work on the article, so I just wanted to ask if this was true. It shouldn't be a big problem right now if it's true but you should only be using one account to edit. See WP:SOCK for more info. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 22:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spt172012. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to
make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2012 (UTC) |