![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
I think you are wrong reverting me at Lee Chatfield. For a former politician from the religious right to be accused of sexual abuse (including rape) by his current sister-in-law is a major development in his life, very likely the last incident in his political career. It is being investigated by the Michigan State police with the cooperation of the Michigan House of Representatives. She was a minor when the alleged abuse began, and he was her school teacher. It's not going away. Smallbones( smalltalk) 20:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Springee, sorry for the delayed response of your notification, I'm quite busy off-wiki. On the issue, I think you've made your point to Soibangla, and so has VQuakr in their response to Soibangla. If there are further issues, I would suggest AE/ANI. On another note, I'm trying to stay out of the politics topic area indefinitely, just a heads-up to you. Commenting on editor behavior should be fine though. starship .paint ( exalt) 03:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Your phone has such a one-track mind. [1] Dr. Freud | talk 12:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC).
I'm not sure you should use the word "bitch" there. Please remove that word as a completely unnecessary and unwarranted insult. You might have had issues with Hob, as I have, but calling him a bitch cannot be mistaken for anything but an insult, and therefore a personal attack. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 23:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey Springee, was checking through the Edit filter log like I normally do, and I stumbled upon an account a few days ago that triggered the filter New account suspicious activity. I try to keep an eye on those accounts... one of them being IMiss2010. I'm not sure that there is any violation they've made, but I did call them out on their excessive edits to their sandbox (they were indeed, excessive). Further, they were experimenting with fonts and what not, but perplexingly are choosing to focus exclusively on Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians—which I can't see any reason why a new editor would be exclusively fixated with that topic. Seems suspicious to me, wanted to have another set of eyes on their contribs. Thanks. -- PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 21:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
We seem to be in a pattern of wasting each others time. Perhaps we should give each other a little more WP:FAITH on talk pages in which we both seem to be involved. What do you say? DN ( talk) 21:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
I am ok as far as interacting with you on article talk pages, but let's try our best to leave it at that. Also, I will no longer receive pings from you or TFD, so stick to article talk page sections where I am involved and ask other editors (besides TFD) or mods to ping me for immediate attention if something extremely important comes up. Have a peaceful day. DN ( talk) 21:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey Springee, was hoping you could take a look at Talk:Bruce Bostelman. I don't think I'm in the wrong with my input, but was hoping you could provide your own two-cents there. Thanks! -- PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 00:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Could you make a note to that effect on the talk page? Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Eww. The article People's Party of Canada calls it far-right. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I'm not as far-left as Stalin, but I have IRL been called a "libtard." I'm also a retired nurse. I believe in the "right to refuse." So I cannot agree with mandating or compelling vaccines. Thanks for pointing out the fallacies of labelling. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you but I need to make sure I'm clear on your view here [4], because I find it extremely odd. The editor said "For all we know, his enemies are actively editing his WP article under pseudonyms to say bad things about him.". You believe that type of discourse is indicative of WP:AGF? I recall you actually said something similar [5], after I had previously responded to one of your replies on your TP [6]. I ask because I feel we are still in need of work in agreeing on the definition of AGF so that we can understand and work with each other in a more productive manner. If at all possible, please stick to simple yes or no, I understand there is a spectrum and context to it, but I have a difficult time sorting through some of the complexity of your answers. This is purely for my edification and future reference when it comes to understanding what to expect in engagements and discussions in which you are involved moving forward. You do not have to answer, but in fairness to you, this question is very much on my mind. DN ( talk) 22:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Extra sorry about my comments earlier. I made sure to apologize in the edit summary where I struck those comments. I was tired and cranky but that's no excuse. Give me some time to come back without being in Battlemode with you. I realize I may be solo on this view, and I am considering conceding in hopes of consensus. If I don't try to cover the bases with it, I will have a harder time moving on. Thanks for being patient. Cheers. DN ( talk) 02:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi. With respect to your vote here, did you intentionally indent it? Or did you mean to withdraw it? You may wish to return to it to reformat it in order to make your intention more clear by preserving the numbering or striking it as the case may be. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey Springee,may I have your input on this edit,this event happened back in 2019 and made national and international news over the controversy. This edit is already/was technically before I made this edit on this article :
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_%22-gate%22_scandals_and_controversies&action=history
But now someone deleted it just now
In November 2019,while in a live interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews discussing the Impeachment hearings of Donald J. Trump,the sound of what many thought to be Flatulence was believed to be heard while Swalwell was speaking. [1] Swalwell repeated denied the allegation,stating he didn't even hear the sound during the interview. [2]The incident was widely reported and covered by Multiple foreign news channels, such as the British breakfast television News channel Good Morning Britain. [3]The Viral incident was Coined "Fartgate" by many. MSNBC later released a statement saying the noise was actually a mug moving across a desk.However, many people dispute the network's explanation, claiming that Swalwell's speech paused for a moment during the noise, and he slightly raised his body as well. [4]
I see this of note as it was covered by many sources and isn't an ongoing saga of events being covered by some gossip page etc. It meets the definition of a gate/scandal.
Conservative cheese ball ( talk) 19:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Springee, Would you say from your experience that this article is an opinion piece? From what I can see it seems very much so.However im looking to see what other people think A user is trying to use it for this article:
/info/en/?search=Turning_Point_UK
Here is the link:
According to Wikipedia, the Coversation posts opinion pieces consistently, meaning those particular articles arent to be used. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Idolator
Basedosaurus (
talk) 13:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
The sources are not about gun registration. They are about NSA surveillance. We need sources that relate this initiative to gun registration. It's also not clear why it is in the legislation section. SPECIFICO talk 23:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For all your work in ensuring that contentious articles maintain a neutral point of view. Thank you. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 19:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
Howdy. I read over 'three times' the Twitter article & can't find any criticism of Twitter, mentioned in the article. Maybe you or another, can find it. GoodDay ( talk) 19:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
BTW - I need to clarify my comment over at Jordan Peterson's talkpage. I do support the total inclusion of his remarks. I was merely pointing out the odds of his remarks being kept in the article. GoodDay ( talk) 00:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
It appears there's an editor over at the Peterson page, unilaterally shutting down any post(s), that the editor doesn't like. GoodDay ( talk) 18:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
I commend you for your hard work in trying to keep balance and neutrality here on Wikipedia regarding subjects that need a lot of tip toeing around. Keep up the good work (and may science and common sense win out!) Masterhatch ( talk) 14:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Just wanted to say 'hello' & that I'm still getting older :) GoodDay ( talk) 16:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |title=
(
help)
What is RS and what is DUE material? Maurice Magnus ( talk) 02:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
The second edit was a code correction; the first edit had an appropriate comment, stating that there was a correction about Gaetz’s assertion. The article as it exists is misleading with regards to a key fact about American-Israeli-Palestinian foreign policy. Ðrdak ( T) 19:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
I appreciate it! Ðrdak ( T) 20:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, how'd you find yourself on the page Thomas Jefferson and Slavery? Loki ( talk) 03:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering why you would think the two Black Rifle Coffee Companylawsuits came from non reliable source? The source is United States district court 20:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzhou1991 ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
I appreciate your work on the Donald C. Bolduc article! Grahaml35 ( talk) 18:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. The thread is Toa Nidhiki05. Thank you. –– FormalDude (talk) 13:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
Appreciate your thoughtful engagement on the page. Toa Nidhiki05 20:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Springee!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
I think you are wrong reverting me at Lee Chatfield. For a former politician from the religious right to be accused of sexual abuse (including rape) by his current sister-in-law is a major development in his life, very likely the last incident in his political career. It is being investigated by the Michigan State police with the cooperation of the Michigan House of Representatives. She was a minor when the alleged abuse began, and he was her school teacher. It's not going away. Smallbones( smalltalk) 20:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello Springee, sorry for the delayed response of your notification, I'm quite busy off-wiki. On the issue, I think you've made your point to Soibangla, and so has VQuakr in their response to Soibangla. If there are further issues, I would suggest AE/ANI. On another note, I'm trying to stay out of the politics topic area indefinitely, just a heads-up to you. Commenting on editor behavior should be fine though. starship .paint ( exalt) 03:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Your phone has such a one-track mind. [1] Dr. Freud | talk 12:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC).
I'm not sure you should use the word "bitch" there. Please remove that word as a completely unnecessary and unwarranted insult. You might have had issues with Hob, as I have, but calling him a bitch cannot be mistaken for anything but an insult, and therefore a personal attack. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 23:00, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey Springee, was checking through the Edit filter log like I normally do, and I stumbled upon an account a few days ago that triggered the filter New account suspicious activity. I try to keep an eye on those accounts... one of them being IMiss2010. I'm not sure that there is any violation they've made, but I did call them out on their excessive edits to their sandbox (they were indeed, excessive). Further, they were experimenting with fonts and what not, but perplexingly are choosing to focus exclusively on Wikipedia:Missing_Wikipedians—which I can't see any reason why a new editor would be exclusively fixated with that topic. Seems suspicious to me, wanted to have another set of eyes on their contribs. Thanks. -- PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 21:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
We seem to be in a pattern of wasting each others time. Perhaps we should give each other a little more WP:FAITH on talk pages in which we both seem to be involved. What do you say? DN ( talk) 21:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
I am ok as far as interacting with you on article talk pages, but let's try our best to leave it at that. Also, I will no longer receive pings from you or TFD, so stick to article talk page sections where I am involved and ask other editors (besides TFD) or mods to ping me for immediate attention if something extremely important comes up. Have a peaceful day. DN ( talk) 21:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey Springee, was hoping you could take a look at Talk:Bruce Bostelman. I don't think I'm in the wrong with my input, but was hoping you could provide your own two-cents there. Thanks! -- PerpetuityGrat ( talk) 00:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Could you make a note to that effect on the talk page? Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Eww. The article People's Party of Canada calls it far-right. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:09, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I'm not as far-left as Stalin, but I have IRL been called a "libtard." I'm also a retired nurse. I believe in the "right to refuse." So I cannot agree with mandating or compelling vaccines. Thanks for pointing out the fallacies of labelling. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Sorry to bug you but I need to make sure I'm clear on your view here [4], because I find it extremely odd. The editor said "For all we know, his enemies are actively editing his WP article under pseudonyms to say bad things about him.". You believe that type of discourse is indicative of WP:AGF? I recall you actually said something similar [5], after I had previously responded to one of your replies on your TP [6]. I ask because I feel we are still in need of work in agreeing on the definition of AGF so that we can understand and work with each other in a more productive manner. If at all possible, please stick to simple yes or no, I understand there is a spectrum and context to it, but I have a difficult time sorting through some of the complexity of your answers. This is purely for my edification and future reference when it comes to understanding what to expect in engagements and discussions in which you are involved moving forward. You do not have to answer, but in fairness to you, this question is very much on my mind. DN ( talk) 22:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Extra sorry about my comments earlier. I made sure to apologize in the edit summary where I struck those comments. I was tired and cranky but that's no excuse. Give me some time to come back without being in Battlemode with you. I realize I may be solo on this view, and I am considering conceding in hopes of consensus. If I don't try to cover the bases with it, I will have a harder time moving on. Thanks for being patient. Cheers. DN ( talk) 02:14, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Hi. With respect to your vote here, did you intentionally indent it? Or did you mean to withdraw it? You may wish to return to it to reformat it in order to make your intention more clear by preserving the numbering or striking it as the case may be. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 03:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey Springee,may I have your input on this edit,this event happened back in 2019 and made national and international news over the controversy. This edit is already/was technically before I made this edit on this article :
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_%22-gate%22_scandals_and_controversies&action=history
But now someone deleted it just now
In November 2019,while in a live interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews discussing the Impeachment hearings of Donald J. Trump,the sound of what many thought to be Flatulence was believed to be heard while Swalwell was speaking. [1] Swalwell repeated denied the allegation,stating he didn't even hear the sound during the interview. [2]The incident was widely reported and covered by Multiple foreign news channels, such as the British breakfast television News channel Good Morning Britain. [3]The Viral incident was Coined "Fartgate" by many. MSNBC later released a statement saying the noise was actually a mug moving across a desk.However, many people dispute the network's explanation, claiming that Swalwell's speech paused for a moment during the noise, and he slightly raised his body as well. [4]
I see this of note as it was covered by many sources and isn't an ongoing saga of events being covered by some gossip page etc. It meets the definition of a gate/scandal.
Conservative cheese ball ( talk) 19:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello Springee, Would you say from your experience that this article is an opinion piece? From what I can see it seems very much so.However im looking to see what other people think A user is trying to use it for this article:
/info/en/?search=Turning_Point_UK
Here is the link:
According to Wikipedia, the Coversation posts opinion pieces consistently, meaning those particular articles arent to be used. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#Idolator
Basedosaurus (
talk) 13:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
The sources are not about gun registration. They are about NSA surveillance. We need sources that relate this initiative to gun registration. It's also not clear why it is in the legislation section. SPECIFICO talk 23:56, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
For all your work in ensuring that contentious articles maintain a neutral point of view. Thank you. Scorpions13256 ( talk) 19:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC) |
Howdy. I read over 'three times' the Twitter article & can't find any criticism of Twitter, mentioned in the article. Maybe you or another, can find it. GoodDay ( talk) 19:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
BTW - I need to clarify my comment over at Jordan Peterson's talkpage. I do support the total inclusion of his remarks. I was merely pointing out the odds of his remarks being kept in the article. GoodDay ( talk) 00:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
It appears there's an editor over at the Peterson page, unilaterally shutting down any post(s), that the editor doesn't like. GoodDay ( talk) 18:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
I commend you for your hard work in trying to keep balance and neutrality here on Wikipedia regarding subjects that need a lot of tip toeing around. Keep up the good work (and may science and common sense win out!) Masterhatch ( talk) 14:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Just wanted to say 'hello' & that I'm still getting older :) GoodDay ( talk) 16:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: External link in |title=
(
help)
What is RS and what is DUE material? Maurice Magnus ( talk) 02:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
The second edit was a code correction; the first edit had an appropriate comment, stating that there was a correction about Gaetz’s assertion. The article as it exists is misleading with regards to a key fact about American-Israeli-Palestinian foreign policy. Ðrdak ( T) 19:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
I appreciate it! Ðrdak ( T) 20:23, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, how'd you find yourself on the page Thomas Jefferson and Slavery? Loki ( talk) 03:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I was wondering why you would think the two Black Rifle Coffee Companylawsuits came from non reliable source? The source is United States district court 20:36, 3 October 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzhou1991 ( talk • contribs)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
I appreciate your work on the Donald C. Bolduc article! Grahaml35 ( talk) 18:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. The thread is Toa Nidhiki05. Thank you. –– FormalDude (talk) 13:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
Appreciate your thoughtful engagement on the page. Toa Nidhiki05 20:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, Springee!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Wikipedia friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:33, 22 December 2022 (UTC)