Hi, Spidey. I'll do what I can to help, though probably not tonight. Though I think we both know The Amazing Spider-Man is coming back at some point -- strictly by definition, one can only be "superior" to something else ... and if that something else ain't around, "superior" will stop making sense pretty soon. Like the "dead" Captain America and the Human Torch recently, the Reed Richard in the 1990s, the dead Superman in the 2000s, etc. Peter Parker will be back. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 01:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#BASC:_Asgardian_appeal. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting. SilkTork ✔Tea time 00:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I was able to view the info of the first issue of The Superior Spider-Man (which featured Doctor Octopus in Spider-Man's body) and it was seen that the Superior Spider-Man fought a new incarnation of the Sinister Six consisting of Boomerang, Living Brain, Overdrive, Shocker, Speed Demon, and the female Beetle (whose first name was revealed to be Janice). A twist near the end is that Peter Parker's spirit has stopped the Superior Spider-Man from going too far and vows to find a way back. What do you think of the first issue so far? Rtkat3 ( talk) 4:05, January 26 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Son (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Son (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Thank you for uploading File:Scarlet Spider combined.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{ di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.
An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Spidey104,
I am writing to ask if you, as a fan of comics and a contributor to the Comics portal on Wikipedia, would support the notability of the community project called the Marvel Comics Database. Several years ago, the site was deemed too new and not sufficiently notable to qualify for its own Wikipedia article. Since then, the site has passed the 100,000 article mark, after nearly 8 years of effort, and has been featured in the New York Times, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, the Toronto Star, among other mainstream press.
I am the founder of the site and will not create the article myself (to prevent infringing the self-promotion policy), but I ask that you objectively consider my suggestion that the site has become a valued resource and a notable part of the comic book culture, in the same way that Memory Alpha and Wookieepedia have done. If you agree that the Marvel Database is now justifiably notable in its own right, please consider creating an article for the site. Either way, I'd love to hear from you.
Thank you very much,
-- Jamie ( talk) 06:37, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I appreciate your good efforts at A+X, however regarding your comment "following guidelines supersedes WP:BRD" is flatly incorrect. How the guideline is to be interpreted and applied is at the heart of the matter and reason why we need discussion in the first place.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 18:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion at this RfC and the various sections that followed it, the latest being "This discussion". Since there are four sections so far, very spread out, I am clarifying that the topics are whether we open with Publication history, and whether citation format should be consistent. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 14:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering if you would like to join the discussion about tie-ins at this link since Friginator removed the tie-ins even though most of the past Marvel Comics storylines have them. By the way, thanks for siding with me in opposing the merge of Cardiac. Rtkat3 ( talk) 6:59, April 8 2013 (UTC)
I have read your post. If you want to get caught up, you should find the episodes on Marvel.com, YouTube, or any other sites that would have the episodes so that you can get caught up before the next episode. Rtkat3 ( talk) 1:30, April 10 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tel'aran'rhiod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channeling ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 02:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with your edits here and here to Free Comic Book Day. As a veteran editor since 2009 who has accumulated over 17,000 edits, I'm surprised at your edits, but as you should know, Wikipedia requires citations of reliable sources accompany the material you add in the article text, and not in edit summaries.
Moreover, examiner.com is not considered a reliable source, as indicated by numerous conversations of the community at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard ( May 2009, June 2009, October 2009, July 2011, January 2013)
Lastly, you added no citation to support the statement about a "permanent" move of the holiday to the first Saturday in May after the third year, nor does the BoingBoing story already cited at the end of that passage make any mention of it. Nightscream ( talk) 02:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Oh, sorry, I didn't know that. Do we know how many he has, and if so, have they been named? Because if so, then that would make them brothers of Nick Jr. which should be mentioned in the passage: He is a son of Nick Fury, and a brother (half-brother?) to WhatsHisName, or He is one of the sons of Nick Fury. He has a brother (half-brother), but his identity has not been specified. You should amend the passage to reflect this, since I'm ignorant of the specifics. Thanks. :-) Nightscream ( talk) 00:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raptor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
You don't mind if I try to replace you're image with a less blurry version do you? Jhenderson 777 15:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Amazing Spider-Man 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
What do you think of the inclusion of Phil Urich. I am not sure of him. Jhenderson 777 20:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
...in the navbox that is. Jhenderson 777 20:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
I just feel like saying that the same reason you oppose Mister Negative is sort of why I don't really care about Phil Urich being on there. Has he established himself as a character that would be Hobgoblin in media appearances and alternate universes like the two before him? I don't think so. Flash Thompson has become Venom but I am pretty sure that will only stay in the comic books. That's why I just leave it to Eddie Brock even though Mac Gargan, Flash Thompson etc. have become Venom as well. In all honesty Phil Urich needs to be merged but I don't know where yet because he has been both the Green Goblin and the Hobgoblin. Jhenderson 777 14:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh ok I got you. What made you changed you're mind about Beetle and Boomerang? I was almost going to go "Oh they are fine" for a few reasons? One:Boomerang appeared in Sinister Twelve with every character a established Spider-Man villain. Two:Beetle was the leader of the Sinister Syndicate. What do you think. Maybe I was a little harsh on them being Spidey centered villains? Jhenderson 777 18:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Digifan23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Digifan23 ( talk) 04:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
I plan on making Goblin (Marvel Comics) and it will be about every Goblin themed character in the Marvel universe. Yes noting these characters in a sentence is fine on another Goblin section on the article but a section about them is not necessary. Jhenderson 777 19:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Are you kidding me dude? Evans has a deal with Marvel to be apart of four films; Avengers 2 is his last film! So he is confirmed. TreCoolGuy ( talk) 18:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hmm Rhino and Electro havent been confirmed for Amazing Spider-Man 2? Well even though Marvel, Sony, Marc Webb and other reliable sources stated that they are the main villains in the movie. It even has Electro in the cover of a comic con magazine and trailer. Oh yeah they havent been confirmed yet. Dont get rid of my edit on Spider-Man in film unless you have a real reason to do so. - User:TreCoolGuy
This had me laughing so hard, and I'm still giggling as I type this. I and others have been aggravated by that editor more than once; see his currently long talk page. Thanks for the laugh. Flyer22 ( talk) 19:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Godzilla (2014 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
I am inviting you to take part in a deletion discussion revolving around some of the Marvel Comics prisons taking place here, here, and here so that you can list your say in this. Rtkat3 ( talk) 1:41, October 24 2013 (UTC)
Would you mind checking his edits on Template:Spider-Man. It wouldn't seem right for me to be reverting him all the time. Jhenderson 777 12:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a neutral request for comments at Talk:Ms. Marvel#Requested move 2. All participants in the first request are receiving the same notification.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 20:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day ( see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Lets talk about this. We both think we know better, it seems. The old intro description that I removed included too much talk about The Wheel of Time. That's my reason to change it in the first place; it looks better now. Your edit, however, doesn't even include the title of the second book and only changes a few words; the text stays the same. Mine includes the title and reduces the Wheel of Time part. I hope my English doesn't disturb you. Greetings, -- J.A.R. Huygebaert ( talk) 15:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Spidey. I'll do what I can to help, though probably not tonight. Though I think we both know The Amazing Spider-Man is coming back at some point -- strictly by definition, one can only be "superior" to something else ... and if that something else ain't around, "superior" will stop making sense pretty soon. Like the "dead" Captain America and the Human Torch recently, the Reed Richard in the 1990s, the dead Superman in the 2000s, etc. Peter Parker will be back. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 01:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#BASC:_Asgardian_appeal. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting. SilkTork ✔Tea time 00:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I was able to view the info of the first issue of The Superior Spider-Man (which featured Doctor Octopus in Spider-Man's body) and it was seen that the Superior Spider-Man fought a new incarnation of the Sinister Six consisting of Boomerang, Living Brain, Overdrive, Shocker, Speed Demon, and the female Beetle (whose first name was revealed to be Janice). A twist near the end is that Peter Parker's spirit has stopped the Superior Spider-Man from going too far and vows to find a way back. What do you think of the first issue so far? Rtkat3 ( talk) 4:05, January 26 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Son (comics) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Son (comics) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.
Thank you for uploading File:Scarlet Spider combined.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{ di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.
An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Spidey104,
I am writing to ask if you, as a fan of comics and a contributor to the Comics portal on Wikipedia, would support the notability of the community project called the Marvel Comics Database. Several years ago, the site was deemed too new and not sufficiently notable to qualify for its own Wikipedia article. Since then, the site has passed the 100,000 article mark, after nearly 8 years of effort, and has been featured in the New York Times, Bloomberg BusinessWeek, the Toronto Star, among other mainstream press.
I am the founder of the site and will not create the article myself (to prevent infringing the self-promotion policy), but I ask that you objectively consider my suggestion that the site has become a valued resource and a notable part of the comic book culture, in the same way that Memory Alpha and Wookieepedia have done. If you agree that the Marvel Database is now justifiably notable in its own right, please consider creating an article for the site. Either way, I'd love to hear from you.
Thank you very much,
-- Jamie ( talk) 06:37, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
I appreciate your good efforts at A+X, however regarding your comment "following guidelines supersedes WP:BRD" is flatly incorrect. How the guideline is to be interpreted and applied is at the heart of the matter and reason why we need discussion in the first place.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 18:42, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion at this RfC and the various sections that followed it, the latest being "This discussion". Since there are four sections so far, very spread out, I am clarifying that the topics are whether we open with Publication history, and whether citation format should be consistent. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 14:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering if you would like to join the discussion about tie-ins at this link since Friginator removed the tie-ins even though most of the past Marvel Comics storylines have them. By the way, thanks for siding with me in opposing the merge of Cardiac. Rtkat3 ( talk) 6:59, April 8 2013 (UTC)
I have read your post. If you want to get caught up, you should find the episodes on Marvel.com, YouTube, or any other sites that would have the episodes so that you can get caught up before the next episode. Rtkat3 ( talk) 1:30, April 10 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tel'aran'rhiod, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channeling ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 02:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced material to articles, as you did with your edits here and here to Free Comic Book Day. As a veteran editor since 2009 who has accumulated over 17,000 edits, I'm surprised at your edits, but as you should know, Wikipedia requires citations of reliable sources accompany the material you add in the article text, and not in edit summaries.
Moreover, examiner.com is not considered a reliable source, as indicated by numerous conversations of the community at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard ( May 2009, June 2009, October 2009, July 2011, January 2013)
Lastly, you added no citation to support the statement about a "permanent" move of the holiday to the first Saturday in May after the third year, nor does the BoingBoing story already cited at the end of that passage make any mention of it. Nightscream ( talk) 02:16, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Oh, sorry, I didn't know that. Do we know how many he has, and if so, have they been named? Because if so, then that would make them brothers of Nick Jr. which should be mentioned in the passage: He is a son of Nick Fury, and a brother (half-brother?) to WhatsHisName, or He is one of the sons of Nick Fury. He has a brother (half-brother), but his identity has not been specified. You should amend the passage to reflect this, since I'm ignorant of the specifics. Thanks. :-) Nightscream ( talk) 00:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raptor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
You don't mind if I try to replace you're image with a less blurry version do you? Jhenderson 777 15:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Amazing Spider-Man 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 17:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
What do you think of the inclusion of Phil Urich. I am not sure of him. Jhenderson 777 20:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
...in the navbox that is. Jhenderson 777 20:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
I just feel like saying that the same reason you oppose Mister Negative is sort of why I don't really care about Phil Urich being on there. Has he established himself as a character that would be Hobgoblin in media appearances and alternate universes like the two before him? I don't think so. Flash Thompson has become Venom but I am pretty sure that will only stay in the comic books. That's why I just leave it to Eddie Brock even though Mac Gargan, Flash Thompson etc. have become Venom as well. In all honesty Phil Urich needs to be merged but I don't know where yet because he has been both the Green Goblin and the Hobgoblin. Jhenderson 777 14:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Oh ok I got you. What made you changed you're mind about Beetle and Boomerang? I was almost going to go "Oh they are fine" for a few reasons? One:Boomerang appeared in Sinister Twelve with every character a established Spider-Man villain. Two:Beetle was the leader of the Sinister Syndicate. What do you think. Maybe I was a little harsh on them being Spidey centered villains? Jhenderson 777 18:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Digifan23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Digifan23 ( talk) 04:44, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
I plan on making Goblin (Marvel Comics) and it will be about every Goblin themed character in the Marvel universe. Yes noting these characters in a sentence is fine on another Goblin section on the article but a section about them is not necessary. Jhenderson 777 19:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Are you kidding me dude? Evans has a deal with Marvel to be apart of four films; Avengers 2 is his last film! So he is confirmed. TreCoolGuy ( talk) 18:11, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hmm Rhino and Electro havent been confirmed for Amazing Spider-Man 2? Well even though Marvel, Sony, Marc Webb and other reliable sources stated that they are the main villains in the movie. It even has Electro in the cover of a comic con magazine and trailer. Oh yeah they havent been confirmed yet. Dont get rid of my edit on Spider-Man in film unless you have a real reason to do so. - User:TreCoolGuy
This had me laughing so hard, and I'm still giggling as I type this. I and others have been aggravated by that editor more than once; see his currently long talk page. Thanks for the laugh. Flyer22 ( talk) 19:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Godzilla (2014 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:39, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
I am inviting you to take part in a deletion discussion revolving around some of the Marvel Comics prisons taking place here, here, and here so that you can list your say in this. Rtkat3 ( talk) 1:41, October 24 2013 (UTC)
Would you mind checking his edits on Template:Spider-Man. It wouldn't seem right for me to be reverting him all the time. Jhenderson 777 12:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a neutral request for comments at Talk:Ms. Marvel#Requested move 2. All participants in the first request are receiving the same notification.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 20:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day ( see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Lets talk about this. We both think we know better, it seems. The old intro description that I removed included too much talk about The Wheel of Time. That's my reason to change it in the first place; it looks better now. Your edit, however, doesn't even include the title of the second book and only changes a few words; the text stays the same. Mine includes the title and reduces the Wheel of Time part. I hope my English doesn't disturb you. Greetings, -- J.A.R. Huygebaert ( talk) 15:13, 24 December 2013 (UTC)