I don't know about the Prowler and Sinister Six links of which you speak of unless the ones I removed turned out to be redirects. But for Avenging Spider-Man, Moloids redirect to Subterranea. At least I was able to add a section for the Molans on Subterranea's page. Rtkat3 ( talk) 5:21, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Hi Spidey! I see you've been adding {{
orphan}}
on
Ai Apaec (comics), which has five incoming links.
WP:ORPHAN#Criteria states "An article is orphaned if no other articles link to it. It is recommended to only place the {{
orphan}} tag if the article has ZERO incoming links from other articles. Although a single, relevant incoming link is sufficient to remove the tag, three or more is ideal and will help ensure the article is reachable to readers." Happy editing!
GoingBatty (
talk)
05:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey, we've worked together in the past and I noticed you have made significant contributions to the Anya Corazon article. I have started a discussion about the edit war currently going on in that article. I thought I'd let you know in case you want to make a comment. Kurt Parker ( talk) 21:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Ends of the Earth (Marvel Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Aunty-S (
talk)
18:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Personally I don't think that's a reason for the inclusion myself. The character hasn't proven notability as a Spider-Man enemy except as another Lizard ripoff and his biography is related to the Lizards...but I am free to talk about it if you disagree. And if he deserves to stay because of that reason Shriek and Calypso probably deserve to stay as well even though they are basically just supporting villains of the more major villain. :) Jhenderson 777 15:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
What do you think of a teamwork on making Spider-Man a FA article. Jhenderson 777 17:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Eric Battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walking Dead ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
I searched for a suitable merge before proding American Son (comics), but found nothing. Before I nominate it at AFD, do you have any suggestions? Argento Surfer ( talk) 13:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Although I'll probably just incorporate the link into the text with a piped link (where space allows it), since I often like to include explanations ( here and here, for example) to newbies who either don't know to or don't wish to click on the wikilinks.
No kidding. But using the redirect seems natural when "Peter Parker" is used as a linkable point in the text. "[[Spider-Man|Peter Parker]] is a bit overkill unless the intent is to orphan the redirect from all article use.
- J Greb ( talk) 22:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey Spidey104, I was wondering what you think about the recent issues of Spider-Man which revolved around the Ends of the Earth. Even though Doctor Octopus has turned the government against Spider-Man, he is planning to take the world down with him when his illness reaches it's limit. Also, thanks for helping me improve the Savage Six. That page had to be created since there were two sections for it listed on the Sinister Six's page. When the Savage Six's next appearance comes out, we'll have some more info to put for the group. Rtkat3 ( Rtkat3) 5:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Why did you suddenly change your opinion in the discussion? I know you can't be TriiipleThreat, but the change is very surprising and confusing. Kurt Parker ( talk) 14:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
In List of Spider-Man enemies, Spider-Man revenge squad is removed constantly as if it's not a group enemy. What is your thoughts about it? I also think I probably have had enough with reverting because the IP editor might have been the same editor for a while. Which means I could have gone reverting more than I should. If so would you mind taking over patrolling if you feel that it should stay. Jhenderson 777 20:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Because we do not know what will come to pass, we do however know the intent of the filmmakers. And excuse me if my edit summary came off as harsh, I do recognize your good faith.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 15:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
While I appreciate the intent, Paulharv2 only edited the Spider-Man template to add the Daredevil article today [1].
- J Greb ( talk) 23:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
You previously contributed to this discussion and now there is a straw poll being conducted. Please make your vote clearly so numbers do not need to be interpreted. Thank you Kurt Parker ( talk) 14:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Falcon avengers 64.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for making a request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. I am sorry that it has taken this amount of time to attend to your request. Please be advised that we have been unable to close your request based on the information supplied. Please visit the whitelist request page and search for your name or the site you requested where you will see details of what additional information is required. Please note that replies here or on my talk page will not be taken into account. Please also note that if no information is received within two weeks from now, your request may be treated as withdrawn. Stifle ( talk) 17:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I do hope you're not encouraging that people relink terms every section, because that is just what you endorsed. I'm also pretty sure that cannot be the policy because that would result in massive overlink. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 01:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
I think we need to merge Sha-Shan into a list article just like Anna Watson. I definitely don't see her belonging on the navbox either. Jhenderson 777 00:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't know about the Prowler and Sinister Six links of which you speak of unless the ones I removed turned out to be redirects. But for Avenging Spider-Man, Moloids redirect to Subterranea. At least I was able to add a section for the Molans on Subterranea's page. Rtkat3 ( talk) 5:21, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
Hi Spidey! I see you've been adding {{
orphan}}
on
Ai Apaec (comics), which has five incoming links.
WP:ORPHAN#Criteria states "An article is orphaned if no other articles link to it. It is recommended to only place the {{
orphan}} tag if the article has ZERO incoming links from other articles. Although a single, relevant incoming link is sufficient to remove the tag, three or more is ideal and will help ensure the article is reachable to readers." Happy editing!
GoingBatty (
talk)
05:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey, we've worked together in the past and I noticed you have made significant contributions to the Anya Corazon article. I have started a discussion about the edit war currently going on in that article. I thought I'd let you know in case you want to make a comment. Kurt Parker ( talk) 21:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of films considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Thank you, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
The article Ends of the Earth (Marvel Comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Aunty-S (
talk)
18:11, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Personally I don't think that's a reason for the inclusion myself. The character hasn't proven notability as a Spider-Man enemy except as another Lizard ripoff and his biography is related to the Lizards...but I am free to talk about it if you disagree. And if he deserves to stay because of that reason Shriek and Calypso probably deserve to stay as well even though they are basically just supporting villains of the more major villain. :) Jhenderson 777 15:21, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
What do you think of a teamwork on making Spider-Man a FA article. Jhenderson 777 17:08, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Eric Battle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walking Dead ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:39, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
I searched for a suitable merge before proding American Son (comics), but found nothing. Before I nominate it at AFD, do you have any suggestions? Argento Surfer ( talk) 13:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! Although I'll probably just incorporate the link into the text with a piped link (where space allows it), since I often like to include explanations ( here and here, for example) to newbies who either don't know to or don't wish to click on the wikilinks.
No kidding. But using the redirect seems natural when "Peter Parker" is used as a linkable point in the text. "[[Spider-Man|Peter Parker]] is a bit overkill unless the intent is to orphan the redirect from all article use.
- J Greb ( talk) 22:55, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey Spidey104, I was wondering what you think about the recent issues of Spider-Man which revolved around the Ends of the Earth. Even though Doctor Octopus has turned the government against Spider-Man, he is planning to take the world down with him when his illness reaches it's limit. Also, thanks for helping me improve the Savage Six. That page had to be created since there were two sections for it listed on the Sinister Six's page. When the Savage Six's next appearance comes out, we'll have some more info to put for the group. Rtkat3 ( Rtkat3) 5:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Why did you suddenly change your opinion in the discussion? I know you can't be TriiipleThreat, but the change is very surprising and confusing. Kurt Parker ( talk) 14:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
In List of Spider-Man enemies, Spider-Man revenge squad is removed constantly as if it's not a group enemy. What is your thoughts about it? I also think I probably have had enough with reverting because the IP editor might have been the same editor for a while. Which means I could have gone reverting more than I should. If so would you mind taking over patrolling if you feel that it should stay. Jhenderson 777 20:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Because we do not know what will come to pass, we do however know the intent of the filmmakers. And excuse me if my edit summary came off as harsh, I do recognize your good faith.-- TriiipleThreat ( talk) 15:06, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
While I appreciate the intent, Paulharv2 only edited the Spider-Man template to add the Daredevil article today [1].
- J Greb ( talk) 23:37, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
You previously contributed to this discussion and now there is a straw poll being conducted. Please make your vote clearly so numbers do not need to be interpreted. Thank you Kurt Parker ( talk) 14:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Falcon avengers 64.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for making a request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. I am sorry that it has taken this amount of time to attend to your request. Please be advised that we have been unable to close your request based on the information supplied. Please visit the whitelist request page and search for your name or the site you requested where you will see details of what additional information is required. Please note that replies here or on my talk page will not be taken into account. Please also note that if no information is received within two weeks from now, your request may be treated as withdrawn. Stifle ( talk) 17:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I do hope you're not encouraging that people relink terms every section, because that is just what you endorsed. I'm also pretty sure that cannot be the policy because that would result in massive overlink. Darkwarriorblake ( talk) 01:48, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
I think we need to merge Sha-Shan into a list article just like Anna Watson. I definitely don't see her belonging on the navbox either. Jhenderson 777 00:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)