Hello, Spear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Geurie, New South Wales have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the
guide for citing sources or come to the
new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bidgee ( talk) 10:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
Geurie, New South Wales. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Bidgee (
talk)
11:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Deep Purple. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Mlpearc
powwow
12:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Just wondering about your edit to Murder of Janine Balding at 06:25, 22 September 2013. See here. I presume a mistake? I've reverted it manually anyway. Regards, 220 of Borg 13:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Hi. From what I see., I removed the word "bludgeoned". Janine was not bludgeoned in any way. I know. I was the forensic (crime scene) officer who conducted the entire forensic investigation of her murder - including the post-mortem, autopsy examination at the Westmead Mortuary. Dr. Peter ELLIS was the attending pathologist and I assisted him with the examination and photographing of her body. I still hold a copy of the entire prosecution brief and every photograph I took during the investigation. One would assume that qualifies me to correct inaccuracies? Cheers.
Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Australian_War_Memorial&diff=635941389&oldid=635940711 - do you have a reference that says the road name is capitalised? Everything I've seen ( example) says that it's "Anzac Parade". Mitch Ames ( talk) 06:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Janine Balding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Janine Balding, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
TJRC (
talk)
05:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I AM the reliable source. I was intensely involved in Janine's murder as the forensics Police officer who investigated same. I have a copy of the entire brief of evidence, including Moberley's statement - evidence that she gave at the coroner's inquest, committal and subsequent Supreme Court trials. All that evidence is on the public record and as court transcripts. I could expand this entry to the nth degree if necessary, but I'm just trying to add what I see as relevant, pertinent and interesting points. Perhaps a relevant citation could be statement page and paragraph numbers, with the name of the trial???
Too hard. Game over.
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. 220 of Borg 04:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Virtually all of your edits are in violation of our Manual of Style, or just matters of personal preference. Please stop, and familiarize yourself with WP:MOS before making further edits of this nature. -- Laser brain (talk) 13:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC) No personal preferences here. All common English usage. I fail to see any 'violations' as you call them - but if that's your decision, so be it! Who am I to argue?
Hello, Spear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you provide a more complete cite than " The Daily Telegraph 25/09/2019"? A link to the article, the article's name or at least a complete date with an actual year? I'd like to keep your contribution in the article, but not if it cannot be verified. TJRC ( talk) 15:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry. That was obviously a typo/slip that omitted the 9 in 2019.
The journalist who wrote the article is Janet Fife-Yeomans, chief crime reporter for The Daily Telegraph, who reported on the Balding murder from day one. I was the NSW Police Forensics officer who had carriage of the crime scene/s from day one, and I've stayed in touch with Janet since the days of the original court matters - Coroner's Court right through to the Supreme Court Trials. The details for the cited entry are taken directly from her reporting on Wilmot's appeal. Hope that helps. Thank you.
Spear (
talk)
10:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Spear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Geurie, New South Wales have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the
guide for citing sources or come to the
new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{
helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bidgee ( talk) 10:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
Geurie, New South Wales. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Bidgee (
talk)
11:07, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Deep Purple. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Mlpearc
powwow
12:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Just wondering about your edit to Murder of Janine Balding at 06:25, 22 September 2013. See here. I presume a mistake? I've reverted it manually anyway. Regards, 220 of Borg 13:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC) Hi. From what I see., I removed the word "bludgeoned". Janine was not bludgeoned in any way. I know. I was the forensic (crime scene) officer who conducted the entire forensic investigation of her murder - including the post-mortem, autopsy examination at the Westmead Mortuary. Dr. Peter ELLIS was the attending pathologist and I assisted him with the examination and photographing of her body. I still hold a copy of the entire prosecution brief and every photograph I took during the investigation. One would assume that qualifies me to correct inaccuracies? Cheers.
Re: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Australian_War_Memorial&diff=635941389&oldid=635940711 - do you have a reference that says the road name is capitalised? Everything I've seen ( example) says that it's "Anzac Parade". Mitch Ames ( talk) 06:52, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murder of Janine Balding, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
TJRC. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Janine Balding, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
TJRC (
talk)
05:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I AM the reliable source. I was intensely involved in Janine's murder as the forensics Police officer who investigated same. I have a copy of the entire brief of evidence, including Moberley's statement - evidence that she gave at the coroner's inquest, committal and subsequent Supreme Court trials. All that evidence is on the public record and as court transcripts. I could expand this entry to the nth degree if necessary, but I'm just trying to add what I see as relevant, pertinent and interesting points. Perhaps a relevant citation could be statement page and paragraph numbers, with the name of the trial???
Too hard. Game over.
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. 220 of Borg 04:36, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Virtually all of your edits are in violation of our Manual of Style, or just matters of personal preference. Please stop, and familiarize yourself with WP:MOS before making further edits of this nature. -- Laser brain (talk) 13:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC) No personal preferences here. All common English usage. I fail to see any 'violations' as you call them - but if that's your decision, so be it! Who am I to argue?
Hello, Spear. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you provide a more complete cite than " The Daily Telegraph 25/09/2019"? A link to the article, the article's name or at least a complete date with an actual year? I'd like to keep your contribution in the article, but not if it cannot be verified. TJRC ( talk) 15:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry. That was obviously a typo/slip that omitted the 9 in 2019.
The journalist who wrote the article is Janet Fife-Yeomans, chief crime reporter for The Daily Telegraph, who reported on the Balding murder from day one. I was the NSW Police Forensics officer who had carriage of the crime scene/s from day one, and I've stayed in touch with Janet since the days of the original court matters - Coroner's Court right through to the Supreme Court Trials. The details for the cited entry are taken directly from her reporting on Wilmot's appeal. Hope that helps. Thank you.
Spear (
talk)
10:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)