|
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
College and university rankings—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk) 08:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Please don't use deceptive edit summaries - this appears to be a trend. Kuru (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
RovingPersonalityConstruct. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. -
RovingPersonalityConstruct (
talk,
contribs) 02:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes I understand. Will specify next time. Soumya Sekhar Biswas ( talk) 04:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 17:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Firestar464 (
talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
What's the problem? Specify. I don't remember deleting anything, rather aligned data according to sequence(which happened before). Soumya Sekhar Biswas ( talk) 04:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
User talk:Firestar464. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. "Are you some self-appointed vigilante?" That's not really respectful.
Firestar464 (
talk) 06:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Soumya
I saw your alert on the Pahela Baisakh talk page. Thank you. I reintroduced the material on Shashank that had been deleted. Please continue to keep a tab on that page.
Dipendra2007 ( talk) 20:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks SReader21 ( talk) 20:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
College and university rankings—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk) 08:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Please don't use deceptive edit summaries - this appears to be a trend. Kuru (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
RovingPersonalityConstruct. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. -
RovingPersonalityConstruct (
talk,
contribs) 02:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Yes I understand. Will specify next time. Soumya Sekhar Biswas ( talk) 04:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 17:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Firestar464 (
talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
What's the problem? Specify. I don't remember deleting anything, rather aligned data according to sequence(which happened before). Soumya Sekhar Biswas ( talk) 04:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
User talk:Firestar464. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. "Are you some self-appointed vigilante?" That's not really respectful.
Firestar464 (
talk) 06:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Soumya
I saw your alert on the Pahela Baisakh talk page. Thank you. I reintroduced the material on Shashank that had been deleted. Please continue to keep a tab on that page.
Dipendra2007 ( talk) 20:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks SReader21 ( talk) 20:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)