Hello! Soulman1125,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Sulfurboy (
talk)
19:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Braeden Wright, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Soulman1125. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Braeden Wright".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 12:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
The article Braeden Wright has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. "References" are quotes, brief mentions, interviews, or lack mention of the article subject.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
reddogsix (
talk)
03:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Braeden Wright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braeden Wright until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix ( talk) 23:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lola Lennox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Lennox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix ( talk) 23:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Putting my money where my mouth is. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
You have said here and here that you have no "conflict of interest". I have no idea how you define "conflict of interest" but your behavior here in Wikipedia shows that you very likely a) are being paid to work on these articles about models or b) have some other connection with the two subjects about which you have edited the most.
Please a) disclose if you are being paid, or expect to be paid, for any of your work here; b) disclose any connection you have to Braeden Wright or Lola Lennox and their management.
Please respond here before you do anything else.
Please be aware that there is a place for editors who are paid or who have some connection to subjects about which they write, but you need to follow the relevant policies and guidelines. The foundation of each of them, is disclosure. Please think carefully before you reply, and please be forthright in answering the two questions. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 14:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've moved this article to draft again because I don't think it is ready for article space. I would say straight up that I don't see any copyright infringement in the present text. However, I don't see good evidence of notability either. I would hope that you can work on it together with others to bring it up to standard. Having it in draft ought to reduce the heat generated by the edit war. Deb ( talk) 14:36, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Wright was born in Edmonton, Canada, where he lived until beginning his international career as a model. He is a lifelong ice hockey player. [1] He received a degree with distinction in Political Science from the University of Alberta in 2010. [2] [3] </ref>
References
The Citation Barnstar | |
Hey there, thanks for commenting on
The Hugs page (nominated for deletion - not sure why) You're right about the citations being valid and not local or run of the mill.
Can you help edit the page so it stays up on Wiki? I think removing some of the regional/local press and to shorten the article with the best citations would be best. Glad you commented! Alternatively, maybe you could get more users to add "Strong Keep" on the deletion page. Thank you for your kind word and help in keeping this page up. Also, the username that edited The Hugs Wiki Page was not valid but was not a promotional effort or a manager writing the article. "Robert McClenon" accusations are simply not correct and the article deserves to stay up. Thank you again, Beinganiceperson ( talk) 06:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Soulman1125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Braeden Wright".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 20:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illangelo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page After Hours ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Lola Lennox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Lennox. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 06:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Soulman1125,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Sulfurboy (
talk)
19:21, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Braeden Wright, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:31, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Soulman1125. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, " Braeden Wright".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 12:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
The article Braeden Wright has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. "References" are quotes, brief mentions, interviews, or lack mention of the article subject.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
reddogsix (
talk)
03:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Braeden Wright is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braeden Wright until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix ( talk) 23:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lola Lennox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Lennox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix ( talk) 23:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Putting my money where my mouth is. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme ( talk) 10:59, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
You have said here and here that you have no "conflict of interest". I have no idea how you define "conflict of interest" but your behavior here in Wikipedia shows that you very likely a) are being paid to work on these articles about models or b) have some other connection with the two subjects about which you have edited the most.
Please a) disclose if you are being paid, or expect to be paid, for any of your work here; b) disclose any connection you have to Braeden Wright or Lola Lennox and their management.
Please respond here before you do anything else.
Please be aware that there is a place for editors who are paid or who have some connection to subjects about which they write, but you need to follow the relevant policies and guidelines. The foundation of each of them, is disclosure. Please think carefully before you reply, and please be forthright in answering the two questions. Thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 14:58, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I've moved this article to draft again because I don't think it is ready for article space. I would say straight up that I don't see any copyright infringement in the present text. However, I don't see good evidence of notability either. I would hope that you can work on it together with others to bring it up to standard. Having it in draft ought to reduce the heat generated by the edit war. Deb ( talk) 14:36, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Wright was born in Edmonton, Canada, where he lived until beginning his international career as a model. He is a lifelong ice hockey player. [1] He received a degree with distinction in Political Science from the University of Alberta in 2010. [2] [3] </ref>
References
The Citation Barnstar | |
Hey there, thanks for commenting on
The Hugs page (nominated for deletion - not sure why) You're right about the citations being valid and not local or run of the mill.
Can you help edit the page so it stays up on Wiki? I think removing some of the regional/local press and to shorten the article with the best citations would be best. Glad you commented! Alternatively, maybe you could get more users to add "Strong Keep" on the deletion page. Thank you for your kind word and help in keeping this page up. Also, the username that edited The Hugs Wiki Page was not valid but was not a promotional effort or a manager writing the article. "Robert McClenon" accusations are simply not correct and the article deserves to stay up. Thank you again, Beinganiceperson ( talk) 06:45, 4 October 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, Soulman1125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Braeden Wright".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta ( talk) 20:41, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illangelo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page After Hours ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Lola Lennox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Lennox. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 06:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)