Hello, Soshuvo, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot ( talk) 10:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC) reply Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Sania Sultana Liza has been reverted.
Your edit here to Sania Sultana Liza was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed ( https://www.facebook.com/SaniaSultanaLiza, https://www.facebook.com/SaniaSultanaLiza) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! -- XLinkBot ( talk) 10:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Soshuvo! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm DatGuy. I noticed that in this edit to Dilshad Nahar Kona, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat Guy ^Talk _Contribs 07:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sania Sultana Liza. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marvellous Spider -Man 17:46, 10 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Stop continually adding promotional and puffery to the Sania Sultana Liza article. This isn't a place to promote her, but to describe the person simply and plainly. Phrases like "Soon with all the support of her fans she will rock the world" absolutely do not belong on Wikipedia articles. This article was already deleted once because it was so over the top promotional. You are continuing towards that goal. If you continue to rewrite the article using repeated promotional language, I will ask to have you blocked from editing. Stop. Ravensfire ( talk) 05:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Liza without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU ^{( ✉)} 11:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Laoris. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Google Page Creator without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Laoris ( talk) 05:18, 16 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hey, please be aware of the number of references you're adding for basic, non-controversial facts. We don't need 4 references to say when an album was released, just one good one. Please review and reduce the references you've added. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:26, 16 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Stop adding WP:TRIVIA to the Liza article. The list of countries she's traveled is considered trivia - it's not notable and not relevant for an encyclopedia. Stop adding it. Ravensfire ( talk) 20:51, 16 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Do not remove tags from articles, as you did here without fixing the problem. There are too many references/citations in that section. You do NOT need six references to say a particular article was released. You need ONE. You do not need six references to say she's been on other albums, you need only a couple at most, just one if it says she's appears on 50+ albums. Stop removing the tag until you actually fix the problem. The sources aren't in English so I cannot review them and do the clean up for you. I have created a talk page section on the article talk page so discuss it there. Until the problem is fixed though, STOP removing the tag. Ravensfire ( talk) 14:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Please stop trying to make the Liza page about that one artist. It's a disambiguation page as multiple other articles share that same name. You've tried twice now to make it only about the one artist. Stop. Your actions are starting to borderline on disruptive. You need to use article talk pages more and stop trying to promote one artist on Wikipedia. This is the wrong website for that. Ravensfire ( talk) 16:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Liza without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! CAPTAIN RAJU ^{( ✉)} 19:39, 18 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Soshuvo, please be careful with the images you're uploading to Wikimedia Commons. The only images they allow there are ones that have been published with the correct Creative Commons license. Most commercial images don't have the right license and will be deleted from Commons. You cannot just take an image from a website and upload it to Commons, claiming it was either your work or that it has the right license. YOU have to make sure it's correct before you upload it or the image will be deleted (as you've already found out) and potentially you being blocked (if you continue to upload images with bad or false license information).

The English Wikipedia site has a slightly more flexible image policy that may help. For some types of images, you can claim fair use. The Fair Use page has some information that might help. Basically, the album covers would be allowable as fair use images. Pictures of Liza are not allowed as fair use images though. As a living person, it's possible for someone to take a candid photo of her and release it under the Creative Commons license, making it fully free. We therefore do not allow a fair-use exemption for living persons because a free alternative could be found.

Please take some time to understand the rules about images on Commons and here. The upload page for both sites has a place where you can ask questions before uploading the images and I encourage you to use them. If you continue to upload image with false claims ("Own work" with it clearly was not your work) or with non-compatible licenses, you will end up blocked from editing. Don't let things get that far. Ravensfire ( talk) 15:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Soshuvo, you've been reverting the tag under your IP while you weren't logged in. You've now just logged in to revert the tag again despite warnings and multiple attempts to get you to discuss the issue on the article talk page. Enough. You've clearly breached the 3 revert limit and made NO attempt to discuss the issues. I will be reporting you to the edit-war noticeboard unless you IMMEDIATELY return the tag to the article and use the article talk page to discuss the problem. Ravensfire ( talk) 17:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:27.147.205.217_.2F_User:Soshuvo_reported_by_User:Ravensfire_.28Result:_.29. Thank you. Ravensfire ( talk) 17:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Sania Sultana Liza. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.   NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:50, 20 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 21:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Soshuvo, you need to stop adding the excessive citations. They were removed for a good reason - we only need one good source, not lots of them. Wikipedia already has links set to WP:NOFOLLOW so google and other search engines do NOT include links here when determining page rank. In other words, adding links here for search engine optimization (SEO) simply doesn't work. If you continue to add excessive links, I will ask admins to review your actions. Please stop and respond to the concerns here. Ravensfire ( talk) 16:40, 25 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Roshu Bangal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sania Sultana Liza have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. What in the world are you trying to do with this 'Liza' madness, Ha? Roshu ( talk · contribs · email) 01:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sania Sultana Liza, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. This is the English wikipedia - articles must be in English, not another language. Ravensfire ( talk) 01:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soshuvo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ravensfire ( talk) 16:10, 29 September 2016 (UTC) reply

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soshuvo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN talk to me 17:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Your addition to Sania Sultana Liza has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You obviously have no concept of what is a copyright violation. You just uploaded another copyright violation and tried to link it here. That WILL NOT HAPPEN. Do you understand that? Please respond here and at least acknowledge that you see these concerns. Ravensfire ( talk) 00:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Asked again for you to be blocked on commons. You must start responded both there and here to the warnings being left or you WILL be blocked. Ravensfire ( talk) 00:47, 7 October 2016 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for disruptive editing-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. reply

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Sania Sultana Liza‎, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

• If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
• If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
• If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Image is CLEARLY not your work but was copied from Liza's twitter page and uploaded to commons. That is another copyright violation that you've uploaded and lied about it being your work. You must stop this. You will end up blocked both here and on commons if you continue the lies and copyright violations. Stop. Ravensfire ( talk) 22:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soshuvo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Ravensfire ( talk) 18:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Soshuvo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Soshuvo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chadmukh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadmukh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. আফতাব ( talk) 02:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC) reply