There's no debate because it is a prod, not an AfD. Prods get deleted in 5 days if nobody objects to the deletion. If you want it to be an AfD instead, feel free to change it to that. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 21:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, grazie, gracias and merci for semi-protecting the article. Now I can do useful things instead of dealing with idiots. Totnesmartin 16:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
You stated the plesiosaur section was too long. Read it over and tell me what you think. Carajou 08:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Guess what got removed because some admin guy didn't think they'd be back?
And guess who came back? Carajou 02:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
You've seen a UFO? What did it look like? What did you do about it? You should put that in your user page, I don't know a lot of people who have seen UFOs. I did find it useful that you have a "Trying to avoid lame edit wars" section; that part about going through the trouble of scanning a book only to be met with persistent disbelief sucks. V-Man737 00:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The
Paranormal WikiProject Newsletter Issue II - February 2007 | |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please de-list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
InShaneee 21:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Construct your article around that title, lay it out according to the way it looks best...and there ya go! Carajou 02:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeppers, I did Nessie, pretty-much following the same layout I did for Bigfoot. Put the animal first, then the other mundane stuff afterwards. I didn't do too much changing of the writing, but I did smooth out the lead paragraph, which should work for the article. Carajou 23:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I just ripped out some new arse-orifices without naming names over the Bermuda Triangle page. What happened is two editors came in, and altered the intro paragraph in such a way as to downplay the official, real version and replace it with the fictional one. In short, they traded facts for bulls##t. They also trashed the layout of the page, and I wouldn't stand for that.
The Triangle page was picked up as a foreign-language featured article before these clowns did their alterations. I put it back exactly the way I had it, and invited the staff at the Wiki-paranormal side to give it a look. They can edit in their own info, but they're going to respect the article. Carajou 03:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for the info. I've never read the book so I couldn't do the comparison myself.
I hope that you don't mind, but I've used the information that you provided and reworded the passage a bit. If you don't think that my version is an improvement, feel free to edit it.
perfectblue 09:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The
Paranormal WikiProject Newsletter Issue III - March 2007 | |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please de-list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
InShaneee 05:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. Please feel free to take and make use of anything about the [[WP:Cheshire|Cheshire WikiProject}} you feel would be useful. If you improve what you borrow, may be we will come back and re-borrow the improved one from you! Seriously, anything that can help us both improve the coverage of our respective counties can, I think, be shared with no problem. Congratulations on getting the project up and running. Already, I can see some things that might be useful for us to borrow! DDStretch (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
(stored here after deleting section in Proposed Projects)
Description : a project to create and improve articles about Devon (the English County).
Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)
Comments:
There have been a number of rather negative aspects to Devon articles, notably disagreements as to history, obviously enthusiastic people who have a particular viewpoint or local knowledge but unverified information, and also the usual inferiority problem we have relating to our regional position and low economic and social status, within the SW, UK and the world. Cornwall should be the model to approach, with an objective for everyone to raise their game, and be more constructive. The project should cover Plymouth, Exeter, Torbay and all aspects of Devon and its environs. I'm likely to provide rhetorical help. Stevebritgimp 16:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
WIll you be Exploring the Devonian langage?-- Lucy-marie 00:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
I suppose that would depend on whether or not anyone has the needed expertise Birddrz 12:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Langage as in the farm? :) Old Westcounty Brythonic/Devonish would be fair game as a Devon subject, but the facts (such as they are) should be stuck to. Speaking personally the 'Devon'-ness of things needn't just be geographical, but as pointed out below geography will be the lion's share of it. Stevebritgimp 22:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree, much of Devon is geographicaly interesting anyway such as Dartmoor Birddrz 23:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to apologise on behalf of Axevalley, as I guess some of our more immature students were responsible for at least some of the vandalism created on the Colyton Grammar School Page.
My apologies, Pureferret 10:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I've seen much worse here! Totnesmartin 16:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Yes I know, nobody's perfect. go away. Totnesmartin 22:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to blahblahblah etc HagermanBot 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thought you might like to know that several of the articles in the Category:Disney's The Little Mermaid characters are currently being considered for deletion as being non-notable. Badbilltucker 21:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Hola, I thought this comment on Talk:Spider webs in space was hilarious! "Cross spider redirects to European garden spider, so perhaps that's the answer, rather than hybridised spiders. Or perhaps they were annoyed about being in space. Totnesmartin 17:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)"You have just scored yourself a laughing point :) Rosa 18:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Just like to thank you for cutting the plot section down a considerable amount! It's been that way for far too long. WP style guidelines recommend a length of 400-600 words (IIRC) unless the film is very long or very complicated, so it's still a bit too long, but you've cut out a big chunk. Thanks again. Geoff B 15:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! A Tory? Yeah, us Wiccans tend to be pretty conservative old gits! Funny, eh! Fuzzypeg ☻ 03:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi...the AFD you posted in was for its first nomination. I've nominated it for AFD again, so feel free to drop in your two cents again. Thanks.-- CyberGhostface 17:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: your post in Talk:Current 93, I'd say that if the category is British experimental musicians then it should only include people. Thus, David Tibet should be included, but not Current 93. Likewise, Nurse With Wound (a band, though one containing only one constant member) should not be included in the category, but Steven Stapleton (NWW's sole member) should be. -- rynne 17:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC) How did I miss those links? dur. Totnesmartin 21:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
The "discuss" tag for merging Zohnerism goes to the Dihydrogen monoxide hoax talk page, where nobody necessarily knows that Zohnerism (the article) even exists. Shouldn't it go to the talk page for Zohnerism? - DavidWBrooks 13:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Say, do you know of any journals or articles discussing about the Naraoiids and relatives as not being trilobites? I want to include that in the articles about Naraoia and Nektaspida.-- Mr Fink 22:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Totnesmartin 23:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your contribution to the article Jimmy Cauty. I'm a little surprised that Cauty is mentioned in a book as early as 1980, perhaps you could help WP:KLF out with a little more info on this? Please see Talk:Jimmy_Cauty#Born_in_Totnes_reference. -- kingboyk 15:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for cracking me up... "New article about slugs. Needs lettuce to grow." is possibly the funniest (and cutest) edit summary I've ever seen. :) Pinball22 20:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
No reason, just hoping to brighten your day. V-Man - T/ C 00:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the link - I meant to reply earlier. The spelling would probably still keep getting altered even if I added it to the article! It's always good to have proof though, especially for obscure details like this. Pufnstuf 00:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC) What you have to do is add an invisible comment at the spot. here's a couple of examples: [2] [3]. They help, actually. Totnesmartin 12:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Onceonthisisland has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Just wanted to bring happiness!-- Onceonthisisland 21:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Hay Totnesmartin... you might want to watch your language a little bit when reverting vandalism. (In reference to this edit) I know it's not really a big deal when the shoe relay does fit... but it makes us all look good if we maintain a level of dignity above that of the vandal. Thanks, --- J.S ( T/ C/ WRE)
Thanks for being bold where I wavered. The trouble is the "Medicinal use" section is now better referenced than the rest of the article. I'll see what I can find.-- QuestingVole 21:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to go on about this, but all of the sources that I found specifically state Britain as in the geographic area, the UK is a larger area and the overall statistics may be very different if you include the rest of the UK. I only have data for Britain so I think that we should stick to it.
perfectblue 17:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Its on david gerards watch i think - he used to come from where I am sending this from - I was the driver for jimmy when he was here two weeks ago - does that explain all? Satu Suro 11:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for getting back to me with that. I did a bit of scrounging and worked it out... I take it that it's not too big a placethough - it looks like you've given me a map of some guys' back paddocks! Ga rr ie 22:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
It's probably just a couple of farms! I'd never heard of it until you mentioned it. Totnesmartin 09:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
NGC=National Geographic Channel, it was said in the Bermuda Triangle article.-- Migospia 20:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Poltergeist/Archive1, by
SkierRMH, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Poltergeist/Archive1 fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Poltergeist/Archive1, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Poltergeist/Archive1 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
07:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, it can be spelt 'Febuary' or 'February', though February is more common. I actually don't think I can change it at the moment, I've been having computer troubles. Brenton.eccles 10:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Please always check page histories before nominating pages for speedy deletion. Some pages, such as Dahia (Rajput clan), which you tagged to speedy deletion, have merely been vandalized. Administrators are responsible for checking page histories before they hit the delete button as well, but sometimes make mistakes. Thanks for your help! Goodnight mush Talk 21:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
There's no debate because it is a prod, not an AfD. Prods get deleted in 5 days if nobody objects to the deletion. If you want it to be an AfD instead, feel free to change it to that. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 21:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, grazie, gracias and merci for semi-protecting the article. Now I can do useful things instead of dealing with idiots. Totnesmartin 16:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
You stated the plesiosaur section was too long. Read it over and tell me what you think. Carajou 08:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Guess what got removed because some admin guy didn't think they'd be back?
And guess who came back? Carajou 02:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
You've seen a UFO? What did it look like? What did you do about it? You should put that in your user page, I don't know a lot of people who have seen UFOs. I did find it useful that you have a "Trying to avoid lame edit wars" section; that part about going through the trouble of scanning a book only to be met with persistent disbelief sucks. V-Man737 00:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The
Paranormal WikiProject Newsletter Issue II - February 2007 | |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please de-list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
InShaneee 21:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Construct your article around that title, lay it out according to the way it looks best...and there ya go! Carajou 02:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Yeppers, I did Nessie, pretty-much following the same layout I did for Bigfoot. Put the animal first, then the other mundane stuff afterwards. I didn't do too much changing of the writing, but I did smooth out the lead paragraph, which should work for the article. Carajou 23:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
I just ripped out some new arse-orifices without naming names over the Bermuda Triangle page. What happened is two editors came in, and altered the intro paragraph in such a way as to downplay the official, real version and replace it with the fictional one. In short, they traded facts for bulls##t. They also trashed the layout of the page, and I wouldn't stand for that.
The Triangle page was picked up as a foreign-language featured article before these clowns did their alterations. I put it back exactly the way I had it, and invited the staff at the Wiki-paranormal side to give it a look. They can edit in their own info, but they're going to respect the article. Carajou 03:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Cheers for the info. I've never read the book so I couldn't do the comparison myself.
I hope that you don't mind, but I've used the information that you provided and reworded the passage a bit. If you don't think that my version is an improvement, feel free to edit it.
perfectblue 09:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The
Paranormal WikiProject Newsletter Issue III - March 2007 | |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please de-list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
InShaneee 05:45, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. Please feel free to take and make use of anything about the [[WP:Cheshire|Cheshire WikiProject}} you feel would be useful. If you improve what you borrow, may be we will come back and re-borrow the improved one from you! Seriously, anything that can help us both improve the coverage of our respective counties can, I think, be shared with no problem. Congratulations on getting the project up and running. Already, I can see some things that might be useful for us to borrow! DDStretch (talk) 01:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
(stored here after deleting section in Proposed Projects)
Description : a project to create and improve articles about Devon (the English County).
Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)
Comments:
There have been a number of rather negative aspects to Devon articles, notably disagreements as to history, obviously enthusiastic people who have a particular viewpoint or local knowledge but unverified information, and also the usual inferiority problem we have relating to our regional position and low economic and social status, within the SW, UK and the world. Cornwall should be the model to approach, with an objective for everyone to raise their game, and be more constructive. The project should cover Plymouth, Exeter, Torbay and all aspects of Devon and its environs. I'm likely to provide rhetorical help. Stevebritgimp 16:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
WIll you be Exploring the Devonian langage?-- Lucy-marie 00:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
I suppose that would depend on whether or not anyone has the needed expertise Birddrz 12:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Langage as in the farm? :) Old Westcounty Brythonic/Devonish would be fair game as a Devon subject, but the facts (such as they are) should be stuck to. Speaking personally the 'Devon'-ness of things needn't just be geographical, but as pointed out below geography will be the lion's share of it. Stevebritgimp 22:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree, much of Devon is geographicaly interesting anyway such as Dartmoor Birddrz 23:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to apologise on behalf of Axevalley, as I guess some of our more immature students were responsible for at least some of the vandalism created on the Colyton Grammar School Page.
My apologies, Pureferret 10:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I've seen much worse here! Totnesmartin 16:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC) Yes I know, nobody's perfect. go away. Totnesmartin 22:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to blahblahblah etc HagermanBot 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thought you might like to know that several of the articles in the Category:Disney's The Little Mermaid characters are currently being considered for deletion as being non-notable. Badbilltucker 21:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Hola, I thought this comment on Talk:Spider webs in space was hilarious! "Cross spider redirects to European garden spider, so perhaps that's the answer, rather than hybridised spiders. Or perhaps they were annoyed about being in space. Totnesmartin 17:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)"You have just scored yourself a laughing point :) Rosa 18:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Just like to thank you for cutting the plot section down a considerable amount! It's been that way for far too long. WP style guidelines recommend a length of 400-600 words (IIRC) unless the film is very long or very complicated, so it's still a bit too long, but you've cut out a big chunk. Thanks again. Geoff B 15:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! A Tory? Yeah, us Wiccans tend to be pretty conservative old gits! Funny, eh! Fuzzypeg ☻ 03:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi...the AFD you posted in was for its first nomination. I've nominated it for AFD again, so feel free to drop in your two cents again. Thanks.-- CyberGhostface 17:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Re: your post in Talk:Current 93, I'd say that if the category is British experimental musicians then it should only include people. Thus, David Tibet should be included, but not Current 93. Likewise, Nurse With Wound (a band, though one containing only one constant member) should not be included in the category, but Steven Stapleton (NWW's sole member) should be. -- rynne 17:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC) How did I miss those links? dur. Totnesmartin 21:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
The "discuss" tag for merging Zohnerism goes to the Dihydrogen monoxide hoax talk page, where nobody necessarily knows that Zohnerism (the article) even exists. Shouldn't it go to the talk page for Zohnerism? - DavidWBrooks 13:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Say, do you know of any journals or articles discussing about the Naraoiids and relatives as not being trilobites? I want to include that in the articles about Naraoia and Nektaspida.-- Mr Fink 22:58, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Totnesmartin 23:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello! If you are receiving this message, that means that your user page is in a specific year category. Per a recent user-category per deletion, all specific year categories are to be deleted. If you wish to continue using year categories, you have two options:
If you wish, you may do both. Hopefully, this change in categorization will be quick and painless. Happy editing! --An automated message from MessedRobot 12:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your contribution to the article Jimmy Cauty. I'm a little surprised that Cauty is mentioned in a book as early as 1980, perhaps you could help WP:KLF out with a little more info on this? Please see Talk:Jimmy_Cauty#Born_in_Totnes_reference. -- kingboyk 15:10, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for cracking me up... "New article about slugs. Needs lettuce to grow." is possibly the funniest (and cutest) edit summary I've ever seen. :) Pinball22 20:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
No reason, just hoping to brighten your day. V-Man - T/ C 00:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the link - I meant to reply earlier. The spelling would probably still keep getting altered even if I added it to the article! It's always good to have proof though, especially for obscure details like this. Pufnstuf 00:30, 18 April 2007 (UTC) What you have to do is add an invisible comment at the spot. here's a couple of examples: [2] [3]. They help, actually. Totnesmartin 12:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Onceonthisisland has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Just wanted to bring happiness!-- Onceonthisisland 21:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Hay Totnesmartin... you might want to watch your language a little bit when reverting vandalism. (In reference to this edit) I know it's not really a big deal when the shoe relay does fit... but it makes us all look good if we maintain a level of dignity above that of the vandal. Thanks, --- J.S ( T/ C/ WRE)
Thanks for being bold where I wavered. The trouble is the "Medicinal use" section is now better referenced than the rest of the article. I'll see what I can find.-- QuestingVole 21:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to go on about this, but all of the sources that I found specifically state Britain as in the geographic area, the UK is a larger area and the overall statistics may be very different if you include the rest of the UK. I only have data for Britain so I think that we should stick to it.
perfectblue 17:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Its on david gerards watch i think - he used to come from where I am sending this from - I was the driver for jimmy when he was here two weeks ago - does that explain all? Satu Suro 11:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for getting back to me with that. I did a bit of scrounging and worked it out... I take it that it's not too big a placethough - it looks like you've given me a map of some guys' back paddocks! Ga rr ie 22:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
It's probably just a couple of farms! I'd never heard of it until you mentioned it. Totnesmartin 09:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
NGC=National Geographic Channel, it was said in the Bermuda Triangle article.-- Migospia 20:20, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Poltergeist/Archive1, by
SkierRMH, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Poltergeist/Archive1 fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Poltergeist/Archive1, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Poltergeist/Archive1 itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
07:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
As far as I'm aware, it can be spelt 'Febuary' or 'February', though February is more common. I actually don't think I can change it at the moment, I've been having computer troubles. Brenton.eccles 10:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Please always check page histories before nominating pages for speedy deletion. Some pages, such as Dahia (Rajput clan), which you tagged to speedy deletion, have merely been vandalized. Administrators are responsible for checking page histories before they hit the delete button as well, but sometimes make mistakes. Thanks for your help! Goodnight mush Talk 21:45, 10 June 2007 (UTC)