Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own
user or user talk page.
You can find me at my
user page or
talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.
Jo e I 21:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. Peace. Okay? I love that you are putting the info box everywhere! But why are you not using the callable box? Why are you hard coding it? It makes it really hard to change them later? I thought that someone else had been hard coding them, so I am following you around changing them all to the infobox template. Can I suggest that we both divide the work, move all the towns and villages to teh infobox template, and then we should have a dialog abotu what other formating and information changes we want to make to the template? Yours in good wiki and all that WayeMason 23:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. What's the point of adding "dog" if it's just gonna be blank everywhere? I'm inclined to remove all of em, but I'll give you a chance to explain. El_C 21:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Every Porvince has one-- Sonyuser 21:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
So why are you leaving em blank? El_C 21:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
If you check the Nova Scotia article I found a way around it.-- Sonyuser 12:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with that page.
Cheers ( Psyklek 20:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC))
Hello there, sorry for the form-letter post.... I am writing you because your edits of Halifax, Nova Scotia, like a half dozen others, since January, have been reverted by one user, Lonewolf BC.
I have recently lodged a Request for Comments on the Talk:Halifax, Nova Scotia page. I and several other editors have had a running dispute with user Lonewolf BC. The RFC is This is a dispute about whether it is accurate to continue to refer to the area of or approximately coinciding with the boundaries of the City of Halifax, which became a part of the rural/urban Halifax Regional Municipality in 1996, as a city.
Basically, as I say on the RFC, we all agree that this is no longer a City, but to use former City's boundaries when describing the current urban area as a "city" (note the lower case) is at best arbitrary and at worst a fabrication. The city is now a continuous area that wraps the harbour, from Portuguese Cove (outside of the city of Halifax to the west and south) to Cole Harbour (outside of the former City of Dartmouth to the east). People now refer to the entire urban area of Halifax Regional Municipality as 'the city' and 'Halifax'.
Anyway, the bottom line is at least five people have tried to change the wording of the intro since January, and every time this one user changes it back. I have tried to come up with compromise wording, and he won't dialog. Right now wikipedia says HRM and Halifax are the capital of Nova Scotia. This article is now factually incorrect, in my opinion, and I need your help, please chime in. WayeMason 23:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Despite what can only be described as a rocky start, I think we will get along fine! Sorry to be such a total overbearing jerk...
I am kinda counting on you for things like telephone exchanges and postal codes and such for the HRM template. If you have a second, check out Albro_Lake,_Nova_Scotia. The generic HRM infobox ALMOST works, but not quite. I think a new, really stripped down tag or box would be good, for each neighbourhood or village... what do you think? WayeMason 03:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I made a change to your last edit of Rothesay, New Brunswick ( diff). Flag size must be a number. Also, I'll add some blank fields to the infobox tomorrow unless someone complains. — MJCdetroit 03:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sonyuser,
Thought I would drop you a line and let you know that I standardized the Nova Scotia Infoboxes to {{
Infobox Settlement}} (aka Infobox City) to match most of the rest of Canada. I know that you are one of the main editors for articles in that part of Canada and have implemented those infoboxes along with Infobox Settlement. I think it makes good sense to have one infobox and look for all of Canada. Let me know if you have any questions. —
MJCdetroit
20:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I placed the infoboxes up for deletion. Here's the link if you want to contribute to the discussion.
Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_18#Template:Infobox_County_of_Nova_Scotia
— MJCdetroit 13:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Sonyuser, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
You have several options freely available to you:
Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus â either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 18:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:CrestPWNS.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Monpei-shield.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:TruroCoatofArms.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:T-flagmonpei.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sony, I mean Cherry1000,
Your edit to
Perth-Andover, New Brunswick was detected by a category that is set up to detect deprecated parameter names of {{
Infobox Settlement}}. I am not sure where you got the syntax with the deprecated names in it but see the
diff to see what was changed. Check out the table at Infobox Settlement for the new and deprecated parameter names. Regards, —
MJCdetroit (
talk)
04:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:MDY w71.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I was curious as to where you found the elevations for places such as Cambridge Bay. The reason I ask is that the hamlet boundaries would include the Cambridge Bay Airport which is 27 m and might include Ovayok Territorial Park which is 183 m.
Also I noticed that you were putting in some coordinates for communities but using the older template. Check out Template:Coord and Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Parameters. The default is, I think, 1:300,000 but for smaller places you can set a scale of 1:20,000 to give a better view. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC) I get my elevations from Google Earth ,it looks like I got the wrong infromation from them for Cambridge Bay ,however based on the infromation about the park it should be 183m . and I use Google Earth also for coordinates using the "Coords for Wikipedia" tool and include the further information later . Thanks for the tip .-- Cherry1000 ( talk) 22:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Baddeck.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 14:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:198.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:198.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk ⢠Contribs ⢠Owner) 10:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I just wanted to inform you that the template {{ Coor title dms}} is deprecated. You should use {{ Coord}} instead, formatting it as {{Coord|45|54|32|N|75|30|25|W|display=title}}. For example, see this recent edit I made. Thanks. Mind matrix 01:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add coordinates to highway articles as of yet; we are still discussing what points should be tagged. However, you are adding in way too many coordinates and adding clutter to the article. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 23:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page AH1 has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): geocities\.com (links: http://www.geocities.com/marcelmonterie/routelists/bdn.htm).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! -- XLinkBot ( talk) 22:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi - I notice you are placing succession boxes on NS highways. Just wondering ('cause I can't figure it out): what logic are you using to decide how to link one road to another? Verne Equinox ( talk) 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I just noticed this. What it should look like is this. For airports the default is a scale of 30,000 and that works best for almost all of them. A scale of 11,000 would bring the map in too close for all the details to be seen. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 12:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Upper Ohio, Nova Scotia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Upper Ohio, Nova Scotia seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Upper Ohio, Nova Scotia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
17:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Designated place is a specific status conferred by Statistics Canada on certain specific communities for census purposes. It doesn't apply to any and every community you choose to add it to; it belongs only on our articles about the specific communities listed here. Bearcat ( talk) 17:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you created Category:Municipalities of Nova Scotia and added Pictou County, Nova Scotia to it. I have reverted this, because Pictou County, Nova Scotia is an article about the whole county. The Municipality of that name largely covers the rural areas, and the towns have their own councils. If you want an article about the municipality, it should be called Municipality of Pictou County, Nova Scotia.
I also removed the self-reference within that category. Is there some subtle difference between that and Category:Municipal districts in Nova Scotia? -- Derek Andrews ( talk) 17:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Great job there, but as you include coordinates you might also want to add an infobox with a map to your articles. I did this at some of your newly created stubs, e.g. McCallum Settlement, Nova Scotia. De728631 ( talk) 20:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
You only need to use the {{kml}} template when you have a list of coordinates that you want in a drop down box. For the community articles you're making you don't need them. Regards, Killiondude ( talk) 04:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
What Killiondude said, there is no need to add the kml template to your Nova Scotia stubs. De728631 ( talk) 14:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, If you're adding {{ NovaScotia-geo-stub}} to a new article, like Pleasantville, Nova Scotia, please don't also add the unsorted {{ stub}} - it's not needed, and wastes the time of people at WP:WSS who will come to the article to "stub-sort" it unnecessarily. Thanks. PamD ( talk) 09:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the first time I've seen coordinates in a dab page. Unless you can give a good reason why they should stay, I'm afraid they'll have to go. Please respond here. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alton, Nova Scotia, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: South Alton, Nova Scotia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 21:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
The coordinates you have entered for Bachelor's Cove, Newfoundland and Labradorâ, Apsey Point, Newfoundland and Labradorâ and Apsey Cove, Newfoundland and Labradorâ seems to be far removed from the general area from which these places are located. Do you have knowledge of where these communities are located? Thanks -- HJKeats ( talk) 11:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it's a good idea to start articles about communities in Nova Scotia. Good work!
Just a minor point: headlines should start with "==" rather than "===" ( Wikipedia:MOSHEAD#Section headings). At WikiProject Check Wikipedia#Headlines start with three "=", there is a report about these and it seems that entries from Nova Scotia are somewhat frequent. Anyways, I fixed most of them. At some, e.g. Lornevale, Nova Scotia, there is an additional element: it includes <code></code> tags. If you want, I can try to fix those too. By bot, it's fairly easy to do. -- User:Docu
As reviewing admin, I need to know if there is some reason you requested deletion of this? Please reply on y talk p. DGG ( talk) 17:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Cherry1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Chelseafan19 (
talk)
00:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hiya, I don't know that there's any sense in creating one-sentence articles on unincorporated areas if there isn't anything to say about them aside from the fact that they're in Nova Scotia. If there's nothing notable about them, every little placename on a map shouldn't have it's own article, really - there's nothing to say about 'em :P. South Lochaber, Nova Scotia, for example, appears to have no more than three dwellings. Kinou ( talk) 02:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Note:
Kinou is a dupicate account created by
User:Sprocket
Cherry1000 ( talk) 04:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darling's Lake, Nova Scotia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Sorry for this but it appears you created two articles for the same place one with and one without the apostrophe and the reference calls it Darlings Lake. Waacstats ( talk) 09:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Cherry1000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Block was not done properly and on the opinon of one person and besides I edit 10,000 articles Note: Kinou is a dupicate account created by User:Sprocket to hide the indiviual disruptive past and to violate wikipedias Privacy policy
Decline reason:
No, Peter's conclusions seem to be correct. Do not add false unblock acceptance templates to this page. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 23:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Template:Infobox HRM Community Neighbourhood Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Gibbon, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PK
T(alk)
19:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Pleasantville, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
ɱ
(talk)
20:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Region of Queens Municipality. Since you had some involvement with the Region of Queens Municipality redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hwy43 ( talk) 07:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Nova Scotia Municipal Districts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 18:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Bayfield Road, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The Canadian Geographic Names Board describes this place name as a railway point. [2] Looking on maps there is indeed a level crossing at that location, and not much else. Road signage (via Google Street View) only indicates this is a road and no more.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Derek Andrews (
talk)
16:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Bouctouche, New Brunswick Location.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Baddeck, Nova Scotia (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on White Point, Nova Scotia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randi Moth Talk Contribs 16:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
The article The Lookoff, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of notability and any information anything past the most basic description with an uncited source.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Nxnbl (
talk)
11:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Port Royal, Richmond County, Nova Scotia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 9 § Port Royal, Richmond County, Nova Scotia until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions; you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles, see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions, go to Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ; if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.
Here are some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
Be bold in updating pages! You can find instantaneous help any time simply by typing {{help}} anywhere on your own
user or user talk page.
You can find me at my
user page or
talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.
Jo e I 21:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey there. Peace. Okay? I love that you are putting the info box everywhere! But why are you not using the callable box? Why are you hard coding it? It makes it really hard to change them later? I thought that someone else had been hard coding them, so I am following you around changing them all to the infobox template. Can I suggest that we both divide the work, move all the towns and villages to teh infobox template, and then we should have a dialog abotu what other formating and information changes we want to make to the template? Yours in good wiki and all that WayeMason 23:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi. What's the point of adding "dog" if it's just gonna be blank everywhere? I'm inclined to remove all of em, but I'll give you a chance to explain. El_C 21:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Every Porvince has one-- Sonyuser 21:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
So why are you leaving em blank? El_C 21:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
If you check the Nova Scotia article I found a way around it.-- Sonyuser 12:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help with that page.
Cheers ( Psyklek 20:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC))
Hello there, sorry for the form-letter post.... I am writing you because your edits of Halifax, Nova Scotia, like a half dozen others, since January, have been reverted by one user, Lonewolf BC.
I have recently lodged a Request for Comments on the Talk:Halifax, Nova Scotia page. I and several other editors have had a running dispute with user Lonewolf BC. The RFC is This is a dispute about whether it is accurate to continue to refer to the area of or approximately coinciding with the boundaries of the City of Halifax, which became a part of the rural/urban Halifax Regional Municipality in 1996, as a city.
Basically, as I say on the RFC, we all agree that this is no longer a City, but to use former City's boundaries when describing the current urban area as a "city" (note the lower case) is at best arbitrary and at worst a fabrication. The city is now a continuous area that wraps the harbour, from Portuguese Cove (outside of the city of Halifax to the west and south) to Cole Harbour (outside of the former City of Dartmouth to the east). People now refer to the entire urban area of Halifax Regional Municipality as 'the city' and 'Halifax'.
Anyway, the bottom line is at least five people have tried to change the wording of the intro since January, and every time this one user changes it back. I have tried to come up with compromise wording, and he won't dialog. Right now wikipedia says HRM and Halifax are the capital of Nova Scotia. This article is now factually incorrect, in my opinion, and I need your help, please chime in. WayeMason 23:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Despite what can only be described as a rocky start, I think we will get along fine! Sorry to be such a total overbearing jerk...
I am kinda counting on you for things like telephone exchanges and postal codes and such for the HRM template. If you have a second, check out Albro_Lake,_Nova_Scotia. The generic HRM infobox ALMOST works, but not quite. I think a new, really stripped down tag or box would be good, for each neighbourhood or village... what do you think? WayeMason 03:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I made a change to your last edit of Rothesay, New Brunswick ( diff). Flag size must be a number. Also, I'll add some blank fields to the infobox tomorrow unless someone complains. — MJCdetroit 03:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sonyuser,
Thought I would drop you a line and let you know that I standardized the Nova Scotia Infoboxes to {{
Infobox Settlement}} (aka Infobox City) to match most of the rest of Canada. I know that you are one of the main editors for articles in that part of Canada and have implemented those infoboxes along with Infobox Settlement. I think it makes good sense to have one infobox and look for all of Canada. Let me know if you have any questions. —
MJCdetroit
20:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I placed the infoboxes up for deletion. Here's the link if you want to contribute to the discussion.
Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_18#Template:Infobox_County_of_Nova_Scotia
— MJCdetroit 13:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Sonyuser, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
You have several options freely available to you:
Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus â either here or at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you. -- lucasbfr talk 18:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:CrestPWNS.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Monpei-shield.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:TruroCoatofArms.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:T-flagmonpei.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi Sony, I mean Cherry1000,
Your edit to
Perth-Andover, New Brunswick was detected by a category that is set up to detect deprecated parameter names of {{
Infobox Settlement}}. I am not sure where you got the syntax with the deprecated names in it but see the
diff to see what was changed. Check out the table at Infobox Settlement for the new and deprecated parameter names. Regards, —
MJCdetroit (
talk)
04:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:MDY w71.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
I was curious as to where you found the elevations for places such as Cambridge Bay. The reason I ask is that the hamlet boundaries would include the Cambridge Bay Airport which is 27 m and might include Ovayok Territorial Park which is 183 m.
Also I noticed that you were putting in some coordinates for communities but using the older template. Check out Template:Coord and Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#Parameters. The default is, I think, 1:300,000 but for smaller places you can set a scale of 1:20,000 to give a better view. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC) I get my elevations from Google Earth ,it looks like I got the wrong infromation from them for Cambridge Bay ,however based on the infromation about the park it should be 183m . and I use Google Earth also for coordinates using the "Coords for Wikipedia" tool and include the further information later . Thanks for the tip .-- Cherry1000 ( talk) 22:07, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Baddeck.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 14:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:198.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 05:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:198.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate
copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{
PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{
self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag
here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- MifterBot ( Talk ⢠Contribs ⢠Owner) 10:39, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I just wanted to inform you that the template {{ Coor title dms}} is deprecated. You should use {{ Coord}} instead, formatting it as {{Coord|45|54|32|N|75|30|25|W|display=title}}. For example, see this recent edit I made. Thanks. Mind matrix 01:07, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add coordinates to highway articles as of yet; we are still discussing what points should be tagged. However, you are adding in way too many coordinates and adding clutter to the article. -- Rschen7754 ( T C) 23:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page AH1 has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): geocities\.com (links: http://www.geocities.com/marcelmonterie/routelists/bdn.htm).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! -- XLinkBot ( talk) 22:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi - I notice you are placing succession boxes on NS highways. Just wondering ('cause I can't figure it out): what logic are you using to decide how to link one road to another? Verne Equinox ( talk) 20:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
I just noticed this. What it should look like is this. For airports the default is a scale of 30,000 and that works best for almost all of them. A scale of 11,000 would bring the map in too close for all the details to be seen. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 12:56, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Upper Ohio, Nova Scotia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Upper Ohio, Nova Scotia seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Upper Ohio, Nova Scotia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click
here
CSDWarnBot (
talk)
17:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Designated place is a specific status conferred by Statistics Canada on certain specific communities for census purposes. It doesn't apply to any and every community you choose to add it to; it belongs only on our articles about the specific communities listed here. Bearcat ( talk) 17:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I noticed that you created Category:Municipalities of Nova Scotia and added Pictou County, Nova Scotia to it. I have reverted this, because Pictou County, Nova Scotia is an article about the whole county. The Municipality of that name largely covers the rural areas, and the towns have their own councils. If you want an article about the municipality, it should be called Municipality of Pictou County, Nova Scotia.
I also removed the self-reference within that category. Is there some subtle difference between that and Category:Municipal districts in Nova Scotia? -- Derek Andrews ( talk) 17:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Great job there, but as you include coordinates you might also want to add an infobox with a map to your articles. I did this at some of your newly created stubs, e.g. McCallum Settlement, Nova Scotia. De728631 ( talk) 20:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
You only need to use the {{kml}} template when you have a list of coordinates that you want in a drop down box. For the community articles you're making you don't need them. Regards, Killiondude ( talk) 04:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
What Killiondude said, there is no need to add the kml template to your Nova Scotia stubs. De728631 ( talk) 14:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, If you're adding {{ NovaScotia-geo-stub}} to a new article, like Pleasantville, Nova Scotia, please don't also add the unsorted {{ stub}} - it's not needed, and wastes the time of people at WP:WSS who will come to the article to "stub-sort" it unnecessarily. Thanks. PamD ( talk) 09:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the first time I've seen coordinates in a dab page. Unless you can give a good reason why they should stay, I'm afraid they'll have to go. Please respond here. Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Alton, Nova Scotia, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: South Alton, Nova Scotia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 21:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
The coordinates you have entered for Bachelor's Cove, Newfoundland and Labradorâ, Apsey Point, Newfoundland and Labradorâ and Apsey Cove, Newfoundland and Labradorâ seems to be far removed from the general area from which these places are located. Do you have knowledge of where these communities are located? Thanks -- HJKeats ( talk) 11:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, it's a good idea to start articles about communities in Nova Scotia. Good work!
Just a minor point: headlines should start with "==" rather than "===" ( Wikipedia:MOSHEAD#Section headings). At WikiProject Check Wikipedia#Headlines start with three "=", there is a report about these and it seems that entries from Nova Scotia are somewhat frequent. Anyways, I fixed most of them. At some, e.g. Lornevale, Nova Scotia, there is an additional element: it includes <code></code> tags. If you want, I can try to fix those too. By bot, it's fairly easy to do. -- User:Docu
As reviewing admin, I need to know if there is some reason you requested deletion of this? Please reply on y talk p. DGG ( talk) 17:07, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Cherry1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Chelseafan19 (
talk)
00:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Hiya, I don't know that there's any sense in creating one-sentence articles on unincorporated areas if there isn't anything to say about them aside from the fact that they're in Nova Scotia. If there's nothing notable about them, every little placename on a map shouldn't have it's own article, really - there's nothing to say about 'em :P. South Lochaber, Nova Scotia, for example, appears to have no more than three dwellings. Kinou ( talk) 02:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
Note:
Kinou is a dupicate account created by
User:Sprocket
Cherry1000 ( talk) 04:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Darling's Lake, Nova Scotia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Sorry for this but it appears you created two articles for the same place one with and one without the apostrophe and the reference calls it Darlings Lake. Waacstats ( talk) 09:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Cherry1000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Block was not done properly and on the opinon of one person and besides I edit 10,000 articles Note: Kinou is a dupicate account created by User:Sprocket to hide the indiviual disruptive past and to violate wikipedias Privacy policy
Decline reason:
No, Peter's conclusions seem to be correct. Do not add false unblock acceptance templates to this page. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 23:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Template:Infobox HRM Community Neighbourhood Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Gibbon, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
PK
T(alk)
19:35, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Pleasantville, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
ɱ
(talk)
20:44, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Region of Queens Municipality. Since you had some involvement with the Region of Queens Municipality redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Hwy43 ( talk) 07:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
Template:Nova Scotia Municipal Districts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes ( talk) 18:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Bayfield Road, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The Canadian Geographic Names Board describes this place name as a railway point. [2] Looking on maps there is indeed a level crossing at that location, and not much else. Road signage (via Google Street View) only indicates this is a road and no more.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Derek Andrews (
talk)
16:28, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Bouctouche, New Brunswick Location.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Baddeck, Nova Scotia (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 12:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on White Point, Nova Scotia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randi Moth Talk Contribs 16:53, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
The article The Lookoff, Nova Scotia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Lack of notability and any information anything past the most basic description with an uncited source.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Nxnbl (
talk)
11:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Port Royal, Richmond County, Nova Scotia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 9 § Port Royal, Richmond County, Nova Scotia until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 19:38, 9 July 2024 (UTC)