Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my
talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes
(~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
{{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.-- Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 02:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Dadagiri Unlimited has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Dadagiri Unlimited was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.facebook.com/dadagiriunlimited) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
14:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Dev (actor). It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
15:44, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Dev (actor). It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
17:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Dev (actor), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
17:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
18:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
18:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Not me, but Wikipedia wants proof in the form of inline citations from reliable third-party sources. You can see how its done in this and other articles, and there are plenty of learning links. Let me know if you need help finding them. BollyJeff || talk 18:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
18:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
18:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didn't do anything wrong! I am just making the page with more accurate information! Sohompramanick ( talk) 12:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are absolutely failing the concept of WP:CONSENSUS. You are also massively misunderstanding what is and what is NOT a reliable source. Just because you hold the WP:TRUTH does not mean that consensus will permit it in the article. Edit-warring, claiming "accuracy" are not a part of this process. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
link is dead dude. And if you can't stop writing in caps or forget to sign, please don't post in my talk page. I mean it. I really don't care for your sources because after explaining the 1000th time you don't pay any attention and have no clue. I'm not interested. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
12:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Dev (actor). Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. That means adding the
reliable reference in your edit, too. Thank you, --
MST☆
R
(Merry Christmas!)
12:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Dev (actor). Thank you. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
We understand you want to make the Dev article as complete and accurate as possible, there's nothing wrong with that. However, there are limitations on what Wikipedia allows for various reasons. The choices you have are to learn and follow the guidelines, or you'll likely be blocked indefinitely, at which point you won't be able to edit the article at all. This is not a threat -- I'm not an admin and can't block you -- but an observation from someone who has been around here a long time.
Nobody Ent (Gerardw)
13:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
13:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had all reliable sources this time! I even had the information given by Dev (actor)! He is the one whom I am editing about! His official page also shows the same information! So please remove the block & allow me to edit it! I can give you all the reliable sources if you want! som.rocks 18:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have to think that if you truly did have reliable, independent sources, you would have cited them at some point during the ten-day edit war I see in the history of Dev (actor). Your request seems to indicate that you still don't understand what an independent source is, which means that, if unblocked you would go back to breaking the same rule again, and have to be immediately re-blocked and your edits cleaned up again. That seems like a lot of unnecessary work for others. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 18:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had put reliable source in reference! som.rocks 09:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't see any improvement in understanding of editing and sourcing policies, despite warnings and blocks -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 10:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Then tell me what are the reliable sources & in what way my sources are not reliable! I would be careful next time then! som.rocks 11:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case ( talk) 20:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will mention the sources next time! Please give me one last chance & permission to edit Dev (actor) by adding reliable sources in the reference! Please! som.rocks 13:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I see no indication whatsoever in your latest unblock request that you have read WP:RS. If you truly want to be unblocked, you should thoroughly read it over, and when you have finished give a few examples of citations you would include. Continued refusal to get the message will probably result in your talkpage being locked. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 19:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my
talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes
(~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
{{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.-- Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 02:03, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Dadagiri Unlimited has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Dadagiri Unlimited was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.facebook.com/dadagiriunlimited) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
14:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Dev (actor). It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
15:44, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Dev (actor). It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
17:22, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Dev (actor), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
17:27, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
18:12, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
18:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)Not me, but Wikipedia wants proof in the form of inline citations from reliable third-party sources. You can see how its done in this and other articles, and there are plenty of learning links. Let me know if you need help finding them. BollyJeff || talk 18:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Legolas
(talk2me)
18:11, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
18:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I didn't do anything wrong! I am just making the page with more accurate information! Sohompramanick ( talk) 12:56, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are absolutely failing the concept of WP:CONSENSUS. You are also massively misunderstanding what is and what is NOT a reliable source. Just because you hold the WP:TRUTH does not mean that consensus will permit it in the article. Edit-warring, claiming "accuracy" are not a part of this process. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
link is dead dude. And if you can't stop writing in caps or forget to sign, please don't post in my talk page. I mean it. I really don't care for your sources because after explaining the 1000th time you don't pay any attention and have no clue. I'm not interested. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
12:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without
verifying it by citing
reliable sources, as you did to
Dev (actor). Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. That means adding the
reliable reference in your edit, too. Thank you, --
MST☆
R
(Merry Christmas!)
12:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Dev (actor). Thank you. — Legolas (talk2me) 12:39, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
We understand you want to make the Dev article as complete and accurate as possible, there's nothing wrong with that. However, there are limitations on what Wikipedia allows for various reasons. The choices you have are to learn and follow the guidelines, or you'll likely be blocked indefinitely, at which point you won't be able to edit the article at all. This is not a threat -- I'm not an admin and can't block you -- but an observation from someone who has been around here a long time.
Nobody Ent (Gerardw)
13:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
13:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had all reliable sources this time! I even had the information given by Dev (actor)! He is the one whom I am editing about! His official page also shows the same information! So please remove the block & allow me to edit it! I can give you all the reliable sources if you want! som.rocks 18:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have to think that if you truly did have reliable, independent sources, you would have cited them at some point during the ten-day edit war I see in the history of Dev (actor). Your request seems to indicate that you still don't understand what an independent source is, which means that, if unblocked you would go back to breaking the same rule again, and have to be immediately re-blocked and your edits cleaned up again. That seems like a lot of unnecessary work for others. FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 18:26, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I had put reliable source in reference! som.rocks 09:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't see any improvement in understanding of editing and sourcing policies, despite warnings and blocks -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 10:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Then tell me what are the reliable sources & in what way my sources are not reliable! I would be careful next time then! som.rocks 11:35, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case ( talk) 20:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sohompramanick ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I will mention the sources next time! Please give me one last chance & permission to edit Dev (actor) by adding reliable sources in the reference! Please! som.rocks 13:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I see no indication whatsoever in your latest unblock request that you have read WP:RS. If you truly want to be unblocked, you should thoroughly read it over, and when you have finished give a few examples of citations you would include. Continued refusal to get the message will probably result in your talkpage being locked. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい) 19:05, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.