This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 12:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I sent you an email yesterday, so this is just a little ping in case you don't check that account often. NW ( Talk) 17:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you have any tools you'd recommend for me? I know there are a bunch of Twinkle tools, etc. but I'd hate to just copy your monobook without knowing what I was doing. It's ok if you don't have the time right now. :) Enigma msg 05:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't get Bay window, Fixed window, Picture window, etc all have the same point as Sidelight, so shouldn't they sidelight be apart of the window article as are bay window, and the rest are.-- Fire 55 ( talk) 08:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The following articles were fully protected due to edit-warring/content disputes, but there was no discussion on-going on the talk pages and the protection, which generally should not last more than seven days, was left in place for weeks.
I have unprotected these and suggest that in the future it may be best to deal with the editors rather than the page when there is no on-going discussion. لenna vecia 19:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm looking for an adopter and you seem a very capable Wikipedian. Would you possibly adopts me to help me with any issues I may have? DotComCairney 18:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey SoWhy, I just wanted to stop by and say thank you for all your help and support. I do realize that without your support, my RfA could have easily have been a failure. Having one of the top guys in XfD matters support me, even though it is my weakest area, I think you calmed a LOT of potential opposes. That fact is not lost on me. It may be a while before I try to help much with the CSD and XfD items, but I know that I can come to you for guidance, and that means a LOT to me. Thank you very much! ;) — Ched : ? 03:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Greetings my name is Liam Devlin i created the page
Warrnambool Rugby Union Club. This page is a factual page on Victoria Australia's most southern main land club. The page is important to warrnambool people and to the rugby communitee.
could you please let me know why this has been deleted? If it can be reinstated or what action i can take to get this page active again.
Many thanks
Liam Devlin Warrnmabool Australia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devlin liam ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, you might be interested to read wt:RFA#Lets try to avoid all checking the same things, if only because I named you as one of the inspirations for the thread:) Ϣere SpielChequers 19:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy,
I was just wondering how 9 separate incidents of vandalism in less than a week by the same dynamic IP isn't enough to have some sort of semi-protection or other recourse. Could you please explain that to me, or what I could do in the future to mitigate the vandalism that this dynamic IP user inflicts upon the page? Thanks in advance! JasonDUIUC ( talk) 19:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey there SoWhy, thanks for semi-protecting In a Perfect World..., but I'd like to point out that a registered user (I'm assuming the same person who was editing while logged out) is making the same edits. Can you take another look? Thanks. — Σ xplicit 20:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Well, looks like you beat me to the blocks before I could report them. Thank you, hopefully this encourages both users to discuss the issue on the talk page instead of reverting each other. — Σ xplicit 20:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Noticed your block (which I concur with), and was wondering why you didn't deem AndreaCarax to be equally problematic. Looks like 5 reverts each in that edit war.— Kww( talk) 20:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
FYI, The Fox and the Hound and One Hundred and One Dalmatians need unprotection. Skylab's little chicken ( talk) 21:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, would you have a look at this thread on my talk page, and the deletion logs of those other files. I haven't really used these new buttons too much yet, and I want to make sure I'm doing it right. Wouldn't you know it - the very first adminy thing someone asks of me, is the one thing I said I was least interested in doing .... lol. Couldn't be a page protection, or block an obvious vandal ... noooo... "Ched can you delete this" ...lol. Anyway, I saw that Quadell got one of the files too ... so I dropped him a note too. Thanks ;) — Ched : ? 18:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy,
I had added an article called Advanced Market Research Group and it was deleted saying content is similar, but i own the website.
I have sent you a talk message on May 2nd 2009 with this regards.
I would request you to be kind enough to consider adding this article and advise me accordingly
Thanks Kunnal Motwani Managing Director & Owner Advanced Market Research Group(www.amrgindia.com) Kunnalamrg ( talk) 08:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear SoWhy,
thanks for you prompt response to my query. My apologies for repeating the question earlier.
Since i am new to wikipedia, love and use it to a large extent. I am no way trying to advertise my website.
My basic purpose was to list my company among other listed like on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Companies_of_India and hence wanted to add this article.
By adding this article i would help users who use that existing page.
another example of a an article like mine would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMRB_International
I would like to seek your advice, how to do this.
thanks and regards, Kunnalamrg ( talk) 19:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Hiya, I see you declined the speedy on the above, as you couldn't find the copyright infringement. Having loked at the link it seems to have changed since I put the nomination in (there were more entries when I originally looked). Anyway, having looked through the site, the bit which the article is a copy of is here: [1]. It seemed pretty blatant to me, hence the speedy. Cheers. Quantpole ( talk) 14:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Could you possibly install the archiving bot which you have into my talk page? I did try but could seem to figure it out. DotComCairney 16:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Dude, seriously have I stolen your thunder with this RFA? I'm really sorry to step on your toes if I did. My fault, I should have read his page further and asked you first. Pedro : Chat 10:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, are you around? A user from the Spanish wiki, Xavigivax ( talk · contribs), asked me to help him move an article over a redirect. I put in a request at WP:RM; from what I can tell, the request seems uncontroversial. What was at Siurana, he moved to Bellmunt del Priorat, and wanted Siurana (Alt Empordà) moved to Siurana. All ok so far, :-) However, I'm not sure if the original move he made was a mistake or if he just realised there was a better name for the article, because he has cut most of the content of Bellmunt del Priorat and pasted it in a new article, Siurana (Tarragona). I'm pretty sure he did it that way because he didn't want to replace or actually redirect Bellmunt del Priorat. I've left a note on his talk page asking him to correct it by undoing his edits, and instead moving Bellmunt del Priorat to the new name, but I've realised that, because Siurana (Tarragona) exists now, he won't be able to. That's where you come in! Would you be able to help sort it out? I know it's confusing, sorry to waste your time, :-/ Maedin\ talk 12:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
{{
db-move|Siurana (Alt Empordà)}}
on the redirect page, it's usually quicker than RM. Regards
So
Why
12:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)I noticed you do a lot of stuff at changing username pages, so I thought I would ask you here to save me the embarrasment if I'm wrong. I have an "alternate account" called User:Auric Goldfinger 4472 that I use for warning vandals (so far just once). I was wanting to get that account usurped to use the username for my User:Spongefrog account. Is this actually possible? Or could I even rename it without the 4472 (by the way, I chose the name because I wanted to steal User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld's idea and I had a clever idea for a signature). I notice you are undergoing an admin review. Unfortunately, I have no idea what that is (although I could just click the links) so if A) you're to busy to answer, or B) this is the wrong place to be asking, I'll understand. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 21:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
AndreaCarax ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just doesn't seem to get the point. She has continued her edit war after coming off the 72-hour block you gave her. Time for a week or an indef, I think.— Kww( talk) 11:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Would it be possible to create a category for User:Bobbo/Supports_The_Pirate_Bay so I could see all the users who have the Userbox? Thanks, DotComCairney 17:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if there were any user groups you think I'd be eligible for. I applied for permissions to use New Page Watcher which I downloaded, I was turned down because it seems like I haven't done much npwatching but that is surely not the case. Most of the new page edits I do don't show up as such, I believe someone has clicked the "patrolled" link or done something slight just before I make my edit. I just feel like I could be doing more. Read my talk page and those I've conversed with if you like, I believe I have improved since I started and am continuing on the right path. Any input would be helpful :D Thanks. Cliffsteinman ( talk) 07:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Before I press "Save page", do you know of an "unwritten" rule that says that RfA candidates should not ¬vote in other RfAs? It just seems to be a rare occurence. I can of course think of a few reasons why.. decltype ( talk) 09:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I feel the deletion of my article as "vandalism" was a little unfair. "Non-encyclopedic" I can live with, but it was a genuine attempt to provide a terminology for a phenomena which has yet to be defined with a modern latin name. I mean, voraphilia and similar have wikipedia articles defining them.
Well, I was planning to add further references to the article,, but in the interest of not agrivating the community, and in keeping to the site's policy, which I've not read in a bit more detail than my initial skim, I do not intend to re-post the article, and understand the reason for its deletion. I have to say that "vandalism" is a bit misleading though.
No hard feelings, I hope.
Also, the Vandals never actually vandalised anything. Yes, they sacked Rome, but there are no records or smashed telephone boxes. Sorry, historical joke.
I am not peterbed by this early failure though, and hope to provide better referenced and researched articles in the future that fall within the wikipedia guidelines.
Thankyou for your time
Username DocRossim (note, not actually a doctor, that's just a reference to part of my name) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DocRossim ( talk • contribs) 13:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I Was Writing in regards to the Yung Banks Page. The Source You Are referring to that was copywrite infringed, was in fact not. I would love the chance to prove to you that this was not a copywrite infringment.
MidwestKing2007 ( talk) 15:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)MidwestKing2007
Hi SoWhy, I noticed that my page was deleted today. I actually wrote the page following what 'Fitbit' did, as mySkin is a very similar play as Fitbit. It's a venture backed company, 30 employees, accomplished founders, and a product that solves customer needs. I think it was written in a neutral tone to provide information...would you have any advice for me? Thanks! Sulmare ( talk) 16:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi So Why, thanks for the message. I find neologisms difficult some are certainly done in good faith but I would think this sort of unreferenced sexual neologism is more likely for titillation value amongst early teen boys. I appreciate that there is no specific CSD category for neologisms but the alternative is to leave this rubbish on site for a minimum of 7 days and possibly, if contested, 14 - I don't think that is the best interests of the Wikipedia project and it has the risk of encouraging copycat entries. Do you remember all the articles on unlikely coprophagic sexual practices that were here a few years ago? I think this is vandalism and should be CSd'd om this criteria. Porturology ( talk) 21:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. There's a conversation at the CSD talk page that might be of interest to you (since it involves an article the speedy deletion of which you just declined :)). It's at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Religion_against_sea_swimmers. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi So Why, please tell me what claim to significance you saw in Wicked Wendsdays--I didn't see it, though I wasn't sure whether A7 was the applicable rule. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 05:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
[3] Good point, well said. Nathan T 19:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
...but I finished the German translation for my edit counter. Thanks! ( X! · talk) · @960 · 22:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
In review, I was hasty with the marking of Sarah Carbonel. It has been nominated for deletion: Non-notable, fails WP:BIO.-- TRL ( talk) 15:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
1. I read the link "read here" first.
You deleted MeetingUniverse's entry with only the comment that it had been deleted before. As for notability when MeetingUniverse was first added a year ago, there were NO articles about it and thus was deleted. The conversation with the wiki editor at the time said if you can get even one 3rd party source that verifies your identity "we can leave MU there". Not only has there been one source but many that have written about MU and the importance in the meeting planning arena. This alone should speak to the relevance of MU. The meeting planning industry controls upwards of 100 billions of dollars of spend and is vital to the nations economy. Look at all the hotels that are suffering from a downturn in meetings, comments made by Obama about corporate meetings and the backlash they incurred and I think you will have a better understanding that meeting planning is much more than an insignificant niche. There are other individual traveler sites such as tripadvisor or igougo on wikipedia whose references consist mostly of internal press releases and yet they remain. There are over 500000 meeting planners in the US and they can command budgets upwards of $10M per meeting. It is for that reason that publications such as M&C magazine command ad rates of $50,000 per page and gross $3-4M in advertising per monthly issue despite only having a circulation of 60,000.
In other words MU doesn't fall within any of the deletion categories you list except for possibly notability. Wiki editors would have a point on notability if perhaps MU was a passing mention in one article but when you add up all of the references in different publications including a reference in a recently published book about how to start a niche travel business, MU is hardly non-notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hospitalityexpert ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Please see the section I just created at Afd talk. It's possible I posed that question in the wrong place, it is an unusual circumstance and any advice you have would be appreciated. Sswonk ( talk) 04:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey .. THANKS!!! ... You made my day ... <* big smiles *> — Ched : ? 16:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
You declined the A7 on this 4 months ago when it was 4 sentences, but promotional material has been added relentlessly since then (by User:Rawhide... among others); it seemed hopeless and I decided to go with the tagger on the G11. I'll be happy to reinstate if you like. - Dank ( push to talk) 17:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy. Just wanted to check if you had found a source that confirmed this title...? I could not find one, and the editor who added it had some other dubious edits... Thanks, Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Dear SoWhy,
I wanted to take a moment to thank you personally for supporting me in my RFA, which just closed as successful at 66/6/1. I remembered that you were one of the people that opposed me in my last RfA. My stomach was in knots the whole time while I was putting in my self-nom, as well as during the first couple of days that my RfA was open. However, when I saw your !vote, it made me feel easier about myself, and gave me some hope that I had indeed improved my standing with the community. I look forward to serving the community in the coming months, and I hope that we can continue to collaborate together in future endeavors. I sincerely thank you again for your support. Thanks, Matt ( talk) 07:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the Chrome/Chromium merge discussion, the user User:Reisio has deleted an important official reference in the lead section (along with the wikitext) from the Chromium (web browser) article only to justify separating the articles, quoting a meaningless google search page. I request that you intervene is this matter as you have done before, and somehow make him/her understand that such vandalism will not be tolerated. Thank you. I also want to thank you for your excellent comments in regard to the same discussion. Most reasonable and respectable. -- Tomjenkins52 ( talk) 11:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello: I fail to understand the reason why you wanted to keep the article Swami Amritaswarupananda Puri while it is not at all notable. Being the first disciple of a sanyasini is not enough reason for a person to become notable. I had placed a speedy on it once. Now someone else has done it. There are many devotees around for the sanyasini, but keeping an article shouldn't be based on such sentiments. That is my thought. I honestly hope you will look into the article on its merit. Happy editing! -- Sreejith Kumar ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
SoWhy,
Please tell me why tripadvisor, IgoUgo and Meeting Professionals International have been allowed to stay and MeetingUniverse has not. I patterned my article after those pages with the exception that I added reliable 3rd party sources while most of their sources are internal. I would like to learn rather than being censored without answers to my questions. Are you willing to help me?
Thank you,
Mfetzer3 ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there my trusty stalkers, I just used some of my university time and created User:SoWhy/Not everyone is an artist. I would invite you to comment on it and of course feel free to change and fiddle with it as much as you want. Thanks! So Why 17:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
so why did you delete this page? It was completely neutral and did not promote anything. It was simply information and that's what Wikipedia is for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocketmcgee9 ( talk • contribs) 23:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello... There is some missing material on one of my user pages that was removed without my knowing. [4]. I'd like this material restored or a short explanation for why it was removed. Thank you Mrshaba ( talk) 02:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
For folks that are interested in closes. I posted a question about adding a close date and time to XfD items: posted at: XfD thread
The only reason I mentioned it here SoWhy, is because you're usually the first person I look for when I have question about deleting things. Hope you don't see it as "canvassing". — Ched : ? 14:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Do whatever you like with the afd, but please don't exaggerate, and please don't patronize me. A Google News search turned up ONE (1) hit on Ron Scot Fry. I did read the criteria for speedy deletion, which clearly state that there must be significant coverage that is reliable and independent of the subject. One Google News hit is hardly "significant coverage". Of the 51 regular Google hits, 90% are from Renaissance Faire (his former employer), his own websites, Facebook, LinkedIn, and others of that ilk, none of which are reliable or independent of the subject. -- Sift& Winnow 22:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate your guidance related to the proposed speedy deletion. After revisiting it, I agree. It does have discernable content (sort of like a blog comment, but yes some content). Again, thanks for your help. Capitalismojo ( talk) 01:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Read carefully. The Trashwomen weren't on a notable label, Tina & the Total Babes were. I only found six Google News hits, only one of which was non-trivial. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi - another quick question for you - re your decline here. I can't find where it's written that journals or newspapers don't qualify under A7. Can you point me in the right direction. I was thinking this should be treated as an organization. Would seem strange to say that a website or podcast can be A7 but a magazine can't. Thanks. 7 talk | Δ | 14:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy. Sorry to bother you, but as you protected the Matthew Johns page I figured I should check with you and ask for some advice. We seem to have arrived at something close to consensus on the page. While it isn't anyone's prefered version, it's probably as good as we're going to get. Anyway, my query was whether you would recommend requesting an edit to a protected page; going with unprotecting the page, making the change, and seeing whether or not things start up again with the new text; or seeking further discussion and not making a change at this point. Personally I'd lean towards an unprotect, simply to see if the dispute still exists with the new text, but WP:BRD has a certain appeal to me. :)
The main editor against the change is Archaic d00d, but the current wording is closely based on their suggestion. Currently the editor is blocked for two weeks, so I'm also happy if you recommend waiting until the block expires, but to be honest I'm not convinced we'll get 100% support from all editors no matter what we do. - Bilby ( talk) 16:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
I've disabled the filter. Please see Wikipedia talk:Edit filter#Filter 200 and my comments there. Is there a reason the bot can't simply monitor the category for new entries? – xeno talk 17:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, if you have a moment could you please take a look at File:Chairman-mao-holding-hands-of-bush-senior.jpg (or recommend me to someone else who can)? It was just uploaded by a user who was blocked in the past for uploading copyvio (among other things), so I figured I should get it checked by someone more familiar with the rules than I am. It is listed as PD-government, but appears to be a screenshot from something (just says "Documentary", doesn't specify the title or source information). Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 01:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, I don't necessarily agree with your assertion of notability for this group so I've brought it to AfD. Just courtesy heads up. Not watching here but I'm watching AfD. Have a nice day StarM 12:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Somebody yesterday added two linked new pages, Network Integrity Systems and NIS Interceptor. The first was speedily deleted, so I nominated the second, which you declined. Maybe I should have used some other criterion than A7, but it seems odd to chop the one and leave the other. Perhaps you can sort it out. SamuelTheGhost ( talk) 12:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
By the way how did you make the notice above the edit box? -- Tyw7 ( Talk • Contributions) 16:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 23:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad to see that you were able to improve the the article Staubli so that it indicates notability; I no longer intend to pursue its deletion. At your suggestion I checked google news, but most of the articles were only available through paysites, so I couldn't really verify independently or jump in to help. Keep up the good work! Synchronism ( talk) 11:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I guess there has been a misunderstanding. I just checked today that the article I had written about Two Cents of Hope has been deleted. I am not sure what the reason for this is. Two Cents of Hope is a noted Non- Government organization founded by graduate students of NC State University at Raleigh, NC, USA. It has developed a local prominence by hosting a number of fund raising events. It has gained in popularity in the recent year. Tabulating such an organization in wikipedia should not be discouraged. When articles such as " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asha_for_Education" has been allowed in wikipedia, why not the one on Two Cents of Hope. Also one more point I would like to mention here is that this was my first article and I was not done with editing the page. However I could not find a way to save the pages but not publish it. If the article is cleared I assure you that the page will be completed and only then saved onto wikipedia. You can review it then and reach any conclusion. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetantekur ( talk • contribs) 01:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello soWhy, thank you for your feedback. I have a included a few links here to illustrate the popularity of Two Cents of Hope in local areas -- " http://www.twocentsofhope.com/documents/ruksana.pdf", " http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/15/stories/2006061518700200.htm" , " http://www.technicianonline.com/news/crescendo-07-event-to-promote-cause-1.1107384 ", " http://www.ncsu.edu/sorc/myOrgs/details.php?id=529", " http://www.apnatriangle.com/component/option,com_events/Itemid,130/agid,182/catids,19%7C20%7C18/day,12/month,09/task,view_detail/year,2009/". The organization has already helped hundreds of students in India. The organization has 3 chapters in USA, 1 chapter in India and 1 chapter in Europe.Give me the opportunity to work on this article further. I request you to help me in this effort. After I finish working on it if you still feel that the article is not up to the standards or if you feel that the organization is not very important, then I will not complain about it's deletion. Please let me know if I need to do anything else to convince you. Chetantekur ( talk) 20:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Regards User:Chetantekur
Heh, nice template. :) I hope you don't mind me using it as well? Best wishes, — Aitias // discussion 22:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Would this count as an author requesting deletion (as best he can since he is banned)? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
The requested articles have been moved. Thank you.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 19:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Looks like we had the same idea. :-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, I haven't really understood. I have written here that I am ThoFreyer at en-wiki. But where do I have to write that I am really ThoFreyer? on my en-wiki user page? - Thanks for your help, regards ThoFreyer ( talk) 10:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there you recently deleted my page and i just read your why did i delete your article page. my page was deleted for copyright violation. But Sir, i have all the rights to the page www.tc.umn.edu/~ssa/about.html that the bot found infringement on i am part of the organization and the technology coordinator of it. (i edit the website lol). The Student group is valid and we have over 500 members. if you google Somali Student Association the first link you find should be us. I have added the word Wikipedia inside the about.html where the infringement was found to proof what i am saying.
Thank You!!! SoWhy
Diri0010 ( talk) 13:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey thanks SoWhy i understand what you mean and i have read the conflict of interest guidelines and have asked a third person to write what SSA is or is to him.
this is alot easier thanks :D
Diri0010 (
talk)
22:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy i fixed the main issue of infringement and have gotten a more cleaner Mission statement can you take a look. I placed it back up thank you.
Diri0010 (
talk)
22:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 12:18, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
I sent you an email yesterday, so this is just a little ping in case you don't check that account often. NW ( Talk) 17:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Do you have any tools you'd recommend for me? I know there are a bunch of Twinkle tools, etc. but I'd hate to just copy your monobook without knowing what I was doing. It's ok if you don't have the time right now. :) Enigma msg 05:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I don't get Bay window, Fixed window, Picture window, etc all have the same point as Sidelight, so shouldn't they sidelight be apart of the window article as are bay window, and the rest are.-- Fire 55 ( talk) 08:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
The following articles were fully protected due to edit-warring/content disputes, but there was no discussion on-going on the talk pages and the protection, which generally should not last more than seven days, was left in place for weeks.
I have unprotected these and suggest that in the future it may be best to deal with the editors rather than the page when there is no on-going discussion. لenna vecia 19:17, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
I'm looking for an adopter and you seem a very capable Wikipedian. Would you possibly adopts me to help me with any issues I may have? DotComCairney 18:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey SoWhy, I just wanted to stop by and say thank you for all your help and support. I do realize that without your support, my RfA could have easily have been a failure. Having one of the top guys in XfD matters support me, even though it is my weakest area, I think you calmed a LOT of potential opposes. That fact is not lost on me. It may be a while before I try to help much with the CSD and XfD items, but I know that I can come to you for guidance, and that means a LOT to me. Thank you very much! ;) — Ched : ? 03:55, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Greetings my name is Liam Devlin i created the page
Warrnambool Rugby Union Club. This page is a factual page on Victoria Australia's most southern main land club. The page is important to warrnambool people and to the rugby communitee.
could you please let me know why this has been deleted? If it can be reinstated or what action i can take to get this page active again.
Many thanks
Liam Devlin Warrnmabool Australia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devlin liam ( talk • contribs) 10:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, you might be interested to read wt:RFA#Lets try to avoid all checking the same things, if only because I named you as one of the inspirations for the thread:) Ϣere SpielChequers 19:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy,
I was just wondering how 9 separate incidents of vandalism in less than a week by the same dynamic IP isn't enough to have some sort of semi-protection or other recourse. Could you please explain that to me, or what I could do in the future to mitigate the vandalism that this dynamic IP user inflicts upon the page? Thanks in advance! JasonDUIUC ( talk) 19:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey there SoWhy, thanks for semi-protecting In a Perfect World..., but I'd like to point out that a registered user (I'm assuming the same person who was editing while logged out) is making the same edits. Can you take another look? Thanks. — Σ xplicit 20:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Well, looks like you beat me to the blocks before I could report them. Thank you, hopefully this encourages both users to discuss the issue on the talk page instead of reverting each other. — Σ xplicit 20:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Noticed your block (which I concur with), and was wondering why you didn't deem AndreaCarax to be equally problematic. Looks like 5 reverts each in that edit war.— Kww( talk) 20:32, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
FYI, The Fox and the Hound and One Hundred and One Dalmatians need unprotection. Skylab's little chicken ( talk) 21:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, would you have a look at this thread on my talk page, and the deletion logs of those other files. I haven't really used these new buttons too much yet, and I want to make sure I'm doing it right. Wouldn't you know it - the very first adminy thing someone asks of me, is the one thing I said I was least interested in doing .... lol. Couldn't be a page protection, or block an obvious vandal ... noooo... "Ched can you delete this" ...lol. Anyway, I saw that Quadell got one of the files too ... so I dropped him a note too. Thanks ;) — Ched : ? 18:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy,
I had added an article called Advanced Market Research Group and it was deleted saying content is similar, but i own the website.
I have sent you a talk message on May 2nd 2009 with this regards.
I would request you to be kind enough to consider adding this article and advise me accordingly
Thanks Kunnal Motwani Managing Director & Owner Advanced Market Research Group(www.amrgindia.com) Kunnalamrg ( talk) 08:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Dear SoWhy,
thanks for you prompt response to my query. My apologies for repeating the question earlier.
Since i am new to wikipedia, love and use it to a large extent. I am no way trying to advertise my website.
My basic purpose was to list my company among other listed like on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Companies_of_India and hence wanted to add this article.
By adding this article i would help users who use that existing page.
another example of a an article like mine would be http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMRB_International
I would like to seek your advice, how to do this.
thanks and regards, Kunnalamrg ( talk) 19:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Hiya, I see you declined the speedy on the above, as you couldn't find the copyright infringement. Having loked at the link it seems to have changed since I put the nomination in (there were more entries when I originally looked). Anyway, having looked through the site, the bit which the article is a copy of is here: [1]. It seemed pretty blatant to me, hence the speedy. Cheers. Quantpole ( talk) 14:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Could you possibly install the archiving bot which you have into my talk page? I did try but could seem to figure it out. DotComCairney 16:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Dude, seriously have I stolen your thunder with this RFA? I'm really sorry to step on your toes if I did. My fault, I should have read his page further and asked you first. Pedro : Chat 10:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, are you around? A user from the Spanish wiki, Xavigivax ( talk · contribs), asked me to help him move an article over a redirect. I put in a request at WP:RM; from what I can tell, the request seems uncontroversial. What was at Siurana, he moved to Bellmunt del Priorat, and wanted Siurana (Alt Empordà) moved to Siurana. All ok so far, :-) However, I'm not sure if the original move he made was a mistake or if he just realised there was a better name for the article, because he has cut most of the content of Bellmunt del Priorat and pasted it in a new article, Siurana (Tarragona). I'm pretty sure he did it that way because he didn't want to replace or actually redirect Bellmunt del Priorat. I've left a note on his talk page asking him to correct it by undoing his edits, and instead moving Bellmunt del Priorat to the new name, but I've realised that, because Siurana (Tarragona) exists now, he won't be able to. That's where you come in! Would you be able to help sort it out? I know it's confusing, sorry to waste your time, :-/ Maedin\ talk 12:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
{{
db-move|Siurana (Alt Empordà)}}
on the redirect page, it's usually quicker than RM. Regards
So
Why
12:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)I noticed you do a lot of stuff at changing username pages, so I thought I would ask you here to save me the embarrasment if I'm wrong. I have an "alternate account" called User:Auric Goldfinger 4472 that I use for warning vandals (so far just once). I was wanting to get that account usurped to use the username for my User:Spongefrog account. Is this actually possible? Or could I even rename it without the 4472 (by the way, I chose the name because I wanted to steal User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld's idea and I had a clever idea for a signature). I notice you are undergoing an admin review. Unfortunately, I have no idea what that is (although I could just click the links) so if A) you're to busy to answer, or B) this is the wrong place to be asking, I'll understand. Spongefrog, (talk to me, or else) 21:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
AndreaCarax ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just doesn't seem to get the point. She has continued her edit war after coming off the 72-hour block you gave her. Time for a week or an indef, I think.— Kww( talk) 11:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Would it be possible to create a category for User:Bobbo/Supports_The_Pirate_Bay so I could see all the users who have the Userbox? Thanks, DotComCairney 17:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if there were any user groups you think I'd be eligible for. I applied for permissions to use New Page Watcher which I downloaded, I was turned down because it seems like I haven't done much npwatching but that is surely not the case. Most of the new page edits I do don't show up as such, I believe someone has clicked the "patrolled" link or done something slight just before I make my edit. I just feel like I could be doing more. Read my talk page and those I've conversed with if you like, I believe I have improved since I started and am continuing on the right path. Any input would be helpful :D Thanks. Cliffsteinman ( talk) 07:05, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Before I press "Save page", do you know of an "unwritten" rule that says that RfA candidates should not ¬vote in other RfAs? It just seems to be a rare occurence. I can of course think of a few reasons why.. decltype ( talk) 09:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I feel the deletion of my article as "vandalism" was a little unfair. "Non-encyclopedic" I can live with, but it was a genuine attempt to provide a terminology for a phenomena which has yet to be defined with a modern latin name. I mean, voraphilia and similar have wikipedia articles defining them.
Well, I was planning to add further references to the article,, but in the interest of not agrivating the community, and in keeping to the site's policy, which I've not read in a bit more detail than my initial skim, I do not intend to re-post the article, and understand the reason for its deletion. I have to say that "vandalism" is a bit misleading though.
No hard feelings, I hope.
Also, the Vandals never actually vandalised anything. Yes, they sacked Rome, but there are no records or smashed telephone boxes. Sorry, historical joke.
I am not peterbed by this early failure though, and hope to provide better referenced and researched articles in the future that fall within the wikipedia guidelines.
Thankyou for your time
Username DocRossim (note, not actually a doctor, that's just a reference to part of my name) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DocRossim ( talk • contribs) 13:48, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I Was Writing in regards to the Yung Banks Page. The Source You Are referring to that was copywrite infringed, was in fact not. I would love the chance to prove to you that this was not a copywrite infringment.
MidwestKing2007 ( talk) 15:29, 30 June 2009 (UTC)MidwestKing2007
Hi SoWhy, I noticed that my page was deleted today. I actually wrote the page following what 'Fitbit' did, as mySkin is a very similar play as Fitbit. It's a venture backed company, 30 employees, accomplished founders, and a product that solves customer needs. I think it was written in a neutral tone to provide information...would you have any advice for me? Thanks! Sulmare ( talk) 16:17, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi So Why, thanks for the message. I find neologisms difficult some are certainly done in good faith but I would think this sort of unreferenced sexual neologism is more likely for titillation value amongst early teen boys. I appreciate that there is no specific CSD category for neologisms but the alternative is to leave this rubbish on site for a minimum of 7 days and possibly, if contested, 14 - I don't think that is the best interests of the Wikipedia project and it has the risk of encouraging copycat entries. Do you remember all the articles on unlikely coprophagic sexual practices that were here a few years ago? I think this is vandalism and should be CSd'd om this criteria. Porturology ( talk) 21:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. There's a conversation at the CSD talk page that might be of interest to you (since it involves an article the speedy deletion of which you just declined :)). It's at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Religion_against_sea_swimmers. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi So Why, please tell me what claim to significance you saw in Wicked Wendsdays--I didn't see it, though I wasn't sure whether A7 was the applicable rule. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 05:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
[3] Good point, well said. Nathan T 19:02, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
...but I finished the German translation for my edit counter. Thanks! ( X! · talk) · @960 · 22:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
In review, I was hasty with the marking of Sarah Carbonel. It has been nominated for deletion: Non-notable, fails WP:BIO.-- TRL ( talk) 15:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
1. I read the link "read here" first.
You deleted MeetingUniverse's entry with only the comment that it had been deleted before. As for notability when MeetingUniverse was first added a year ago, there were NO articles about it and thus was deleted. The conversation with the wiki editor at the time said if you can get even one 3rd party source that verifies your identity "we can leave MU there". Not only has there been one source but many that have written about MU and the importance in the meeting planning arena. This alone should speak to the relevance of MU. The meeting planning industry controls upwards of 100 billions of dollars of spend and is vital to the nations economy. Look at all the hotels that are suffering from a downturn in meetings, comments made by Obama about corporate meetings and the backlash they incurred and I think you will have a better understanding that meeting planning is much more than an insignificant niche. There are other individual traveler sites such as tripadvisor or igougo on wikipedia whose references consist mostly of internal press releases and yet they remain. There are over 500000 meeting planners in the US and they can command budgets upwards of $10M per meeting. It is for that reason that publications such as M&C magazine command ad rates of $50,000 per page and gross $3-4M in advertising per monthly issue despite only having a circulation of 60,000.
In other words MU doesn't fall within any of the deletion categories you list except for possibly notability. Wiki editors would have a point on notability if perhaps MU was a passing mention in one article but when you add up all of the references in different publications including a reference in a recently published book about how to start a niche travel business, MU is hardly non-notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hospitalityexpert ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Please see the section I just created at Afd talk. It's possible I posed that question in the wrong place, it is an unusual circumstance and any advice you have would be appreciated. Sswonk ( talk) 04:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey .. THANKS!!! ... You made my day ... <* big smiles *> — Ched : ? 16:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
You declined the A7 on this 4 months ago when it was 4 sentences, but promotional material has been added relentlessly since then (by User:Rawhide... among others); it seemed hopeless and I decided to go with the tagger on the G11. I'll be happy to reinstate if you like. - Dank ( push to talk) 17:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy. Just wanted to check if you had found a source that confirmed this title...? I could not find one, and the editor who added it had some other dubious edits... Thanks, Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Dear SoWhy,
I wanted to take a moment to thank you personally for supporting me in my RFA, which just closed as successful at 66/6/1. I remembered that you were one of the people that opposed me in my last RfA. My stomach was in knots the whole time while I was putting in my self-nom, as well as during the first couple of days that my RfA was open. However, when I saw your !vote, it made me feel easier about myself, and gave me some hope that I had indeed improved my standing with the community. I look forward to serving the community in the coming months, and I hope that we can continue to collaborate together in future endeavors. I sincerely thank you again for your support. Thanks, Matt ( talk) 07:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the Chrome/Chromium merge discussion, the user User:Reisio has deleted an important official reference in the lead section (along with the wikitext) from the Chromium (web browser) article only to justify separating the articles, quoting a meaningless google search page. I request that you intervene is this matter as you have done before, and somehow make him/her understand that such vandalism will not be tolerated. Thank you. I also want to thank you for your excellent comments in regard to the same discussion. Most reasonable and respectable. -- Tomjenkins52 ( talk) 11:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello: I fail to understand the reason why you wanted to keep the article Swami Amritaswarupananda Puri while it is not at all notable. Being the first disciple of a sanyasini is not enough reason for a person to become notable. I had placed a speedy on it once. Now someone else has done it. There are many devotees around for the sanyasini, but keeping an article shouldn't be based on such sentiments. That is my thought. I honestly hope you will look into the article on its merit. Happy editing! -- Sreejith Kumar ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
SoWhy,
Please tell me why tripadvisor, IgoUgo and Meeting Professionals International have been allowed to stay and MeetingUniverse has not. I patterned my article after those pages with the exception that I added reliable 3rd party sources while most of their sources are internal. I would like to learn rather than being censored without answers to my questions. Are you willing to help me?
Thank you,
Mfetzer3 ( talk) 16:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there my trusty stalkers, I just used some of my university time and created User:SoWhy/Not everyone is an artist. I would invite you to comment on it and of course feel free to change and fiddle with it as much as you want. Thanks! So Why 17:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
so why did you delete this page? It was completely neutral and did not promote anything. It was simply information and that's what Wikipedia is for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocketmcgee9 ( talk • contribs) 23:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello... There is some missing material on one of my user pages that was removed without my knowing. [4]. I'd like this material restored or a short explanation for why it was removed. Thank you Mrshaba ( talk) 02:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
For folks that are interested in closes. I posted a question about adding a close date and time to XfD items: posted at: XfD thread
The only reason I mentioned it here SoWhy, is because you're usually the first person I look for when I have question about deleting things. Hope you don't see it as "canvassing". — Ched : ? 14:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Do whatever you like with the afd, but please don't exaggerate, and please don't patronize me. A Google News search turned up ONE (1) hit on Ron Scot Fry. I did read the criteria for speedy deletion, which clearly state that there must be significant coverage that is reliable and independent of the subject. One Google News hit is hardly "significant coverage". Of the 51 regular Google hits, 90% are from Renaissance Faire (his former employer), his own websites, Facebook, LinkedIn, and others of that ilk, none of which are reliable or independent of the subject. -- Sift& Winnow 22:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate your guidance related to the proposed speedy deletion. After revisiting it, I agree. It does have discernable content (sort of like a blog comment, but yes some content). Again, thanks for your help. Capitalismojo ( talk) 01:49, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Read carefully. The Trashwomen weren't on a notable label, Tina & the Total Babes were. I only found six Google News hits, only one of which was non-trivial. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi - another quick question for you - re your decline here. I can't find where it's written that journals or newspapers don't qualify under A7. Can you point me in the right direction. I was thinking this should be treated as an organization. Would seem strange to say that a website or podcast can be A7 but a magazine can't. Thanks. 7 talk | Δ | 14:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy. Sorry to bother you, but as you protected the Matthew Johns page I figured I should check with you and ask for some advice. We seem to have arrived at something close to consensus on the page. While it isn't anyone's prefered version, it's probably as good as we're going to get. Anyway, my query was whether you would recommend requesting an edit to a protected page; going with unprotecting the page, making the change, and seeing whether or not things start up again with the new text; or seeking further discussion and not making a change at this point. Personally I'd lean towards an unprotect, simply to see if the dispute still exists with the new text, but WP:BRD has a certain appeal to me. :)
The main editor against the change is Archaic d00d, but the current wording is closely based on their suggestion. Currently the editor is blocked for two weeks, so I'm also happy if you recommend waiting until the block expires, but to be honest I'm not convinced we'll get 100% support from all editors no matter what we do. - Bilby ( talk) 16:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
I've disabled the filter. Please see Wikipedia talk:Edit filter#Filter 200 and my comments there. Is there a reason the bot can't simply monitor the category for new entries? – xeno talk 17:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, if you have a moment could you please take a look at File:Chairman-mao-holding-hands-of-bush-senior.jpg (or recommend me to someone else who can)? It was just uploaded by a user who was blocked in the past for uploading copyvio (among other things), so I figured I should get it checked by someone more familiar with the rules than I am. It is listed as PD-government, but appears to be a screenshot from something (just says "Documentary", doesn't specify the title or source information). Thanks, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 01:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy, I don't necessarily agree with your assertion of notability for this group so I've brought it to AfD. Just courtesy heads up. Not watching here but I'm watching AfD. Have a nice day StarM 12:10, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Somebody yesterday added two linked new pages, Network Integrity Systems and NIS Interceptor. The first was speedily deleted, so I nominated the second, which you declined. Maybe I should have used some other criterion than A7, but it seems odd to chop the one and leave the other. Perhaps you can sort it out. SamuelTheGhost ( talk) 12:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
By the way how did you make the notice above the edit box? -- Tyw7 ( Talk • Contributions) 16:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of the Kindness campaign, I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, -- A Nobody My talk 23:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm glad to see that you were able to improve the the article Staubli so that it indicates notability; I no longer intend to pursue its deletion. At your suggestion I checked google news, but most of the articles were only available through paysites, so I couldn't really verify independently or jump in to help. Keep up the good work! Synchronism ( talk) 11:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I guess there has been a misunderstanding. I just checked today that the article I had written about Two Cents of Hope has been deleted. I am not sure what the reason for this is. Two Cents of Hope is a noted Non- Government organization founded by graduate students of NC State University at Raleigh, NC, USA. It has developed a local prominence by hosting a number of fund raising events. It has gained in popularity in the recent year. Tabulating such an organization in wikipedia should not be discouraged. When articles such as " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asha_for_Education" has been allowed in wikipedia, why not the one on Two Cents of Hope. Also one more point I would like to mention here is that this was my first article and I was not done with editing the page. However I could not find a way to save the pages but not publish it. If the article is cleared I assure you that the page will be completed and only then saved onto wikipedia. You can review it then and reach any conclusion. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetantekur ( talk • contribs) 01:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello soWhy, thank you for your feedback. I have a included a few links here to illustrate the popularity of Two Cents of Hope in local areas -- " http://www.twocentsofhope.com/documents/ruksana.pdf", " http://www.hindu.com/2006/06/15/stories/2006061518700200.htm" , " http://www.technicianonline.com/news/crescendo-07-event-to-promote-cause-1.1107384 ", " http://www.ncsu.edu/sorc/myOrgs/details.php?id=529", " http://www.apnatriangle.com/component/option,com_events/Itemid,130/agid,182/catids,19%7C20%7C18/day,12/month,09/task,view_detail/year,2009/". The organization has already helped hundreds of students in India. The organization has 3 chapters in USA, 1 chapter in India and 1 chapter in Europe.Give me the opportunity to work on this article further. I request you to help me in this effort. After I finish working on it if you still feel that the article is not up to the standards or if you feel that the organization is not very important, then I will not complain about it's deletion. Please let me know if I need to do anything else to convince you. Chetantekur ( talk) 20:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Regards User:Chetantekur
Heh, nice template. :) I hope you don't mind me using it as well? Best wishes, — Aitias // discussion 22:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Would this count as an author requesting deletion (as best he can since he is banned)? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
The requested articles have been moved. Thank you.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 19:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Looks like we had the same idea. :-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, I haven't really understood. I have written here that I am ThoFreyer at en-wiki. But where do I have to write that I am really ThoFreyer? on my en-wiki user page? - Thanks for your help, regards ThoFreyer ( talk) 10:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there you recently deleted my page and i just read your why did i delete your article page. my page was deleted for copyright violation. But Sir, i have all the rights to the page www.tc.umn.edu/~ssa/about.html that the bot found infringement on i am part of the organization and the technology coordinator of it. (i edit the website lol). The Student group is valid and we have over 500 members. if you google Somali Student Association the first link you find should be us. I have added the word Wikipedia inside the about.html where the infringement was found to proof what i am saying.
Thank You!!! SoWhy
Diri0010 ( talk) 13:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey thanks SoWhy i understand what you mean and i have read the conflict of interest guidelines and have asked a third person to write what SSA is or is to him.
this is alot easier thanks :D
Diri0010 (
talk)
22:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi SoWhy i fixed the main issue of infringement and have gotten a more cleaner Mission statement can you take a look. I placed it back up thank you.
Diri0010 (
talk)
22:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)