Thanks for uploading Image:20060912190949 f.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Percent poverty world map2006-7.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of Image:Herrmann.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Herrmann.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Herrmann.jpg is an image licensed as " for non-commercial use only" or " used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles ( CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{ GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{ cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{ PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Herrmann.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 07:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of Image:Ginobili.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ginobili.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ginobili.jpg is an image licensed as " for non-commercial use only" or " used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles ( CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{ GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{ cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{ PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Ginobili.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 08:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
The same message as for 190.16.20.42. If you wish to make major changes to the article, please provide an edit summary because any edits made without an edit summary are likely to be reverted as they appear to be vandalism. In this instance it is quite clear that this needs to be discussed on the talk page. Will you please therefore discuss this rather than keep adding the same edit as it will only be reverted again until this has been discussed on the articles talk page. ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 00:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, there. It makes it really difficult for other users to know who has left a message on their talk page if you do not sign your comments, and it is very easy to do. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! With regard to the
Argentina article, when you have edited you have not left an edit summary making it equally difficult to establish whether or not your edits are vandalism or not. I am not saying they are vandalism just explaining that because you do not leave an edit summary it can be difficult for other users to tell. With regard to the article and it being protected to prevent the edit war, the way forward is to discuss all this on the talk page of the article rather than constantly adding the same edit, no matter whether it is right or not. If after discussion it results in what you have posted being the version to use then it can be restored, but not just by an edit war with no edit summary. Please take this in the spirit it is meant, which is to try and resolve this and help you edit on wikipedia it is not intended as a personal attack on you. Thank you and best wishes,
♦Tangerines♦·
Talk
01:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry to add a second message so soon after the one above. However, you need to be careful about logging in on wikipedia. You have just signed yourself as Snowhite1985 on the IP user talk page for 190.16.20.42 which means you are using two different users to make edits. It would really help you if you make sure that you are logged in as Snowhite1985 when you edit. Again my apologies for this! ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 01:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi yet again, further to your comment on the Argentina talk page. I am sorry but it seems that I again need to explain what to do. When you add a new comment it needs to go at the bottom of the page, and not the top where you keep adding them. That is the standard way to do it on wikipedia. Also unfortunately your signature still was not right. All you need do is add four of these ~ Don't add more than four though. I am sorry if this seems like I am pestering you about this when the important matter is of course the article. However, if you don't sign your comments then other users will not know (without checking) who wrote it. It is a courtesy for other users. And adding new comments at the end of the page keeps everything in order as that is where users look for new comments and where they should be. Of course if you are replying to another users comment then add it below that message, but add one of these : at the start so your message looks like this -
- A reply indented! Finally, I would strongly advise you to make sure you are signed in on this account when you edit and post comments. If you use both this account and the IP user 190.16.20.42 then someone might accuse you of being a sockpuppet which I don't believe you but others mightdo so. As always have fun! ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 00:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Argentina. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
MastCell
Talk
02:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Julie-G.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:20060912190949 f.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Percent poverty world map2006-7.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of Image:Herrmann.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Herrmann.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Herrmann.jpg is an image licensed as " for non-commercial use only" or " used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles ( CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{ GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{ cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{ PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Herrmann.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 07:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Commercial use of Image:Ginobili.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Ginobili.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Ginobili.jpg is an image licensed as " for non-commercial use only" or " used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles ( CSD I3).
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{ GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{ cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{ PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Ginobili.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 08:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
The same message as for 190.16.20.42. If you wish to make major changes to the article, please provide an edit summary because any edits made without an edit summary are likely to be reverted as they appear to be vandalism. In this instance it is quite clear that this needs to be discussed on the talk page. Will you please therefore discuss this rather than keep adding the same edit as it will only be reverted again until this has been discussed on the articles talk page. ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 00:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, there. It makes it really difficult for other users to know who has left a message on their talk page if you do not sign your comments, and it is very easy to do. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the
Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! With regard to the
Argentina article, when you have edited you have not left an edit summary making it equally difficult to establish whether or not your edits are vandalism or not. I am not saying they are vandalism just explaining that because you do not leave an edit summary it can be difficult for other users to tell. With regard to the article and it being protected to prevent the edit war, the way forward is to discuss all this on the talk page of the article rather than constantly adding the same edit, no matter whether it is right or not. If after discussion it results in what you have posted being the version to use then it can be restored, but not just by an edit war with no edit summary. Please take this in the spirit it is meant, which is to try and resolve this and help you edit on wikipedia it is not intended as a personal attack on you. Thank you and best wishes,
♦Tangerines♦·
Talk
01:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, sorry to add a second message so soon after the one above. However, you need to be careful about logging in on wikipedia. You have just signed yourself as Snowhite1985 on the IP user talk page for 190.16.20.42 which means you are using two different users to make edits. It would really help you if you make sure that you are logged in as Snowhite1985 when you edit. Again my apologies for this! ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 01:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi yet again, further to your comment on the Argentina talk page. I am sorry but it seems that I again need to explain what to do. When you add a new comment it needs to go at the bottom of the page, and not the top where you keep adding them. That is the standard way to do it on wikipedia. Also unfortunately your signature still was not right. All you need do is add four of these ~ Don't add more than four though. I am sorry if this seems like I am pestering you about this when the important matter is of course the article. However, if you don't sign your comments then other users will not know (without checking) who wrote it. It is a courtesy for other users. And adding new comments at the end of the page keeps everything in order as that is where users look for new comments and where they should be. Of course if you are replying to another users comment then add it below that message, but add one of these : at the start so your message looks like this -
- A reply indented! Finally, I would strongly advise you to make sure you are signed in on this account when you edit and post comments. If you use both this account and the IP user 190.16.20.42 then someone might accuse you of being a sockpuppet which I don't believe you but others mightdo so. As always have fun! ♦Tangerines♦· Talk 00:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Argentina. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
MastCell
Talk
02:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Julie-G.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)