Thanks for uploading or contributing to
File:Marclepine.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under
non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to
the file description page, and edit it to include a
non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a
request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 13:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up that I will shortly no longer be able to act as gatekeeper because I have some family obligations that take precedence.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Slp1 - how are you!
You may have seen that I've queried the inclusion of a previously unknown picture of Wilberforce on the article page. Apart from anything else, it seems to bear little resemblance to any other portrait of the great man — although this could possibly be because it depicts him when very elderly. I suspect that the person who uploaded the image of the painting may be descended from the artist, George Hayter, which immediately rang alarm bells (as all of his/her contriburions seem to be about similar subjects).
I wondered what your take on this is? On the other hand, the picture is featured on the BBC website and clearly seems to be recognised by the Ferens Gallery in Hull as authentic. What would you advise? Cheers, Bruce — Agendum ( talk) 15:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The image is from the collections of the Ferens Art Gallery, Hull Museums. See the following link
Alternatively search the online catalogue of Hull Museums and search for the artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholasjevans1 ( talk • contribs) 09:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Men's Rights". Thank you. -- SarahStierch ( talk) 13:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your exemplary precision in dealing with sources at Talk:Men's rights. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 19:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi - Just a note to alert you that the photo you posted of Mario Duschenes in 2009 is apparently under threat of removal from a bot who claims you provided no fair-use rationale. It looks to me that you did, but it is time to argue and defend the use of this photo. As a long-ago student of Mario, I hope you can succeed in keeping his photo on Wikipedia. Bonne chance. Dirac66 ( talk) 16:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Ebikeguy ( talk) 02:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
You are awesome and should thus have a cookie. Kevin ( talk) 20:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC) |
That was certainly most awesome evidence you just posted on the arb board, thanks for that! FeydHuxtable ( talk) 19:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to
File:Marclepine.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under
non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to
the file description page, and edit it to include a
non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "
my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on
criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a
request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the
Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Sfan00 IMG (
talk) 13:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up that I will shortly no longer be able to act as gatekeeper because I have some family obligations that take precedence.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Slp1 - how are you!
You may have seen that I've queried the inclusion of a previously unknown picture of Wilberforce on the article page. Apart from anything else, it seems to bear little resemblance to any other portrait of the great man — although this could possibly be because it depicts him when very elderly. I suspect that the person who uploaded the image of the painting may be descended from the artist, George Hayter, which immediately rang alarm bells (as all of his/her contriburions seem to be about similar subjects).
I wondered what your take on this is? On the other hand, the picture is featured on the BBC website and clearly seems to be recognised by the Ferens Gallery in Hull as authentic. What would you advise? Cheers, Bruce — Agendum ( talk) 15:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
The image is from the collections of the Ferens Art Gallery, Hull Museums. See the following link
Alternatively search the online catalogue of Hull Museums and search for the artist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholasjevans1 ( talk • contribs) 09:18, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Men's Rights". Thank you. -- SarahStierch ( talk) 13:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
For your exemplary precision in dealing with sources at Talk:Men's rights. -- Sonicyouth86 ( talk) 19:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi - Just a note to alert you that the photo you posted of Mario Duschenes in 2009 is apparently under threat of removal from a bot who claims you provided no fair-use rationale. It looks to me that you did, but it is time to argue and defend the use of this photo. As a long-ago student of Mario, I hope you can succeed in keeping his photo on Wikipedia. Bonne chance. Dirac66 ( talk) 16:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Ebikeguy ( talk) 02:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
You are awesome and should thus have a cookie. Kevin ( talk) 20:51, 26 December 2011 (UTC) |
That was certainly most awesome evidence you just posted on the arb board, thanks for that! FeydHuxtable ( talk) 19:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)