This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for uploading Image:KCSM logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

could you copy paste three lines? Template_talk:RailGauge#Spain_.2B_Portugal ? TrackConnect ( talk) 10:25, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Template:RailGauge Conversion corrections

Please correct the conversions of the following templates as per List of rail gauges#Broad gauge railways, by gauge and country as follows

• 1664 (1664 mm = 5 ft 5½ in)
• 1668 (1668 mm = 5 ft 55⁄6 in) (= 5 2⁄3 in))
• 1672 (1672 mm = 5 ft 5⅞ in) (= 55⁄6 in)

See also the templates below, where the difference is taken into account!!!

• 1520
• 1524

The present situation is somewhat absurd. Peter Horn 00:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

1520 (1520 mm = 4 ft 115⁄6 in) from List of rail gauges#Broad gauge railways, by gauge and country Peter Horn 00:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a quick ack right now that I've seen this note. I saw the changes that were made last week, but didn't look very closely at them yet. I hope to take some time tomorrow to look into this further. Slambo (Speak) 10:37, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Some corrections:

• 1668 (1668 mm = 5 ft 52⁄3 in)
• 1672 (1672 mm = 5 ft 55⁄6 in)

Peter Horn 01:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

You've made what I believe to be a serious mistake in adding wikiproject tags.

For example, on Talk:Railroad, the tags have to be after the #redirect, if they should be there at all, rather than replacing the redirect. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, I nominated the article British Bangladeshi some time ago as a Good Article, and would you be able to please review the page to see whether it falls into the criteria, or Review the page. Thank you. M Miah ( talk) 12:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article ( Grand Central Station (Chicago) & Pioneer Zephyr) that includes a category at WP:CHIBOTCATS and that has been promoted to WP:FA, WP:FL or WP:GA. You are not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 19:30, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

oops, i've done this rather a lot... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stethomson90 ( talk • contribs) 09:46, August 12, 2008

Being subjected on my name and reference, I remembered a discussion of nearly a year ago in September, where you're helping me with half a dozen tramarticles. So I mentioned your expertise on said pages. Still high esteem so faithfully yours: D.A. Borgdorff etc. 86.83.155.44 ( talk) 23:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Hello. The above article is on hold pending the resolution of a problem regarding the licensing of the image. I'm wondering whether you would like to take a look and see what you think. As usual, there are no free images available online, and the chances of one coming up anytime soon are pretty slim. I would be most grateful if you could help to resolve this issue one way or another (I suspect that the licensing may be wrong, but I'm not overly sure). Thank you, -- Bulleid Pacific ( talk) 23:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash ( talk) 20:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

The The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter

The The WikiProject Good articles Newsletter Volume I, No. 10 – August 2008 July issue Project News There are currently 4,675 Good Articles listed at WP:GA. The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 141 unreviewed articles. Out of 186 total nominations, 28 are on hold, 14 are under review, and 3 are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article or three as soon as you have a chance! The oldest unreviewed articles are: Juggernaut (wrestler), Dark Angel (wrestler), Irrigation in Peru, Tropical cyclone rainfall forecasting, Coltrane for Lovers, Bayshore Freeway, Jon Cryer, Heather Mills, New York State Route 273, and Tsugaru clan. The categories with the largest backlogs are: Theatre, film, and drama (28 articles), Sports and recreation (27 articles), Music (22 articles), Transport (18 articles), and War and military (13 articles). There are currently 4 articles up for re-review at Good Article Reassessment. Congratulations! There really is no "backlog" here! :-) GA Sweeps is Recruiting Reviewers We are once again recruiting new sweeps participants. Candidates should be very strong and comfortable in reviewing GA and familiar with the GA processes and criteria. If you are interested, please contact OhanaUnited for details. GAN Reviewer of the Month ThinkBlue ( talk · contribs) is the GAN Reviewer of the Month for July, based on the assessments made by Dr. Cash on the number and thoroughness of the reviews made by individual reviewers each week. ThinkBlue had a whopping 49 reviews during the month of July! ThinkBlue was also one of our two reviewers of the month from June, and has been editing Wikipedia since December 1, 2006, and is interested in articles dealing with Friends, Will and Grace, CSI:Miami, Monday Night Raw, Coldplay. Congratulations to Giggy ( talk · contribs) on being May's GAN Reviewer of the Month! Other outstanding reviewers during the month of July include: Gary King ( talk · contribs) Giggy ( talk · contribs) Lpangelrob ( talk · contribs) Nikki311 ( talk · contribs) Peanut4 ( talk · contribs) Also, with 17 nominations, Mr.crabby ( talk · contribs) is the nominator of the month. Member News There are now 223 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to the 7 new members that joined during the month of July: 97198 ( talk · contribs) Carbonrodney ( talk · contribs) Gary King ( talk · contribs) Omaga99 ( talk · contribs) Protonk ( talk · contribs) RSkyhawk ( talk · contribs) Samuel Tan ( talk · contribs) This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all! GA Sweeps Process The GA Sweeps process has recently reached its first year anniversary. If you are unaware of what GA Sweeps is, it is a process put in place to help ensure the integrity of the ever-growing number of GAs, by determining if the articles still meet the GA criteria. Experienced reviewers check each article, improving articles as they review them, and delisting those that no longer meet the criteria. Reviewers work on a specific category of GAs, and there are still many categories that need to be swept. In order to properly keep track of reviews, a set date was used to determine what articles needed to be reviewed (since any future GAs would be passed according to the most recent GA criteria). The number of GAs that were to be reviewed totals 2,808. Since the beginning of Sweeps, the progress has reviewed 981 by the end of July 2008 (or exempted them). For a table and chart breakdown of the current progress, see here. With more than twenty editors reviewing the articles, progress is currently a third of the way done. At this rate, it will take another two years to complete the Sweeps, and active involvement is imperative to completing on time. We are always looking for new reviewers, and if you are interested in helping in speeding up the Sweeps process and improving your reviewing skills, please contact OhanaUnited. Did You Know... ... that the goal of GA Sweeps is to reviewed all articles listed before 26 August 2007? ... that the entire category of, "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" has been swept? ... that of all subcategories, "Recordings, compositions and performances" in the Music category has the most articles (240 articles in total)? ... that the GA project was recently mentioned in a Wall Street Journal article entitled, " Wikipedians Leave Cyberspace, Meet in Egypt," on Wikipedia on August 8, 2008? From the Editor Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue here. Contributors to this Issue Dr. Cash (Lead Editor, Distributor) OhanaUnited (GA Sweeps Correspondent) Nehrams2020 (Article Correspondent) Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005! WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia. Nominations: 2022 Northern Ireland Open ( talk | history | start review) • McLaren MCL60 ( talk | history | start review) • Infant school ( talk | history | start review) • Murali Vijay ( talk | history | start review) • Barry Sheene ( talk | history | start review) Reassessment: Joe Rice • Xinxiu bencao • John W. Campbell • Ni Yulan • FM (No Static at All) • Combat Aviation Brigade, 10th Mountain Division • Justinian I • Franklin's lost expedition • Task forces: Project quality • Sweeps • GAN Backlog Drives • GA Cup WikiProject Good articles newsletter (last updated January 2013) Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list |

Hi Slambo,

How do I add the German railway articles I have created (and any others that may have been missed) to the list of project articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Recent changes? Thanks in advance. -- Bermicourt ( talk) 09:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Both are correct English as the past tense of spell, please check any dictionary, such as www.dictionary.com. Spelt is by far the most common version in Britain at least, as I can't speak for anywhere else. Please check such things before you change them - both are acceptable. Boleyn ( talk) 18:41, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate taking the time to comment politely, but as someone who has to live with a gluten-free diet for life, "spelt" will always be a grain in my mind. I feel this really isn't worth arguing about, so I consider the discussion ended. Slambo (Speak) 18:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

John Bull (locomotive) has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Halgin ( talk) 00:27, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Someone else added some comments on a three images at Wikipedia:Featured article review/John Bull (locomotive). It looks like two of them have been taken care of. One of them is on Image:John Bull at the Smithsonian, 1920.jpg which you uploaded. Halgin ( talk) 00:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. I must have missed it on my watch list over the weekend. Slambo (Speak) 10:53, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

It is off the review list. I added it to the today's featured article requests page for Sep 15. Halgin ( talk) 00:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

I've been working on the Lists of named passenger trains: after merging the info from the List of passenger trains into its sub-lists, I ended up moving those sub-lists to a consistent naming scheme of List of named passenger trains of X. Most of these are not tagged with {{ TWP}}: as you're the expert on this, could you fix this when you get the chance? Thanks, -- RFBailey ( talk) 03:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Slambo,

Thanks for all your hard work in putting the WikiProject Trains box on various German railway articles. I was beginning to plan this and have even put some proposed criteria here Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains/Rail transport in Germany task force/Importance criteria. I did this partly to help me get my mind around it. Looks like I wasn't too far wrong as your assessments pretty well match! Thanks again -- Bermicourt ( talk) 10:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Good catch! Chris the speller ( talk) 19:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi, why do you think the template on Transrapid is necessary to the reader? Kind regards, Templatehater ( talk) 11:25, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Cheers for the heads-up on the usage of FRN in the article Railfan. My mistake, apologies. Srushe ( talk) 10:53, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Slambo,

Forgive my ignorance because I'm relatively new to this game, but is there a set of guidelines for how we name things? I've been trying to tidy up articles and categories linked to German railways (mainly) and have come across some conundrums (or is it conundra?).

One obvious area of potential difficulty is the different terminology between English-speaking countries. For example, I had no idea that open wagons are called 'gondolas' in the US. In Europe, the only gondolas are ferrying tourists around the waterways of Venice! Redirection is part of the answer, but sensible, neutral naming can also help. E.g. 'Tender locomotive' (which was actually about tenders, not locos) was recently renamed to 'Tender (railroad car)' which reflects US usage. However 'Tender (rail)' is probably just as good and reflects common usage.

Another area is simply coherence. Why have 'Firebox (locomotive)', 'Pantograph (rail)', 'Cylinder (steam locomotive)', 'Tender (railroad car)' and 'Buffer (rail transport)'? Why not have all locomotive-related items that need disambiguation called 'xxxx (locomotive)' and all general railway/railroad terms called 'xxx (rail)'? I'm over-simplifying a bit, I know, but you get the idea.

Sorry a bit of a ramble! -- Bermicourt ( talk) 16:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

As you've done such a good job bringing this article back up to FA standard, you may be interested to know that it is currently being proposed to being the main page featured article for 15 September - see Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests —   Tivedshambo  _{( t/ c)} 14:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up that TrainsWikiProject goes in the talk area :), I've moved the same for 1215 to user talk as well... Grey3k ( talk) 13:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

I updated the the blurb on John Bull (locomotive), for TFA request. I figure you were also interested in seeing this as a TFA and would support it. Halgin ( talk) 20:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)