![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have placed a post at An/I in regards to the actions taken against this user. I feel that the users actions are somewhat mitigated by an incorrect application of policy by the original admin who reverted the users blanking of his own page and that the issue escalated from there and was somewhat hasty and unfair on the part of the other admins involved. Thank you. Awotter ( talk) 06:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Slakr. A while ago, I reverted a few edits by User:767-249ER, who was vandalising Sydney suburb articles. Since then, he has been harassing me and my user page. Since the user was blocked, he has tried to create a number of Sock Puppets and make edits anonymously. You helped to identify him and block. I believe he has just returned again and considering the edits he has made to my user page is posing as an administrator to continue to harrass me. Can the address he is using be blocked or is there something else that can be done? Thanks J Bar ( talk) 06:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I would propose that SineBot does not sign comments on talk pages when they are ABOVE the first section. ( diff)— Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the BRC! We've recently opened membership up to the editing community at large, so if you know any badasses, feel free to invite them. Glass Cobra 07:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Yikes. Don't hurt yourself. :P Glass Cobra 08:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Damnit, you don't look Romanian! Wait until I'm in... dihydrogen monoxide ( H20) 09:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Is something going on with your bot performance lately? I am totally used to SineBot putting the small-print in before I get anywhere and I may have seen some dropouts lately. I seriously doubt I'm getting any faster... Franamax ( talk) 12:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but I'm just pointing out that I didn't violate the 3RR rule while User:Pietervhuis did, I was not the only user he reverted, he also reverted User:Caesar Augustvs if you look at the diffs and article history, so essentially he got away with violating the 3RR, and right after getting off a block-
Ouch, right, forgot about that. :/ · AndonicO Hail! 11:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Could SineBot be taught to link to [[Special:Contributions/Username|Username]] rather than to [[User:Username|Username]] in its edit summaries (where it says, "signing comment by ...")? Especially for IP edits. Thanks, Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem with using both the contribs and the talk link on the page. That's what SineBot is doing, that's what {{ unsignedIP}} does, and that's what WP:SIG recommends. Fine. But I'm still primarily talking about the edit summaries, not the sig on the page. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
hello Slakr, either I'm annoying or your glad people come to you for answers.(you happen to be the easiest to find that I know knows something) When reverting vandalism or advertising from wikipedia and then seeing on whois that the IP address belongs to a school (your telling me you don't wonder where there coming from) should I e-mail the network admin mentioning it, or is that allowed. Also if I should, at what level of vandalism? Thank you for your time-- Pewwer42 Talk 01:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
That was your idea! Remember? You showed me this one and suggested I modify it. My modifications are kind of pollywollycrappy, but it'll have to do until I can get a brainscan pic. :) Anyhow, thanks for the idea! :D delldot talk 21:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Any chance we might see an opt-out feature that only opts out of date signing for when we use ~~~ instead of ~~~~? Spud Hai/ watidone 03:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome brother, to our Bathrobe Cabal. Please familiarize yourself with the aims of the The Illustrious and Honorable Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia.
As is customary, the welcome song shall be sung:
Welcome to the jungle! We got fun n' games, We got everything you want. Honey, we know the names. We are the people that can find - Whatever you may need. If you got the money honey; We got your disease. In the jungle! Welcome to the jungle! Watch it bring you to your shunn,n,n,n,,n,n,,n,n,n,,n,n,,n knees, knees; I wanna watch you bleed!
If you have a suggestion for the advancement of the Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia; or a country you would like to see invaded, please direct your comment to the Bathrobe Cabal diabolical discussion page. Stay Frosty! Dfrg_ msc 05:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
THank you but Umm you blocked them for a period of null....how long is that?-- Pewwer42 Talk 17:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey I figured out your name, you slak from your job to edit wikipedia, no? ah well it was a guess. Anyway theres this article called Pergamon that seems to be having a dispute and only one side seems willing to discuss it on the talk page. The other side is a revolving IP address in Turkey (see the whois info [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]) I tried to get the page protected twice, the first time "not enough recent activity" the second time "borderline vandalism revert and warn" the second one might work but as I said it is a revolving IP address. So any Ideas?(Its not even a big disagreement, just over where and what a city is...hmmmm)-- Pewwer42 Talk 18:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Brannan. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 20:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You said:
The reason I made the edit was per an OTRS complaint, ticket number 2008020210003368. Whether the material goes in again or not is open to question (and may be moot if the article is deleted), but it looks to me form the history as if it was reinserted knowing that the subject did not want it there, almost as an act of spite; that's certainly how it looked to the subject. So, let's see it it gets deleted or kept, and then decide how to proceed in a way that does not cause the subject to believe, as he currently does, that Wikipedia does not care how much hurt and distress we cause him. If it's kept, I'll ask for your help to make the article less offensive to the subject, yes? Guy ( Help!) 21:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Foreign language translations are ususally done on a subpage of Wikipedia talk:Translation and I see SineBot signing several edits on the Airmail draft page when they are unneeded. Maybe you can stop it doping these types of pages? Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 22:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
{{
bots|deny=SineBot}}
instead. I'll put the feature for auto subpage deny lists on the to-do list though. --
slakr\
talk /
00:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Hey, slakr, could you please look at my new article on the Basilica of Sts. Peter and Paul and tell me what you think? ALso while your there could you... you know, correct any spelling errors and links and stuff I may of missed. Thank you very much, Hasta la Pasta-- Pewwer42 Talk 09:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe a better question would have been what is required to reach at least good article status?-- Pewwer42 Talk 21:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
How would a user sign a comment they spot the same way SineBot does? Thanks. Cheers. Earth bending master 02:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Check here, I copied and pasted a comment a user added in the article itself, appending the {{ unsignedip}} template with the user ip as signature. However, the bot did not recognize the template, and signed me. Is it possible for the bot to skip signing in these circumstances? Cheers! -- ReyBrujo ( talk) 23:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti..
slakr\
talk /
00:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
so umm you might want to talk a look at this. riiight and don't forget to see the history page-- Pewwer42 Talk 06:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! Have you already published your bot's source code? I would like to see it on Polish Wikipedia, working as hard as it does here. ;) Hołek ҉ 10:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
That seems to have done the trick! (Must have been some script-blocking issue on my end, or something -- I will try to get that resolved without having to bother you again about this... )
Thank you very much!
Wikiscient ( talk) 22:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be and edit war on the Hillary Clinton page between User:Frank Lofaro Jr. and User:Wasted Time R thought you should know-- Pewwer42 Talk 22:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw you were having issues previously with User:Pietervhuis. Now, my concern is that the user is engaging in revert warring again, sometimes without explanation in edit summaries and talk pages. I'm making this notification in a bid to avoid doing a 3RR by me but also by this user. Cheers! -- TheFEARgod ( Ч) 00:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Neigh! Did you even read what I wrote? I am trying to rewrite a horrible article. You should offer me a carrot, not revert my edit as vandalism. -- NotAHorse (neigh!) 11:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
For Cappadocia, Esbelli Evi is what Ice Hotel is for Sweden. This place was selected as one of the best in the world, a unique place with 2000 years old cave rooms. I have stayed at this place and believe they deserve a link from Wikipedia. So do not threaten me and try to understand that this is not an advertisement or anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.197.237.117 ( talk) 10:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Didn't seem to like the [[en: in the signature, /me thinks. Mønobi 22:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked User:767-249ER has returned as 122.106.83.63. My user page is being constantly vandalised now and there has been other vandalism from this address. Can you please block? J Bar ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 04:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I think you blocked the wrong guy, it was
User 122.106.83.63 not
User 122.106.63.212--
Pewwer42
Talk
04:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Whoops. Sorry. Hehe. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 17:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I would like to encourage you to take another look at this: [12], which you claimed was not a username vio. First of all, the editor is apparently engaging in disruptive editing at Allegations of state terrorism committed by the United States, and is quite obviously a reincarnation of the now username blocked User:Ultrastoopid. The reason this is clearly a username vio is that one of the regular editors, User:Ultramarine, has a username similar to that of User:UntimelyMaroon. Furthermore, in case you are not a native speaker of American English, the word "Maroon" is a slang term meaning the same thing as stupid. The username thus falls squarely under "Disruptive usernames" and "Offensive usernames." I have encouraged the user to select a name which is not based on that of User:Ultramarine. He/she appears not to have payed attention. Silly rabbit ( talk) 17:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that this IP also vandalized User:John Carter's user page per this edit. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I recently received a message from SineBot regarding early letters of the Church fathers, and I would be delighted to help. As you maintain SineBot, I assumed the message must have actually come from you. The e-mail address left in the message did not work, and my e-mail was rejected by the server. If you still require help, contact me on my Talk Page. Again, I'd really be glad to be of service. User: Two-face Jackie.
Hi the Talk:Cottage pie is still misdirecting, can you correct the move of that too. This did get badly mangled! GameKeeper ( talk) 10:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way that you could direct Sinebot to my talk page? There is an unsigned comment that was left there by a user we are pursuing a sockpuppetry case against. Thanks. -- Elaich talk 22:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Slakr, I have found another user of interest for you to look into. Jajhill seems to be going through pages changing things such as 7th to 7th (such as in this is the 7th president) I don't know if this actually matters but it seemed rather odd. Here is there contribute page. -- Pewwer42 Talk 01:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting that nonsense on my user page! He's quite the immature little troll. Thanks again~! - Sukecchi ( talk) 01:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I transferred a comment by a new user from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Abandon Productions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandon Productions, and your bot went in afterwards and noted that I had left the comment unsigned. I didn't want to sign it, because it wasn't my comment. I have undone it. How do I stop that from happening again? -- Roleplayer ( talk) 03:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Believe it or not, it's the fourth time today that a sockpuppet of V-Dash has done that to my page. MelicansMatkin ( talk) 05:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Which user are you refering to? I'm doing a lot of warning and anti-vandal patrol right now. Colleenthegreat ( talk) 06:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm reviewing this unblock request, and I'm baffled. I don't understand which page the user is supposed to have been edit warring on; I checked out both Allegations of state terrorism committed by the United States and Meir Weinstein; I found a couple of reverts but certainly not more than 3 on any day in recent history. I saw some new accounts and some IPs on the Allegations page but none of them looked like sockpuppets. This is clearly a complicated situation. What happened here? Mango juice talk 17:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Attack_accounts showed an other sock. I don't know under which evidence you blocked him, but I thought I'd let you know :). -- lucasbfr talk 18:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the input on (no signature). Will be sure to sign all following in puts ! Razorback 1 ( talk) 19:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I think the bot is acting up a little. its signing post that have already been signed βcommand 19:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Could you check this talk page, please? I've got it set up with the following bots template:
But user:SineBot is still editing that page. Could you find a way to make it stop, please? -- TS 16:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
This page was deleted and the reason cited was that it was a copy of a page that was nominated for deletion. This is incorrect. I wrote the page for the first time, and there hasn't been a Page on the international languages based on the Slavic language family. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekstazo ( talk • contribs) 02:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
But there was no recreation, as I wrote the article. And why shouldn't there be an article on Slovio? Ekstazo 03:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekstazo ( talk • contribs)
Hello Slakr, we have resolved the Hezbollah dispute, please check here, is there a chance to remove the page protection now? ( Imad marie ( talk) 10:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC))
ur a fukin n00b ill pwn u at any game u bitch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.38.50 ( talk) 23:16, 20 February 2008
Xerpi page was deleted again. please reactivate this page; it was objective, sourced, and notable (I described three ways in which it was a innovative social bookmarking tool social bookmarking is relevant to wiki!) There are 19 other 'notable' wiki articles about competing bookmarking sites (see list_of_social_software#Social_bookmarking which would be a perfect niche for the Xerpi article.
I stated this point in my contest to the speedy deletion; which was not replied to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mollymeghanmiller ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
your a facking b!tch and i hate you, you facker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaid12 ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Sinebot signed a comment that i had already signed with the four tildes. Why? I am sooooo cool! 22:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Same edit war. Same problem. See Talk:Serbia. 204.52.215.107 ( talk) 06:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. SineBot has signed several Talk page posts that I had already signed. Here are a couple of diffs: Talk:Black people, User talk:209.217.86.26.
I don't know if it matters, but my signature is "— {{SUBST:User|Malik Shabazz}}".
It's not a big deal, it's a little annoying and I thought you should know. Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ( talk · contribs) 18:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you could review my case at WP:AN/3 against User:Twsx. I realize it was you who blocked me before, which is part of the reason I ask for your help now. Twsx has been edit warring at least since august of last year on two pages with me and many other users having to revert him. He has been warned, but continues to be disruptive. He will not stop. Perhaps if some punitive action is taken against him we can all move on and learn something from this. Twsx seems to think I've made this report in bad faith. That is a lie. Yes, he did report me and get me blocked. Yes, he does seem to try and get me in trouble whenever possible (since I first came to wikipedia we have not been on good terms) but that is not why I reported him. I really don't care what he does. I just want him to stop messing with those two pages so we can all get back to actual editing that matters. Many editors (although I admit mostly myself) have had to revert him constantly on those two pages and he has been warned by myself and others. He continues and I know he will not stop. He always just waits a few days and then changes the pages again. Anyways, I would appreciate your review. I'm not asking for punishment or justice or w/e (I've learned that those do not have a place here on wikipedia), but only for preventative measures to be taken. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 18:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page. This is a very famous dance school in NYC. Other schools such as Steps on Broadway, New Dance Group and Dance New Amsterdam are listed on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwydance ( talk • contribs) 21:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
hey there, I received a kind reminder from one of your bots, SineBot, reminding me to sign off on the stuff I write. That led me to your user page and I came to know that you are a member of the counter-vandalism team, and I though perhaps you could help me with a recent edit I made to an article which got reverted on vandalism charges though I would like to think I did not indulge in any such activity with my contribution. I would love for you to help me out by offering advice on where I might have gone wrong since I am a new editor on Wikipedia. The link to the talk page of the article is below;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International
Thanks Syedshoaib ( talk) 17:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
back off then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.166.119 ( talk) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Please cancel his fourth revert - which violates 3RR. No need to warn him, because I'm sure it was not done on purpose! He's an honest person who is absolutely aware to the 3RR and has always obeyed the 3RR. Eliko ( talk) 01:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if this is a bug, but a message got left on my page that didn't get signed. Is it because someone else edited the page right afterwards? I'm a little confused. Usually SineBot always gets them. Thanks, Enigma msg! 16:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I made an article about the mixed martial arts academy Universidad da Luta. My sources are credible and it is important because it is about a camp formed by several well known people in the MMA world and is recent. I believe it is good that Wikipedia keeps up with ALL appropriate knowledge of ALL kinds including MMA. I'm not sure why you had a problem with the article but please let me know. I already appealed for the article in the section designated. Also Universidade da Luta is not a club but a mixed martial arts academy as stated in the article. We all have our off days as I'm sure that day was yours.
Thank You,
P.S. I accidentally wrote the article as Universidad da Luta due to a typo. If you could please delete that for me and the general public it would be much appreciated.
TapOut_013 —Preceding unsigned comment added by TapOut 013 ( talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
User signatures are not appropriate on this page, and sinebot should not add them. Can you add this page to its exception list? Thanks, Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 22:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Slakr,
you and I were editing at the same time. I am glad you only gave a warning. A question: can two editors break or avoid the 3RR rule by making 4 identical edits, taking turns, or no? Thanks, — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 23:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Slakr, can you figure out why sinebot is signing my (signed) comments? Here is one example: [13]
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 05:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
So I think my latest idea is the best yet, check out my user page-- Pewwer42 Talk 06:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Posted a comment, signed, of course, which Sinebot then corrects with another signature along with a warning. I have a feeling it might have something to do with me using a redirect in my sig (to shorten the length of it), but this hasn't happened to me before, even with the redirect, so I'm assuming it's a glitch. Thanks in advance. -- TBC !?! 11:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you block this twit again? Seems to be up to his old tricks. ~ Alcmaeonid ( talk) 17:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Just curious about removing the Speedy request from Toni Graphia per this edit. You didn't explain why you deleted the request, and the article clearly falls within db-bio, since it in no way asserts notability. Clarify for me? Thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 22:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to let you know that I have removed the block on Zsero ( talk · contribs) based on your saying on AN that you don't care either way. I really think that ending the block during waking hours has a huge upside and I will keep an eye on his edits until I go to bed to make sure that the issue doesn't flare back up. Thanks. -- B ( talk) 04:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Slackr, I appreciate you blocking 208.54.95.64 for 55 h as an abusive Matt Sanchez sock puppet for this and this. You may not be aware that Matt's previous IPs used for abusing editors have been blocked for a month, the first by John Vandenberg amd the second by Edgar181, As such, you might want to consider extending the block. Also, I think you are supposed to record the block here. Best, Jay*Jay ( talk) 07:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Slakr! I see that you thanked the above user for placing a vandalism warning. I suspect that this user (Colleenthegreat) is in fact a disruptive user, verging on vandalism. When you have time, please take a look at her contributions - she hasn't been around long, so look at her last 500 contributions. You will see that virtually all edits she has made to articles were just silly comments which were in most cases immediately reverted. Her vandalism warnings to anonymous users is itself silly - we all know thousands of non-registered users screw around with pages every day. Many even self-revert! Most are caught quickly ... but I know of no seasoned admin who then leaves a vandalism warning. Why? An anonymous user only has an IP address and for all we know, two hours later or the next day a different person may make good edits from the same address. Or this non-registered vandal is doing this once and will never come back. In the examples I see of Colleenthegreat's "warnings," the only effect she had was to create a talk page for an IP address, in many cases an IP addressed used only once. I will provide just two more examples of nonsense (even disruptive) edits: [14] and [15]. Now, if this were someone's first edit to Wikipedia, Andrew c's response (ro read our NPOV and NOR and V policies) would have made sense. But this is someone who has made hundreds of edits and has even rebuked others for vandalism! In any event, the second disruptive edit came after Andrew c's suggestion that she comply with policy.
You were generous to her in thanking her for spotting vandalism. In fact, I think her account exists only to make disruptive edits. Could you go over her contributions and provide another opinion? Slrubenstein | Talk 11:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Kurt,
I'm glad you finally stopped changing my edit of the spelling of Tuli's name. You made me work hard to add that little bit of knowledge. I wonder why you didn't check your Fugs CDs,LPs or do a Google Search before you acted. When his name appeared in red instead of blue you should have realized it wasn't linking to a page and something was wrong. Well, we all make mistakes,and we learn from them if we are wise.
Yrs, Thelma (Lightning49)
I'm sorry, Slakr, I was apparently unclear in my description of IronAngelAlice's 3RR violation.
Please see: [16]
Regards, NCdave ( talk) 19:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I have prepared a revised entry for Richard Mohr, RCA Recording Producer and would like to submit it. You are listed as having removed my previous entry with the reason being “Blatant Copyright Infringement.” Are you referring to the Copyright for www.richardmohr.com ? I am the author of that web site and hold the copyright. Richard Mohr was the American counterpart of Decca Records, JOHN CULSHAW, (who is already correctly listed in Wikipedia) and he most definitely deserves inclusion.(His 1975 Grammy Award is on Wikipedia). I am a lifelong friend of the late Mr. Mohr and heir to his estate. I would be very grateful for your comments. Thank you for your reconsideration. Peter Bonelli pfbonelli@aol.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteratwik ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I have prepared a revised entry for Richard Mohr, RCA Recording Producer and would like to submit it. You are listed as having removed my previous entry with the reason being “Blatant Copyright Infringement.” Are you referring to the Copyright for www.richardmohr.com ? I am the author of that web site and hold the copyright. Richard Mohr was the American counterpart of Decca Records, JOHN CULSHAW, (who is already correctly listed in Wikipedia) and he most definitely deserves inclusion.(His 1975 Grammy Award is on Wikipedia). I am a lifelong friend of the late Mr. Mohr and heir to his estate. I would be very grateful for your comments. Thank you for your reconsideration. Peter Bonelli pfbonelli@aol.com. Peteratwik ( talk) 21:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
The general rudimental drumminnng public defines a hybrid rudiment as any rudiment, thatis a combonation of two or more of the 40 original PAS International Rudiments. There are unlimited possibilities for these Hybrids, and a source can not be attributed for a rudiment that is thought up or innvented by a WIki user. This page allows users to use new combonations of rudiments in their composition, and should be re uploaded because it is a great resource for writers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.182.192.244 ( talk) 04:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
could you watch this user for me? I need to get some sleep(not that I really want to), and If your already sleeping....well guess whoever sees this could do the job. Good night, and see your edits tomorrow-- Pewwer42 Talk 08:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
you put a block on this user a couple days ago which now seems to have ended. the very first edit he did after that was to remove the sockpuppet warnings on User:Tvarkytojas who has been massively disruptive as a POV-pushing category-shifter both in the lithuanian and church denomination areas. when Tvarkytojas began a few days ago, he made hundreds of edits in a very short space of time (often four or five a minute) suggesting to me that his damage is automated. Don't know. I posted something on the administartors incident noteboard, and it hasn't been responded to. in any case, something nasty is afoot. Tb ( talk) 15:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
haha nice pic
ElisaEXPLOSiON
talk.
17:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Re Richard Mohr - I do not understand what you are talking about. None of the copy in my entry is quoted verbatim from the web site (which site, in any event, I authored). The facts of his career are the same whether I write them or someone else does. I am sure there are thousands of entries in Wikipedia that contain facts that dudplicate facts published in other forms. It is sounding to me that you are just arbtrarily bouncing this entry. Can you tell me what resources I have (at Wikipedia) to question your interpretation of this situation? TYhank you for the courtesy of a reply. P Bonelli. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteratwik ( talk • contribs) 21:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I think I am starting to get the hang of this process. First of all let me quickly say that I submitted a new account because for some reason I was not able to get onto my original account. Please know that I have no intention of abusing the "sockpuppetry" guidlines and will cancel out one of the accounts at once. Secondly I have redone the entry, carefully trying not to repeat the copy from my web site verbatim. There are of course duplicate Names, Dates and Events. So perhaps now I do not have to deal with the GNU Free Doc statement, although that would be easy enough to include on the site if necessary. Can you advise me if I should resubmit the revised entry the usual way or is there another procedure I should follow. Thank you for your patience and I apologize for my blatant unfamiliarity with the correct procedure at Wikipedia. Thanks. Peteratwik ( talk) 22:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
For me: ""Sjfla;lje998098098 f;lsejkfs (talk • contribs) is already blocked (block log • unblock) . To change the block expiry and/or block reason, you must first unblock the user."" :) Pedro : Chat 11:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that part doesn't com up until the New Testament, I guess. :D Cheers! – Clockwork Soul 16:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand on your page when you say:
What exactly do you mean?
Basketball
110
what famous people say
00:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The PCHS-NJROTC Abuse Report and Antivandal Barnstar | |
For reverting vandalism to Port Charlotte High School! |
GO-PCHS-NJROTC ( talk) 00:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Here's a barnstar for improving Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! The Helpful One (Review) 22:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC) |
Did you know that the Dallas-Fort Worth WikiProject is believed to be inactive? Basketball 110 what famous people say ♣ 17:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Dallas-Fort Worth WikiProject Newsletter | ||
Volume 1, Issue 1 • March 9, 2008 • Written by Basketball 110 | ||
Project news:
|
Featured Dallas-Fort Worth articles of the week: |
|
Archives • Project info |
Behold: [17]. :P - Warthog Demon 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
but peter faulk IS a legend! why was that deleted?
Cammieshawaaaaaaaaa ( talk) 03:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Linux and BSD are the SAME THING!!!!! Two names for the same exact thing. and by the way... its nto original resertch if i got the idea from a nother website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpolster2005 ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Linux and unix are esentially the same thing. they are both using the same commands, applications are cross compatible etc..... Mach and BSD are also like linux. therefore u can say the mac os is based on linux. i have a mac mini here at home as one of my computers. I have seen the linux command line and have use it. i have been on websites which tell me mac os x is based on linux. linux is a free version of unix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpolster2005 ( talk • contribs) 06:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Is source code of your bot available for download? I was asked to run a signing bot on another project, so it would be quite useful (there is no point in re-inventing the wheel:). Invisible Idiot ( talk) 12:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Slakr. I noticed at the end of user talk:Tom Butler when I was commenting earlier today that user:Martinphi added a comment [18], then went back and added an extra link within that comment [19], which SineBot then signed [20]. If it is relevant, Martinphi and I were editing that section at the same time, and had an edit conflict, so my posting occurred between his comment and addition. It seems to me that SineBot didn't need to sign this, and the final product (at the end of Martinphi's first post in the section) looks a little odd to me. I just thought you'd like to know in case this indicates a problem with your Bot. Best, Jay*Jay ( talk) 13:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Scientology Handbook, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scientology Handbook. Thank you. Coffeepusher ( talk) 00:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you'd recently left a message on this user's talk page relating to vandalism to Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. I just wanted to let you know that this user has also been vandalising the page for Racing game. I've cleaned up the page, but felt taht I should let you know that he doesn't seem to have stopped. Many thanks Gazimoff ( talk) 15:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I wonder if you might explain more fully why you regard this an inappropriate user name. It's unusual, certainly, but I don't see what guidlines it breaches. Regards, Mannafredo ( talk) 12:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
re: copyrighted material... what copyrighted material was added?
Slakr, you told me that i vandalise "List of Bleach Character". You know, I NEVER open that page. And I NEVER share this IP-Address with anyone. I NEVER editing page in Wikipedia (English). So, you must be making a mistake.
Regards,
Stefan Karel Yang —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.94.16.186 ( talk) 14:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
i dont think u know what ur talking about sorry...if allowed copyrighted image then allowed copyrighted lyrics also. anyway it is really only the music that is copyrighted... no1 goes to the record store to buy a copy of pink floyd lyrics lol they go to buy the music...it would b bad if we had the music on the site but it just the lyrics...there are lots of free sites where can get lyrics from and it eaasy to pirate the songs too so i dont think pink floyd care about lyrics on wikipeda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.217.186 ( talk)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I have placed a post at An/I in regards to the actions taken against this user. I feel that the users actions are somewhat mitigated by an incorrect application of policy by the original admin who reverted the users blanking of his own page and that the issue escalated from there and was somewhat hasty and unfair on the part of the other admins involved. Thank you. Awotter ( talk) 06:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Slakr. A while ago, I reverted a few edits by User:767-249ER, who was vandalising Sydney suburb articles. Since then, he has been harassing me and my user page. Since the user was blocked, he has tried to create a number of Sock Puppets and make edits anonymously. You helped to identify him and block. I believe he has just returned again and considering the edits he has made to my user page is posing as an administrator to continue to harrass me. Can the address he is using be blocked or is there something else that can be done? Thanks J Bar ( talk) 06:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
I would propose that SineBot does not sign comments on talk pages when they are ABOVE the first section. ( diff)— Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (talk) 14:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to the BRC! We've recently opened membership up to the editing community at large, so if you know any badasses, feel free to invite them. Glass Cobra 07:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Yikes. Don't hurt yourself. :P Glass Cobra 08:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Damnit, you don't look Romanian! Wait until I'm in... dihydrogen monoxide ( H20) 09:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Is something going on with your bot performance lately? I am totally used to SineBot putting the small-print in before I get anywhere and I may have seen some dropouts lately. I seriously doubt I'm getting any faster... Franamax ( talk) 12:31, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but I'm just pointing out that I didn't violate the 3RR rule while User:Pietervhuis did, I was not the only user he reverted, he also reverted User:Caesar Augustvs if you look at the diffs and article history, so essentially he got away with violating the 3RR, and right after getting off a block-
Ouch, right, forgot about that. :/ · AndonicO Hail! 11:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Could SineBot be taught to link to [[Special:Contributions/Username|Username]] rather than to [[User:Username|Username]] in its edit summaries (where it says, "signing comment by ...")? Especially for IP edits. Thanks, Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:03, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
No problem with using both the contribs and the talk link on the page. That's what SineBot is doing, that's what {{ unsignedIP}} does, and that's what WP:SIG recommends. Fine. But I'm still primarily talking about the edit summaries, not the sig on the page. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:11, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
hello Slakr, either I'm annoying or your glad people come to you for answers.(you happen to be the easiest to find that I know knows something) When reverting vandalism or advertising from wikipedia and then seeing on whois that the IP address belongs to a school (your telling me you don't wonder where there coming from) should I e-mail the network admin mentioning it, or is that allowed. Also if I should, at what level of vandalism? Thank you for your time-- Pewwer42 Talk 01:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
That was your idea! Remember? You showed me this one and suggested I modify it. My modifications are kind of pollywollycrappy, but it'll have to do until I can get a brainscan pic. :) Anyhow, thanks for the idea! :D delldot talk 21:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Any chance we might see an opt-out feature that only opts out of date signing for when we use ~~~ instead of ~~~~? Spud Hai/ watidone 03:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome brother, to our Bathrobe Cabal. Please familiarize yourself with the aims of the The Illustrious and Honorable Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia.
As is customary, the welcome song shall be sung:
Welcome to the jungle! We got fun n' games, We got everything you want. Honey, we know the names. We are the people that can find - Whatever you may need. If you got the money honey; We got your disease. In the jungle! Welcome to the jungle! Watch it bring you to your shunn,n,n,n,,n,n,,n,n,n,,n,n,,n knees, knees; I wanna watch you bleed!
If you have a suggestion for the advancement of the Bathrobe Cabal of Wikipedia; or a country you would like to see invaded, please direct your comment to the Bathrobe Cabal diabolical discussion page. Stay Frosty! Dfrg_ msc 05:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
THank you but Umm you blocked them for a period of null....how long is that?-- Pewwer42 Talk 17:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey I figured out your name, you slak from your job to edit wikipedia, no? ah well it was a guess. Anyway theres this article called Pergamon that seems to be having a dispute and only one side seems willing to discuss it on the talk page. The other side is a revolving IP address in Turkey (see the whois info [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]) I tried to get the page protected twice, the first time "not enough recent activity" the second time "borderline vandalism revert and warn" the second one might work but as I said it is a revolving IP address. So any Ideas?(Its not even a big disagreement, just over where and what a city is...hmmmm)-- Pewwer42 Talk 18:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jay Brannan. - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 20:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
You said:
The reason I made the edit was per an OTRS complaint, ticket number 2008020210003368. Whether the material goes in again or not is open to question (and may be moot if the article is deleted), but it looks to me form the history as if it was reinserted knowing that the subject did not want it there, almost as an act of spite; that's certainly how it looked to the subject. So, let's see it it gets deleted or kept, and then decide how to proceed in a way that does not cause the subject to believe, as he currently does, that Wikipedia does not care how much hurt and distress we cause him. If it's kept, I'll ask for your help to make the article less offensive to the subject, yes? Guy ( Help!) 21:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Foreign language translations are ususally done on a subpage of Wikipedia talk:Translation and I see SineBot signing several edits on the Airmail draft page when they are unneeded. Maybe you can stop it doping these types of pages? Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 22:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
{{
bots|deny=SineBot}}
instead. I'll put the feature for auto subpage deny lists on the to-do list though. --
slakr\
talk /
00:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Hey, slakr, could you please look at my new article on the Basilica of Sts. Peter and Paul and tell me what you think? ALso while your there could you... you know, correct any spelling errors and links and stuff I may of missed. Thank you very much, Hasta la Pasta-- Pewwer42 Talk 09:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe a better question would have been what is required to reach at least good article status?-- Pewwer42 Talk 21:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
How would a user sign a comment they spot the same way SineBot does? Thanks. Cheers. Earth bending master 02:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Check here, I copied and pasted a comment a user added in the article itself, appending the {{ unsignedip}} template with the user ip as signature. However, the bot did not recognize the template, and signed me. Is it possible for the bot to skip signing in these circumstances? Cheers! -- ReyBrujo ( talk) 23:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Franz Wilhelm Rabaliatti..
slakr\
talk /
00:29, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
so umm you might want to talk a look at this. riiight and don't forget to see the history page-- Pewwer42 Talk 06:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! Have you already published your bot's source code? I would like to see it on Polish Wikipedia, working as hard as it does here. ;) Hołek ҉ 10:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
That seems to have done the trick! (Must have been some script-blocking issue on my end, or something -- I will try to get that resolved without having to bother you again about this... )
Thank you very much!
Wikiscient ( talk) 22:17, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
There seems to be and edit war on the Hillary Clinton page between User:Frank Lofaro Jr. and User:Wasted Time R thought you should know-- Pewwer42 Talk 22:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw you were having issues previously with User:Pietervhuis. Now, my concern is that the user is engaging in revert warring again, sometimes without explanation in edit summaries and talk pages. I'm making this notification in a bid to avoid doing a 3RR by me but also by this user. Cheers! -- TheFEARgod ( Ч) 00:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Neigh! Did you even read what I wrote? I am trying to rewrite a horrible article. You should offer me a carrot, not revert my edit as vandalism. -- NotAHorse (neigh!) 11:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
For Cappadocia, Esbelli Evi is what Ice Hotel is for Sweden. This place was selected as one of the best in the world, a unique place with 2000 years old cave rooms. I have stayed at this place and believe they deserve a link from Wikipedia. So do not threaten me and try to understand that this is not an advertisement or anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.197.237.117 ( talk) 10:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Didn't seem to like the [[en: in the signature, /me thinks. Mønobi 22:09, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked User:767-249ER has returned as 122.106.83.63. My user page is being constantly vandalised now and there has been other vandalism from this address. Can you please block? J Bar ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 04:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I think you blocked the wrong guy, it was
User 122.106.83.63 not
User 122.106.63.212--
Pewwer42
Talk
04:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Whoops. Sorry. Hehe. Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 17:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I would like to encourage you to take another look at this: [12], which you claimed was not a username vio. First of all, the editor is apparently engaging in disruptive editing at Allegations of state terrorism committed by the United States, and is quite obviously a reincarnation of the now username blocked User:Ultrastoopid. The reason this is clearly a username vio is that one of the regular editors, User:Ultramarine, has a username similar to that of User:UntimelyMaroon. Furthermore, in case you are not a native speaker of American English, the word "Maroon" is a slang term meaning the same thing as stupid. The username thus falls squarely under "Disruptive usernames" and "Offensive usernames." I have encouraged the user to select a name which is not based on that of User:Ultramarine. He/she appears not to have payed attention. Silly rabbit ( talk) 17:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that this IP also vandalized User:John Carter's user page per this edit. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 19:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I recently received a message from SineBot regarding early letters of the Church fathers, and I would be delighted to help. As you maintain SineBot, I assumed the message must have actually come from you. The e-mail address left in the message did not work, and my e-mail was rejected by the server. If you still require help, contact me on my Talk Page. Again, I'd really be glad to be of service. User: Two-face Jackie.
Hi the Talk:Cottage pie is still misdirecting, can you correct the move of that too. This did get badly mangled! GameKeeper ( talk) 10:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way that you could direct Sinebot to my talk page? There is an unsigned comment that was left there by a user we are pursuing a sockpuppetry case against. Thanks. -- Elaich talk 22:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Slakr, I have found another user of interest for you to look into. Jajhill seems to be going through pages changing things such as 7th to 7th (such as in this is the 7th president) I don't know if this actually matters but it seemed rather odd. Here is there contribute page. -- Pewwer42 Talk 01:24, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting that nonsense on my user page! He's quite the immature little troll. Thanks again~! - Sukecchi ( talk) 01:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
I transferred a comment by a new user from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Abandon Productions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abandon Productions, and your bot went in afterwards and noted that I had left the comment unsigned. I didn't want to sign it, because it wasn't my comment. I have undone it. How do I stop that from happening again? -- Roleplayer ( talk) 03:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Believe it or not, it's the fourth time today that a sockpuppet of V-Dash has done that to my page. MelicansMatkin ( talk) 05:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Which user are you refering to? I'm doing a lot of warning and anti-vandal patrol right now. Colleenthegreat ( talk) 06:15, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm reviewing this unblock request, and I'm baffled. I don't understand which page the user is supposed to have been edit warring on; I checked out both Allegations of state terrorism committed by the United States and Meir Weinstein; I found a couple of reverts but certainly not more than 3 on any day in recent history. I saw some new accounts and some IPs on the Allegations page but none of them looked like sockpuppets. This is clearly a complicated situation. What happened here? Mango juice talk 17:06, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Attack_accounts showed an other sock. I don't know under which evidence you blocked him, but I thought I'd let you know :). -- lucasbfr talk 18:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the input on (no signature). Will be sure to sign all following in puts ! Razorback 1 ( talk) 19:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I think the bot is acting up a little. its signing post that have already been signed βcommand 19:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Could you check this talk page, please? I've got it set up with the following bots template:
But user:SineBot is still editing that page. Could you find a way to make it stop, please? -- TS 16:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
This page was deleted and the reason cited was that it was a copy of a page that was nominated for deletion. This is incorrect. I wrote the page for the first time, and there hasn't been a Page on the international languages based on the Slavic language family. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekstazo ( talk • contribs) 02:41, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
But there was no recreation, as I wrote the article. And why shouldn't there be an article on Slovio? Ekstazo 03:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekstazo ( talk • contribs)
Hello Slakr, we have resolved the Hezbollah dispute, please check here, is there a chance to remove the page protection now? ( Imad marie ( talk) 10:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC))
ur a fukin n00b ill pwn u at any game u bitch! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.38.50 ( talk) 23:16, 20 February 2008
Xerpi page was deleted again. please reactivate this page; it was objective, sourced, and notable (I described three ways in which it was a innovative social bookmarking tool social bookmarking is relevant to wiki!) There are 19 other 'notable' wiki articles about competing bookmarking sites (see list_of_social_software#Social_bookmarking which would be a perfect niche for the Xerpi article.
I stated this point in my contest to the speedy deletion; which was not replied to. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mollymeghanmiller ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
your a facking b!tch and i hate you, you facker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaid12 ( talk • contribs) 21:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Sinebot signed a comment that i had already signed with the four tildes. Why? I am sooooo cool! 22:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Same edit war. Same problem. See Talk:Serbia. 204.52.215.107 ( talk) 06:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. SineBot has signed several Talk page posts that I had already signed. Here are a couple of diffs: Talk:Black people, User talk:209.217.86.26.
I don't know if it matters, but my signature is "— {{SUBST:User|Malik Shabazz}}".
It's not a big deal, it's a little annoying and I thought you should know. Thanks. — Malik Shabazz ( talk · contribs) 18:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you could review my case at WP:AN/3 against User:Twsx. I realize it was you who blocked me before, which is part of the reason I ask for your help now. Twsx has been edit warring at least since august of last year on two pages with me and many other users having to revert him. He has been warned, but continues to be disruptive. He will not stop. Perhaps if some punitive action is taken against him we can all move on and learn something from this. Twsx seems to think I've made this report in bad faith. That is a lie. Yes, he did report me and get me blocked. Yes, he does seem to try and get me in trouble whenever possible (since I first came to wikipedia we have not been on good terms) but that is not why I reported him. I really don't care what he does. I just want him to stop messing with those two pages so we can all get back to actual editing that matters. Many editors (although I admit mostly myself) have had to revert him constantly on those two pages and he has been warned by myself and others. He continues and I know he will not stop. He always just waits a few days and then changes the pages again. Anyways, I would appreciate your review. I'm not asking for punishment or justice or w/e (I've learned that those do not have a place here on wikipedia), but only for preventative measures to be taken. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 18:49, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete this page. This is a very famous dance school in NYC. Other schools such as Steps on Broadway, New Dance Group and Dance New Amsterdam are listed on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwydance ( talk • contribs) 21:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
hey there, I received a kind reminder from one of your bots, SineBot, reminding me to sign off on the stuff I write. That led me to your user page and I came to know that you are a member of the counter-vandalism team, and I though perhaps you could help me with a recent edit I made to an article which got reverted on vandalism charges though I would like to think I did not indulge in any such activity with my contribution. I would love for you to help me out by offering advice on where I might have gone wrong since I am a new editor on Wikipedia. The link to the talk page of the article is below;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International
Thanks Syedshoaib ( talk) 17:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
back off then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.218.166.119 ( talk) 19:31, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Please cancel his fourth revert - which violates 3RR. No need to warn him, because I'm sure it was not done on purpose! He's an honest person who is absolutely aware to the 3RR and has always obeyed the 3RR. Eliko ( talk) 01:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if this is a bug, but a message got left on my page that didn't get signed. Is it because someone else edited the page right afterwards? I'm a little confused. Usually SineBot always gets them. Thanks, Enigma msg! 16:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I made an article about the mixed martial arts academy Universidad da Luta. My sources are credible and it is important because it is about a camp formed by several well known people in the MMA world and is recent. I believe it is good that Wikipedia keeps up with ALL appropriate knowledge of ALL kinds including MMA. I'm not sure why you had a problem with the article but please let me know. I already appealed for the article in the section designated. Also Universidade da Luta is not a club but a mixed martial arts academy as stated in the article. We all have our off days as I'm sure that day was yours.
Thank You,
P.S. I accidentally wrote the article as Universidad da Luta due to a typo. If you could please delete that for me and the general public it would be much appreciated.
TapOut_013 —Preceding unsigned comment added by TapOut 013 ( talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
User signatures are not appropriate on this page, and sinebot should not add them. Can you add this page to its exception list? Thanks, Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 22:18, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Slakr,
you and I were editing at the same time. I am glad you only gave a warning. A question: can two editors break or avoid the 3RR rule by making 4 identical edits, taking turns, or no? Thanks, — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 23:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Slakr, can you figure out why sinebot is signing my (signed) comments? Here is one example: [13]
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 05:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
So I think my latest idea is the best yet, check out my user page-- Pewwer42 Talk 06:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Posted a comment, signed, of course, which Sinebot then corrects with another signature along with a warning. I have a feeling it might have something to do with me using a redirect in my sig (to shorten the length of it), but this hasn't happened to me before, even with the redirect, so I'm assuming it's a glitch. Thanks in advance. -- TBC !?! 11:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you block this twit again? Seems to be up to his old tricks. ~ Alcmaeonid ( talk) 17:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Just curious about removing the Speedy request from Toni Graphia per this edit. You didn't explain why you deleted the request, and the article clearly falls within db-bio, since it in no way asserts notability. Clarify for me? Thanks! -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 22:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I wanted to let you know that I have removed the block on Zsero ( talk · contribs) based on your saying on AN that you don't care either way. I really think that ending the block during waking hours has a huge upside and I will keep an eye on his edits until I go to bed to make sure that the issue doesn't flare back up. Thanks. -- B ( talk) 04:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Slackr, I appreciate you blocking 208.54.95.64 for 55 h as an abusive Matt Sanchez sock puppet for this and this. You may not be aware that Matt's previous IPs used for abusing editors have been blocked for a month, the first by John Vandenberg amd the second by Edgar181, As such, you might want to consider extending the block. Also, I think you are supposed to record the block here. Best, Jay*Jay ( talk) 07:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey Slakr! I see that you thanked the above user for placing a vandalism warning. I suspect that this user (Colleenthegreat) is in fact a disruptive user, verging on vandalism. When you have time, please take a look at her contributions - she hasn't been around long, so look at her last 500 contributions. You will see that virtually all edits she has made to articles were just silly comments which were in most cases immediately reverted. Her vandalism warnings to anonymous users is itself silly - we all know thousands of non-registered users screw around with pages every day. Many even self-revert! Most are caught quickly ... but I know of no seasoned admin who then leaves a vandalism warning. Why? An anonymous user only has an IP address and for all we know, two hours later or the next day a different person may make good edits from the same address. Or this non-registered vandal is doing this once and will never come back. In the examples I see of Colleenthegreat's "warnings," the only effect she had was to create a talk page for an IP address, in many cases an IP addressed used only once. I will provide just two more examples of nonsense (even disruptive) edits: [14] and [15]. Now, if this were someone's first edit to Wikipedia, Andrew c's response (ro read our NPOV and NOR and V policies) would have made sense. But this is someone who has made hundreds of edits and has even rebuked others for vandalism! In any event, the second disruptive edit came after Andrew c's suggestion that she comply with policy.
You were generous to her in thanking her for spotting vandalism. In fact, I think her account exists only to make disruptive edits. Could you go over her contributions and provide another opinion? Slrubenstein | Talk 11:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Kurt,
I'm glad you finally stopped changing my edit of the spelling of Tuli's name. You made me work hard to add that little bit of knowledge. I wonder why you didn't check your Fugs CDs,LPs or do a Google Search before you acted. When his name appeared in red instead of blue you should have realized it wasn't linking to a page and something was wrong. Well, we all make mistakes,and we learn from them if we are wise.
Yrs, Thelma (Lightning49)
I'm sorry, Slakr, I was apparently unclear in my description of IronAngelAlice's 3RR violation.
Please see: [16]
Regards, NCdave ( talk) 19:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I have prepared a revised entry for Richard Mohr, RCA Recording Producer and would like to submit it. You are listed as having removed my previous entry with the reason being “Blatant Copyright Infringement.” Are you referring to the Copyright for www.richardmohr.com ? I am the author of that web site and hold the copyright. Richard Mohr was the American counterpart of Decca Records, JOHN CULSHAW, (who is already correctly listed in Wikipedia) and he most definitely deserves inclusion.(His 1975 Grammy Award is on Wikipedia). I am a lifelong friend of the late Mr. Mohr and heir to his estate. I would be very grateful for your comments. Thank you for your reconsideration. Peter Bonelli pfbonelli@aol.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteratwik ( talk • contribs) 21:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
I have prepared a revised entry for Richard Mohr, RCA Recording Producer and would like to submit it. You are listed as having removed my previous entry with the reason being “Blatant Copyright Infringement.” Are you referring to the Copyright for www.richardmohr.com ? I am the author of that web site and hold the copyright. Richard Mohr was the American counterpart of Decca Records, JOHN CULSHAW, (who is already correctly listed in Wikipedia) and he most definitely deserves inclusion.(His 1975 Grammy Award is on Wikipedia). I am a lifelong friend of the late Mr. Mohr and heir to his estate. I would be very grateful for your comments. Thank you for your reconsideration. Peter Bonelli pfbonelli@aol.com. Peteratwik ( talk) 21:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
The general rudimental drumminnng public defines a hybrid rudiment as any rudiment, thatis a combonation of two or more of the 40 original PAS International Rudiments. There are unlimited possibilities for these Hybrids, and a source can not be attributed for a rudiment that is thought up or innvented by a WIki user. This page allows users to use new combonations of rudiments in their composition, and should be re uploaded because it is a great resource for writers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.182.192.244 ( talk) 04:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
could you watch this user for me? I need to get some sleep(not that I really want to), and If your already sleeping....well guess whoever sees this could do the job. Good night, and see your edits tomorrow-- Pewwer42 Talk 08:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
you put a block on this user a couple days ago which now seems to have ended. the very first edit he did after that was to remove the sockpuppet warnings on User:Tvarkytojas who has been massively disruptive as a POV-pushing category-shifter both in the lithuanian and church denomination areas. when Tvarkytojas began a few days ago, he made hundreds of edits in a very short space of time (often four or five a minute) suggesting to me that his damage is automated. Don't know. I posted something on the administartors incident noteboard, and it hasn't been responded to. in any case, something nasty is afoot. Tb ( talk) 15:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
haha nice pic
ElisaEXPLOSiON
talk.
17:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Re Richard Mohr - I do not understand what you are talking about. None of the copy in my entry is quoted verbatim from the web site (which site, in any event, I authored). The facts of his career are the same whether I write them or someone else does. I am sure there are thousands of entries in Wikipedia that contain facts that dudplicate facts published in other forms. It is sounding to me that you are just arbtrarily bouncing this entry. Can you tell me what resources I have (at Wikipedia) to question your interpretation of this situation? TYhank you for the courtesy of a reply. P Bonelli. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peteratwik ( talk • contribs) 21:25, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I think I am starting to get the hang of this process. First of all let me quickly say that I submitted a new account because for some reason I was not able to get onto my original account. Please know that I have no intention of abusing the "sockpuppetry" guidlines and will cancel out one of the accounts at once. Secondly I have redone the entry, carefully trying not to repeat the copy from my web site verbatim. There are of course duplicate Names, Dates and Events. So perhaps now I do not have to deal with the GNU Free Doc statement, although that would be easy enough to include on the site if necessary. Can you advise me if I should resubmit the revised entry the usual way or is there another procedure I should follow. Thank you for your patience and I apologize for my blatant unfamiliarity with the correct procedure at Wikipedia. Thanks. Peteratwik ( talk) 22:23, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
For me: ""Sjfla;lje998098098 f;lsejkfs (talk • contribs) is already blocked (block log • unblock) . To change the block expiry and/or block reason, you must first unblock the user."" :) Pedro : Chat 11:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, that part doesn't com up until the New Testament, I guess. :D Cheers! – Clockwork Soul 16:57, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand on your page when you say:
What exactly do you mean?
Basketball
110
what famous people say
00:10, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The PCHS-NJROTC Abuse Report and Antivandal Barnstar | |
For reverting vandalism to Port Charlotte High School! |
GO-PCHS-NJROTC ( talk) 00:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Here's a barnstar for improving Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! The Helpful One (Review) 22:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC) |
Did you know that the Dallas-Fort Worth WikiProject is believed to be inactive? Basketball 110 what famous people say ♣ 17:19, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Dallas-Fort Worth WikiProject Newsletter | ||
Volume 1, Issue 1 • March 9, 2008 • Written by Basketball 110 | ||
Project news:
|
Featured Dallas-Fort Worth articles of the week: |
|
Archives • Project info |
Behold: [17]. :P - Warthog Demon 06:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
but peter faulk IS a legend! why was that deleted?
Cammieshawaaaaaaaaa ( talk) 03:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Linux and BSD are the SAME THING!!!!! Two names for the same exact thing. and by the way... its nto original resertch if i got the idea from a nother website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpolster2005 ( talk • contribs) 03:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Linux and unix are esentially the same thing. they are both using the same commands, applications are cross compatible etc..... Mach and BSD are also like linux. therefore u can say the mac os is based on linux. i have a mac mini here at home as one of my computers. I have seen the linux command line and have use it. i have been on websites which tell me mac os x is based on linux. linux is a free version of unix. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpolster2005 ( talk • contribs) 06:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Is source code of your bot available for download? I was asked to run a signing bot on another project, so it would be quite useful (there is no point in re-inventing the wheel:). Invisible Idiot ( talk) 12:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Slakr. I noticed at the end of user talk:Tom Butler when I was commenting earlier today that user:Martinphi added a comment [18], then went back and added an extra link within that comment [19], which SineBot then signed [20]. If it is relevant, Martinphi and I were editing that section at the same time, and had an edit conflict, so my posting occurred between his comment and addition. It seems to me that SineBot didn't need to sign this, and the final product (at the end of Martinphi's first post in the section) looks a little odd to me. I just thought you'd like to know in case this indicates a problem with your Bot. Best, Jay*Jay ( talk) 13:39, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, The Scientology Handbook, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Scientology Handbook. Thank you. Coffeepusher ( talk) 00:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you'd recently left a message on this user's talk page relating to vandalism to Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. I just wanted to let you know that this user has also been vandalising the page for Racing game. I've cleaned up the page, but felt taht I should let you know that he doesn't seem to have stopped. Many thanks Gazimoff ( talk) 15:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I wonder if you might explain more fully why you regard this an inappropriate user name. It's unusual, certainly, but I don't see what guidlines it breaches. Regards, Mannafredo ( talk) 12:41, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
re: copyrighted material... what copyrighted material was added?
Slakr, you told me that i vandalise "List of Bleach Character". You know, I NEVER open that page. And I NEVER share this IP-Address with anyone. I NEVER editing page in Wikipedia (English). So, you must be making a mistake.
Regards,
Stefan Karel Yang —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.94.16.186 ( talk) 14:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
i dont think u know what ur talking about sorry...if allowed copyrighted image then allowed copyrighted lyrics also. anyway it is really only the music that is copyrighted... no1 goes to the record store to buy a copy of pink floyd lyrics lol they go to buy the music...it would b bad if we had the music on the site but it just the lyrics...there are lots of free sites where can get lyrics from and it eaasy to pirate the songs too so i dont think pink floyd care about lyrics on wikipeda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.217.186 ( talk)