WP:NPOV Violation #1
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fox News Channel. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. . / Blaxthos 16:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Which part do you consider NPOV? That I stated an alternate analysis group claiming that Fox News is not bias. The group claiming bias is suspect.
- First you need to figure out whether your source is a reliable source. Check out WP:RS to see the criteria. Second, you need to link the source by writing it in the following format [www.maginalrevoltion.com]. Third, your edit has to be faithful to the source, otherwise it is original research. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 18:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Skypad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Ramsquire
(throw me a line)
16:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Thank you for your greeting. I got a nasty NPOV on my discussion page by someone who seems to have a personal bias. I don't want to get into a flame war but how should I deal with a person who is trying to be difficult? Skypad 18:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever you do, don't get into a flame war. It's the quickest way you can be indefinitely blocked from contributing. There are guidelines at WP:CIVIL you can follow. Another interesting page to check out is WP:TE to see if you are indirectly or directly instigating bad faith on the article pages. Good luck, and remember WP:NPOV and WP:V are the only requirements to editing. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 18:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Ramsquire: I hope you may be able to assist. I took a rare vacation, when I got back I found I was blocked by user Mackensen, I am unable to contact him and ask why he just went ahead and blocked me without discussion, I believe that someone has a problem with my Hugo Chavez edits on the talk page. Thanks skypad.
Skypad
00:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
original block was not legitimate and current situation from P.C administrators who don't believe in everyone's right to edit.
WP:NPOV Violation #1
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Fox News Channel. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. . / Blaxthos 16:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Which part do you consider NPOV? That I stated an alternate analysis group claiming that Fox News is not bias. The group claiming bias is suspect.
- First you need to figure out whether your source is a reliable source. Check out WP:RS to see the criteria. Second, you need to link the source by writing it in the following format [www.maginalrevoltion.com]. Third, your edit has to be faithful to the source, otherwise it is original research. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 18:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Skypad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Ramsquire
(throw me a line)
16:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello
Thank you for your greeting. I got a nasty NPOV on my discussion page by someone who seems to have a personal bias. I don't want to get into a flame war but how should I deal with a person who is trying to be difficult? Skypad 18:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever you do, don't get into a flame war. It's the quickest way you can be indefinitely blocked from contributing. There are guidelines at WP:CIVIL you can follow. Another interesting page to check out is WP:TE to see if you are indirectly or directly instigating bad faith on the article pages. Good luck, and remember WP:NPOV and WP:V are the only requirements to editing. Ramsquire (throw me a line) 18:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Ramsquire: I hope you may be able to assist. I took a rare vacation, when I got back I found I was blocked by user Mackensen, I am unable to contact him and ask why he just went ahead and blocked me without discussion, I believe that someone has a problem with my Hugo Chavez edits on the talk page. Thanks skypad.
Skypad
00:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
original block was not legitimate and current situation from P.C administrators who don't believe in everyone's right to edit.