![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
see please talk on the article talk page before do the edit.Thank you
Eshwar.om
Talk tome
20:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
I read your message from Abhishek191288's talk page.i will consider that.Thank you.
Eshwar.om
Talk tome
09:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I modified the article .Previous namely called Bangalore Tamils.i followed the neutral policies.Please could you read and give your suggestion . sandbox article.Thank you! Eshwar.om Talk tome 13:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, isn't the article in the Kannada weekly Prajamata of Bangalore an acceptable citation to support the fact that Vishwanath Ayengar is a noted Kannada Brahmin? I hope you will undo your action and restore the entry made by me. Thanks. Kanchanamala ( talk) 04:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Whether the series of edits made by user "AcorruptionfreeIndia" to article AAP are permitted as per Wikipedia policy? The history of AAP article shows that, almost all edits made by the user from 12.6.2013 to 16.3.2013 are deletions! (except three edits, out of 28 or so edits). At times, the deletes included sourced info(recently added by me). Is it appropriate for me to stay away from this particular article? I seek your suggestion. Thank you, all the best. Rayabhari ( talk) 16:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your name at the noticeboard and was wondering if you could comment at this post. I've been getting feedback only from editors who've used the source in question in the articles they add to, so I don't think I'm getting a very impartial response. Dan56 ( talk) 18:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I see you are involved with this editor, is this strange to you [1] or normal? Thank you, MarioNovi ( talk) 18:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
The first version appears to be at least partially copyvio from http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/apr192004/metro9.asp just in case some of the content ends up somewhere else.
I won't comment on the redirect. Best wishes. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 02:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you please look into this article? I note that this article seems to have gotten some controversial removal and reverting lately, but at the same time, the controversy section looks very POV too. i'm not sure if thats supported by sources too. So could you please look into it, if you can?
Thanks, TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 03:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I put protection on the page for one month. I already had the page on my watchlist and saw your edit summary. Next time, put in a request at WP:RFPP as a wonderful, fantastic admin probably won't have the page in their watchlist. Titodutta, how much longer do I have to be nice to Sitush? This blackmail is torture. Bgwhite ( talk) 03:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your message on my talk Page.surely i will drop a a reminder on your talk page.Thank you. Eshwar.om Talk tome 07:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
I Don't Know |
Hello, I don't know what was the problem with the article Hassan Khan. I am new to wikipedia and don't know how to send a message therefore am using this message of appreciation. I just want o know what was wrong with the material that I posted. I had given authentic references to every editI made. But you just came and edited out all I had done. Moreover I am from Ladakh and could write about the person as he represents Ladakh in the Indian Parliament. Please do let me know of my wrong doings (if any).
Awaiting a reply Anwaraj ( talk) 13:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC) |
I changed some things at Hassan Khan that involved categories. We have a message area for the Wikipedia India Project - see here - and there is also one for discussing categories in general. In this instance, I replaced Category:Members of the Lok Sabha with the more specific categories for Category:13th Lok Sabha members and Category:15th Lok Sabha members. All people who are listed in the two categories that I added are automatically a part of the first category, so there is no need to show that also.
I also removed an image that was "redlinked": I've no idea if the image was not showing because there was a spelling mistake or if the image simply does not exist but there is no point in showing the supposed filename of an image that we do not have.
The other big thing I did was this. It was good that you used sources but those sources must also be reliable - just because something appears on the web in a Wordpress blog, for example, does not make it suitable for use in an article. We have to be particularly careful when articles relate to biographies of living people. Some of the wording was also not neutral or involved original research/judgements; for example, His views on communal harmony is clear from his statements .... In addition, we do not generally use honorifics such as "Shri" and "Mr", and we have guidelines for how dates are shown in articles - see WP:MOSDATE.
This is a lot for you to take in, so do not become disheartened. People will help you find your way around all these policies and guidelines as long as you are contributing in good faith, which you are. You'll probably quickly learn the basic ones and if you have any doubts or queries then the best thing to do is to ask - which is why I am pleased to see you here! Hope this helps you in some way.- Sitush ( talk) 15:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Trust me i don't have any ill-intentions if that is what your implying - which i hope you aren't. But i will fight if i believe i have a point. To me adding her Brahmin caste is a part of her life and in all probability could have played a role in the person she is today - just as one wouldn't be surprised to read an article on wiki about someone in England mentioned as having been born to an aristocratic family. Fotoriety ( talk) 14:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Sir, According to my humble opinion I think the article on Ms Bahar Dutt should be deleted.I saw you edited the page a lot so please take part in the discussion and correct me if I am wrong. Uncletomwood ( talk) 17:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Thanks for watching my back and reverting the vandalism on my page! — Σosthenes12 Talk 17:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bicycle helmets in Australia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Magadh University may have broken the
syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bicycle helmets in Australia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Here is one
jalebi for you. Jalebi is a sweet popular in countries of the Indian Subcontinent, specially in
India,
Pakistan,
Bangaldesh. Hope you'll like it.
Thank you.
Tito☸
Dutta
19:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
The issue of mentioning caste for Bachchan and his family has been discussed on the article talk page. There is also a link at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. Trying to get round WP:BLP by referring to his family rather than the man himself creates an inference and is not acceptable. - Sitush (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Si Tush, you obviously guard these articles like a hawk and I admire you for that. Since, you are so well versed in Wikipedia policies and are indeed, "Proposer" of many policies on India / Hindu related subjects, can you advice me on how to get the policy on mentioning caste of living persons changed ? After all, nothing is set in concrete, is it ? Best regards. Jonathansammy ( talk) 15:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, can you please look into the article? I have removed material (social media "nickname", comments and opinion by Modi and BJP) that seems WP:Undue, WP:Opinion and not WP:Relevant. But, it's being added back in again and again. I have already reached the 3RR limit. Cliniic ( talk) 07:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Well I think Indian political articles are poorly patrolled and prone to disruptive editing. A month ago, the Sonia Gandhi page made it 10 days without anyone reverting controversial edits like Nazi connections etc. I believe part of the blame lies with me, since I had taken responsibility of patrolling her page (taking a break) but its still annoying to realize that nobody else bothered to revert it before I came back. Anyway, thanks for the prompt reply! Cliniic ( talk) 09:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The user has reverted me again. He is citing the Narendra Modi page as a template in claiming the 'Pappu' nickname is relevant. I suppose you know what he is talking about? Cliniic ( talk) 10:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hmm, but I reverted only once. The Legend of Zorro 23:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC) |
I categorically state that i am NOT a member of ANY Political Party, specially not AAP, and I have no personal agenda/interest in promoting a person and/or political party. I am NOT operating under any pseudo-name, as most on wiki are.
An old inhabitant of this beautiful planet, I am enthused by the world wide phenomenon of citizens, specially the youth, protesting against the oppressive mis/non-governance by the elected few and thus followed India Against Corruption with great hope.
The agenda listed on the menu bar of AAP is a breakdown of the steps enunciated in the book for decentralisation - power back to the people. I think if the essence of a book is publicly acknowledged as the mission/inspiration by any political party, it should get a mention on the book page. "With Swaraj in mind, Kejriwal launches Aam Aadmi Party" http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/politics/with-swaraj-in-mind-kejriwal-launches-aam-aadmi-party/article4130337.ece
http://www.swaraj.info is a public page on different aspects of Swaraj (book) and does not "link an article to itself"
My present interest on the topic is only to help spread the news, as widely as possible to those who care, to participate in the happenings around, which in my opinion are for the good.
I had earlier contributed on Odissi, Mayadhar Raut, Madhumita Raut etc
"In your zeal to promote this anti-corruption messiah and his political party, you are overstepping a few marks and you are demonstrating the downsides that often come from someone operating as a single-purpose account." was totally uncalled for and an utterly biased statement validating the pertinent question raised in the heading. I have NO intention of getting into any war, let alone edit war, but I detest your wholesale deletion of additions rather than correcting the editorial mistakes, as you have done now. Thanks a lot. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 00:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
As per OED
sarvajna , 'promote' also mean "give publicity to (a product, organization, or venture) so as to increase public awareness".
Giving 'correct' information: 'My present interest on the topic is only to help spread the news', is what Wikipedia does, promoting awareness/knowledge/news(and not views), without hypes and/or value judgments (promotion, marketing), accessible by anyone interested from anywhere. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 04:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Well Sitush, you are being pedantic now. Arab Spring, Occupy Wall Street, happenings in Brazil now, etc., all are/were 'news'! Thanks, anyway. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 11:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The cited examples were not argument of 'similarity' but illustration of ‘knowledge’ germinating from narrow definition ‘news’, though vice versa not always true. All arguments have counters, gravity depending on the context and predisposition of the evaluator, and should never be dismissed (deleted) perfunctorily; otherwise, very essence of universal collaboration gets lost, in spite of selfless work put in by many.
Sleeping on my thoughts, fearing entry into esoteric territory, decided to share it on your frequently visited page of ‘wiki-experts’. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 03:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I agree but leaving out contemporary issues is an easy way out, surrendering unique advantage of Wikipedia being on real-time. Hindsight does not provide the dynamics of an evolution, and runs the risk of 'your views vs my views', without reasonable means of checking on the 'facts', as it happened.
Sources are indeed a problem though may be overcome with a rider on its origin/interest/association regarding its accuracy, independence and reliability, and leave it to the reader to form her/his opinion. Same event written/broadcast differently, even with hindsight, is well known, 'extraneous factors' influencing 'facts'.
I agree to merger of 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement with 2012 Indian anti-corruption movement, the same movement evolving over years, but not to deletion of 90% content. I believe all sides should be suitably represented as there is really no "absolute truth", its always your (editor's) truth vs mine. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 02:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
We are approaching towards closing this month's nomination. Few days in hand. -- Tito☸ Dutta 00:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
You should probably just nominate for deletion or keep up the unreferenced tag, I'm pretty sure you aren't suppose to blank it. -- AshFR ( talk) 05:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
I would like you to have a look look into the activities of this student user, who, in the past, has been blocked, created new accounts to overcome that, run multiple accounts, ostensibly retired very recently to bypass any other action that might have been taken against him, and reemerged today in his latest incarnation as The Rahul Jain, with the definite article, and a user page that is his article about himself. I have only had dealings with him at AfDs, as he has a habit of going there, instead of discussing the matter at the talk page of an article, if he disagrees about something in it. For the most part, his AfD nominations have failed and he has usually been the sole detractor. But I do think this user is playing the game, even allowing for good faith. I note another user has already mentioned this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Rahuljain2307.2C_again . The Rahul Jain has deleted such comments on his talk page.Thanks.-- Zananiri ( talk) 11:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
.... for butting in on my talk page. I thought I was reasonably clear but apparently that wasn't the case! Equally apparently, my American sense of humor didn't go down too well :) -- regentspark ( comment) 19:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I have mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive828#Block review - OrangesRyellow -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 06:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Did you find anything in your source re the cow protection movement? And do you have any other suggestions for improvement? Darkness Shines ( talk) 07:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Sitush... There were n number of debates regarding the origin of Kulin Kayasthas on the related talk pages, and whether five Shudras or Kayasthas (later granted Kulina status) actually accompanied the Brahmins invited by King Adisur. Now, like reliable sources which are considered as reference(s) for this article, mention them as 'Shudra servants', similarly there are other reliable sources which mention them originally as Kayasthas. For example 'Tales of Bengal' by S.B.Banerjea (page 28, available on Google Books) mentions that Adisur invited five Kayasthas with five Brahmins. Similarly 'Bengal and Assam' (available on Google Books), actually a report on the Reconstitution of Provinces by Govt. of India, also mentions on Page 104 that five Brahmins and five Kayasthas from 'Kanouj' were invited and were settled in Bengal and formed the Kulin Brahmins and Kayasthas respectively. Similarly, we can find other sources as well. Based on the existing sources mentioned, and based on these new ones, and considering the huge debate through ages, will it not be fair to mention in the article on Kulin Kayastha, that there are both the opinions among historians. I believe this will make the article all the more neutral and make it all the more complete. Please let me know your opinion. Thanks. Ekdalian ( talk) 11:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, I certainly did not intend copyright infringement - if the source is appropriately credited, I didn't think there would be an issue. But I defer to you on this matter.
Also, regarding the substance of edit itself, regardless of what was decided among a separate group, my edits were meant to improve the language - I'm sure you'll agree that the following discussion of Kayasthas' varna status is awkward, incongruous and repetitive:
"Other sources...describe [Kayasthas] as 'a mixed caste', variously thought to be composed of people from the Brahmin, Vaishya and Kshatriya varnas or 'Brahman-Sudra (lower caste)', and sometimes Kshatriyas."
I would respectfully suggest editing the sentence to read more clearly and concisely per the below:
"Other sources...describe [Kayasthas] as 'a mixed caste', variously thought to be composed of Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, as well as Brahmin-Shudras."
I appreciate your vigilance in monitoring this apparently controversial page, but I hope you'd accept my edits as not being part of the unsourced, agenda-laden additions that we've commonly seen.
Best, Melotown
See the talk page regarding this [3] Have we wanted long enough? Would like to merge the two. thanks Red Rose 13 ( talk) 20:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. How to find out a reliable source for religion of a person like, Rama Jois? Thank you. Rayabhari ( talk) 12:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, you have deleted the entire content on the Samra page under the presumption that "no evidence that Sumra=Samra... I find your conjecture funny, you seemingly sounding Indian by name. You should know that both are pronounced in Hindi absolutely similar. It was the Britishers problem that they mispronounced most of Indian names... Jaipur was called as Jeypore, Brahmputra was called as Berampooter, and so on. Sumra, or Sumrah or Samra are all different pronounciations of the same surname. Can you please revert the misguided deletions you have done! Kulveer ( talk) 07:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Are you really happy with the vandalisation and bullying you have been doing in the name of editing, without even a debate on why you are deleting that information repeatedly.
Kulveer (
talk) 08:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kulveer (
talk •
contribs)
08:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Again, caught another article which had clear cites to People of India stating the caste was Rajput. The actual book (with the group spelled "Lunia") says nothing like that whatsoever, so I dug up a few other cites showing this caste was in a similar status with the Mahar and Chamar, but had sought to re-define itself as Kshatriya.
Again, I'm sympathetic to the fact that Sanskritisation had real life-or-death advantages in the 1850-1950 period, but this constant whitewashing of history rather than admitting the endemic oppression and discrimination really gets my goat. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
I've given up on the likes of Thurston, Russell, Tod etc. They are generally useless and I see no need to perpetuate historical curiosities based on silly theories that in some cases were outdated even before the books hit the shelves and in at least one case was acknowledged to be so by the author (Ibbetson). I still have the germ of an idea to write an article about this school of thought in the Raj: an umbrella article that links the various biographies to the theories of scientific racism, martial races, criminal tribes etc and the massive impact it all had on the censuses, the perceptions of the caste system and so on. It is do-able but there are least another couple of hundred sources I'd need to read before attempting it! - Sitush ( talk) 22:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you consider this Reminder?!My sand box article waiting for your review Sandbox article;:).Thank you Eshwar.om Talk tome 19:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Kindly let me know the Removal of Two Important Personality details who are related with Kashi Math directly. Inside Guru - Shishya System, The Madathipathi, Patta-shishya, H.H.Sudhindra Thirtha & H.H.Samyamindra Thirtha was Source able which were directly related and much required for the article. But you removed
Spedian ( talk) 06:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
A notable person to one Country might not be notable for another country. Both Swamijis are notable persons in India. Both are Swamijis of Kashimath. So Giving honors for them is required. And I have never violated Copy Right anywhere in Guru-Shishya Topic Spedian ( talk) 06:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I have read it well. I have added "His Holiness" only from the English Verifiable Sources. Spedian ( talk) 07:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
But Even When I'm adding that Two Topics with Valid Reliable Sources, you are simply removing. Why? Spedian ( talk) 08:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Understood, Now I have added the same Topic without H.H or His Holiness. Kindly please Dont Remove it anymore
Spedian (
talk)
08:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, could you take a quick look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relationship of the Cholas with the Chinese, and check if there are no revisionsim/neutrality items going on there? As long as there are no gross misrepresentations there I'm OK with inclusion, but we both know that's not always the case, and not always easy to spot for the casual reviewer. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 12:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
It looks like an admin bounced in and moved
Vishwabrahmin to
Vishwakarma (caste). I'm fine with the title overall, but also concerned about whatever data we're losing in moves. Also a lot of these drive-by IPs have a tendency to copy-paste old versions, but using the reading and not editing view so we get the "[3]" and "[citation needed]" artifacts. I'm particularly interested in getting the talk pages of the two articles merged, as there was a lot of discussion on the old
Vishwakarma (caste) that's now obscured. EDIT: The admin archived it, all good. Any ideas how to deal with this? I didn't catch your comment until after I did some cleanup following the move, but do you need me to refrain until an admin can do some untangling? We may need to lock a number of alternate spellings to make sure people don't sneak in and bounce the article to a different title in the future.
The article is still a hot mess overall, but when I squint I think I can generally see some patterns which could be relatively easily/simply laid out for readers. It's not an unduly complicated caste-cluster, and it has a slew of alternate names but not so hard to address. Part of the problem is we have a few longstanding participants who "don't appear to be here to build an encyclopedia", mysterious IPs, etc. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I am very busy these days (though I am coming online everyday), I am not following all discussions. To reply your question at WT:INB, so far we used to discuss on the main nomination page and delete the discussion after work's end. This month right after you initiated INCOTM, I took the nomination page to a separate page Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Collaborations of the month/Nominations/2013 July, so that the nomination discussion can be preserved. The next discussion can be done at /2013 August. After creating such few pages, we can link those in main page as "See previous nominations". -- Tito☸ Dutta 21:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For diligent help in sorting out disagreements in a contentious subject (bicycle helmets) of no direct interest to you Richard Keatinge ( talk) 09:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Sitush! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:
Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot ( talk) 16:42, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
This article ( P. Sathasivam) created on 29 June seems to be an almost verbatim copy of the press report, cited as the 3rd ref in the article. Please see: http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=802270 The person who has nominated it for merger, by mistake at AfD, after creating his own article on the subject ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_.Sathasivam), seems to be worried about other things which he mentions on the AfD page - DYK etc. The 'early life' bit in his own article is also the same as that in the source I have quoted, which is copied in the original article. And, it appears, he has tagged his own article wrongly, too, as the suggestion, going by the revision history of his article was that his article should be redirected to the first one which is at AfD now. I hope all this makes sense. Pleaee have a look. Merci.-- Zananiri ( talk) 16:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC
Which article is the preferred version? I'll try to sort out the rest of the problems. - Sitush ( talk) 20:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Please do not edit war at Somnath Bharti.You don't own Wikipedia articles,I request you to don't delete contend add by me w/o discussion. TY of Walk 19:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TY of Walk 19:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
The List of 'Common Surnames' and 'Notable People' is very comprehensive in the previous version of Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu article. Please try to cite sources rather than removing the uncited content -- by a senior member from the community.
Your wish dude.you can give your comments in my talkpage or else the article talk page.which is feel best for you .you can.Thank you Eshwar.om Talk tome 19:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
What was that draft template you put on the anti muslim violence draft? I am being badgered over this one. Darkness Shines ( talk) 18:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, you've reverted an edit done after a BRD process with the tags ESSAY, which seems to have no relevance, and TW. Is this accidental TWABUSE? I can't fix it if you've got a bot on the prowl. If you really have a reason to revert you need to state it - see TW.
Hi Sitush,
I think you have misunderstood my edit to Jayalalithaa Article. I did not add or remove any content to that article. I replaced the old defunct template {{ succession box}} with the newer one {{ s-bef}}. I don't know why you reverted it. You have mentioned: but she is incumbent & may, for eg, die before 2016, which is irrelevant. If you look at the rendered page, it still says incumbent. -- Jayarathina ( talk) 07:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Did you check out List of Parsis? I'm pretty sure some aren't.- Ravi My Tea Kadai 18:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Very good work in Thoothukudi Page Thankyou Perumalism Chat 01:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC) |
Both reverted, and both deleted :) Cheers, Dusti *poke* 16:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Kamboj are considered :Category:Social groups of Pakistan and not :Category:Ethnic groups in Pakistan. They are considered part of Punjabi people ethnic group. Delljvc ( talk) 13:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
You were thought of: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Kachwaha Edit
Opting out of this one would be completely understandable. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Why didnt you reply? I changed the tone of the para you edited yesterday and fixed the dead link. See if its ok. Mayan302 ( talk) 13:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Digvijaya Singh". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 21:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Going by the articles created by this person about members of the same clan, with the same peacock expressions, and the timing of the keep !Votes today in quick succession at this AfD ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vasant_Krishna_Sharma) from new IPOs, with no previous contributions, one wonders...!-- Zananiri ( talk) 18:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I saw you have reverted my source info in vanniyar page by describe as "Reverted good faith edits by Prabhubreaker (talk): Not a reliable source (Gyan imprint) but in any case why are you removing alternate names?" Let me know what is "gyan imprint". Do you think it is not a source info? Book have ISBN and reliable source. Try to add more info. i saw your page you have more star but why you can't improve the page in better way. Regards, prabhubreaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhubreaker ( talk • contribs) 13:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Sitush ( talk), Just know about Jacob Pandian http://anthro.fullerton.edu/faculty/pandianPage.htm. He is not a stablemate. Please do verify before you use and dont blindy say he is a stablemate. I have added the Vanniya kula Kshatriyar and palli in vanniyar page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhubreaker ( talk • contribs) 05:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Sitush ( talk), Book have ISBN no: 978-0861321360 and then what is the problem with the book. Please know what is ISBN. It is not Gyan if it have ISBN. Hope you are sensible. And don't revert again by commenting "Good Faith" or "Gyan" when there is a sourced info with book ISBN no and dont waste both of us time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhubreaker ( talk • contribs) 08:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Ramonadhar ( talk) 17:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Dear Sitush, I can see that you too seem to have great interest in this particular article. I just want to understand if your hunting (for some specific source, I guess) is over. But, then, my point is, in any case, we cannot ignore these varied versions, even if you find something specific. As per our convention, we need to show all possible versions, especially when it comes to factual data. Therefore, I would like to request you to go through my composition as well (apart from your own research), and suggest on any point I may have missed rather than just editing your version and closing at that. Needless to mention, I am seriously looking forward to improve the content as well as reliability of this article. Thanks.
Ramonadhar ( talk) 18:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Dear Sitush, thanks for your message. I can see that you are resorting to "blocking" as such. Anyway, I have checked the links as mentioned in your talk page and these are credible political leaders of national importance and I do not see the need to compare their write-ups with anyone for that matter. The content in their wikipage talks more about matters of national relevance rather than about them and the write-ups are generic as well. The topic I am trying to edit is with reference to "the 2011 Hisar by-election" and hence whatever factual and relevant information is available with respect to the "2011 Hisar by-election" is what I intent to update at least. However, I would again request that you point out what I missed rather than just editing your version and closing at that and I am open to any assistance as well. And just to clarify, my only intention is to improve the article with relevant factual data. Thanks.
Pramathesh a ( talk) 23:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC) I have just noticed your curtailing of the article on Manubhai Shah and then as I was searching to determine how to write to you I saw that there was also a note for me saying that the whole article might be removed from Wikipedia. If you want to remove the article, that is up to you but it will be a great loss to society as Mr Shah was a very important contributor to the social and economic development of India among other things. I want to write on this further but am on a tight schedule and will be able to get back only after the middle of August. But I will briefly say that I think you have misunderstood a source of information here. You say that, "Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media." This is what was done in this case. The information you seem to have a problem with was quoted from a highly reputed Gujarati newspaper from the region of Saurashtra in India. Regional newspapers in different languages are often of very good quality and are highly respected for their professionalism and standards and that is not surprising in a large country like India with people speaking and writing in many different languages and there being thousands of eminent writers and journalists also writing in different languages. You might be aware of the existence of high quality regional literature in India. Since university days (which was a long time ago), I have tried to learn about leaders and movers who have changed the face of the world we live in, some of them are much written about and some go unsung but were no less important. When possible we need to inspire especially the youth of our world with facts about how people even from simple backgrounds can make a difference. And regional newspapers too can provide us with important facts and can become instruments of change. In fact Wikipedia itself is a wonderful example of a highly effective instrument of change. In my various journeys I came across this very important issue of the newspaper Phulchhab on the legendary figure Manubhai Shah and felt the need to bring some of the information to the notice of the wider world. Newspaper archives are a great source of knowledge and often this knowledge stays unrevealed. I felt it a privilege to bring some of the information to light. Manubhai Shah is a legendary figure who we used to listen to with rapt attention decades ago as he unfolded the plans and policies for the reconstruction and development of India. His life was the stuff of legends and it will be a shame if you were to misunderstand the source of information in this case as being inauthentic. Hope to return again in August. Take care. Pramathesh a ( talk) 23:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Have you seen this? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23354613
The circumcision one in the top ten is the one that surprised me!-- Zananiri ( talk) 15:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I do know you are an Unbiased person, But why such a biasness when it comes to AAP. When you know BJP wikipage is also violating the same rule. - If you are an Unbiased please bring the faith back. - Tall.kanna ( talk) 16:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I agreed on almost all points you have made.But I again have a doubt, If Spoiler Effect is a speculation. Then another party being Main contender is also speculation? - Tall.kanna ( talk) 11:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Seriously, you seem to have a big investment in the presentation of the AAP on Wikipedia and it is quite worrying - you are not coming across as neutral and you are coming across as someone who is attempting to publicise the party. It probably wouldn't be a bad thing to leave the subject matter alone for a while. - Sitush ( talk) 11:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Sitush...I 'll obviously wait for you till you confirm that your hunting (for some specific source, I guess) is over. But, then, my point is, in any case, we cannot ignore these varied versions, even if you find something specific. As per our convention, we need to show all possible versions, especially when it comes to such contentious issues. Therefore, I would like to request you to go through my composition as well (apart from your own research), and suggest me on any point I may have missed. Needless to mention, I am seriously looking forward to improve the content as well as reliability of this article. Thanks. Ekdalian ( talk) 11:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
If you can improve the page. Improve it but dont be egoistic and Agenda section which you have reverted to is way below standard of wikipedia. If you can improve it as per your wisdom please do it but dont degrade wikipedia just for your personal predujices.- Tall.kanna ( talk) 18:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aam Aadmi Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 01:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Your comments are welcome at this discussion: Talk:Royal College, Colombo#College name. Thanks.-- obi2canibe talk contr 13:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I do have a printed copy of this book and have used it to add information to several local hospital articles. If you let me know which hospitals you are interested in I will see what information it provides for them.-- Felix Folio Secundus ( talk) 11:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush,
I have made the changes in the article by collecting informations from various sources and I hope the changes made were almost correct.I have added six more groups in christianity such as Knanaya christians(Catholic and Jacobite),Bhramavar and Honavar churches and Antichian Syrian church and its split form in Kerala recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.165.226.88 ( talk) 09:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Why do you want to revert the regional name? Why do want to control the use of Malayalam Language?
Hi thank you for advice to take my concern to External Links Noticeboard. It does not seem in frequent use, but now the user that has also been harassing me because he thinks I have a vendetta to him, Wwwwhatsup, and his friend Stalwart, have shut it down. Is this allowed? [5]. Wwwwhatsup stalked by like at Jeff Berlin and Stalwart admitted to stalking me and being unhelpful and putting a stop in my tries to figure out if these links are valid. [6] I think if he wanted to really be helpful he would not just make things harder so I have to keep trying but would tell me how to do things. Am I doing everything wrong? You seem to deal with these types more often. Thank you, and sorry if I inconvenience you, MarioNovi ( talk) 18:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Is this an accident, an adjective-noun pair? (used by you at wp:ae) Ignore if you wish so. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 04:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I remember reading an old American book that read " Majority of Hindoos in Kashmir are Muslims"! The meaning was that everybody from Hindoostan was a Hindoo , just like everybody from Afghanistan was Afghan! Also check www.thefreedictionary.com/Hindoo I do not know the full context of this thread but hope this was useful. Jonathansammy ( talk) 14:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I believe Khomeini's family was called "Hindi" in Iran because his ancestors either came from India or had lived in India for a long time so it was not just the British or American who used these terms. In modern usage it, of course, means adherents of the Indigenous Indian religion but the actual origin of the word comes from River Sindhu with the S shifting to H in Arabic / Farsi. I personally prefer the word "Sanatan Dharma" for Hindu but that is a discussion for another day! Jonathansammy ( talk) 16:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I am having WP:Competence issues with an editor on several articles Diet in Sikhism, Damdami Taksal etc. I don't think he gets where he is going wrong. Your help would be most appreciated. Thanks SH 07:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Medicine Barnstar | |
For your healing touch at Ancoats Hospital and... elsewhere. Bravo! Stalwart 111 08:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC) |
Since my views on the retention of Batla House Encounter in Digvijaya Singh's WP:BLP are different from yours i welcome you to share your views in detail on the talk page of this article why this particular edit should be retained. If we fail to reach consensus, i propose to take this for Dispute Resolution. Soham321 ( talk) 20:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I thought I would bring this conversation about Buddhists born to Brahmin families here. Thanks for noting the problems found with Rocking It Loud. Checking the logs, I noticed that Rocking created an account at 15:57 on 14 April 2012. In fact, the last of Buddhakahika's socks were blocked earlier on that date ( [11] and [12]). Since I watch the pages Buddhakahika was fooling with, I always wondered whether Rocking was a sock of Buddhakahika, but apart from editing the same pages, on the surface there doesn't seem to be a case for claiming the user is Buddhakahika. But perhaps digging deeper may create a case. Michitaro ( talk) 09:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2013_July_11
Did you see this? I didn't see it until after the event, but to call that Hindi newspaper the leading Hindi newspaper in India (last comment) because of its circulation is a travesty. Like saying the Sun is the leading newspaper in the UK for the same reason. The mind boggles. Why should I believe the rest!-- Zananiri ( talk) 22:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Actually, British prime ministers seem to be the exception to having a "number". Presumably because it goes so far back in history that there is debate as to where the numbering begins (even Robert Walpole is only "regarded" as being the first).
All/most other countries' heads of government/state seem to be easily numbered. For eg: the 8th Aussie PM Stanley Bruce, currently at FAC, or the 22nd and current Canadian PM, Stephen Harper (a GA).— indopug ( talk) 12:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at B. R. Ambedkar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Blueyarn ( talk) 10:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kashmiri Pandit may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I might have told a little white lie. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 22:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
I wish to bring to your attention your edit on the Digvijaya Singh page in which you replaced an existing edit with an edit which does not comply with wikipedia guidelines. Please see the talk page where your edit is being discussed. Soham321 ( talk) 15:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC) In the Digvijaya Singh page you are reverting edits which are blatant examples of vandalism which is a good thing, but in your edit summary you are marking them as good faith edits. I find this inappropriate. Soham321 ( talk) 15:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I don't know why you have removed the history itself.
-Vijaya Kumar Poun Raj 16:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijayhbk ( talk • contribs)
Your mass revert to my category Social Groups of Pakistan has been reported for mediation at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Delljvc ( talk) 17:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I serendipitously chanced upon "Keep calm and carry on" and declared that hence forth that would by my motto, [13] now I notice that you too display it here. Perhaps "great minds think alike" :-). Happy editing! Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 17:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Digvijaya Singh". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 02:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, it struck me that Joseph Jordan may have joined a Militia Regiment. This might fit in with your source saying "he had no opportunity to go on active service" - Militia tended to stay on home defence duties. The list of stations 1806-1811 should help to nail this down e.g. what units were stationed in Milford Haven between 1806 and 1811.
I believe that the senior Lancashire unit was the "1st Royal Lancashire Militia (Duke of Lancaster's Own)" - later 3rd Battalion, King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). Might easily have been rendered as "1st Royal Lancashire Regiment" or "1st Battalion Royal Lancashire Regiment".
Also, have you tried searching The London Gazette here? I would have thought that his appointments would have been gazetted. "Joseph Jordan" will probably return thousands of hits, but "Ensign Joseph Jordan" and "Surgeon Joseph Jordan" may be more fruitful, particularly if your limit your dates to 1806 / 1807 (depending upon how reliable these dates are). Hamish59 ( talk) 10:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Peshawar was the second Afghan capital, until the Sikhs pushed the Afgans back to the Khyber pass. So yes the border wer different pre-1850. Thanks SH 18:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
When you start swearing you play right into their hands. Why don't you report him for WP:NPA? Or are you too busy badmouthing Californians? JanetteDoe ( talk) 00:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Your behavior in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digvijaya_Singh has now been reported in WP:ANI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#A_complaint_about_User:Sitush Soham321 ( talk) 06:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I have replied to your objections. You should be able to accept Gait now for the particular use in Kamapitha, because D C Sircar does the same. Chaipau ( talk) 02:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, maybe you are too busy, but I had a question on my talk page for you. If you are too busy it is ok. Thank you, MarioNovi ( talk) 04:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that u removed 2 articles from certain categories which are related to religion. That is information which might be important to some, and since such categories exist, with considerable population, i was wondering if u could shed some light on the removal, cheers. Mentabolism ( talk) 05:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This biography of Michael contains the quotes you removed here. I have no idea if http://www.poemhunter.com/ is a reliable source though.
Sir,
I have made some more contribution to the Page Mardorva Rajputs and Rajput Mali, but from past few stances there has been a continuous intervention from your part. It is a request that all the information given on these pages are true and have their proper reference
Regards N.J.S Gahlot — Preceding unsigned comment added by N.J.S.Gahlot ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, because your name is on this notification list, I'm just letting you know that there will be a Manchester Wikimeet taking place on 25 August. Perhaps we'll see you there? Cheers, Bazonka ( talk) 21:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Harikumar Pallathadka may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, can you look at this edit and check the reference given, if it implies Sikhism as a ethnicity. I have read the whole document and it was not clear to me. --Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 15:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
When you remove a category because it is the parent of another cat into which the subject falls (an excellent habit of yours, one which I appreciate), could you be a smidgen more explicit in your edit summary? I almost just reverted you because I mistook one of your edits (merely summarized as "overcategorisation") for a "he's not from Andhra Pradesh, he's from glorious Telangana, hurrah!" edit. -- Orange Mike | Talk 13:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC) (tiring of Telangana edits)
It is quite hilarious that someone that quite obviously does not even look at pages they edit ( reading all the sources on the page in 45 seconds? – or look here for an example where you actually delete a source with obvious self-identification, or here when a source is cited in the infobox for Christ's sake) has the gall to lecture others on editing. What constructive users do when they have a potential issue with another’s edit is take the time to demonstrate how a policy has been violated. Instead of sanctimoniously defecating a few Wikilinks in edit summaries and patting yourself on the back afterwards, try, I don’t know, reading articles for a change. Also with regards to Digvijay Singh its quite rich you delete well-sourced and notable sections of a page, and then turn around and accuse users who disagree with your edits of violating a number of irrelevant (to the matter, not in general, in case you were trying to Wikilawyer your way through that statement) Wikipedia policies. Pectore talk 22:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello I was wondering if you have thoughts on this [14] [15] [16]. Wwwwhatsup originally accused me of being the person who keeps putting that there, which is why I know about it. I never heard of Manitoba before. Thank you, MarioNovi ( talk) 07:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, can you clarify the problem with this, apart from sourcing? Wwwhatsup ( talk) 17:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
It is great to see an enthusiast - nay, someone whom many probably consider to be an expert - take an interest in such subjects here but it does not give you carte blanche and there is little doubt in my mind that you do or have had commercial conflicts of interest. I really do think that you need to take another look at WP:V and if it were not for the fact that I've got enough on my plate dealing with other issues elsewhere, my guess is that 30 - 40 per cent of the content of articles to which you have contributed would by removed by me. It is about time that this project got to grips with this type of "we aficionados like it so the rules do not matter" routine. If the rules get in your way then go propose a change to them. Obviously, I've done my research and I know who you are; I've no idea yet whether you have made that clear to other people but, if not, then I think you might be in a position where you should do and where you should note all your past and present commercial involvements. A tough call, I know, but this really is a rather ridiculous situation and I know that you are not a stupid person, far from it. - Sitush ( talk) 00:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
The term "high tea" was used as a way to distinguish it from "low tea" in the article about the Afternoon tea. This is what was so far stated (until today) : Though it is often stated that the words "low" and "high" refer to the height of the tables from which either meal was eaten, this is incorrect. Well somebody removed [17] 'this is incorrect', and this changs the whole meaning of the sentence.
The situation, Sitush, is now that the meaning states that : it is often stated that the words "low" and "high" refer to the height of the tables from which either meal was eatend. This meaning that the whole busines is about the tables. Now has this low and high tea stuff has to do with the social class or the height of the table, or what? You are the British, who may offer assistance said Drmies, you should know. Warrington ( talk) 19:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sitush ( talk) 14:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Tea seems first to have established for itself a particular niche in the day in the 1740s, by which time it had become the fashionable breakfast drink. It was also drunk after dinner, and as the usual time for dinner progressed during the eighteenth century towards the evening a gap opened up for a late-afternoon refreshment, filled by what has since become the traditional English afternoon tea, a meal in its own right, with sandwiches and cake as well as cups of tea (amongst the earliest references to it are these by Fanny Burney in Evelina (1778): ‘I was relieved by a summons to tea,’ and by John Wesley in 1789: ‘At breakfast and at tea…I met all the Society’; Anna Maria Russell, Duchess of Bedford (1783–1857), famously claimed to have originated the fashion, but as can be seen, it was around well before she was in a position to have any influence over it). In various other parts of the English-speaking world, teatime has assumed other connotations: in Jamaica, for instance, it is the first meal of the day, while for Australians and New Zealanders it is a cooked evening meal—a usage reflected in the tea, and more specifically the ‘high tea’, of certain British dialects, predominantly those of the working class and of the North (the term high tea dates from the early nineteenth century).
![]() |
100,000 Edits | |
Congratulations are appropriate as you have reached the milestone of 100,000 edits, a couple of thousand edits ago! Very few editors have been able to amass such an accomplishment—you are a rare breed. The wiki is a better place because of your dedication!
Binksternet (
talk)
04:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Do we have any past connection? Shobhit Gosain ( talk) 07:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi There, I think I had added valid sources in the article with credible Indian newspapers as references. I hope that Barry's invitation is covered here and here. And Firstpost is Indian national online newspaper, which comes under notable references too. Please reconsider the removal of section. Thanks! - Vatsan34 ( talk) 15:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Occassion : your edit count crossing a major mile stone!! Rayabhari ( talk) 16:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Sitush, when you have some time, would you mind taking a look at recent edits to this article? I just restored a bunch of deletions from Jattnijj. I personally vetted the McCleod source and could see nothing wrong with it; the other sources are not accessible to me, but Jattnijj's wholesale deletions seemed a bit arbitrary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Sitush, Please, do not edit my father, Barun De's, page. You made changes to section that have remained there for several years now. If you have any questions, then ask me first. B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.224.247 ( talk) 02:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Having read WP:FILMMARKETING, I now see why including the trailer might have been a bad idea. But as for your objection to the date format, please see WP:DATEFORMAT; the format I used is acceptable. Or was your objection to something else? GlaedrH ( talk) 08:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, please take a look at the article Brahmin. Would you consider Vepachedu and Kamakoti.org authoritative sources? -- Mayasutra [= No ||| Illusion =] ( talk) 14:01, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Mayasutra
Sitush, The information that I have given are all authentic. They have been on this page since the page was opened several years ago. Please, don't edit them. I am sourcing them as per the guidelines of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.227.188 ( talk) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Your concerns are well appreciated. I was wondering if you could kindly reveal your identity. And yes, I am giving completely authentic information on these Wikipedia pages. How do you know I am not giving authentic information? Citing of the sources will be done as and when the sources come up. But semi-protecting the articles without letting the author know may not be entirely justifiable. But of course, you are the administrator here and you do have the right to decide. Please, do, because I have other things to do as well. And information on the people the pages were opened or on people whose pages have been semi-protected can be put up elsewhere on the internet or in some other public sphere where Wikipedia doesn't rule the roost. Wikipedia isn't the only source of the most valuable and value oriented information. I simply don't understand why it can't be mentioned in Kumar Suresh Singh's page that he was indeed a member of the zamindari family of Nayangaon in Munger district in Bihar, or why the section on the ideology of Barun De has to be spruced. And also, I do know what I need to do. B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.252.255 ( talk) 14:03, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
As you say, there are plenty of places on the internet where you could indulge in your whims. My suggestion to you would be to take advantage of those if you are unable to resolve the numerous issues being highlighted here. - Sitush ( talk) 15:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Many thanks for the comments. Much appreciated the extremely valid points you have made. I have one more suggestion to make: please, feel free to delete the pages that you have mentioned here, or any other page on the Wikipedia that were opened along with these. And thanks for the nature of some of your comments: "I think you have somehow managed to fly under the radar of common sense here for many years because most of your article creations and most of your other contributions simply fail to abide by our policies". B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.225.25 ( talk) 21:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Sitush and Qwyrxian: Kindly stop messing around with my father, Barun De's Wikipedia site. Also, please do NOT touch my grandfather, Basanta Kumar De and great uncle Jyotish Chandra De's sites. I am taking offence to that. Their pages are now thanks to your wiki-activism on facebook as well. You have absolutely no right to touch their pages without the permission of the author. If you want you can delete them, but you cannot lock them. I must say this: you are the vandals on Wikipedia. And stop being so rude - haven't you learnt manners. B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.244.48 ( talk) 10:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Indeed the British are proud of your courage. Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:"Britons never, never, never shall be slaves." Warrington ( talk) 13:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC) |
It was nice learning from you, I think it looks like you decided to give up on the external links too. Thank you for all of your help and kindness, MarioNovi ( talk) 05:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
I appreciate your editings on page Brahmin. The page is now organised, neater, concise and rich and overall giving a much better look. My thanks to you for this. But I wonder why Hemu's mention from the page is deleted. I know some people have claimed that he was a Vaishy (Bania by birth ). But no reference is given which confirms that he was born in a Vaisya family. The references given on page Hemu are wrong. They do not mention about his birth or parentage at all. Please check those two references. His father Puran Das was a renowned Purohit. Hemu was called a Vaishya or Bania because he adopted the profession of business when he grew up. Sudhirkbhargava ( talk) 05:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. Jheald ( talk) 18:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, I am relatively new to Wikipedia. My first contribution was to create a comprehensive and instructive account of the Rajput clan. Post a period of inactivity, it came to my attention that the said article has become a breeding ground for constant edits and arguments on the data at hand.As a result, I have begun structuring the page to provide greater clarity.
I have made a study of your contributions and enhancements to the Wikipedia community. Although I am sure your concerns regarding my article are genuine,please understand that the referred certificates, manuscripts, books and papers from the concerned timelines have been preserved by my estate, the National Archives of India and the British National Archives.
The Imperial Gazetteer of India, Gazetteer N.W.P and District Gazetteers of the United Provinces are genuine and highly regarded sources of the British Raj era that may be found in the national libraries of Britain, India and even university archives at Harvard and the Oxford Press. To claim otherwise is not called for. Tod's has been criticized for certain inaccuracies but his accounts of the Rajputs and of India in general had a significant effect on British views of the area for many years. Moreover, kindly study the context in which the reference was used before you present his work as unreliable. On the other hand, I have many sources yet to be attached from the works and testimonials of Allan Octavian Hume, Sir Henry Elliot and various others. It would indeed be very helpful if you stop reverting unfinished and rather time consuming summaries as unsourced and non reliable before a user is able to finish his documentation and upload relevant material on the subject at hand.
I do not believe in personal vendettas. I welcome your insight and help in the editing process. Feel free to contact me and provide suggestions. An error brought to my notice will indeed be rectified.
I remain yours most sincerely Rohit Rohitsengar ( talk) 13:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Official Aam Aadmi Party logo from their website.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa ( talk) 22:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
...you have started attacking my city now i.e. Kolkata? I live in Kolkata, but, my dynamic IP address (currently 14.99.244.227, Tata Photon+) will tell you I am browsing from Bengaluru or Hyderabad. So, I feel jealous of those Kolkatans who have got Kolkata IP address. -- Tito☸ Dutta 06:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hasteur ( talk) 19:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
So you know, my archiving is set at seven days - that's not rapid archiving. I closed the discussion as my talk page is not the place for you and another editor to bicker with each other. If you want to harass John further you're welcome to do so on his talk page, not mine. Worry about your edits, not mine. I discussed the issue with a few admins on IRC myself and they each agreed that both of the AfD's that were brought to my talk page were appropriate actions. Perhaps you need to review a few policies yourself, such as this, maybe this, or even this. Don't post on my talk page again unless it's a notification regarding a talkboard or I will bring your conduct up in a RfC/U. Cheers, Dusti *Let's talk!* 00:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
see please talk on the article talk page before do the edit.Thank you
Eshwar.om
Talk tome
20:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
I read your message from Abhishek191288's talk page.i will consider that.Thank you.
Eshwar.om
Talk tome
09:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I modified the article .Previous namely called Bangalore Tamils.i followed the neutral policies.Please could you read and give your suggestion . sandbox article.Thank you! Eshwar.om Talk tome 13:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, isn't the article in the Kannada weekly Prajamata of Bangalore an acceptable citation to support the fact that Vishwanath Ayengar is a noted Kannada Brahmin? I hope you will undo your action and restore the entry made by me. Thanks. Kanchanamala ( talk) 04:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Whether the series of edits made by user "AcorruptionfreeIndia" to article AAP are permitted as per Wikipedia policy? The history of AAP article shows that, almost all edits made by the user from 12.6.2013 to 16.3.2013 are deletions! (except three edits, out of 28 or so edits). At times, the deletes included sourced info(recently added by me). Is it appropriate for me to stay away from this particular article? I seek your suggestion. Thank you, all the best. Rayabhari ( talk) 16:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your name at the noticeboard and was wondering if you could comment at this post. I've been getting feedback only from editors who've used the source in question in the articles they add to, so I don't think I'm getting a very impartial response. Dan56 ( talk) 18:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I see you are involved with this editor, is this strange to you [1] or normal? Thank you, MarioNovi ( talk) 18:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
The first version appears to be at least partially copyvio from http://archive.deccanherald.com/Deccanherald/apr192004/metro9.asp just in case some of the content ends up somewhere else.
I won't comment on the redirect. Best wishes. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 02:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Could you please look into this article? I note that this article seems to have gotten some controversial removal and reverting lately, but at the same time, the controversy section looks very POV too. i'm not sure if thats supported by sources too. So could you please look into it, if you can?
Thanks, TheOriginalSoni ( talk) 03:42, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I put protection on the page for one month. I already had the page on my watchlist and saw your edit summary. Next time, put in a request at WP:RFPP as a wonderful, fantastic admin probably won't have the page in their watchlist. Titodutta, how much longer do I have to be nice to Sitush? This blackmail is torture. Bgwhite ( talk) 03:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your message on my talk Page.surely i will drop a a reminder on your talk page.Thank you. Eshwar.om Talk tome 07:38, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
I Don't Know |
Hello, I don't know what was the problem with the article Hassan Khan. I am new to wikipedia and don't know how to send a message therefore am using this message of appreciation. I just want o know what was wrong with the material that I posted. I had given authentic references to every editI made. But you just came and edited out all I had done. Moreover I am from Ladakh and could write about the person as he represents Ladakh in the Indian Parliament. Please do let me know of my wrong doings (if any).
Awaiting a reply Anwaraj ( talk) 13:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC) |
I changed some things at Hassan Khan that involved categories. We have a message area for the Wikipedia India Project - see here - and there is also one for discussing categories in general. In this instance, I replaced Category:Members of the Lok Sabha with the more specific categories for Category:13th Lok Sabha members and Category:15th Lok Sabha members. All people who are listed in the two categories that I added are automatically a part of the first category, so there is no need to show that also.
I also removed an image that was "redlinked": I've no idea if the image was not showing because there was a spelling mistake or if the image simply does not exist but there is no point in showing the supposed filename of an image that we do not have.
The other big thing I did was this. It was good that you used sources but those sources must also be reliable - just because something appears on the web in a Wordpress blog, for example, does not make it suitable for use in an article. We have to be particularly careful when articles relate to biographies of living people. Some of the wording was also not neutral or involved original research/judgements; for example, His views on communal harmony is clear from his statements .... In addition, we do not generally use honorifics such as "Shri" and "Mr", and we have guidelines for how dates are shown in articles - see WP:MOSDATE.
This is a lot for you to take in, so do not become disheartened. People will help you find your way around all these policies and guidelines as long as you are contributing in good faith, which you are. You'll probably quickly learn the basic ones and if you have any doubts or queries then the best thing to do is to ask - which is why I am pleased to see you here! Hope this helps you in some way.- Sitush ( talk) 15:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Trust me i don't have any ill-intentions if that is what your implying - which i hope you aren't. But i will fight if i believe i have a point. To me adding her Brahmin caste is a part of her life and in all probability could have played a role in the person she is today - just as one wouldn't be surprised to read an article on wiki about someone in England mentioned as having been born to an aristocratic family. Fotoriety ( talk) 14:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Sir, According to my humble opinion I think the article on Ms Bahar Dutt should be deleted.I saw you edited the page a lot so please take part in the discussion and correct me if I am wrong. Uncletomwood ( talk) 17:02, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
|
Thanks for watching my back and reverting the vandalism on my page! — Σosthenes12 Talk 17:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bicycle helmets in Australia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:59, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Magadh University may have broken the
syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 06:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Bicycle helmets in Australia may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Here is one
jalebi for you. Jalebi is a sweet popular in countries of the Indian Subcontinent, specially in
India,
Pakistan,
Bangaldesh. Hope you'll like it.
Thank you.
Tito☸
Dutta
19:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
The issue of mentioning caste for Bachchan and his family has been discussed on the article talk page. There is also a link at User:Sitush/Common#Castelists. Trying to get round WP:BLP by referring to his family rather than the man himself creates an inference and is not acceptable. - Sitush (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Si Tush, you obviously guard these articles like a hawk and I admire you for that. Since, you are so well versed in Wikipedia policies and are indeed, "Proposer" of many policies on India / Hindu related subjects, can you advice me on how to get the policy on mentioning caste of living persons changed ? After all, nothing is set in concrete, is it ? Best regards. Jonathansammy ( talk) 15:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, can you please look into the article? I have removed material (social media "nickname", comments and opinion by Modi and BJP) that seems WP:Undue, WP:Opinion and not WP:Relevant. But, it's being added back in again and again. I have already reached the 3RR limit. Cliniic ( talk) 07:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Well I think Indian political articles are poorly patrolled and prone to disruptive editing. A month ago, the Sonia Gandhi page made it 10 days without anyone reverting controversial edits like Nazi connections etc. I believe part of the blame lies with me, since I had taken responsibility of patrolling her page (taking a break) but its still annoying to realize that nobody else bothered to revert it before I came back. Anyway, thanks for the prompt reply! Cliniic ( talk) 09:03, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The user has reverted me again. He is citing the Narendra Modi page as a template in claiming the 'Pappu' nickname is relevant. I suppose you know what he is talking about? Cliniic ( talk) 10:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hmm, but I reverted only once. The Legend of Zorro 23:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC) |
I categorically state that i am NOT a member of ANY Political Party, specially not AAP, and I have no personal agenda/interest in promoting a person and/or political party. I am NOT operating under any pseudo-name, as most on wiki are.
An old inhabitant of this beautiful planet, I am enthused by the world wide phenomenon of citizens, specially the youth, protesting against the oppressive mis/non-governance by the elected few and thus followed India Against Corruption with great hope.
The agenda listed on the menu bar of AAP is a breakdown of the steps enunciated in the book for decentralisation - power back to the people. I think if the essence of a book is publicly acknowledged as the mission/inspiration by any political party, it should get a mention on the book page. "With Swaraj in mind, Kejriwal launches Aam Aadmi Party" http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/politics/with-swaraj-in-mind-kejriwal-launches-aam-aadmi-party/article4130337.ece
http://www.swaraj.info is a public page on different aspects of Swaraj (book) and does not "link an article to itself"
My present interest on the topic is only to help spread the news, as widely as possible to those who care, to participate in the happenings around, which in my opinion are for the good.
I had earlier contributed on Odissi, Mayadhar Raut, Madhumita Raut etc
"In your zeal to promote this anti-corruption messiah and his political party, you are overstepping a few marks and you are demonstrating the downsides that often come from someone operating as a single-purpose account." was totally uncalled for and an utterly biased statement validating the pertinent question raised in the heading. I have NO intention of getting into any war, let alone edit war, but I detest your wholesale deletion of additions rather than correcting the editorial mistakes, as you have done now. Thanks a lot. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 00:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
As per OED
sarvajna , 'promote' also mean "give publicity to (a product, organization, or venture) so as to increase public awareness".
Giving 'correct' information: 'My present interest on the topic is only to help spread the news', is what Wikipedia does, promoting awareness/knowledge/news(and not views), without hypes and/or value judgments (promotion, marketing), accessible by anyone interested from anywhere. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 04:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Well Sitush, you are being pedantic now. Arab Spring, Occupy Wall Street, happenings in Brazil now, etc., all are/were 'news'! Thanks, anyway. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 11:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The cited examples were not argument of 'similarity' but illustration of ‘knowledge’ germinating from narrow definition ‘news’, though vice versa not always true. All arguments have counters, gravity depending on the context and predisposition of the evaluator, and should never be dismissed (deleted) perfunctorily; otherwise, very essence of universal collaboration gets lost, in spite of selfless work put in by many.
Sleeping on my thoughts, fearing entry into esoteric territory, decided to share it on your frequently visited page of ‘wiki-experts’. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 03:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I agree but leaving out contemporary issues is an easy way out, surrendering unique advantage of Wikipedia being on real-time. Hindsight does not provide the dynamics of an evolution, and runs the risk of 'your views vs my views', without reasonable means of checking on the 'facts', as it happened.
Sources are indeed a problem though may be overcome with a rider on its origin/interest/association regarding its accuracy, independence and reliability, and leave it to the reader to form her/his opinion. Same event written/broadcast differently, even with hindsight, is well known, 'extraneous factors' influencing 'facts'.
I agree to merger of 2011 Indian anti-corruption movement with 2012 Indian anti-corruption movement, the same movement evolving over years, but not to deletion of 90% content. I believe all sides should be suitably represented as there is really no "absolute truth", its always your (editor's) truth vs mine. Ratanmaitra ( talk) 02:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
We are approaching towards closing this month's nomination. Few days in hand. -- Tito☸ Dutta 00:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
You should probably just nominate for deletion or keep up the unreferenced tag, I'm pretty sure you aren't suppose to blank it. -- AshFR ( talk) 05:45, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
I would like you to have a look look into the activities of this student user, who, in the past, has been blocked, created new accounts to overcome that, run multiple accounts, ostensibly retired very recently to bypass any other action that might have been taken against him, and reemerged today in his latest incarnation as The Rahul Jain, with the definite article, and a user page that is his article about himself. I have only had dealings with him at AfDs, as he has a habit of going there, instead of discussing the matter at the talk page of an article, if he disagrees about something in it. For the most part, his AfD nominations have failed and he has usually been the sole detractor. But I do think this user is playing the game, even allowing for good faith. I note another user has already mentioned this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Rahuljain2307.2C_again . The Rahul Jain has deleted such comments on his talk page.Thanks.-- Zananiri ( talk) 11:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
.... for butting in on my talk page. I thought I was reasonably clear but apparently that wasn't the case! Equally apparently, my American sense of humor didn't go down too well :) -- regentspark ( comment) 19:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I have mentioned you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive828#Block review - OrangesRyellow -- Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 06:59, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Did you find anything in your source re the cow protection movement? And do you have any other suggestions for improvement? Darkness Shines ( talk) 07:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Sitush... There were n number of debates regarding the origin of Kulin Kayasthas on the related talk pages, and whether five Shudras or Kayasthas (later granted Kulina status) actually accompanied the Brahmins invited by King Adisur. Now, like reliable sources which are considered as reference(s) for this article, mention them as 'Shudra servants', similarly there are other reliable sources which mention them originally as Kayasthas. For example 'Tales of Bengal' by S.B.Banerjea (page 28, available on Google Books) mentions that Adisur invited five Kayasthas with five Brahmins. Similarly 'Bengal and Assam' (available on Google Books), actually a report on the Reconstitution of Provinces by Govt. of India, also mentions on Page 104 that five Brahmins and five Kayasthas from 'Kanouj' were invited and were settled in Bengal and formed the Kulin Brahmins and Kayasthas respectively. Similarly, we can find other sources as well. Based on the existing sources mentioned, and based on these new ones, and considering the huge debate through ages, will it not be fair to mention in the article on Kulin Kayastha, that there are both the opinions among historians. I believe this will make the article all the more neutral and make it all the more complete. Please let me know your opinion. Thanks. Ekdalian ( talk) 11:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, I certainly did not intend copyright infringement - if the source is appropriately credited, I didn't think there would be an issue. But I defer to you on this matter.
Also, regarding the substance of edit itself, regardless of what was decided among a separate group, my edits were meant to improve the language - I'm sure you'll agree that the following discussion of Kayasthas' varna status is awkward, incongruous and repetitive:
"Other sources...describe [Kayasthas] as 'a mixed caste', variously thought to be composed of people from the Brahmin, Vaishya and Kshatriya varnas or 'Brahman-Sudra (lower caste)', and sometimes Kshatriyas."
I would respectfully suggest editing the sentence to read more clearly and concisely per the below:
"Other sources...describe [Kayasthas] as 'a mixed caste', variously thought to be composed of Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishyas, as well as Brahmin-Shudras."
I appreciate your vigilance in monitoring this apparently controversial page, but I hope you'd accept my edits as not being part of the unsourced, agenda-laden additions that we've commonly seen.
Best, Melotown
See the talk page regarding this [3] Have we wanted long enough? Would like to merge the two. thanks Red Rose 13 ( talk) 20:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. How to find out a reliable source for religion of a person like, Rama Jois? Thank you. Rayabhari ( talk) 12:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, you have deleted the entire content on the Samra page under the presumption that "no evidence that Sumra=Samra... I find your conjecture funny, you seemingly sounding Indian by name. You should know that both are pronounced in Hindi absolutely similar. It was the Britishers problem that they mispronounced most of Indian names... Jaipur was called as Jeypore, Brahmputra was called as Berampooter, and so on. Sumra, or Sumrah or Samra are all different pronounciations of the same surname. Can you please revert the misguided deletions you have done! Kulveer ( talk) 07:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Are you really happy with the vandalisation and bullying you have been doing in the name of editing, without even a debate on why you are deleting that information repeatedly.
Kulveer (
talk) 08:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Kulveer (
talk •
contribs)
08:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Again, caught another article which had clear cites to People of India stating the caste was Rajput. The actual book (with the group spelled "Lunia") says nothing like that whatsoever, so I dug up a few other cites showing this caste was in a similar status with the Mahar and Chamar, but had sought to re-define itself as Kshatriya.
Again, I'm sympathetic to the fact that Sanskritisation had real life-or-death advantages in the 1850-1950 period, but this constant whitewashing of history rather than admitting the endemic oppression and discrimination really gets my goat. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
I've given up on the likes of Thurston, Russell, Tod etc. They are generally useless and I see no need to perpetuate historical curiosities based on silly theories that in some cases were outdated even before the books hit the shelves and in at least one case was acknowledged to be so by the author (Ibbetson). I still have the germ of an idea to write an article about this school of thought in the Raj: an umbrella article that links the various biographies to the theories of scientific racism, martial races, criminal tribes etc and the massive impact it all had on the censuses, the perceptions of the caste system and so on. It is do-able but there are least another couple of hundred sources I'd need to read before attempting it! - Sitush ( talk) 22:04, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Could you consider this Reminder?!My sand box article waiting for your review Sandbox article;:).Thank you Eshwar.om Talk tome 19:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Kindly let me know the Removal of Two Important Personality details who are related with Kashi Math directly. Inside Guru - Shishya System, The Madathipathi, Patta-shishya, H.H.Sudhindra Thirtha & H.H.Samyamindra Thirtha was Source able which were directly related and much required for the article. But you removed
Spedian ( talk) 06:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
A notable person to one Country might not be notable for another country. Both Swamijis are notable persons in India. Both are Swamijis of Kashimath. So Giving honors for them is required. And I have never violated Copy Right anywhere in Guru-Shishya Topic Spedian ( talk) 06:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I have read it well. I have added "His Holiness" only from the English Verifiable Sources. Spedian ( talk) 07:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
But Even When I'm adding that Two Topics with Valid Reliable Sources, you are simply removing. Why? Spedian ( talk) 08:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Understood, Now I have added the same Topic without H.H or His Holiness. Kindly please Dont Remove it anymore
Spedian (
talk)
08:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, could you take a quick look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relationship of the Cholas with the Chinese, and check if there are no revisionsim/neutrality items going on there? As long as there are no gross misrepresentations there I'm OK with inclusion, but we both know that's not always the case, and not always easy to spot for the casual reviewer. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 12:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
It looks like an admin bounced in and moved
Vishwabrahmin to
Vishwakarma (caste). I'm fine with the title overall, but also concerned about whatever data we're losing in moves. Also a lot of these drive-by IPs have a tendency to copy-paste old versions, but using the reading and not editing view so we get the "[3]" and "[citation needed]" artifacts. I'm particularly interested in getting the talk pages of the two articles merged, as there was a lot of discussion on the old
Vishwakarma (caste) that's now obscured. EDIT: The admin archived it, all good. Any ideas how to deal with this? I didn't catch your comment until after I did some cleanup following the move, but do you need me to refrain until an admin can do some untangling? We may need to lock a number of alternate spellings to make sure people don't sneak in and bounce the article to a different title in the future.
The article is still a hot mess overall, but when I squint I think I can generally see some patterns which could be relatively easily/simply laid out for readers. It's not an unduly complicated caste-cluster, and it has a slew of alternate names but not so hard to address. Part of the problem is we have a few longstanding participants who "don't appear to be here to build an encyclopedia", mysterious IPs, etc. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 16:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
I am very busy these days (though I am coming online everyday), I am not following all discussions. To reply your question at WT:INB, so far we used to discuss on the main nomination page and delete the discussion after work's end. This month right after you initiated INCOTM, I took the nomination page to a separate page Wikipedia:WikiProject India/Collaborations of the month/Nominations/2013 July, so that the nomination discussion can be preserved. The next discussion can be done at /2013 August. After creating such few pages, we can link those in main page as "See previous nominations". -- Tito☸ Dutta 21:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For diligent help in sorting out disagreements in a contentious subject (bicycle helmets) of no direct interest to you Richard Keatinge ( talk) 09:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Sitush! Thanks for participating in the World Digital Library-Wikimedia Partnership. Your contributions are important to improving Wikipedia! I wanted to share a few updates with you:
Keep up the great work, and please contact me if you need anything! Thank you for all you do for free knowledge! EdwardsBot ( talk) 16:42, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
This article ( P. Sathasivam) created on 29 June seems to be an almost verbatim copy of the press report, cited as the 3rd ref in the article. Please see: http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=802270 The person who has nominated it for merger, by mistake at AfD, after creating his own article on the subject ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P_.Sathasivam), seems to be worried about other things which he mentions on the AfD page - DYK etc. The 'early life' bit in his own article is also the same as that in the source I have quoted, which is copied in the original article. And, it appears, he has tagged his own article wrongly, too, as the suggestion, going by the revision history of his article was that his article should be redirected to the first one which is at AfD now. I hope all this makes sense. Pleaee have a look. Merci.-- Zananiri ( talk) 16:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC
Which article is the preferred version? I'll try to sort out the rest of the problems. - Sitush ( talk) 20:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Please do not edit war at Somnath Bharti.You don't own Wikipedia articles,I request you to don't delete contend add by me w/o discussion. TY of Walk 19:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TY of Walk 19:20, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
The List of 'Common Surnames' and 'Notable People' is very comprehensive in the previous version of Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu article. Please try to cite sources rather than removing the uncited content -- by a senior member from the community.
Your wish dude.you can give your comments in my talkpage or else the article talk page.which is feel best for you .you can.Thank you Eshwar.om Talk tome 19:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
What was that draft template you put on the anti muslim violence draft? I am being badgered over this one. Darkness Shines ( talk) 18:49, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, you've reverted an edit done after a BRD process with the tags ESSAY, which seems to have no relevance, and TW. Is this accidental TWABUSE? I can't fix it if you've got a bot on the prowl. If you really have a reason to revert you need to state it - see TW.
Hi Sitush,
I think you have misunderstood my edit to Jayalalithaa Article. I did not add or remove any content to that article. I replaced the old defunct template {{ succession box}} with the newer one {{ s-bef}}. I don't know why you reverted it. You have mentioned: but she is incumbent & may, for eg, die before 2016, which is irrelevant. If you look at the rendered page, it still says incumbent. -- Jayarathina ( talk) 07:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Did you check out List of Parsis? I'm pretty sure some aren't.- Ravi My Tea Kadai 18:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Very good work in Thoothukudi Page Thankyou Perumalism Chat 01:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC) |
Both reverted, and both deleted :) Cheers, Dusti *poke* 16:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Kamboj are considered :Category:Social groups of Pakistan and not :Category:Ethnic groups in Pakistan. They are considered part of Punjabi people ethnic group. Delljvc ( talk) 13:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
You were thought of: User talk:Anna Frodesiak#Kachwaha Edit
Opting out of this one would be completely understandable. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Why didnt you reply? I changed the tone of the para you edited yesterday and fixed the dead link. See if its ok. Mayan302 ( talk) 13:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Digvijaya Singh". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 21:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Going by the articles created by this person about members of the same clan, with the same peacock expressions, and the timing of the keep !Votes today in quick succession at this AfD ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vasant_Krishna_Sharma) from new IPOs, with no previous contributions, one wonders...!-- Zananiri ( talk) 18:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I saw you have reverted my source info in vanniyar page by describe as "Reverted good faith edits by Prabhubreaker (talk): Not a reliable source (Gyan imprint) but in any case why are you removing alternate names?" Let me know what is "gyan imprint". Do you think it is not a source info? Book have ISBN and reliable source. Try to add more info. i saw your page you have more star but why you can't improve the page in better way. Regards, prabhubreaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhubreaker ( talk • contribs) 13:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Sitush ( talk), Just know about Jacob Pandian http://anthro.fullerton.edu/faculty/pandianPage.htm. He is not a stablemate. Please do verify before you use and dont blindy say he is a stablemate. I have added the Vanniya kula Kshatriyar and palli in vanniyar page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhubreaker ( talk • contribs) 05:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Sitush ( talk), Book have ISBN no: 978-0861321360 and then what is the problem with the book. Please know what is ISBN. It is not Gyan if it have ISBN. Hope you are sensible. And don't revert again by commenting "Good Faith" or "Gyan" when there is a sourced info with book ISBN no and dont waste both of us time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prabhubreaker ( talk • contribs) 08:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Ramonadhar ( talk) 17:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Dear Sitush, I can see that you too seem to have great interest in this particular article. I just want to understand if your hunting (for some specific source, I guess) is over. But, then, my point is, in any case, we cannot ignore these varied versions, even if you find something specific. As per our convention, we need to show all possible versions, especially when it comes to factual data. Therefore, I would like to request you to go through my composition as well (apart from your own research), and suggest on any point I may have missed rather than just editing your version and closing at that. Needless to mention, I am seriously looking forward to improve the content as well as reliability of this article. Thanks.
Ramonadhar ( talk) 18:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Dear Sitush, thanks for your message. I can see that you are resorting to "blocking" as such. Anyway, I have checked the links as mentioned in your talk page and these are credible political leaders of national importance and I do not see the need to compare their write-ups with anyone for that matter. The content in their wikipage talks more about matters of national relevance rather than about them and the write-ups are generic as well. The topic I am trying to edit is with reference to "the 2011 Hisar by-election" and hence whatever factual and relevant information is available with respect to the "2011 Hisar by-election" is what I intent to update at least. However, I would again request that you point out what I missed rather than just editing your version and closing at that and I am open to any assistance as well. And just to clarify, my only intention is to improve the article with relevant factual data. Thanks.
Pramathesh a ( talk) 23:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC) I have just noticed your curtailing of the article on Manubhai Shah and then as I was searching to determine how to write to you I saw that there was also a note for me saying that the whole article might be removed from Wikipedia. If you want to remove the article, that is up to you but it will be a great loss to society as Mr Shah was a very important contributor to the social and economic development of India among other things. I want to write on this further but am on a tight schedule and will be able to get back only after the middle of August. But I will briefly say that I think you have misunderstood a source of information here. You say that, "Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media." This is what was done in this case. The information you seem to have a problem with was quoted from a highly reputed Gujarati newspaper from the region of Saurashtra in India. Regional newspapers in different languages are often of very good quality and are highly respected for their professionalism and standards and that is not surprising in a large country like India with people speaking and writing in many different languages and there being thousands of eminent writers and journalists also writing in different languages. You might be aware of the existence of high quality regional literature in India. Since university days (which was a long time ago), I have tried to learn about leaders and movers who have changed the face of the world we live in, some of them are much written about and some go unsung but were no less important. When possible we need to inspire especially the youth of our world with facts about how people even from simple backgrounds can make a difference. And regional newspapers too can provide us with important facts and can become instruments of change. In fact Wikipedia itself is a wonderful example of a highly effective instrument of change. In my various journeys I came across this very important issue of the newspaper Phulchhab on the legendary figure Manubhai Shah and felt the need to bring some of the information to the notice of the wider world. Newspaper archives are a great source of knowledge and often this knowledge stays unrevealed. I felt it a privilege to bring some of the information to light. Manubhai Shah is a legendary figure who we used to listen to with rapt attention decades ago as he unfolded the plans and policies for the reconstruction and development of India. His life was the stuff of legends and it will be a shame if you were to misunderstand the source of information in this case as being inauthentic. Hope to return again in August. Take care. Pramathesh a ( talk) 23:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Have you seen this? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23354613
The circumcision one in the top ten is the one that surprised me!-- Zananiri ( talk) 15:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I do know you are an Unbiased person, But why such a biasness when it comes to AAP. When you know BJP wikipage is also violating the same rule. - If you are an Unbiased please bring the faith back. - Tall.kanna ( talk) 16:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I agreed on almost all points you have made.But I again have a doubt, If Spoiler Effect is a speculation. Then another party being Main contender is also speculation? - Tall.kanna ( talk) 11:01, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Seriously, you seem to have a big investment in the presentation of the AAP on Wikipedia and it is quite worrying - you are not coming across as neutral and you are coming across as someone who is attempting to publicise the party. It probably wouldn't be a bad thing to leave the subject matter alone for a while. - Sitush ( talk) 11:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Dear Sitush...I 'll obviously wait for you till you confirm that your hunting (for some specific source, I guess) is over. But, then, my point is, in any case, we cannot ignore these varied versions, even if you find something specific. As per our convention, we need to show all possible versions, especially when it comes to such contentious issues. Therefore, I would like to request you to go through my composition as well (apart from your own research), and suggest me on any point I may have missed. Needless to mention, I am seriously looking forward to improve the content as well as reliability of this article. Thanks. Ekdalian ( talk) 11:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
If you can improve the page. Improve it but dont be egoistic and Agenda section which you have reverted to is way below standard of wikipedia. If you can improve it as per your wisdom please do it but dont degrade wikipedia just for your personal predujices.- Tall.kanna ( talk) 18:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Aam Aadmi Party shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. -- Guy Macon ( talk) 01:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Your comments are welcome at this discussion: Talk:Royal College, Colombo#College name. Thanks.-- obi2canibe talk contr 13:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I do have a printed copy of this book and have used it to add information to several local hospital articles. If you let me know which hospitals you are interested in I will see what information it provides for them.-- Felix Folio Secundus ( talk) 11:27, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush,
I have made the changes in the article by collecting informations from various sources and I hope the changes made were almost correct.I have added six more groups in christianity such as Knanaya christians(Catholic and Jacobite),Bhramavar and Honavar churches and Antichian Syrian church and its split form in Kerala recently. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.165.226.88 ( talk) 09:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Why do you want to revert the regional name? Why do want to control the use of Malayalam Language?
Hi thank you for advice to take my concern to External Links Noticeboard. It does not seem in frequent use, but now the user that has also been harassing me because he thinks I have a vendetta to him, Wwwwhatsup, and his friend Stalwart, have shut it down. Is this allowed? [5]. Wwwwhatsup stalked by like at Jeff Berlin and Stalwart admitted to stalking me and being unhelpful and putting a stop in my tries to figure out if these links are valid. [6] I think if he wanted to really be helpful he would not just make things harder so I have to keep trying but would tell me how to do things. Am I doing everything wrong? You seem to deal with these types more often. Thank you, and sorry if I inconvenience you, MarioNovi ( talk) 18:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Is this an accident, an adjective-noun pair? (used by you at wp:ae) Ignore if you wish so. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 04:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I remember reading an old American book that read " Majority of Hindoos in Kashmir are Muslims"! The meaning was that everybody from Hindoostan was a Hindoo , just like everybody from Afghanistan was Afghan! Also check www.thefreedictionary.com/Hindoo I do not know the full context of this thread but hope this was useful. Jonathansammy ( talk) 14:15, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
I believe Khomeini's family was called "Hindi" in Iran because his ancestors either came from India or had lived in India for a long time so it was not just the British or American who used these terms. In modern usage it, of course, means adherents of the Indigenous Indian religion but the actual origin of the word comes from River Sindhu with the S shifting to H in Arabic / Farsi. I personally prefer the word "Sanatan Dharma" for Hindu but that is a discussion for another day! Jonathansammy ( talk) 16:07, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, I am having WP:Competence issues with an editor on several articles Diet in Sikhism, Damdami Taksal etc. I don't think he gets where he is going wrong. Your help would be most appreciated. Thanks SH 07:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Medicine Barnstar | |
For your healing touch at Ancoats Hospital and... elsewhere. Bravo! Stalwart 111 08:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC) |
Since my views on the retention of Batla House Encounter in Digvijaya Singh's WP:BLP are different from yours i welcome you to share your views in detail on the talk page of this article why this particular edit should be retained. If we fail to reach consensus, i propose to take this for Dispute Resolution. Soham321 ( talk) 20:11, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I thought I would bring this conversation about Buddhists born to Brahmin families here. Thanks for noting the problems found with Rocking It Loud. Checking the logs, I noticed that Rocking created an account at 15:57 on 14 April 2012. In fact, the last of Buddhakahika's socks were blocked earlier on that date ( [11] and [12]). Since I watch the pages Buddhakahika was fooling with, I always wondered whether Rocking was a sock of Buddhakahika, but apart from editing the same pages, on the surface there doesn't seem to be a case for claiming the user is Buddhakahika. But perhaps digging deeper may create a case. Michitaro ( talk) 09:09, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2013_July_11
Did you see this? I didn't see it until after the event, but to call that Hindi newspaper the leading Hindi newspaper in India (last comment) because of its circulation is a travesty. Like saying the Sun is the leading newspaper in the UK for the same reason. The mind boggles. Why should I believe the rest!-- Zananiri ( talk) 22:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Actually, British prime ministers seem to be the exception to having a "number". Presumably because it goes so far back in history that there is debate as to where the numbering begins (even Robert Walpole is only "regarded" as being the first).
All/most other countries' heads of government/state seem to be easily numbered. For eg: the 8th Aussie PM Stanley Bruce, currently at FAC, or the 22nd and current Canadian PM, Stephen Harper (a GA).— indopug ( talk) 12:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at B. R. Ambedkar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Blueyarn ( talk) 10:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Kashmiri Pandit may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 09:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I might have told a little white lie. Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 22:30, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
I wish to bring to your attention your edit on the Digvijaya Singh page in which you replaced an existing edit with an edit which does not comply with wikipedia guidelines. Please see the talk page where your edit is being discussed. Soham321 ( talk) 15:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC) In the Digvijaya Singh page you are reverting edits which are blatant examples of vandalism which is a good thing, but in your edit summary you are marking them as good faith edits. I find this inappropriate. Soham321 ( talk) 15:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I don't know why you have removed the history itself.
-Vijaya Kumar Poun Raj 16:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijayhbk ( talk • contribs)
Your mass revert to my category Social Groups of Pakistan has been reported for mediation at /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents Delljvc ( talk) 17:26, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
I serendipitously chanced upon "Keep calm and carry on" and declared that hence forth that would by my motto, [13] now I notice that you too display it here. Perhaps "great minds think alike" :-). Happy editing! Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 17:24, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Talk:Digvijaya Singh". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 02:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, it struck me that Joseph Jordan may have joined a Militia Regiment. This might fit in with your source saying "he had no opportunity to go on active service" - Militia tended to stay on home defence duties. The list of stations 1806-1811 should help to nail this down e.g. what units were stationed in Milford Haven between 1806 and 1811.
I believe that the senior Lancashire unit was the "1st Royal Lancashire Militia (Duke of Lancaster's Own)" - later 3rd Battalion, King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). Might easily have been rendered as "1st Royal Lancashire Regiment" or "1st Battalion Royal Lancashire Regiment".
Also, have you tried searching The London Gazette here? I would have thought that his appointments would have been gazetted. "Joseph Jordan" will probably return thousands of hits, but "Ensign Joseph Jordan" and "Surgeon Joseph Jordan" may be more fruitful, particularly if your limit your dates to 1806 / 1807 (depending upon how reliable these dates are). Hamish59 ( talk) 10:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Peshawar was the second Afghan capital, until the Sikhs pushed the Afgans back to the Khyber pass. So yes the border wer different pre-1850. Thanks SH 18:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
When you start swearing you play right into their hands. Why don't you report him for WP:NPA? Or are you too busy badmouthing Californians? JanetteDoe ( talk) 00:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Your behavior in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digvijaya_Singh has now been reported in WP:ANI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#A_complaint_about_User:Sitush Soham321 ( talk) 06:43, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
I have replied to your objections. You should be able to accept Gait now for the particular use in Kamapitha, because D C Sircar does the same. Chaipau ( talk) 02:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, maybe you are too busy, but I had a question on my talk page for you. If you are too busy it is ok. Thank you, MarioNovi ( talk) 04:42, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that u removed 2 articles from certain categories which are related to religion. That is information which might be important to some, and since such categories exist, with considerable population, i was wondering if u could shed some light on the removal, cheers. Mentabolism ( talk) 05:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
This biography of Michael contains the quotes you removed here. I have no idea if http://www.poemhunter.com/ is a reliable source though.
Sir,
I have made some more contribution to the Page Mardorva Rajputs and Rajput Mali, but from past few stances there has been a continuous intervention from your part. It is a request that all the information given on these pages are true and have their proper reference
Regards N.J.S Gahlot — Preceding unsigned comment added by N.J.S.Gahlot ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, because your name is on this notification list, I'm just letting you know that there will be a Manchester Wikimeet taking place on 25 August. Perhaps we'll see you there? Cheers, Bazonka ( talk) 21:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Harikumar Pallathadka may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi Sitush, can you look at this edit and check the reference given, if it implies Sikhism as a ethnicity. I have read the whole document and it was not clear to me. --Vigyani talk ਯੋਗਦਾਨ 15:02, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
When you remove a category because it is the parent of another cat into which the subject falls (an excellent habit of yours, one which I appreciate), could you be a smidgen more explicit in your edit summary? I almost just reverted you because I mistook one of your edits (merely summarized as "overcategorisation") for a "he's not from Andhra Pradesh, he's from glorious Telangana, hurrah!" edit. -- Orange Mike | Talk 13:53, 8 August 2013 (UTC) (tiring of Telangana edits)
It is quite hilarious that someone that quite obviously does not even look at pages they edit ( reading all the sources on the page in 45 seconds? – or look here for an example where you actually delete a source with obvious self-identification, or here when a source is cited in the infobox for Christ's sake) has the gall to lecture others on editing. What constructive users do when they have a potential issue with another’s edit is take the time to demonstrate how a policy has been violated. Instead of sanctimoniously defecating a few Wikilinks in edit summaries and patting yourself on the back afterwards, try, I don’t know, reading articles for a change. Also with regards to Digvijay Singh its quite rich you delete well-sourced and notable sections of a page, and then turn around and accuse users who disagree with your edits of violating a number of irrelevant (to the matter, not in general, in case you were trying to Wikilawyer your way through that statement) Wikipedia policies. Pectore talk 22:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello I was wondering if you have thoughts on this [14] [15] [16]. Wwwwhatsup originally accused me of being the person who keeps putting that there, which is why I know about it. I never heard of Manitoba before. Thank you, MarioNovi ( talk) 07:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, can you clarify the problem with this, apart from sourcing? Wwwhatsup ( talk) 17:18, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
It is great to see an enthusiast - nay, someone whom many probably consider to be an expert - take an interest in such subjects here but it does not give you carte blanche and there is little doubt in my mind that you do or have had commercial conflicts of interest. I really do think that you need to take another look at WP:V and if it were not for the fact that I've got enough on my plate dealing with other issues elsewhere, my guess is that 30 - 40 per cent of the content of articles to which you have contributed would by removed by me. It is about time that this project got to grips with this type of "we aficionados like it so the rules do not matter" routine. If the rules get in your way then go propose a change to them. Obviously, I've done my research and I know who you are; I've no idea yet whether you have made that clear to other people but, if not, then I think you might be in a position where you should do and where you should note all your past and present commercial involvements. A tough call, I know, but this really is a rather ridiculous situation and I know that you are not a stupid person, far from it. - Sitush ( talk) 00:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
The term "high tea" was used as a way to distinguish it from "low tea" in the article about the Afternoon tea. This is what was so far stated (until today) : Though it is often stated that the words "low" and "high" refer to the height of the tables from which either meal was eaten, this is incorrect. Well somebody removed [17] 'this is incorrect', and this changs the whole meaning of the sentence.
The situation, Sitush, is now that the meaning states that : it is often stated that the words "low" and "high" refer to the height of the tables from which either meal was eatend. This meaning that the whole busines is about the tables. Now has this low and high tea stuff has to do with the social class or the height of the table, or what? You are the British, who may offer assistance said Drmies, you should know. Warrington ( talk) 19:38, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sitush ( talk) 14:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Tea seems first to have established for itself a particular niche in the day in the 1740s, by which time it had become the fashionable breakfast drink. It was also drunk after dinner, and as the usual time for dinner progressed during the eighteenth century towards the evening a gap opened up for a late-afternoon refreshment, filled by what has since become the traditional English afternoon tea, a meal in its own right, with sandwiches and cake as well as cups of tea (amongst the earliest references to it are these by Fanny Burney in Evelina (1778): ‘I was relieved by a summons to tea,’ and by John Wesley in 1789: ‘At breakfast and at tea…I met all the Society’; Anna Maria Russell, Duchess of Bedford (1783–1857), famously claimed to have originated the fashion, but as can be seen, it was around well before she was in a position to have any influence over it). In various other parts of the English-speaking world, teatime has assumed other connotations: in Jamaica, for instance, it is the first meal of the day, while for Australians and New Zealanders it is a cooked evening meal—a usage reflected in the tea, and more specifically the ‘high tea’, of certain British dialects, predominantly those of the working class and of the North (the term high tea dates from the early nineteenth century).
![]() |
100,000 Edits | |
Congratulations are appropriate as you have reached the milestone of 100,000 edits, a couple of thousand edits ago! Very few editors have been able to amass such an accomplishment—you are a rare breed. The wiki is a better place because of your dedication!
Binksternet (
talk)
04:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
|
![]() |
Do we have any past connection? Shobhit Gosain ( talk) 07:38, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi There, I think I had added valid sources in the article with credible Indian newspapers as references. I hope that Barry's invitation is covered here and here. And Firstpost is Indian national online newspaper, which comes under notable references too. Please reconsider the removal of section. Thanks! - Vatsan34 ( talk) 15:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Occassion : your edit count crossing a major mile stone!! Rayabhari ( talk) 16:15, 15 August 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Sitush, when you have some time, would you mind taking a look at recent edits to this article? I just restored a bunch of deletions from Jattnijj. I personally vetted the McCleod source and could see nothing wrong with it; the other sources are not accessible to me, but Jattnijj's wholesale deletions seemed a bit arbitrary. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:19, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Dear Sitush, Please, do not edit my father, Barun De's, page. You made changes to section that have remained there for several years now. If you have any questions, then ask me first. B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.224.247 ( talk) 02:32, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Having read WP:FILMMARKETING, I now see why including the trailer might have been a bad idea. But as for your objection to the date format, please see WP:DATEFORMAT; the format I used is acceptable. Or was your objection to something else? GlaedrH ( talk) 08:09, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, please take a look at the article Brahmin. Would you consider Vepachedu and Kamakoti.org authoritative sources? -- Mayasutra [= No ||| Illusion =] ( talk) 14:01, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Mayasutra
Sitush, The information that I have given are all authentic. They have been on this page since the page was opened several years ago. Please, don't edit them. I am sourcing them as per the guidelines of Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.227.188 ( talk) 07:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Your concerns are well appreciated. I was wondering if you could kindly reveal your identity. And yes, I am giving completely authentic information on these Wikipedia pages. How do you know I am not giving authentic information? Citing of the sources will be done as and when the sources come up. But semi-protecting the articles without letting the author know may not be entirely justifiable. But of course, you are the administrator here and you do have the right to decide. Please, do, because I have other things to do as well. And information on the people the pages were opened or on people whose pages have been semi-protected can be put up elsewhere on the internet or in some other public sphere where Wikipedia doesn't rule the roost. Wikipedia isn't the only source of the most valuable and value oriented information. I simply don't understand why it can't be mentioned in Kumar Suresh Singh's page that he was indeed a member of the zamindari family of Nayangaon in Munger district in Bihar, or why the section on the ideology of Barun De has to be spruced. And also, I do know what I need to do. B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.252.255 ( talk) 14:03, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
As you say, there are plenty of places on the internet where you could indulge in your whims. My suggestion to you would be to take advantage of those if you are unable to resolve the numerous issues being highlighted here. - Sitush ( talk) 15:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Many thanks for the comments. Much appreciated the extremely valid points you have made. I have one more suggestion to make: please, feel free to delete the pages that you have mentioned here, or any other page on the Wikipedia that were opened along with these. And thanks for the nature of some of your comments: "I think you have somehow managed to fly under the radar of common sense here for many years because most of your article creations and most of your other contributions simply fail to abide by our policies". B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.225.25 ( talk) 21:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Sitush and Qwyrxian: Kindly stop messing around with my father, Barun De's Wikipedia site. Also, please do NOT touch my grandfather, Basanta Kumar De and great uncle Jyotish Chandra De's sites. I am taking offence to that. Their pages are now thanks to your wiki-activism on facebook as well. You have absolutely no right to touch their pages without the permission of the author. If you want you can delete them, but you cannot lock them. I must say this: you are the vandals on Wikipedia. And stop being so rude - haven't you learnt manners. B_de2002 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.244.48 ( talk) 10:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Indeed the British are proud of your courage. Rule, Britannia! rule the waves:"Britons never, never, never shall be slaves." Warrington ( talk) 13:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC) |
It was nice learning from you, I think it looks like you decided to give up on the external links too. Thank you for all of your help and kindness, MarioNovi ( talk) 05:42, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
I appreciate your editings on page Brahmin. The page is now organised, neater, concise and rich and overall giving a much better look. My thanks to you for this. But I wonder why Hemu's mention from the page is deleted. I know some people have claimed that he was a Vaishy (Bania by birth ). But no reference is given which confirms that he was born in a Vaisya family. The references given on page Hemu are wrong. They do not mention about his birth or parentage at all. Please check those two references. His father Puran Das was a renowned Purohit. Hemu was called a Vaishya or Bania because he adopted the profession of business when he grew up. Sudhirkbhargava ( talk) 05:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. Jheald ( talk) 18:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Sitush, I am relatively new to Wikipedia. My first contribution was to create a comprehensive and instructive account of the Rajput clan. Post a period of inactivity, it came to my attention that the said article has become a breeding ground for constant edits and arguments on the data at hand.As a result, I have begun structuring the page to provide greater clarity.
I have made a study of your contributions and enhancements to the Wikipedia community. Although I am sure your concerns regarding my article are genuine,please understand that the referred certificates, manuscripts, books and papers from the concerned timelines have been preserved by my estate, the National Archives of India and the British National Archives.
The Imperial Gazetteer of India, Gazetteer N.W.P and District Gazetteers of the United Provinces are genuine and highly regarded sources of the British Raj era that may be found in the national libraries of Britain, India and even university archives at Harvard and the Oxford Press. To claim otherwise is not called for. Tod's has been criticized for certain inaccuracies but his accounts of the Rajputs and of India in general had a significant effect on British views of the area for many years. Moreover, kindly study the context in which the reference was used before you present his work as unreliable. On the other hand, I have many sources yet to be attached from the works and testimonials of Allan Octavian Hume, Sir Henry Elliot and various others. It would indeed be very helpful if you stop reverting unfinished and rather time consuming summaries as unsourced and non reliable before a user is able to finish his documentation and upload relevant material on the subject at hand.
I do not believe in personal vendettas. I welcome your insight and help in the editing process. Feel free to contact me and provide suggestions. An error brought to my notice will indeed be rectified.
I remain yours most sincerely Rohit Rohitsengar ( talk) 13:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Official Aam Aadmi Party logo from their website.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa ( talk) 22:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
...you have started attacking my city now i.e. Kolkata? I live in Kolkata, but, my dynamic IP address (currently 14.99.244.227, Tata Photon+) will tell you I am browsing from Bengaluru or Hyderabad. So, I feel jealous of those Kolkatans who have got Kolkata IP address. -- Tito☸ Dutta 06:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
Hasteur ( talk) 19:10, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
So you know, my archiving is set at seven days - that's not rapid archiving. I closed the discussion as my talk page is not the place for you and another editor to bicker with each other. If you want to harass John further you're welcome to do so on his talk page, not mine. Worry about your edits, not mine. I discussed the issue with a few admins on IRC myself and they each agreed that both of the AfD's that were brought to my talk page were appropriate actions. Perhaps you need to review a few policies yourself, such as this, maybe this, or even this. Don't post on my talk page again unless it's a notification regarding a talkboard or I will bring your conduct up in a RfC/U. Cheers, Dusti *Let's talk!* 00:35, 25 August 2013 (UTC)