![]() | |
---|---|
Featured content news
Good content news
Reviews and additional project information
Editing tips
This is a new section in the newsletter to help familiarize project members with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.
Professional wrestling article stats
|
Member updates
Recent deletion debates
Recent wrestling news
This fortnight in wrestling history
Contributors to this issue
|
Hey why did you steal my signature designs? Kala jan € ₣ 15:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
You should've asked me, I'm a rather good at it, tell me what colors you wan't. Kala jan € ₣ 19:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
How's this: Sin Of Dreams •™• ?
Glad you like it. Kala jan € ₣ 22:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey you might not know this but this isn't allowed here (that way of speaking, ((rudely))); let me see... There's a thing called WP:NPA, read it and you'll understand, just stay civil. Cheers! Kala jan € ₣ 22:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
It wasn't a personal attack. §imon K S K 23:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
No but it was rude and sarcastic. Kala jan € ₣ 13:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Maybe it wasn't the most polite compliment, but that doesn't mean you should not tell him to read a rule that he has not broken. §imon K S K 19:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
I was adverting him that it somewhat entered WP:NPA. And he has been rude to me more than once. Kala jan € ₣ 19:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with what he said. A personal attack is "You're retarded" or "STFU, you ******* *** ** ******......" He asked me to give him a list, so I give him a list. I don't how it enters WP:NPA if it wasn't a personal attack. It wasn't that rude either. The most important thing is, if I take it personally. If I don't, then you should just drop it. §imon K S K 20:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Well he could use the advice for a near future. Kala jan € ₣ 22:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For what? If he attacks someone? He has been civil so far. He responded calmly to your accusation of stealing sigs. Do you think he needs this? §imon K S K 22:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes precisely, and the rudeness and sarcasm - If it wasn't an WP:NPA what was it? cause I don't really find it should be allowed either. Kala jan € ₣ 14:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
What was it? A simple question that did not show any rudeness or sarcasm. I don't understand why you keep on responding to this. Drop it. ₰imon K S K 00:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay you're having a fit and there's no reason to; he can use the information for future reference in cases that someone is acting stupidly and you feel like saying on his talk page: YOU RETARD! Kala jan € ₣ 23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Sure. [1] Glad I could help. §imon K S K 22:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop making changes to your sig. Your sig looks fine. It's best for you to focus on your mainspace. ₰imon K S K 22:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Yah I currently don't even which one you're using, for I have many but most of them are designs I made for other people. Kala jan € ₣ 23:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay, Why is there a sig with Kalajan's name bieng directed to your talk page? That can raise many eyebrows, which lead to people thinking you are a sock. I told to focus on mainspace. ₰imon K S K 16:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Yah I'm removing it. Kala jan € ₣ 18:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Genesis (2009), is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
TJ
Spyke
21:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Whats Up? Colts 1 17:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Kalajan i'm tired of you gettin all own up in my business, Colt i'll reply to u later since i've got to deal with this know-it-all K Benton Tigers 21:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay you know tht I would probably report you for this, buut I won't because ur new. and unexperenced, hey, if you want to be uncivil Go and smash up a wall with a sledgehammer! Just Kick it out the shed. Kala jan € ₣ 14:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Genesis (2009), is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Yeah We Cool Hahah Colts 1 17:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the UBX! ₰imon KSK 20:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
22:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The WWE Alumni did not have any reliable sources so that is why I deleted it it was not vandilizim. Benton Tigers 00:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding the fake "you have no new messages" to Colts1 webpage. It's not necessary and continuing to replace it (as you've already done) may eventually be seen as harassment or vandalism. Hazardous Matt 17:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I notice that you have been told above to stop adding this to User:Colts1's talkpage, yet you continued to do it. This is your one and only warning. Even though Colts1 is blocked indefinitely does not give you the right to harass him. You will be blocked for harassment if you readd the template. -- Smashville talk 02:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What is the meaning of the account User:KingOreo? Please explain your actions immidiately. -- Deskana (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Sinofdreams ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm Not A Sock I want To See The Reason I'm A Sock And The Prof That I'm A Sock
Decline reason:
Very obvious checkuser-verified abuse of multiple accounts. -- jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 17:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why are you blocked? Shall I unblock you? How? Fiddler96 ( talk) 16:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Regarding The Block Against Sin I Can Assure You He Is not Colts1 Trust Me I Know Sinofdreams And I Will Get Him To Appeal The Block Weaver2009 ( talk) 01:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
read the block thing on the talk page
Weaver2009 (
talk)
02:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() | |
---|---|
Featured content news
Good content news
Reviews and additional project information
Editing tips
This is a new section in the newsletter to help familiarize project members with the Manual of Style and general editing tips.
Professional wrestling article stats
|
Member updates
Recent deletion debates
Recent wrestling news
This fortnight in wrestling history
Contributors to this issue
|
Hey why did you steal my signature designs? Kala jan € ₣ 15:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
You should've asked me, I'm a rather good at it, tell me what colors you wan't. Kala jan € ₣ 19:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
How's this: Sin Of Dreams •™• ?
Glad you like it. Kala jan € ₣ 22:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey you might not know this but this isn't allowed here (that way of speaking, ((rudely))); let me see... There's a thing called WP:NPA, read it and you'll understand, just stay civil. Cheers! Kala jan € ₣ 22:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
It wasn't a personal attack. §imon K S K 23:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
No but it was rude and sarcastic. Kala jan € ₣ 13:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Maybe it wasn't the most polite compliment, but that doesn't mean you should not tell him to read a rule that he has not broken. §imon K S K 19:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
I was adverting him that it somewhat entered WP:NPA. And he has been rude to me more than once. Kala jan € ₣ 19:59, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with what he said. A personal attack is "You're retarded" or "STFU, you ******* *** ** ******......" He asked me to give him a list, so I give him a list. I don't how it enters WP:NPA if it wasn't a personal attack. It wasn't that rude either. The most important thing is, if I take it personally. If I don't, then you should just drop it. §imon K S K 20:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Well he could use the advice for a near future. Kala jan € ₣ 22:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
For what? If he attacks someone? He has been civil so far. He responded calmly to your accusation of stealing sigs. Do you think he needs this? §imon K S K 22:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes precisely, and the rudeness and sarcasm - If it wasn't an WP:NPA what was it? cause I don't really find it should be allowed either. Kala jan € ₣ 14:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
What was it? A simple question that did not show any rudeness or sarcasm. I don't understand why you keep on responding to this. Drop it. ₰imon K S K 00:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay you're having a fit and there's no reason to; he can use the information for future reference in cases that someone is acting stupidly and you feel like saying on his talk page: YOU RETARD! Kala jan € ₣ 23:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Sure. [1] Glad I could help. §imon K S K 22:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop making changes to your sig. Your sig looks fine. It's best for you to focus on your mainspace. ₰imon K S K 22:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Yah I currently don't even which one you're using, for I have many but most of them are designs I made for other people. Kala jan € ₣ 23:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay, Why is there a sig with Kalajan's name bieng directed to your talk page? That can raise many eyebrows, which lead to people thinking you are a sock. I told to focus on mainspace. ₰imon K S K 16:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Yah I'm removing it. Kala jan € ₣ 18:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Genesis (2009), is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
TJ
Spyke
21:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Whats Up? Colts 1 17:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Kalajan i'm tired of you gettin all own up in my business, Colt i'll reply to u later since i've got to deal with this know-it-all K Benton Tigers 21:29, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Okay you know tht I would probably report you for this, buut I won't because ur new. and unexperenced, hey, if you want to be uncivil Go and smash up a wall with a sledgehammer! Just Kick it out the shed. Kala jan € ₣ 14:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Genesis (2009), is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Yeah We Cool Hahah Colts 1 17:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the UBX! ₰imon KSK 20:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to
List of World Wrestling Entertainment alumni has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you.
Alansohn (
talk)
22:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
The WWE Alumni did not have any reliable sources so that is why I deleted it it was not vandilizim. Benton Tigers 00:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding the fake "you have no new messages" to Colts1 webpage. It's not necessary and continuing to replace it (as you've already done) may eventually be seen as harassment or vandalism. Hazardous Matt 17:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
I notice that you have been told above to stop adding this to User:Colts1's talkpage, yet you continued to do it. This is your one and only warning. Even though Colts1 is blocked indefinitely does not give you the right to harass him. You will be blocked for harassment if you readd the template. -- Smashville talk 02:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
What is the meaning of the account User:KingOreo? Please explain your actions immidiately. -- Deskana (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Sinofdreams ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm Not A Sock I want To See The Reason I'm A Sock And The Prof That I'm A Sock
Decline reason:
Very obvious checkuser-verified abuse of multiple accounts. -- jpgordon ∇∆∇∆ 17:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Why are you blocked? Shall I unblock you? How? Fiddler96 ( talk) 16:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Regarding The Block Against Sin I Can Assure You He Is not Colts1 Trust Me I Know Sinofdreams And I Will Get Him To Appeal The Block Weaver2009 ( talk) 01:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
read the block thing on the talk page
Weaver2009 (
talk)
02:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)