![]() |
Hi Sindh Sarkar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
First 100 days of Imran Khan's prime ministership without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
10:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Materialscientist: I thought WP:COPYWITHIN was a thing. The content was copy-pasted w/o attribution from Asia Bibi blasphemy case. Further, as stated in my edit summary it is undue in the said article because it was a court case that had little to do with the govt's actions and it's first 100 day performance. - Sindh Sarkar ( talk) 11:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Sindh Sarkar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC) |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from
First 100 days of Imran Khan's prime ministership without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!
Materialscientist (
talk)
10:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Materialscientist: I thought WP:COPYWITHIN was a thing. The content was copy-pasted w/o attribution from Asia Bibi blasphemy case. Further, as stated in my edit summary it is undue in the said article because it was a court case that had little to do with the govt's actions and it's first 100 day performance. - Sindh Sarkar ( talk) 11:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)