![]() |
Hi SiliconValley925! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Barakzai dynasty, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
00:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Barakzai dynasty. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
00:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, SiliconValley925. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Mohammadzai, you may have a
conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the
conflict of interest guideline and
frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
{{
request edit}}
template);In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Last but not least: All contributors must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws (just as all contributors must respect copyright). The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive is valid throughout the European Union. In a German court decision in 2012 (that also relied on the directive) regarding Wikipedia: "The court held that when a company edits a Wikipedia article, the resulting text falsely creates the impression that the edit has no business-related purpose. By implication, the judges found that the average reader of Wikipedia articles expects to find objective and neutral information." That is a very very important condition, comparable to the FTC Guide" that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experience of a party other than the sponsoring advertiser”. This expectation by consumers of neutral information on Wikipedia, requires that companies not write "their" WP articles for PR/marketing purposes.
Editors who are compensated for their contributions should make the disclosure by placing the {{
connected contributor (paid)}}
template at the top of the talk page of affected articles and filling in the parameters. They should also supply this information as part of a list on their user page of all their paid contributions.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Afghan Hound. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
C.Fred (
talk)
00:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi SiliconValley925! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 17:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
C.Fred. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Barakzai dynasty, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
00:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Barakzai dynasty. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. —
C.Fred (
talk)
00:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, SiliconValley925. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Mohammadzai, you may have a
conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the
conflict of interest guideline and
frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
{{
request edit}}
template);In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Last but not least: All contributors must not contribute content that violates conflict of interest laws (just as all contributors must respect copyright). The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive is valid throughout the European Union. In a German court decision in 2012 (that also relied on the directive) regarding Wikipedia: "The court held that when a company edits a Wikipedia article, the resulting text falsely creates the impression that the edit has no business-related purpose. By implication, the judges found that the average reader of Wikipedia articles expects to find objective and neutral information." That is a very very important condition, comparable to the FTC Guide" that consumers are likely to believe reflects the opinions, beliefs, findings, or experience of a party other than the sponsoring advertiser”. This expectation by consumers of neutral information on Wikipedia, requires that companies not write "their" WP articles for PR/marketing purposes.
Editors who are compensated for their contributions should make the disclosure by placing the {{
connected contributor (paid)}}
template at the top of the talk page of affected articles and filling in the parameters. They should also supply this information as part of a list on their user page of all their paid contributions.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Afghan Hound. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
C.Fred (
talk)
00:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)