![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives
|
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 |
Shubinator, as I understand it (and correct me if I'm wrong), DYKHousekeepingBot should generate a new list when there has been a change in at least one template: a hook as newly become verified (given a tick), or has been unverified (tick superseded); a template has been approved or rejected, or a new hook has been transcluded or an existing hook has been moved to the special occasion holding area and has thus disappeared from view as far as the bot is concerned.
At the moment, it's 21:35 UTC. The bot last did an update at 18:33 (after a new template was transcluded at 18:31), but it also posted a "you forgot to transclude" message on someone's talk page at 21:04, so the bot is clearly still running.
However, at 19:53, Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest Yarrow (from October 3, the oldest hook) was given an AGF tick, but a new list hasn't been generated to reflect this change. Shouldn't it have been? Thanks for taking a look at this (or for correcting my misunderstanding). BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
FYI, DYKUpdateBot failed to perform the update scheduled for 08:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC). A manual update has been performed. Will try to keep an eye out in case the normal recovery code does not function as expected. -- Allen3 talk 10:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Shubinator, DYKHousekeepingBot last ran at 18:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC), so it's been inactive for about 11 hours now. DYKUpdateBot seems to be fine, as it just posted the two-hour warning (no queue is ready at the moment) to WT:DYK.
Please encourage the DYKHousekeepingBot to resume its regular reports as soon as you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
FYI, DYKUpdateBot missed the update scheduled for 16:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC). A manual update has been performed. Will try to check the next update (currently scheduled for 01:15 (UTC)) in case the recovery code does not function normally. -- Allen3 talk 17:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Looks like another set of restarts may be needed. DYKHousekeepingBot has not updated Wikipedia:Did you know/DYK hook count in over 8 hours. DYKUpdateBot in turn failed to issue a warning about all the queues being empty as it usually does when the queues are empty 2 hours before a scheduled update. It does appear some effort is being made to correct issues on the toolservers. [1] Hopefully things will improve soon. -- Allen3 talk 01:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I received a message that a step is missing in Template:Did you know nominations/Magnificat (Rutter), however, it appeared a while ago. Can the bot address the one who didn't close it? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
|passed=yes
was not done when closing it. I've now correctly closed the nomination. I don't know if the bot should be expected to handle such errors.
MANdARAX •
XAЯAbИAM
09:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
FYI, Shubinator: It looks like DYKUpdateBot ( talk · contribs) has stopped working. :-( -- PFHLai ( talk) 04:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Yoshimi Tanigawa - Ikamaryuu shikibouchou.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives
|
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 |
Shubinator, as I understand it (and correct me if I'm wrong), DYKHousekeepingBot should generate a new list when there has been a change in at least one template: a hook as newly become verified (given a tick), or has been unverified (tick superseded); a template has been approved or rejected, or a new hook has been transcluded or an existing hook has been moved to the special occasion holding area and has thus disappeared from view as far as the bot is concerned.
At the moment, it's 21:35 UTC. The bot last did an update at 18:33 (after a new template was transcluded at 18:31), but it also posted a "you forgot to transclude" message on someone's talk page at 21:04, so the bot is clearly still running.
However, at 19:53, Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest Yarrow (from October 3, the oldest hook) was given an AGF tick, but a new list hasn't been generated to reflect this change. Shouldn't it have been? Thanks for taking a look at this (or for correcting my misunderstanding). BlueMoonset ( talk) 22:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
FYI, DYKUpdateBot failed to perform the update scheduled for 08:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC). A manual update has been performed. Will try to keep an eye out in case the normal recovery code does not function as expected. -- Allen3 talk 10:49, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Shubinator, DYKHousekeepingBot last ran at 18:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC), so it's been inactive for about 11 hours now. DYKUpdateBot seems to be fine, as it just posted the two-hour warning (no queue is ready at the moment) to WT:DYK.
Please encourage the DYKHousekeepingBot to resume its regular reports as soon as you can. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
FYI, DYKUpdateBot missed the update scheduled for 16:00, 3 February 2014 (UTC). A manual update has been performed. Will try to check the next update (currently scheduled for 01:15 (UTC)) in case the recovery code does not function normally. -- Allen3 talk 17:46, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Looks like another set of restarts may be needed. DYKHousekeepingBot has not updated Wikipedia:Did you know/DYK hook count in over 8 hours. DYKUpdateBot in turn failed to issue a warning about all the queues being empty as it usually does when the queues are empty 2 hours before a scheduled update. It does appear some effort is being made to correct issues on the toolservers. [1] Hopefully things will improve soon. -- Allen3 talk 01:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
I received a message that a step is missing in Template:Did you know nominations/Magnificat (Rutter), however, it appeared a while ago. Can the bot address the one who didn't close it? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
|passed=yes
was not done when closing it. I've now correctly closed the nomination. I don't know if the bot should be expected to handle such errors.
MANdARAX •
XAЯAbИAM
09:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
FYI, Shubinator: It looks like DYKUpdateBot ( talk · contribs) has stopped working. :-( -- PFHLai ( talk) 04:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Yoshimi Tanigawa - Ikamaryuu shikibouchou.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:39, 22 February 2014 (UTC)