|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
List of plants used in herbalism has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
List of plants used in herbalism was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.isca.in/IJSS/v6i5.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
12:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to
Medicinal plants have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
Medicinal plants was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.isca.in/IJSS/v6i5.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Please read Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Please note that disambiguation pages like Home garden are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
- The introductory link should be a short sentence fragment that contains the term being disambiguated bold
- Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
- Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
- Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
- Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
- Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
- Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 02:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Shemakumara. We
welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.
Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.
Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia ( WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{ requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
MrOllie ( talk) 13:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Shemakumara, I've just reverted a series of edits in which you added links to what appear to be your own publications. I make no judgement on their quality - they may well be helpful additions, but you should not be adding them yourself, If you think that one of your papers would make a useful addition to an article, then propose it on the article's talk page. I have added links to a few of my own papers to articles, but only after discussing this with other editors first - that is how you should proceed. Mikenorton ( talk) 12:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While
objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.
MrOllie (
talk)
15:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing.
MrOllie (
talk)
11:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
MrOllie and
Mikenorton and others have previously warned you about this.
Biogeographist (
talk)
17:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
List of plants used in herbalism has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
List of plants used in herbalism was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.isca.in/IJSS/v6i5.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
12:56, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to
Medicinal plants have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page, or take a look at our
guidelines about links.
Your edit
here to
Medicinal plants was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our
reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (
http://www.isca.in/IJSS/v6i5.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
13:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Please read Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 22:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Please note that disambiguation pages like Home garden are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:
- The introductory link should be a short sentence fragment that contains the term being disambiguated bold
- Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
- Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
- Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
- Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
- Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
- Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).
Thank you. Leschnei ( talk) 02:08, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Shemakumara. We
welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.
Scientific articles should mainly reference review articles to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.
Editing in this way is also a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia ( WP:REFSPAM) and the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.
Finally, please be aware that the editing community highly values expert contributors – please see WP:EXPERT. I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new thread on the article talk page and add {{ requestedit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.
MrOllie ( talk) 13:42, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Shemakumara, I've just reverted a series of edits in which you added links to what appear to be your own publications. I make no judgement on their quality - they may well be helpful additions, but you should not be adding them yourself, If you think that one of your papers would make a useful addition to an article, then propose it on the article's talk page. I have added links to a few of my own papers to articles, but only after discussing this with other editors first - that is how you should proceed. Mikenorton ( talk) 12:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While
objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not
a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.
MrOllie (
talk)
15:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing.
MrOllie (
talk)
11:50, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
MrOllie and
Mikenorton and others have previously warned you about this.
Biogeographist (
talk)
17:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)