{{ helpme}} Please move User:Shaz0t/sandbox to An Droichead Beag.
It's a stub; it's notable, it has refs, I know what I'm doing and - forgive me please - I don't wanna wait weeks for 'articles for creation'.
Stub to be expanded; plenty of RS.
Thx. Shaz0t ( talk) 21:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Hey Shaz. Just wanted to let you know I created some additional Request Edit Templates a while back. Not that it's important they're used (I don't mean to be a pest about it), but there are now decline and accept templates similar to AfC if you find them handy. For example, there's {{request edit|D|ADV}} to decline promotional requests. Corporate 00:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Shaz0t. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! — ΛΧΣ 21™ 00:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
You are new, so let me help you understand. I am commenting at ANI, not because I am bored, but because I am an administrator with over 6 years of editing and dispute mediation experience and a desire to resolve the issue. ANI stands for "Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents". Note the possessive in "Administrator's" It is my job to be there and help diffuse and solve problems. Admins are selected to do exactly this, by the community. My polite but direct comment to you was because I have no desire in egging the parties on, and instead solving the problem. If needed, I will block editors, but my goal is always to find a solution that doesn't require blocking. Antagonizing a situation makes others act out as well, and can lead to editors themselves getting blocked. If you have information that is helpful, it is welcome, but ANI is an admin board, and not the place to just pop off comments. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Shaz0t! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You want to tell us what your previous account was? Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Did you actually read it?
"I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons." [1]
Shaz0t ( talk) 22:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Actually, I'm strongly opposed to the use of multiple accounts, and think they are inherently disruptive. I'm inclined to think Beyond My Ken is right, but, without evidence, there's nothing for anyone to act on. No, stating the obvious doesn't constitute a personal attack: you have used other accounts and your edits do seem to have some kind of dispute-edged flavour to them. If policy permitted, I'd block for the use of an alternate account. It doesn't, so, unless someone can point to an actual sockmaster, you are safe from that. That doesn't mean that I, or anyone else, approves of your use of this account.— Kww( talk) 01:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Reversions reverted again and reported again.
A) I am not new to Wikipedia I have been editing articles for over ten years now.
B) I am an accomplished music and entertainment author currently 72 years old and recently celebrated by 50th year in the field.
C) I find it effronterous to come back after working on a page for two days straight to find it all erased by people who were either A) not born when the events took place or B) not having been to either one or both as I have been.
D) Numerous administrative forums within Wikipedia state that any article heretofore deemed as dry and stodgy-sounding may be rewritten into a more `chatty' style in order to appeal to a wider audience.
The page in question has already been reported to the administration for Page Protection as well as under Edit Wars.
Further interference will also be reverted and reported as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.131.182.86 ( talk) 01:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I have seen the big thread at ANI and I would like to know more about you. I am not asking you to reveal your previous identity; it is personal information, in my opinion. I just have seen you for some days and would like to talk to you, if you let me. Regards. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 02:09, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
You blanked almost 30k worth of material, at least some of which appears to be referenced. This is not wise, and I have reverted your edit. Please be more discriminating in your removal of material. Ladyof Shalott 03:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. — Kww( talk) 04:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I would suggest you email a trusted admin to confirm with them that your old account was not blocked or left under a cloud or any of that. That would be the best method to rectifying this.
Silver
seren
C
04:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shaz0t for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tijfo098 ( talk) 09:19, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
{{ helpme}} Please move User:Shaz0t/sandbox to An Droichead Beag.
It's a stub; it's notable, it has refs, I know what I'm doing and - forgive me please - I don't wanna wait weeks for 'articles for creation'.
Stub to be expanded; plenty of RS.
Thx. Shaz0t ( talk) 21:27, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Hey Shaz. Just wanted to let you know I created some additional Request Edit Templates a while back. Not that it's important they're used (I don't mean to be a pest about it), but there are now decline and accept templates similar to AfC if you find them handy. For example, there's {{request edit|D|ADV}} to decline promotional requests. Corporate 00:41, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Shaz0t. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{ helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! — ΛΧΣ 21™ 00:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
You are new, so let me help you understand. I am commenting at ANI, not because I am bored, but because I am an administrator with over 6 years of editing and dispute mediation experience and a desire to resolve the issue. ANI stands for "Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents". Note the possessive in "Administrator's" It is my job to be there and help diffuse and solve problems. Admins are selected to do exactly this, by the community. My polite but direct comment to you was because I have no desire in egging the parties on, and instead solving the problem. If needed, I will block editors, but my goal is always to find a solution that doesn't require blocking. Antagonizing a situation makes others act out as well, and can lead to editors themselves getting blocked. If you have information that is helpful, it is welcome, but ANI is an admin board, and not the place to just pop off comments. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 01:15, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Shaz0t! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You want to tell us what your previous account was? Beyond My Ken ( talk) 22:30, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Did you actually read it?
"I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons." [1]
Shaz0t ( talk) 22:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Actually, I'm strongly opposed to the use of multiple accounts, and think they are inherently disruptive. I'm inclined to think Beyond My Ken is right, but, without evidence, there's nothing for anyone to act on. No, stating the obvious doesn't constitute a personal attack: you have used other accounts and your edits do seem to have some kind of dispute-edged flavour to them. If policy permitted, I'd block for the use of an alternate account. It doesn't, so, unless someone can point to an actual sockmaster, you are safe from that. That doesn't mean that I, or anyone else, approves of your use of this account.— Kww( talk) 01:13, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Reversions reverted again and reported again.
A) I am not new to Wikipedia I have been editing articles for over ten years now.
B) I am an accomplished music and entertainment author currently 72 years old and recently celebrated by 50th year in the field.
C) I find it effronterous to come back after working on a page for two days straight to find it all erased by people who were either A) not born when the events took place or B) not having been to either one or both as I have been.
D) Numerous administrative forums within Wikipedia state that any article heretofore deemed as dry and stodgy-sounding may be rewritten into a more `chatty' style in order to appeal to a wider audience.
The page in question has already been reported to the administration for Page Protection as well as under Edit Wars.
Further interference will also be reverted and reported as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.131.182.86 ( talk) 01:38, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I have seen the big thread at ANI and I would like to know more about you. I am not asking you to reveal your previous identity; it is personal information, in my opinion. I just have seen you for some days and would like to talk to you, if you let me. Regards. — Ṟ Ṉ™ 02:09, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
You blanked almost 30k worth of material, at least some of which appears to be referenced. This is not wise, and I have reverted your edit. Please be more discriminating in your removal of material. Ladyof Shalott 03:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. — Kww( talk) 04:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
I would suggest you email a trusted admin to confirm with them that your old account was not blocked or left under a cloud or any of that. That would be the best method to rectifying this.
Silver
seren
C
04:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shaz0t for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tijfo098 ( talk) 09:19, 21 November 2012 (UTC)