Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from File:Navid Faridi 12.jpg. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stylez995 ( talk) 18:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Esteghlal Kish F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
22:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Navid-Faridi.jpeg, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Shams pasargad 2000,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
MatthewVanitas (
talk)
23:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
|
Your addition to Fluoride has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 20:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Please don't move this page to another title. A user talk page needs to be kept in place, to maintain a record of the history of messages to the editor. Also, it is difficult to think of a legitimate reason for moving page to a whole succession of different places, as you did. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Please state what other accounts you have used. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Khabargozari mehr (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
20:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC) |
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
2cond chance: Me and my sister khabargozarimeh We're just a month writing artickle in wikipedia sometime she wrote artickle sometime i wrote ( one artickle)for finishing that.. We are use with our username and pasword privecy.please back our user name unblock for us. thanks with best regard . Dr. safari General dentist. Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 08:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Same soprt of copyright violations as the other account and both accounts have edited around articles on Navid Faridi, including both participating in the deletion review. Sorry, the overlap here is almost total. Clear violation of WP:SOCK. I doubt the claim there are two separate people here but even if there are, that'd be a violation of WP:MEAT. Yamla ( talk) 14:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello . I read all the rules relating to sockpuppet.Sockpuppe I said that is a misunderstanding. My sister and I both work together on an edit be finish run correctly. For each edition we have a separate user name in the activity had an edit. However, i am not sockppet,This is a misunderstanding. Please enabled. My username shams pasargad 2000. Dr. Safari with Best regards & thanks Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. MER-C 04:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello.I write everything truth In the top lines, Its sure misunderestanding , But I read and learned all the rules in wikipedia,Please release me to write. I'm interested in here that I write , thanks alot and help me please Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 16:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have not demonstrated sufficient competency in written English for contributing constructively. I am deeply concerned that you will compensate for this by copying text from arbitrary websites into Wikipedia in violation of the copyright policy. MER-C 04:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ALL pictures of this website are free to use for news,websites and publications.That is not compatible with Wikipedia license. Wikipedia (and Wikimedia Commons) only accepts files that are free to be used for any purpose, including commercial purposes (see here: WP:NONCOM). Also, at the bottom of the said page, there is a message that reads
© 2016 Navid Faridi. All Rights Reserved.This is in total contradiction. Images are at the same time free to use and all rights are reserved. That's not possible. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Well, I see a few ways we can go about this. User:MER-C seems to have reviewed your unblock request a few times, and his concern seems fairly legitimate. Although you can try to address the concerns from the previous unblock request revision in another one, I would recommend you focus on a wiki in your native language instead of the English Wikipedia. See List of Wikipedias. -- JustBerry ( talk) 17:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I tried my best to improve my language and written skills and will countinue more. I was not familier with wiki rules, but since then i read alot and i hope will be better and better. I am so intrested in writting and editting in wikipedia and i would like to ask for one more chance.Thanks a lot
Decline reason:
These repeated unblock requests don't help your case, and they don't explain why you would not use a Wikipedia in your own language. You don't appear to have the competence needed for the English Wikipedia. Since this is now your fourth unblock request and we aren't getting anywhere, I am disabling your talk page. Use WP:UTRS for any further appeals. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 13:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 18:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Shams pasargad 2000! I see you have run into many problems such as being blocked, which is very unfortunate. Regardless, with a new perspective on the situation, I would also like to put in my two cents. To clarify, from what I have seen thus far, you have violated multiple Wikipedia policies in the past. These include copyright issues and WP:NPOV which I assume has led you to yet another violation --- that of the sockpuppet and abusing of multiple accounts. I understand that you are learning from your mistakes and working to improve your standards as a Wikipedia editor, but in accordance with Wikimedia policy, it has been YOUR OBLIGATION to document yourself and observe said Wikipedia policies BEFORE making such edits that would normally result in a block. Seeing as how you have not followed through with that, it is only the 'right' consequence for you to have been blocked. While this is unfortunate, I would, as has been remarked, recommend you transfer to your native language's Wikipedia, where you can begin partially "fresh" and have a decent chance at being bold in your edits but not receiving negative consequences.-- Whatshouldichoose ( talk) 03:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from File:Navid Faridi 12.jpg. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stylez995 ( talk) 18:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
The article Esteghlal Kish F.C. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
22:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Navid-Faridi.jpeg, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. — MRD2014 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Shams pasargad 2000,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
MatthewVanitas (
talk)
23:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
|
Your addition to Fluoride has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drchriswilliams ( talk) 20:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Please don't move this page to another title. A user talk page needs to be kept in place, to maintain a record of the history of messages to the editor. Also, it is difficult to think of a legitimate reason for moving page to a whole succession of different places, as you did. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Please state what other accounts you have used. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 18:44, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Khabargozari mehr (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Vanjagenije
(talk)
20:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC) |
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
2cond chance: Me and my sister khabargozarimeh We're just a month writing artickle in wikipedia sometime she wrote artickle sometime i wrote ( one artickle)for finishing that.. We are use with our username and pasword privecy.please back our user name unblock for us. thanks with best regard . Dr. safari General dentist. Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 08:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Same soprt of copyright violations as the other account and both accounts have edited around articles on Navid Faridi, including both participating in the deletion review. Sorry, the overlap here is almost total. Clear violation of WP:SOCK. I doubt the claim there are two separate people here but even if there are, that'd be a violation of WP:MEAT. Yamla ( talk) 14:11, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello . I read all the rules relating to sockpuppet.Sockpuppe I said that is a misunderstanding. My sister and I both work together on an edit be finish run correctly. For each edition we have a separate user name in the activity had an edit. However, i am not sockppet,This is a misunderstanding. Please enabled. My username shams pasargad 2000. Dr. Safari with Best regards & thanks Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 10:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
See below. MER-C 04:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello.I write everything truth In the top lines, Its sure misunderestanding , But I read and learned all the rules in wikipedia,Please release me to write. I'm interested in here that I write , thanks alot and help me please Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 16:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have not demonstrated sufficient competency in written English for contributing constructively. I am deeply concerned that you will compensate for this by copying text from arbitrary websites into Wikipedia in violation of the copyright policy. MER-C 04:03, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ALL pictures of this website are free to use for news,websites and publications.That is not compatible with Wikipedia license. Wikipedia (and Wikimedia Commons) only accepts files that are free to be used for any purpose, including commercial purposes (see here: WP:NONCOM). Also, at the bottom of the said page, there is a message that reads
© 2016 Navid Faridi. All Rights Reserved.This is in total contradiction. Images are at the same time free to use and all rights are reserved. That's not possible. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Well, I see a few ways we can go about this. User:MER-C seems to have reviewed your unblock request a few times, and his concern seems fairly legitimate. Although you can try to address the concerns from the previous unblock request revision in another one, I would recommend you focus on a wiki in your native language instead of the English Wikipedia. See List of Wikipedias. -- JustBerry ( talk) 17:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Shams pasargad 2000 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I tried my best to improve my language and written skills and will countinue more. I was not familier with wiki rules, but since then i read alot and i hope will be better and better. I am so intrested in writting and editting in wikipedia and i would like to ask for one more chance.Thanks a lot
Decline reason:
These repeated unblock requests don't help your case, and they don't explain why you would not use a Wikipedia in your own language. You don't appear to have the competence needed for the English Wikipedia. Since this is now your fourth unblock request and we aren't getting anywhere, I am disabling your talk page. Use WP:UTRS for any further appeals. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 13:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shams pasargad 2000 ( talk) 18:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Shams pasargad 2000! I see you have run into many problems such as being blocked, which is very unfortunate. Regardless, with a new perspective on the situation, I would also like to put in my two cents. To clarify, from what I have seen thus far, you have violated multiple Wikipedia policies in the past. These include copyright issues and WP:NPOV which I assume has led you to yet another violation --- that of the sockpuppet and abusing of multiple accounts. I understand that you are learning from your mistakes and working to improve your standards as a Wikipedia editor, but in accordance with Wikimedia policy, it has been YOUR OBLIGATION to document yourself and observe said Wikipedia policies BEFORE making such edits that would normally result in a block. Seeing as how you have not followed through with that, it is only the 'right' consequence for you to have been blocked. While this is unfortunate, I would, as has been remarked, recommend you transfer to your native language's Wikipedia, where you can begin partially "fresh" and have a decent chance at being bold in your edits but not receiving negative consequences.-- Whatshouldichoose ( talk) 03:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)