![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Dear Shadowowl,
Could you please review the Oh (North Korean defector) article and give some more feedback?
Kind Regards,
( Bleibloem ( talk) 09:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)).
Hello, Shadowowl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~ Kvng ( talk) 17:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Anyone who does much work in NPP or AFC will make errors. I suspect that for good reviewers 2% to 5% is about the usual rate, and I don't think anyone can really do better than 1%. I make errors, I think about 2% in both processes, people tell me about some of them. Some are just slips of the mouse i selecting from the list of reasons. There similarly seem to be a few errors in a few of your recent AfC reviews at about the same rate as mine:
DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Shadowowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Greece Debt Free".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 16:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Dylanwhite56 ( talk) 05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, cleaned up article and requesting re-review. Thanks.
Dylanwhite56 (
talk)
05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shadowowl I've made corrections to wikipedia article and removed WP:CITEKILL from /info/en/?search=Draft:Rob_Niter Are you able to review? Thank you! Dylanwhite56 ( talk) 06:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shadowowl,
I noticed that you have been moving a lot of articles from the mainspace to draft space. It looks like these moves are automated (not sure if they are intentional per-article?). Although in effect it's a "soft deletion" process, there is no deletion rationale. While for one-line articles with just one contributor (usually a new user), there is a policy-based rationale for making such moves, this is not the case for more established articles such as Bavli—which has been edited by a number of established editors, and contains real content. Please note that having no sources isn't in itself a reason for moving an article to AFC or deleting it, especially when there is no dispute about the subject matter's notability. If this move was completely automated (no input from you), it may be worth tweaking the script's criteria.
I have reverted the move, but am afraid that the script might have made more changes that I am not aware of, that have not been reverted.
Cheers, Ynhockey ( Talk) 09:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Phantasmagoria65 ( talk) 08:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm confused about why my article has been declined due to inadequately reliable sources? The series has been officially announced in multiple entertainment publications and websites-- including the three cited in my original article: Daily Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Deadline Hollywood. I would appreciate your reconsideration and/or explanation. Thanks.
![]() |
Hello, Shadowowl!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
EROS
message
13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello,
I am working on an article for Johnny Douglas (record producer) and it was recently declined due to being too dependent on Disogs. I have found many other sources for proof of his notability including articles in billboard and other music magazines. Many of The songs he has written, produced, composed, remixed etc have charted. He has nominated for an notable award with his work for George Michael. All of this has also been cited. I understand wikipedia discogs is not considered a reliable source however, due to his work being mostly of that of the producer and composer, the majority of his proof his found in the liner notes of cds & albums, hence the discogs references. If I remove these references would the article be approved with his billboard magazine, chart information, award information and the artist websites where he is mentioned as working on their work? I do believe this proves notability on its own based on what i have read about music notability. Or is there a way to cite the albums without using discogs? Thank for your help and reviewing the article!
Ashlee444 (
talk)
16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Ashlee444
Ashlee444 (
talk)
16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
talk to !dave 16:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Thanks for creating St. Mary's church (Sønderborg), Shadowowl!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've linked to the Danish-language Wikipedia article.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood ( talk) 22:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for approving my draft article. – Illegitimate Barrister ( talk • contribs), 17:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC) |
They are all actively being worked on. Abyssal ( talk) 16:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 08:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 08:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Hi there, Thanks for your review. I think I need your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hossein.kh.nejad ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Added more notable references. Deleted Youtube as a reference. Cityloop ( talk) 12:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
• Gene93k ( talk) 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 06:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)The draft "Thomas Kuzhinapurath" is based on the reliable sources. See, "Encyclopedia of South Indian Literature" ISBN 978-81-261-3740-4 ( https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Encyclopaedia_Of_South_Indian_Literature.html?id=t6QpAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y). Pages 268-270 give a rather long account of the life and literary contributions of Thomas Kuzhinapurath.Kindly search Kuzhinapurath within the above said encyclopedia. ( https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8qQpAQAAIAAJ&dq=9788126137404&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Kuzhinapurath). More over the citations from you tube are programmes of the famous TV channels in India Doordarsan, Karali People.
You just depend on the reliable sources and approve the article please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.76.82 ( talk) 11:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC) The so-called unreliable sources are removed and reliable sources are added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.76.82 ( talk) 12:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Shadowowl!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
EROS
message
10:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
|
I have added two citation to the head. I'm afraid I had not appreciated that it was necessary for the head to be sourced when this was a summary of the body of the article which was well documented with citations.
I'm not sure that I understand the criticism of containing promotional words. I have made the following change which may help. The term "the Gross Process" was widely used in the 1950's and 60's, when it was the process was thought likely to become widely adopted.
This is no longer the case for both technical and economic reasons; I have therefore changed it to "the mono-chloride process".
DavidGSDavies ( talk) 10:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Derek Williams (musician)
The Discogs copyright issue arose because I supplied Dr Williams with a draft of my opening introduction for him to verify its accuracy, which he then paraphrased and submitted to Discogs, without realising this would infringe copyright. I am the sole author of the material. Dr Williams has now arranged for this to be removed, so the only copy should now be that on Wikipedia.
Chrisdevelop ( talk) 15:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Shadowowl,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether NGC 3545B should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 3545B .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Lithopsian ( talk) 18:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Långträsk, Shadowowl!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for all your hard work creating articles!
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 18:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, As for your tagging of Menashiyas: I see the Hebrew version cites quite a few sources, perhaps it is an idea to ask for translation from the he.wp first, before deleting the article? Huldra ( talk) 22:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Tunnskär, Shadowowl!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add your sources.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 16:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thsmi002 ( talk) 01:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC){{SAFESUBST:Void|
Thank you for you comment, It helps me improve article with reliable sources as you noted. Please review now.
Dreamer14513181 ( talk) 21:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Just got your feedback on the draft...what part of the references doesn't match up for you? I included plenty of references where they were needed.-- DisneyMetalhead ( talk) 05:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Vexations ( talk) 15:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Sir I thank you for pointing out the non-reliable sources from my [ [2]]. By your help I have corrected it now so I request you to please review it. Thank You in Advance Regards, Don.chaudhry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don.chaudhry ( talk • contribs) 10:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Shadowowl!
Thank you for reviewing my article on the artist Andrei Rabodzeenko. I read your reasons for rejecting the article: that it "reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article." I would be grateful for a little more specific direction as to what language has that character, as I understand the NPOV policy and tried to use objective language.
Also, your comment says that the article should "refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources." But the article does have four inline citations to external sources (reviews of exhibits), as well as a list of additional third-party press about this artist. So again, I thought that I had observed Wikipedia guidelines, and substantiated the objective significance of this subject.
I look forward to your response and appreciate your guidance.
Sincerely, Veet Nisha ( talk) 22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Veet Nisha (
talk)
22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 19:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Diyal Sir I appreciate your review and the comments on my draft so I have improved it accordingly to you comment so I request you to re review it Thanks Don.chaudhry Don.chaudhry ( talk) 06:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 15:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 04:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Thanks for your review. You said: "Nothing really changed since last review. Remove citation 6 till 14 , 16 till 22, 24 till 30 and 32 and resubmit."
I have removed most of those. I left in a couple that provide the page number for a long quotation from the book. This seems appropriate to me but I can remove those if you prefer. I also edited for brevity in a couple of places.
Please let me know if we should make other changes.
Here's the link again... /info/en/?search=Draft:Against_The_Grain:_A_Deep_History_of_the_Earliest_States
Street.alex ( talk) 15:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 20:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've been trying to create a page on Theia, the singer, but it's just been declined because it says You Tube is not a reliable reference. It is only one of the references I supplied, and the link was to official music videos and many of them have more than 40,000 views, which clearly indicates they are from a reputable, established singer, which Theia is. Is this the only reason my submission was rejected? If I delete links to YOu Tube will that help? I don't know how to make the submission suitable? Please help.
PKiwi ( talk) 18:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
References have been flagged as un-verifiable. I beg to differ. We are talking about a World Bank Group publication here. What is more verifiable?
2A02:C7D:3E89:BE00:55C3:337C:AC36:9260 (
talk)
01:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
In response to reviewer comment: "Facebook isn't a reliable source.": The Facebook Live feed referenced is from the official Facebook page for BBC Technology News, which has over 500,000 followers. The reporter is Michelle Fleury, the BBC's New York business correspondent and a reporter for BBC World News. Fleury has covered American business and economics for more than 10 years. Please reconsider this as a reliable source.
Genbosmit ( talk) 15:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
203.115.97.156 ( talk) 04:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Shadowowl,
From the comment below yours (Draft:Origin Suite), the artist seems to not necessarily need a page. The album has numerous write ups to include a pretty important one by well known critic Brian Morton in the UK (in the Jazz Journal). If that is the only justification for not accepting the article, Bkissin had addressed it. It is truly unclear at this point what are the guidelines. The following is that Bkissin's comment...
Comment: I noticed a part of WP:NALBUM that contradicts my previous decline and comment.
An album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist or ensemble to merit a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline.
Yes, Draft:Noor ul Ain was nearly identical (a couple extra sentences but otherwise the same), so I G5'd it. Primefac ( talk) 15:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
So my question is you moved the article to draft space stating it needs citations which I did include in the references below so what else is needed more ever this is not a business place its a Temple or a place of worship.! Secondly I have added more sources in the references stating the importance pf the topic in media so can you help what Should I do so my article is moved to mainspace.??
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taransingh ( talk • contribs) 01:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your comment Will try to improve the article and let to know.! Thanks.!
HI, I could not submit my article I do not think it is an advert, it describes who we are and what we do. If you want I am more than happy to send you promotion material to distinguish. We use similar text for our press releases and it has never been an issue before. There are no prices or application links in the article. Can you please let me know which part of the text seemed to be an advert to you? I am more than happy to delete, but please give me some guidance, because me, and the whole team do not understand what is the problem with it.
Much obliged, Greg
195.99.35.77 ( talk) 15:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Through the program, we wish to set up an „innovation acceleration system” to find and support the potential of universities and research centres that have not been exploited. The program aims to develop innovative ideas into new enterprises and to accelerate local R&D products and services based on knowledge transfer models and university incubation methodologies. Moreover, it helps young innovators to develop their entrepreneurial skills and broaden their business knowledge.
This is entirely promotional. I do not know what your definition of promotional is, but this is a straight-up ad. And the whole article is like this. I suggest rewriting the article from scratch, and I didn't even mention this version has no references and will not be accepted anyway. Regards, -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Galobtter ( pingó mió) 17:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear sir I don't cleary understand why the page i submitted was declined. The only comment was youtube is not a reliable source. Agreed but i have also submitted numerous newspaper articles and direct websites links. Please resolve my issue as soon as possible so i can correct my mistakes because This means a lot to me and my family.
Thank you
Have a nice day
Angadjjm (
talk)
08:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
May I ask if you have noticed that amazon's website is only one of six references I posted about Jimmy Corinis' works?
Please inform me about,
Friendly, -- ΑΝώΔυΝος ( talk) 08:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
I am having a great deal of difficulty in amending my article on Albert Reuss to suit your requirements. I have been accused of infringing copyright by quoting from the article
https://artuk.org/discover/stories/albert-reuss-the-artist-as-refugee, and some of the wording which originates from that article has been deleted. In fact, I wrote the Art UK article myself, having been commissioned by Art UK to do so. Since that article and my Wikipedia article are about the same subject, it is inevitable that some of the content is similar or even identical. Following advice from one of your editors, I have been in touch with Art UK about releasing my text under an appropriate Creative Commons licence, and this has now been done, so I hope that will resolve the problem. I hope it will now be possible for you to restore most of the content which has been deleted, and accept my article.
However, should there be any further difficulty, I would also like to say that my work is thoroughly researched and my sources are provided. I have carried out a great deal of original research on this artist which has included obtaining copies of much of his lifetime's correspondence from an organisation in Vienna called "basis wien", as well as his biographical information from the Jewish archives in Vienna (IKG). I have also interviewed many people who knew him, and have been in correspondence with his niece in the USA. My intention in writing this article is to bring to the attention of the public the life and work of a much neglected but important artist.
SusanSoyinka ( talk) 11:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Sir i have removed the YouTube reference as you said . How much time will it take to the article to move to the main space.
Thanks you. Regards. Angad
Angadjjm ( talk) 14:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 17:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Hi actually the draft i made was notable but im just suck at referencing im quite new, the draft was notable as like Dr Disrect and Ninja (streamer).
I don't understand this. What is a major owner on his hometown? What is a esports juggernaut? What does Because of it TSM is joining the scene of an esport but could very soon mean? Are they already a esports team or will they become one very soon? -- » Shadowowl | talk 13:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Shadowowl! Thank you for your review. I totally understand the comment about Instagram, I deleted the link, even though it was an official instagram of one of the biggest VFX company in the world. That being said, the article is filled with articles from the biggest media in the entertainment industry as
IndieWire, most famous Award Academy in the world such as
VES, Oscars Qualifying festival such as
Sitges Film Festival and the biggest CGI software in the world as
Autodesk, and other - or reliable Data Base as
IMDb. Please let me know what could be added if needed.
WaltDisneyPixarFanGirl (
talk)
18:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Shadowowl!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^)
talk
20:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi, Shadowowl. Please could you respond to the comment I made on your talk page on 14 May. I first submitted my article about Albert Reuss in March, and I am hoping it can now be accepted. This has been a very stressful process.
SusanSoyinka (
talk)
14:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I have not touched it in years, and thought it had been deleted. I have just re-read it, and I thought it is ready to be submitted. what do you think? BorisG ( talk) 17:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 09:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Dear Shadowowl,
Could you please review the Oh (North Korean defector) article and give some more feedback?
Kind Regards,
( Bleibloem ( talk) 09:33, 26 November 2017 (UTC)).
Hello, Shadowowl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~ Kvng ( talk) 17:18, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Anyone who does much work in NPP or AFC will make errors. I suspect that for good reviewers 2% to 5% is about the usual rate, and I don't think anyone can really do better than 1%. I make errors, I think about 2% in both processes, people tell me about some of them. Some are just slips of the mouse i selecting from the list of reasons. There similarly seem to be a few errors in a few of your recent AfC reviews at about the same rate as mine:
DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Shadowowl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Greece Debt Free".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 16:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Dylanwhite56 ( talk) 05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi, cleaned up article and requesting re-review. Thanks.
Dylanwhite56 (
talk)
05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shadowowl I've made corrections to wikipedia article and removed WP:CITEKILL from /info/en/?search=Draft:Rob_Niter Are you able to review? Thank you! Dylanwhite56 ( talk) 06:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Shadowowl,
I noticed that you have been moving a lot of articles from the mainspace to draft space. It looks like these moves are automated (not sure if they are intentional per-article?). Although in effect it's a "soft deletion" process, there is no deletion rationale. While for one-line articles with just one contributor (usually a new user), there is a policy-based rationale for making such moves, this is not the case for more established articles such as Bavli—which has been edited by a number of established editors, and contains real content. Please note that having no sources isn't in itself a reason for moving an article to AFC or deleting it, especially when there is no dispute about the subject matter's notability. If this move was completely automated (no input from you), it may be worth tweaking the script's criteria.
I have reverted the move, but am afraid that the script might have made more changes that I am not aware of, that have not been reverted.
Cheers, Ynhockey ( Talk) 09:20, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Phantasmagoria65 ( talk) 08:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm confused about why my article has been declined due to inadequately reliable sources? The series has been officially announced in multiple entertainment publications and websites-- including the three cited in my original article: Daily Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, and Deadline Hollywood. I would appreciate your reconsideration and/or explanation. Thanks.
![]() |
Hello, Shadowowl!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
EROS
message
13:22, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello,
I am working on an article for Johnny Douglas (record producer) and it was recently declined due to being too dependent on Disogs. I have found many other sources for proof of his notability including articles in billboard and other music magazines. Many of The songs he has written, produced, composed, remixed etc have charted. He has nominated for an notable award with his work for George Michael. All of this has also been cited. I understand wikipedia discogs is not considered a reliable source however, due to his work being mostly of that of the producer and composer, the majority of his proof his found in the liner notes of cds & albums, hence the discogs references. If I remove these references would the article be approved with his billboard magazine, chart information, award information and the artist websites where he is mentioned as working on their work? I do believe this proves notability on its own based on what i have read about music notability. Or is there a way to cite the albums without using discogs? Thank for your help and reviewing the article!
Ashlee444 (
talk)
16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Ashlee444
Ashlee444 (
talk)
16:58, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
talk to !dave 16:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 21:01, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Thanks for creating St. Mary's church (Sønderborg), Shadowowl!
Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I've linked to the Danish-language Wikipedia article.
To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Blythwood ( talk) 22:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for approving my draft article. – Illegitimate Barrister ( talk • contribs), 17:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC) |
They are all actively being worked on. Abyssal ( talk) 16:09, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 08:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 08:32, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Hi there, Thanks for your review. I think I need your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hossein.kh.nejad ( talk • contribs) 13:50, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Added more notable references. Deleted Youtube as a reference. Cityloop ( talk) 12:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
• Gene93k ( talk) 03:00, 5 April 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 06:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)The draft "Thomas Kuzhinapurath" is based on the reliable sources. See, "Encyclopedia of South Indian Literature" ISBN 978-81-261-3740-4 ( https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Encyclopaedia_Of_South_Indian_Literature.html?id=t6QpAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y). Pages 268-270 give a rather long account of the life and literary contributions of Thomas Kuzhinapurath.Kindly search Kuzhinapurath within the above said encyclopedia. ( https://books.google.co.in/books?id=8qQpAQAAIAAJ&dq=9788126137404&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=Kuzhinapurath). More over the citations from you tube are programmes of the famous TV channels in India Doordarsan, Karali People.
You just depend on the reliable sources and approve the article please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.76.82 ( talk) 11:59, 7 April 2018 (UTC) The so-called unreliable sources are removed and reliable sources are added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.76.82 ( talk) 12:22, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Shadowowl!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
EROS
message
10:12, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
|
I have added two citation to the head. I'm afraid I had not appreciated that it was necessary for the head to be sourced when this was a summary of the body of the article which was well documented with citations.
I'm not sure that I understand the criticism of containing promotional words. I have made the following change which may help. The term "the Gross Process" was widely used in the 1950's and 60's, when it was the process was thought likely to become widely adopted.
This is no longer the case for both technical and economic reasons; I have therefore changed it to "the mono-chloride process".
DavidGSDavies ( talk) 10:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Draft:Derek Williams (musician)
The Discogs copyright issue arose because I supplied Dr Williams with a draft of my opening introduction for him to verify its accuracy, which he then paraphrased and submitted to Discogs, without realising this would infringe copyright. I am the sole author of the material. Dr Williams has now arranged for this to be removed, so the only copy should now be that on Wikipedia.
Chrisdevelop ( talk) 15:31, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Shadowowl,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether NGC 3545B should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 3545B .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Lithopsian ( talk) 18:29, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Långträsk, Shadowowl!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for all your hard work creating articles!
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 18:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, As for your tagging of Menashiyas: I see the Hebrew version cites quite a few sources, perhaps it is an idea to ask for translation from the he.wp first, before deleting the article? Huldra ( talk) 22:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Tunnskär, Shadowowl!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please add your sources.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn ( talk) 16:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Thsmi002 ( talk) 01:31, 15 April 2018 (UTC){{SAFESUBST:Void|
Thank you for you comment, It helps me improve article with reliable sources as you noted. Please review now.
Dreamer14513181 ( talk) 21:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)Just got your feedback on the draft...what part of the references doesn't match up for you? I included plenty of references where they were needed.-- DisneyMetalhead ( talk) 05:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Vexations ( talk) 15:34, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Sir I thank you for pointing out the non-reliable sources from my [ [2]]. By your help I have corrected it now so I request you to please review it. Thank You in Advance Regards, Don.chaudhry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don.chaudhry ( talk • contribs) 10:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Shadowowl!
Thank you for reviewing my article on the artist Andrei Rabodzeenko. I read your reasons for rejecting the article: that it "reads more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia article." I would be grateful for a little more specific direction as to what language has that character, as I understand the NPOV policy and tried to use objective language.
Also, your comment says that the article should "refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources." But the article does have four inline citations to external sources (reviews of exhibits), as well as a list of additional third-party press about this artist. So again, I thought that I had observed Wikipedia guidelines, and substantiated the objective significance of this subject.
I look forward to your response and appreciate your guidance.
Sincerely, Veet Nisha ( talk) 22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Veet Nisha (
talk)
22:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 19:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Diyal Sir I appreciate your review and the comments on my draft so I have improved it accordingly to you comment so I request you to re review it Thanks Don.chaudhry Don.chaudhry ( talk) 06:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 15:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 04:09, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Thanks for your review. You said: "Nothing really changed since last review. Remove citation 6 till 14 , 16 till 22, 24 till 30 and 32 and resubmit."
I have removed most of those. I left in a couple that provide the page number for a long quotation from the book. This seems appropriate to me but I can remove those if you prefer. I also edited for brevity in a couple of places.
Please let me know if we should make other changes.
Here's the link again... /info/en/?search=Draft:Against_The_Grain:_A_Deep_History_of_the_Earliest_States
Street.alex ( talk) 15:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 20:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I've been trying to create a page on Theia, the singer, but it's just been declined because it says You Tube is not a reliable reference. It is only one of the references I supplied, and the link was to official music videos and many of them have more than 40,000 views, which clearly indicates they are from a reputable, established singer, which Theia is. Is this the only reason my submission was rejected? If I delete links to YOu Tube will that help? I don't know how to make the submission suitable? Please help.
PKiwi ( talk) 18:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
References have been flagged as un-verifiable. I beg to differ. We are talking about a World Bank Group publication here. What is more verifiable?
2A02:C7D:3E89:BE00:55C3:337C:AC36:9260 (
talk)
01:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
In response to reviewer comment: "Facebook isn't a reliable source.": The Facebook Live feed referenced is from the official Facebook page for BBC Technology News, which has over 500,000 followers. The reporter is Michelle Fleury, the BBC's New York business correspondent and a reporter for BBC World News. Fleury has covered American business and economics for more than 10 years. Please reconsider this as a reliable source.
Genbosmit ( talk) 15:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
203.115.97.156 ( talk) 04:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Shadowowl,
From the comment below yours (Draft:Origin Suite), the artist seems to not necessarily need a page. The album has numerous write ups to include a pretty important one by well known critic Brian Morton in the UK (in the Jazz Journal). If that is the only justification for not accepting the article, Bkissin had addressed it. It is truly unclear at this point what are the guidelines. The following is that Bkissin's comment...
Comment: I noticed a part of WP:NALBUM that contradicts my previous decline and comment.
An album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist or ensemble to merit a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline.
Yes, Draft:Noor ul Ain was nearly identical (a couple extra sentences but otherwise the same), so I G5'd it. Primefac ( talk) 15:11, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
So my question is you moved the article to draft space stating it needs citations which I did include in the references below so what else is needed more ever this is not a business place its a Temple or a place of worship.! Secondly I have added more sources in the references stating the importance pf the topic in media so can you help what Should I do so my article is moved to mainspace.??
thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taransingh ( talk • contribs) 01:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your comment Will try to improve the article and let to know.! Thanks.!
HI, I could not submit my article I do not think it is an advert, it describes who we are and what we do. If you want I am more than happy to send you promotion material to distinguish. We use similar text for our press releases and it has never been an issue before. There are no prices or application links in the article. Can you please let me know which part of the text seemed to be an advert to you? I am more than happy to delete, but please give me some guidance, because me, and the whole team do not understand what is the problem with it.
Much obliged, Greg
195.99.35.77 ( talk) 15:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Through the program, we wish to set up an „innovation acceleration system” to find and support the potential of universities and research centres that have not been exploited. The program aims to develop innovative ideas into new enterprises and to accelerate local R&D products and services based on knowledge transfer models and university incubation methodologies. Moreover, it helps young innovators to develop their entrepreneurial skills and broaden their business knowledge.
This is entirely promotional. I do not know what your definition of promotional is, but this is a straight-up ad. And the whole article is like this. I suggest rewriting the article from scratch, and I didn't even mention this version has no references and will not be accepted anyway. Regards, -- » Shadowowl | talk 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Galobtter ( pingó mió) 17:42, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear sir I don't cleary understand why the page i submitted was declined. The only comment was youtube is not a reliable source. Agreed but i have also submitted numerous newspaper articles and direct websites links. Please resolve my issue as soon as possible so i can correct my mistakes because This means a lot to me and my family.
Thank you
Have a nice day
Angadjjm (
talk)
08:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
May I ask if you have noticed that amazon's website is only one of six references I posted about Jimmy Corinis' works?
Please inform me about,
Friendly, -- ΑΝώΔυΝος ( talk) 08:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
I am having a great deal of difficulty in amending my article on Albert Reuss to suit your requirements. I have been accused of infringing copyright by quoting from the article
https://artuk.org/discover/stories/albert-reuss-the-artist-as-refugee, and some of the wording which originates from that article has been deleted. In fact, I wrote the Art UK article myself, having been commissioned by Art UK to do so. Since that article and my Wikipedia article are about the same subject, it is inevitable that some of the content is similar or even identical. Following advice from one of your editors, I have been in touch with Art UK about releasing my text under an appropriate Creative Commons licence, and this has now been done, so I hope that will resolve the problem. I hope it will now be possible for you to restore most of the content which has been deleted, and accept my article.
However, should there be any further difficulty, I would also like to say that my work is thoroughly researched and my sources are provided. I have carried out a great deal of original research on this artist which has included obtaining copies of much of his lifetime's correspondence from an organisation in Vienna called "basis wien", as well as his biographical information from the Jewish archives in Vienna (IKG). I have also interviewed many people who knew him, and have been in correspondence with his niece in the USA. My intention in writing this article is to bring to the attention of the public the life and work of a much neglected but important artist.
SusanSoyinka ( talk) 11:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Sir i have removed the YouTube reference as you said . How much time will it take to the article to move to the main space.
Thanks you. Regards. Angad
Angadjjm ( talk) 14:31, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin ( talk) 17:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Hi actually the draft i made was notable but im just suck at referencing im quite new, the draft was notable as like Dr Disrect and Ninja (streamer).
I don't understand this. What is a major owner on his hometown? What is a esports juggernaut? What does Because of it TSM is joining the scene of an esport but could very soon mean? Are they already a esports team or will they become one very soon? -- » Shadowowl | talk 13:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Shadowowl! Thank you for your review. I totally understand the comment about Instagram, I deleted the link, even though it was an official instagram of one of the biggest VFX company in the world. That being said, the article is filled with articles from the biggest media in the entertainment industry as
IndieWire, most famous Award Academy in the world such as
VES, Oscars Qualifying festival such as
Sitges Film Festival and the biggest CGI software in the world as
Autodesk, and other - or reliable Data Base as
IMDb. Please let me know what could be added if needed.
WaltDisneyPixarFanGirl (
talk)
18:52, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Shadowowl!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Drewmutt (^ᴥ^)
talk
20:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi, Shadowowl. Please could you respond to the comment I made on your talk page on 14 May. I first submitted my article about Albert Reuss in March, and I am hoping it can now be accepted. This has been a very stressful process.
SusanSoyinka (
talk)
14:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. I have not touched it in years, and thought it had been deleted. I have just re-read it, and I thought it is ready to be submitted. what do you think? BorisG ( talk) 17:11, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 09:06, 19 May 2018 (UTC)