You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (
talk)
04:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯
talk
02:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Steve Nash, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per
MOS:GEOCOMMA, a location with multiple levels like "Johannesburg, South Africa" should be followed by a comma. —
Bagumba (
talk)
15:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Good eye on your Peyton Manning edits! Thanks for the good work. Red Director ( talk) 14:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to make you aware that when I am updating references that you have made some minor changes. Some of those changes are accidentally being reverted because the page version I am on while doing time-consuming edits do not keep those changes. I wanted you to know that I am not reverting those on purpose. Red Director ( talk) 20:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
NoACEMM}}
I have blocked you for one month for violation of WP:LOUTSOCK, disruptive editing, and failure to communicate. See WP:GAB if you wish to appeal this block.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Shadowbryan25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I did not know what I was doing was wrong, I was afraid that User:Thedarkknightli would empty the Category:Canadian philanthropists and overcategorize the Category:21st-century Canadian philanthropists, but I know now that I was a bit disruptive and should have voiced my concern earlier instead. Thank you. Shadowbryan25 ( talk) 15:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This only discusses part of the reason for the block, please address the logged out editing. 331dot ( talk) 15:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shadowbryan25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The same reason applies to the logged out editing. I was worried that the Category:Canadian philanthropists would become empty and the Category:21st-century Canadian philanthropists would become overcategorized. I never intended to cause any harm or edit war, and I realized I should have communicated my concerns instead. I will make sure that this will not happen again.
Decline reason:
Your block appears to have expired. SQL Query Me! 18:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shadowbryan25 ( talk) 16:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding categories to athlete pages that are related to where they play. These categories should only be used if they originally from the city they play(ed) in, like Felix Anudike-Uzomah or Kevin Huber. Let me put it to you this way, we wouldn't use a "Politicians from Washington DC" category for presidents or Vice Presidents (and none have been originally from D ), it doesn't make sense to do it for pro athletes.--Rockchalk 7 17 04:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
13:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.
HickoryOughtShirt?4 (
talk)
04:19, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯
talk
02:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Steve Nash, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per
MOS:GEOCOMMA, a location with multiple levels like "Johannesburg, South Africa" should be followed by a comma. —
Bagumba (
talk)
15:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Good eye on your Peyton Manning edits! Thanks for the good work. Red Director ( talk) 14:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I wanted to make you aware that when I am updating references that you have made some minor changes. Some of those changes are accidentally being reverted because the page version I am on while doing time-consuming edits do not keep those changes. I wanted you to know that I am not reverting those on purpose. Red Director ( talk) 20:38, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
{{
NoACEMM}}
I have blocked you for one month for violation of WP:LOUTSOCK, disruptive editing, and failure to communicate. See WP:GAB if you wish to appeal this block.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 13:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Shadowbryan25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I did not know what I was doing was wrong, I was afraid that User:Thedarkknightli would empty the Category:Canadian philanthropists and overcategorize the Category:21st-century Canadian philanthropists, but I know now that I was a bit disruptive and should have voiced my concern earlier instead. Thank you. Shadowbryan25 ( talk) 15:19, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This only discusses part of the reason for the block, please address the logged out editing. 331dot ( talk) 15:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shadowbryan25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The same reason applies to the logged out editing. I was worried that the Category:Canadian philanthropists would become empty and the Category:21st-century Canadian philanthropists would become overcategorized. I never intended to cause any harm or edit war, and I realized I should have communicated my concerns instead. I will make sure that this will not happen again.
Decline reason:
Your block appears to have expired. SQL Query Me! 18:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Shadowbryan25 ( talk) 16:40, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding categories to athlete pages that are related to where they play. These categories should only be used if they originally from the city they play(ed) in, like Felix Anudike-Uzomah or Kevin Huber. Let me put it to you this way, we wouldn't use a "Politicians from Washington DC" category for presidents or Vice Presidents (and none have been originally from D ), it doesn't make sense to do it for pro athletes.--Rockchalk 7 17 04:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
13:21, 15 August 2023 (UTC)