Please see the MOS:DR section of the MOS:BIOGRAPHY guideline on why, however much Steven Hassan has PhD and doctoral qualifications, that is not mentioned everywhere in the article. For that reason your recent additions to that article will be removed. Tx. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 15:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Sh fom. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Steven Hassan, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sh fom. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Steven Hassan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Sh fom. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sh fom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Longhair\
talk
20:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Sh fom you should address the above issues before continuing to edit the Steven Hassan page. Harold the Sheep ( talk) 06:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Sh fom, the very first edit you made to the Steven Hassan article had the edit summary "incorrect URL for my web site"
.
[1] How exactly was it 'your website' if you have no connection with Hassan?
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
15:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Sh fom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Sh fom ( talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As per below. Additionally, if you ever make another unblock request, please read and thoroughly understand WP:GAB. Your reason for contesting your block must go inside the unblock request. Yamla ( talk) 17:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
* Whenever my edits were reverted by any user especially User: Harold the sheep and others, i have followed proper procedure and tried initiating a polite conversation on their respective talk page. please feel free to verify
Nonetheless, based on above points, i feel that the block is no longer necessary because i have understood what i am blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead. In fact,all my dealing have been very polite and i will continue to keep it the same going forward as well. So based on above points kindly consider my appeal. Thank you Sh fom ( talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
"incorrect URL for my web site"". Because without such an explanation, any reasonable person could only either conclude that (a) you are Hassan, or someone working on his behalf, or (b) that the edit summary was false, and you were impersonating Hassan. There appear to be no other reasonable explanations for the use of the word 'my' in the edit summary. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 17:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
"cited reference has an error. I am not a clinical psychologist. I removed it."[3] What is your explanation? AndyTheGrump ( talk) 06:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Please see the MOS:DR section of the MOS:BIOGRAPHY guideline on why, however much Steven Hassan has PhD and doctoral qualifications, that is not mentioned everywhere in the article. For that reason your recent additions to that article will be removed. Tx. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 15:17, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Sh fom. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on the page
Steven Hassan, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 16:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sh fom. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Steven Hassan, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Sh fom. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sh fom|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Longhair\
talk
20:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Sh fom you should address the above issues before continuing to edit the Steven Hassan page. Harold the Sheep ( talk) 06:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Sh fom, the very first edit you made to the Steven Hassan article had the edit summary "incorrect URL for my web site"
.
[1] How exactly was it 'your website' if you have no connection with Hassan?
AndyTheGrump (
talk)
15:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
16:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Sh fom ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Sh fom ( talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As per below. Additionally, if you ever make another unblock request, please read and thoroughly understand WP:GAB. Your reason for contesting your block must go inside the unblock request. Yamla ( talk) 17:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
* Whenever my edits were reverted by any user especially User: Harold the sheep and others, i have followed proper procedure and tried initiating a polite conversation on their respective talk page. please feel free to verify
Nonetheless, based on above points, i feel that the block is no longer necessary because i have understood what i am blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead. In fact,all my dealing have been very polite and i will continue to keep it the same going forward as well. So based on above points kindly consider my appeal. Thank you Sh fom ( talk) 17:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
"incorrect URL for my web site"". Because without such an explanation, any reasonable person could only either conclude that (a) you are Hassan, or someone working on his behalf, or (b) that the edit summary was false, and you were impersonating Hassan. There appear to be no other reasonable explanations for the use of the word 'my' in the edit summary. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 17:10, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
"cited reference has an error. I am not a clinical psychologist. I removed it."[3] What is your explanation? AndyTheGrump ( talk) 06:22, 23 September 2023 (UTC)