![]() This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks. |
![]()
Until August 2007 —
September 2007 |
I don't see how it is not the appropriate venue to ask what the policy is on the situation. [1] I noted I did not want to name the person, but people immediately said details were needed or they couldn't answer. It is not an ANI issue as I have NOT asked for anyone to be sanctioned - I simply want to know is there some policy that addresses the situation, and I don't see how it is not generalizable enough for basic discussion. While I do personally think it is disruptive and shows the user has some serious need for other hobbies, I do not know one way or another if it is against any policy to just continue redoing the edits and having them reverted. He is not, in fact, the only editor making those edits, a few others "joined his cause" so to speak, which is one reason I tried to keep it more general. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you asked for feedback. I think it's a good page: well done. If I have to rack my brains for suggestions ... um ... well I did rack my brains and decided to show you what I meant on the page itself. Please revert what you don't like, and sorry to be so bold!
Hello there. Your edit summary of "bureaucracy" when reverting my edit at WP:MIA made your viewpoint clear. Perhaps the phrasing on the page itself,
“ | People who leave a goodbye message or a {{ retired}} template on their user page or elsewhere, and then actually refrain from editing for at least 3 weeks are likely to have left permanently and may be added to the list. | ” |
should be changed in your estimation? I welcome your thoughts on the matter. Regards, --~ T P W 02:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
While I appreciate your effort to improve the features and admins page, I have found a little issue with it. In Safari 4 Mac OS X 10.6, it displays incorrectly (see image). Please run some compatibility tests to avoid further problems (it looks different in Opera, Chrome, Firefox, and Safari). Thanks, monosock 17:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thanks, the only problem i think i have with it is that the TFP strip on the right means there's a white gap on the left between the text at the top and the promoted pictures at the bottom. i don't think i've got an unusual set-up so i expect others have the same problem. we could potentially drop the TFP strip or reduce it. the gallery at the bottom also seems to run off the page to right, Tom B ( talk) 20:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Ouch, that was close, I was initiating publication already... glad we didn't miss your piece. Speaking of publication, would you mind updating the issue page ( Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/Templates/Issue#June_14_issue)? I can do the rest (already prepared the edits). Regards, HaeB ( talk) 19:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey,
Can you give me more details on the problem with the "spacing on the side" you mentioned to JM? Is this the page you're using as a test case? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Seresin. Although I am new to Wikipedia, I would like to ask if it is possible to put http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldier_Front back up as it is a popular game and I tried showing this game off to my friends but they laughed at me after the removal! I know... this does sound childlish mainly because I am only 16. If possible, please put this back up. Thank you, Kelvin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelv876 ( talk • contribs) 17:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for trashing Vacation storebuilder. Perhaps you might delete User:ToddKane22 which is a copy of the same article. The user, who is listed as an employee of the company has already been warned for COI. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 19:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits to Fred Figglehorn? The proposed split stood for two weeks unopposed. 117Avenue ( talk) 07:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() This page is an archive of User Talk:Seresin (or perhaps something else). If you wish to discuss something here, feel free to bring it up again. The history for this page is here, not on the main talk page. Thanks. |
![]()
Until August 2007 —
September 2007 |
I don't see how it is not the appropriate venue to ask what the policy is on the situation. [1] I noted I did not want to name the person, but people immediately said details were needed or they couldn't answer. It is not an ANI issue as I have NOT asked for anyone to be sanctioned - I simply want to know is there some policy that addresses the situation, and I don't see how it is not generalizable enough for basic discussion. While I do personally think it is disruptive and shows the user has some serious need for other hobbies, I do not know one way or another if it is against any policy to just continue redoing the edits and having them reverted. He is not, in fact, the only editor making those edits, a few others "joined his cause" so to speak, which is one reason I tried to keep it more general. -- AnmaFinotera ( talk · contribs) 13:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you asked for feedback. I think it's a good page: well done. If I have to rack my brains for suggestions ... um ... well I did rack my brains and decided to show you what I meant on the page itself. Please revert what you don't like, and sorry to be so bold!
Hello there. Your edit summary of "bureaucracy" when reverting my edit at WP:MIA made your viewpoint clear. Perhaps the phrasing on the page itself,
“ | People who leave a goodbye message or a {{ retired}} template on their user page or elsewhere, and then actually refrain from editing for at least 3 weeks are likely to have left permanently and may be added to the list. | ” |
should be changed in your estimation? I welcome your thoughts on the matter. Regards, --~ T P W 02:06, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
While I appreciate your effort to improve the features and admins page, I have found a little issue with it. In Safari 4 Mac OS X 10.6, it displays incorrectly (see image). Please run some compatibility tests to avoid further problems (it looks different in Opera, Chrome, Firefox, and Safari). Thanks, monosock 17:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thanks, the only problem i think i have with it is that the TFP strip on the right means there's a white gap on the left between the text at the top and the promoted pictures at the bottom. i don't think i've got an unusual set-up so i expect others have the same problem. we could potentially drop the TFP strip or reduce it. the gallery at the bottom also seems to run off the page to right, Tom B ( talk) 20:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Ouch, that was close, I was initiating publication already... glad we didn't miss your piece. Speaking of publication, would you mind updating the issue page ( Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/Templates/Issue#June_14_issue)? I can do the rest (already prepared the edits). Regards, HaeB ( talk) 19:41, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey,
Can you give me more details on the problem with the "spacing on the side" you mentioned to JM? Is this the page you're using as a test case? Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:21, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Seresin. Although I am new to Wikipedia, I would like to ask if it is possible to put http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soldier_Front back up as it is a popular game and I tried showing this game off to my friends but they laughed at me after the removal! I know... this does sound childlish mainly because I am only 16. If possible, please put this back up. Thank you, Kelvin —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelv876 ( talk • contribs) 17:44, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for trashing Vacation storebuilder. Perhaps you might delete User:ToddKane22 which is a copy of the same article. The user, who is listed as an employee of the company has already been warned for COI. -- Biker Biker ( talk) 19:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits to Fred Figglehorn? The proposed split stood for two weeks unopposed. 117Avenue ( talk) 07:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)